1. Atomic-level characterization of protein–protein association
- Author
-
Duluxan Sritharan, Daniel Jacobson, Albert C. Pan, Konstantin Yatsenko, Thomas M. Weinreich, and David E. Shaw
- Subjects
Multidisciplinary ,Protein Conformation ,Chemistry ,Protein protein ,protein–protein association ,Proteins ,molecular dynamics simulations ,Molecular Dynamics Simulation ,Biological Sciences ,enhanced sampling ,Dissociation (chemistry) ,Biophysics and Computational Biology ,Molecular dynamics ,Native state ,Biophysics ,Thermodynamics ,Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs ,Protein Binding - Abstract
Significance Most proteins associate with other proteins to function, forming complexes that are central to almost all physiological processes. Determining the structures of these complexes and understanding how they associate are problems of fundamental importance. Using long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations, some performed using a new enhanced sampling method, we observed spontaneous association and dissociation of five protein–protein systems to and from their experimentally determined native complexes. By analyzing the simulations of these five systems, which include members of diverse structural and functional classes, we are able to draw general mechanistic conclusions about protein association., Despite the biological importance of protein–protein complexes, determining their structures and association mechanisms remains an outstanding challenge. Here, we report the results of atomic-level simulations in which we observed five protein–protein pairs repeatedly associate to, and dissociate from, their experimentally determined native complexes using a molecular dynamics (MD)–based sampling approach that does not make use of any prior structural information about the complexes. To study association mechanisms, we performed additional, conventional MD simulations, in which we observed numerous spontaneous association events. A shared feature of native association for these five structurally and functionally diverse protein systems was that if the proteins made contact far from the native interface, the native state was reached by dissociation and eventual reassociation near the native interface, rather than by extensive interfacial exploration while the proteins remained in contact. At the transition state (the conformational ensemble from which association to the native complex and dissociation are equally likely), the protein–protein interfaces were still highly hydrated, and no more than 20% of native contacts had formed.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF