Search

Purpose: The ValveClamp system is a novel edge-to-edge mitral valve repair system designed for the ease of operation. We report the outcomes of our initial experience of treating functional mitral regurgitation (MR) with the ValveClamp system., Methods: The subjects of this study were patients with symptomatic functional MR despite standard medical therapy, who were treated with transapical ValveClamp implantation. The patients were divided into an atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) group and a ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR) group. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at baseline and then at the 3-month follow up., Results: Twelve patients, with a median age of 71 years (range 65-78 years), were assigned to the AFMR group (n = 5) or the VFMR group (n = 7). The device implantation rate was 100%, and 10 (83.3%) patients required implantation of only one clamp. The catheter time was less than 10 min in half of the patients, the fastest time being 5 min. There were no procedure-related complications. At the 3-month follow up, all patients were free from all-cause mortality, surgery, and rehospitalization. MR improved to ≤ 2 + in all 12 patients with MR grade 3 + or 4 + at baseline, (100%) and to ≤ 1 + in 9 of these patients (75%), with a low-pressure gradient. The left atrial diameter and the left ventricular end diastolic diameter decreased significantly in both the AFMR and VFMR groups. The left ventricular eject fraction at the 3-month follow up showed a rising trend in both the AFMR and VFMR groups, whereas PASP decreased remarkably. All 12 patients with baseline NYHA functional class III/IV (100%) showed improvement of at least 1 class, and 2 of these patients (16.7%) showed improvement of at least 2 classes., Conclusions: The ValveClamp system is simple and effective for transapical transcatheter edge to edge repair in patients with functional MR., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

The presence of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis has been considered a contraindication to retrograde percutaneous closure of mitral paravalvular leaks, because passing a catheter through the mechanical aortic valve can affect the function of a mechanical valve and thereby lead to severe hemodynamic deterioration. We report what we believe are the first 2 cases of retrograde transcatheter closure of mitral paravalvular leaks through a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis without transseptal or transapical puncture. Our experience shows that retrograde transcatheter closure of mitral paravalvular leaks in this manner can be an optional approach for transcatheter closure of such leaks, especially when a transapical or transseptal puncture approach is not feasible. This technique might also be applied to other transcatheter procedures in which there is a need to pass a catheter through a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis.