Search

Background: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the surgical treatment of choice for hemifacial spasm (HFS). During MVD, monitoring of the abnormal lateral spread response (LSR), an evoked response to facial nerve stimulation, has been traditionally used to monitor adequacy of cranial nerve (CN) VII decompression., Objective: To assess the utility of LSR monitoring in predicting spasm-free status after MVD postoperatively., Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant publications. We included studies reporting on intraoperative LSR monitoring during MVD for HFS and spasm-free status following the procedure. Sensitivity of LSR, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive predictive value were calculated., Results: From 148 studies, 26 studies with 7479 patients were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. The final intraoperative LSR status predicted the clinical outcome of MVD with the following specificities and sensitivities: 89% (0.83- 0.93) and 40% (0.30- 0.51) at discharge, 90% (0.84-0.94) and 41% (0.29-0.53) at 3 mo, 89% (0.83-0.93) and 40% (0.30-0.51) at 1 yr. When LSR persisted after MVD, the probability (95% CI) for HFS persistence was 47.8% (0.33-0.63) at discharge, 40.8% (0.23-0.61) at 3 mo, and 24.4% (0.13-0.41) at 1 yr. However, when LSR resolved, the probability for HFS persistence was 7.3% at discharge, 4.2% at 3 mo, and 4.0% at 1 yr., Conclusion: Intraoperative LSR monitoring has high specificity but modest sensitivity in predicting the spasm-free status following MVD. Persistence of LSR carries high risk for immediate and long-term facial spasm persistence. Therefore, adequacy of decompression should be thoroughly investigated before closing in cases where intraoperative LSR persists., (Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are utilized during aneurysm clipping to detect intraoperative ischemia. We assess the diagnostic accuracy of SSEPs in predicting perioperative stroke during aneurysm clipping. A retrospective review was conducted of 429 consecutive patients who underwent surgical clipping for ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms with intraoperative SSEP monitoring from 2006 to 2013. The relationship between perioperative stroke and SSEP changes was analyzed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, and area under a Receiving Operating Characteristic curve. Sensitivity and specificity were 42% and 90%, respectively. Area under the curve was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.79). Reclassification of reversible temporary clip changes to correct for paradoxical classification of SSEP false positives raised the sensitivity from 42 to 65% (p = 0.041, Chi squared test). EEG (electroencephalography) changes increased the specificity (98% vs. 90%, p < 0.001, McNemar's test), but not sensitivity (48% vs. 42%, p = 0.621, McNemar's test) of SSEPs for perioperative stroke. A stepwise logistic regression model selected SSEP amplitude loss (p = 0.006, OR = 3.7 [95% CI 1.5-9.2]) and the SSEP change duration (p = 0.034, OR = 1.8 [95% CI 1.1-3.1]) as independent predictors of perioperative stroke. SSEP changes induced by temporary clipping were highly reversible compared to other SSEP changes (94% vs. 60%, p = 0.003, Fisher exact test), and typically responded to clip removal or readjustment. SSEP changes have high specificity and modest sensitivity for perioperative stroke. Stroke risk is a function of both the magnitude of SSEP amplitude loss and the duration of its loss. Given the modest sensitivity, patients may benefit from multimodal monitoring including motor-evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm surgery.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with positioning-related SSEP changes (PRSC). The study investigated the association between 18 plausible risk factors and the occurrence of intraoperative PRSC. Risk factors investigated included demographic variables, comorbidities, and procedure related variables. All patients were treated by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2010 to 2012. We used univariate and multivariate statistical methods. 69 out of the 3946 (1.75%) spinal surgeries resulted in PRSC changes. The risk of PRSC was increased for women (p < 0.001), patients older than 65 years of age (p = 0.01), higher BMI (p < 0.001) patients, smokers (p < 0.001), and patients with hypertension (p < 0.001). No associations were found between PRSC and age greater than 80 years, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Three surgical situations were associated with PRSC including abnormal baselines (p < 0.001), patients in the "superman" position (p < 0.001), and patients in surgical procedures that extended over 200 min (p = 0.03). Patients with higher BMIs and who are undergoing spinal surgery longer than 200 min, with abnormal baselines, must be positioned with meticulous attention. Gender, hypertension, and smoking were also found to be risk factors from their odds ratios.

Study Design: This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of significant changes of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to evaluate and predict postoperative neurological deficits after posterior cervical fusions (PCF). Eight hundred forty six eligible patients underwent PCF at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), from 2010 to 2012., Objective: To assess the specificity and sensitivity of intraoperative monitoring in predicting postoperative neurological deficits during PCF., Summary of Background Data: We calculated the predictive value, including sensitivity and specificity, of changes in SSEPs to identify neurological deficits postoperatively. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with SSEP categories as cutoff values to further evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of change in SSEPs and postoperative neurological deficit., Methods: All patients had preposition baselines and continuous SSEP monitoring throughout the surgery. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY)., Results: Age and sex did not influence outcomes. Obesity affected patient outcome. The SSEP categories of significant changes and loss of responses resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 0.30/0.96 and 0.16/0.98, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve has an area under the curve for significant change in/loss of SSEPs of 0.62/0.65 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.525 to 0.714/0.509 to 0.797., Conclusion: Significant SSEP changes during PCF are a very specific but poorly sensitive indicator of postoperative neurological deficits. The odds ratio for significant changes in SSEPs and loss of waveforms was 9.80 and 11.82, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of 4.695 to 20.46 and 4.45 to 31.41, respectively., Level of Evidence: 1.

Background and Purpose: Perioperative stroke risk following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is reported to be approximately 2-3%. The diagnostic accuracies of intraoperative EEG and SSEP monitoring during CEA have been studied separately. However, to date, the effectiveness of simultaneous EEG and SSEP monitoring during CEA has only been evaluated in small study populations. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of combined EEG and SSEP monitoring in a large (N = 1165) patient population., Methods: This study included 1165 patients who underwent CEA from 2000 to 2012 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratio of EEG and SSEP monitoring methods were examined separately and together. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to assess sensitivity and specificity of single and combined Intraoperative monitoring (IONM) methods., Results: Maximum sensitivity was obtained with multimodality monitoring with an IONM change in either EEG or SSEP of 50.00 (95% CI, 30.66-69.34). The specificity of simultaneous EEG and SSEP changes was 93.95 (95% CI, 92.28-95.35%). Maximum area under ROC curve obtained for IONM change in either EEG or SSEP was 0.660 (95% CI, 0.547-0.773, p-value 0.004)., Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of multimodality IONM during CEA is higher than an approach using single modality IONM. Simultaneous EEG and SSEP monitoring improves the likelihood of detecting periprocedural strokes after CEA. Neuro protective therapies to prevent periprocedural strokes can be based on changes in SSEP and EEG during CEA.

Background: Periprocedural stroke after carotid endarterectomy increases long-term mortality. Intraoperative monitoring with electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) helps predict perioperative stroke risk. However, the sensitivity of each technique when used independently still remains low. The aim of this study is to determine whether multimodal monitoring leads to an increase in sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy., Methods: Relevant literature was obtained through a search of Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases and data were extracted. Data from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center hospital records for the 2000-2012 period were included. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were obtained for single and multimodality neurophysiologic monitoring. A McNemar test was used to evaluate for any statistically significant differences in the sensitivities and false-positive rates., Results: The diagnostic odds ratio of dual modality monitoring was found to be 17.4. The specificity of concurrent EEG and SSEP changes in predicting perioperative strokes was calculated to be 96.8% (95% confidence interval 94.1%-98.3%). The sensitivity of combined monitoring with a change in either modality designated as significant was 58.9% (95% confidence interval 41.2%-74.7%). Multimodality monitoring with a change in either EEG or SSEP as the alarm criteria was 1.32 times more sensitive than EEG alone and 1.26 times more sensitive than SSEP alone., Conclusions: The odds of having a change in either EEG or SSEP are 17 times more in patients with perioperative strokes. Dual modality monitoring is more sensitive at predicting perioperative deficits than EEG or SSEP used independently., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This multicenter study aims to evaluate the utility of triggered electromyography (t-EMG) recorded throughout psoas retraction during lateral transpsoas interbody fusion to predict postoperative changes in motor function., Methods: Three hundred and twenty-three patients undergoing L4-5 minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion from 21 sites were enrolled. Intraoperative data collection included initial t-EMG thresholds in response to posterior retractor blade stimulation and subsequent t-EMG threshold values collected every 5 min throughout retraction. Additional data collection included dimensions/duration of retraction as well as pre-and postoperative lower extremity neurologic exams., Results: Prior to expanding the retractor, the lowestt-EMG threshold was identified posterior to the retractor in 94 % of cases. Postoperatively, 13 (4.5 %) patients had a new motor weakness that was consistent with symptomatic neuropraxia (SN) of lumbar plexus nerves on the approach side. There were no significant differences between patients with or without a corresponding postoperative SN with respect to initial posterior blade reading (p = 0.600), or retraction dimensions (p > 0.05). Retraction time was significantly longer in those patients with SN vs. those without (p = 0.031). Stepwise logistic regression showed a significant positive relationship between the presence of new postoperative SN and total retraction time (p < 0.001), as well as change in t-EMG thresholds over time (p < 0.001), although false positive rates (increased threshold in patients with no new SN) remained high regardless of the absolute increase in threshold used to define an alarm criteria., Conclusions: Prolonged retraction time and coincident increases in t-EMG thresholds are predictors of declining nerve integrity. Increasing t-EMG thresholds, while predictive of injury, were also observed in a large number of patients without iatrogenic injury, with a greater predictive value in cases with extended duration. In addition to a careful approach with minimal muscle retraction and consistent lumbar plexus directional retraction, the incidence of postoperative motor neuropraxia may be reduced by limiting retraction time and utilizing t-EMG throughout retraction, while understanding that the specificity of this monitoring technique is low during initial retraction and increases with longer retraction duration.

Purpose: To evaluate the appropriate time to establish baseline responses for brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm and its implications on the alarm criteria and outcomes., Methods: Overall, 61 patients who had intraoperative monitoring with BAEP during microvascular decompression were retrospectively identified. The latencies and amplitudes of wave V before skin incision and at dura opening (before major manipulation) were compared with the latency and amplitude of wave V at change start (first alarm reported to the surgeon). Also, the results with respect to postoperative outcomes were evaluated., Results: More alarms would have been communicated to the surgeon when baseline values were set at the beginning of the procedure, when compared with baseline values reset at dura opening (before major manipulation)., Conclusions: Significant variations in BAEP latency exist before any major manipulations during microvascular decompression. Despite a false-negative case, baselines can be set before any major manipulations (e.g., just before dura opening), with an understanding of the etiology of changes to BAEPs during microvascular decompression., Significance: This is the first study to establish that during intraoperative BAEP monitoring, baselines that are reset before any significant manipulations are performed, rather than at the beginning of the procedure, have a higher level of sensitivity with regards to hearing outcomes.

Background: Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) plays an important role in reducing iatrogenic neurologic deficits during corrective pediatric idiopathic procedures for scoliosis. However, for unknown reasons, recent reports have cited that the sensitivity of SSEPs to detect neurologic deficits has decreased, in some to be less than 50%. This current trend, which is coincident with the addition of transcranial motor-evoked potentials, is surprising given that SSEPs are robust, reproducible responses that were previously shown to have sensitivity and specificity of >90%., Purpose: Our primary aim was to assess whether SSEPs alone can detect impending neurologic deficits with similar sensitivity and specificity as originally reported. Our secondary aim was to estimate the potential predictive value of adding transcranial motor-evoked potentials to SSEP monitoring in idiopathic scoliosis procedures., Design: This was a retrospective review to analyze the efficacy of SSEP monitoring in the group of pediatric instrumented scoliosis fusion cases., Patient Sample: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive cases of patients who underwent idiopathic scoliosis surgery between 1999 and 2009 at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. We identified 477 patients who had the surgery with SSEP monitoring alone. Exclusion criteria included any patients with neuromuscular disorders or unreliable SSEP monitoring. Patients who had incomplete neurophysiology data or incomplete postoperative records were also excluded., Outcome Measures: Major outcomes measured were clinically significant postoperative sensory or motor deficits, as well as significant intraoperative SSEP changes., Methods: Continuous interleaved upper- and lower-extremity SSEPs were obtained throughout the duration of all procedures. We considered a persistent 50% reduction in primary somatosensory cortical amplitude or a prolongation of response latency by >10% from baseline to be significant. Persistent changes represent significant deviation in SSEP amplitude or latency in more than two consecutive averaged trials. Patients were classified into one of four categories with respect to SSEP monitoring: true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were then calculated accordingly., Results: Our review of 477 idiopathic scoliosis surgeries monitored using SSEPs alone revealed a new deficit rate of 0.63% with no cases of permanent injury. Sensitivity = 95.0%, specificity = 99.8%, positive predictive value = 95%, negative predictive value = 99.8%. Using evidence-based epidemiologic measures, we calculated that the number needed to treat was 1,587 patients for one intervention to be performed that would have been missed by SSEP monitoring alone. In addition, the number needed to harm, which represents the increase in false positives with the addition of transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials, was 200., Conclusion: SSEP monitoring alone during idiopathic scoliosis continues to be a highly reliable method for the detection and prevention of iatrogenic injury. Our results confirm the high sensitivity and specificity of SSEP monitoring alone published in earlier literature. As such, we suggest the continued use of SSEP alone in idiopathic scoliosis surgeries. At this time we do not believe there are sufficient data to support the addition of MEP monitoring, although more studies and revised criteria for the use of MEP may provide added value for its use in the future., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Intraoperative monitoring of brain stem auditory evoked potential during microvascular decompression (MVD) prevent hearing loss (HL). Previous studies have shown that changes in wave III (wIII) are an early and sensitive sign of auditory nerve injury., Objective: To evaluate the changes of amplitude and latency of wIII of brain stem auditory evoked potential during MVD and its association with postoperative HL. Hearing loss was classified by American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) criteria, based on changes in pure tone audiometry and speech discrimination score., Methods: Retrospective analysis of wIII in patients who underwent intraoperative monitoring with brain stem auditory evoked potential during MVD was performed. A univariate logistic regression analysis was performed on independent variables amplitude of wIII and latency of wIII at change max and On-Skin, or a final recording at the time of skin closure. A further analysis for the same variables was performed adjusting for the loss of wave., Results: The latency of wIII was not found to be significantly different between groups I and II. The amplitude of wIII was significantly decreased in the group with HL. Regression analysis did not find any increased odds of HL with changes in the amplitude of wIII., Conclusions: Changes in wave III did not increase the odds of HL in patients who underwent brain stem auditory evoked potential s during MVD. This information might be valuable to evaluate the value of wIII as an alarm criterion during MVD to prevent HL.

Background: Cranial nerve VIII is at risk during microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS). The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the empirical factors associated with brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring and its correlation to post operative hearing loss (HL) after MVD for HFS., Methods: Pre-operative and post-operative audiogram data and BAEP from ninety-four patients who underwent MVD for HFS were analyzed. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) and Speech Discrimination Score (SDS) were performed on all patients before and after surgery. Intraoperative neurophysiological data were reviewed independently. HL was assessed using the AAO-HNS classification system for non-serviceable hearing loss (Class C/D), defined as PTA >50 dB and/or SDS <50% within the speech range of frequencies., Results: Patients with HL had higher rates of loss in the amplitude of wave V and prolongation in the interpeak latency of peak I-V latency during MVD. Gender, age, side, and MVD duration did not increase the risk of HL. There was no correlation between successive number of BAEP changes (reflective of the number of surgical attempts) and HL. There was no association between the speed of recovery of BAEPs and HL., Conclusions: Patients with new post-operative HL have a faster rate of change in the amplitude of wave V and the interpeak I-V latency during intraoperative BAEP monitoring for HFS. Our alarm criteria to inform the surgeon about impending nerve injury might have to be modified and prospectively tested to prevent rapid change in BAEPs.

Objectives: To evaluate the value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring to predict and/or prevent postoperative neurological deficits during endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES)., Methods: We retrospectively identified 138 consecutive patients who had BAEP monitoring in addition to SSEP monitoring during EES at our institution. We reviewed the postoperative clinical outcomes and neurophysiological changes independently., Results: The total of number of patients with any IONM changes was 10. The incidence of BAEP changes was 3.62%. The incidence of SSEP changes was 3.62% as well. One patient had changes in both BAEPs and SSEPs. Majority of the changes were observed during changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) without any postoperative neurological deficits. There were two postoperative neurological deficits., Discussion: BAEPs and SSEPs provide unique information about integrity of brainstem function during EES procedures involving tumors in the and around clival region. We advocate a comprehensive multimodality approach to IONM during EESs including BAEPs and SSEPs depending on the location of the neural structures at risk.

Object: Microvascular decompression (MVD) of the facial nerve is an effective treatment for patients with hemifacial spasm. Intraoperative monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) during MVD can reduce the incidence of hearing loss. In this study the authors' goal was to evaluate changes in interpeak latencies (IPLs) of Waves I-V, Waves III-V, and Waves I-III of BAEP Waveforms I, III, and V during MVD and correlate them with postoperative hearing loss. To date, no such study has been performed. Hearing loss is defined as nonuseful hearing (Class C/D), which is a pure tone average of more than 50 dB and/or speech discrimination score of less than 50%., Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of IPLs of BAEPs in 93 patients who underwent intraoperative BAEP monitoring during MVD. Patients who did not have hearing loss were in Class A/B and those who had hearing loss were in Class C/D., Results: Binary logistic regression analysis of independent IPL variables was performed. A maximum change in IPLs of Waves I-III and Waves I-V and on-skin change in IPLs of Waves I-V increases the odds of hearing loss. However, on adjusting the same variables for loss of response, change in IPLs did not increase the odds of hearing loss., Conclusions: Changes in IPL measurements did not increase the odds of postoperative hearing loss. This information might be helpful in evaluating the value of IPLs as alarm criteria during MVD to prevent hearing loss.

Olfaction and vision are two sensory functions that can be lost during surgery. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring can be used to monitor the integrity of the olfactory and the visual pathways during surgery. No objective methods have been established to test olfactory evoked potentials (OEPs) in the operating room. It is a challenge to obtain reliable visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) in the operating room. However, it would be very valuable to reliably monitor these pathways during surgery to predict and prevent iatrogenic neurologic injury. The aim of the review is to describe the techniques used to obtain OEPs and VEPs, the surgical procedures in which they can be used to prevent deficits, and the limitations of the current techniques and future directions for research.

Introduction: Botulinum neurotoxin (BtNtx) treatment for hemifacial spasm (HFS) prior to microvascular decompression (MVD) is hypothesized to be a factor in the variability of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during this procedure., Methods: We analyzed 282 MVDs performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007. We retrospectively compared the lateral spread response (LSR) in the mentalis muscle when stimulus-triggered electromyography (EMG) was elicited from the facial nerve. Previous BtNtx treatment was the grouping factor., Results: Baseline LSR amplitudes during MVD (prior BtNtx: mean = 341.47 μV; no BtNtx: mean = 241.81 μV) were significantly different between groups (df = 1,281; t = -2.463; P = 0.014). Comparisons of latency and current threshold at baseline, as well as HFS disappearance or LSR persistence after the procedure, did not achieve statistical significance., Conclusions: HFS patients treated with BtNtx prior to MVD demonstrated higher LSR baseline amplitudes during IONM. This could be related to muscle poly-reinnervation after recovery from repeated BtNtx use., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, including upper- and lower-extremity somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), has been used to identify and prevent injury to neurovascular structures during conventional skull base surgery. The expanded endonasal approach (EEA) is a novel minimally invasive approach to skull base surgery. However, it carries the risk of injury to neurovascular structures, including the internal carotid artery, anterior cerebral artery, and cranial nerves., Objective: To evaluate the value of SSEP monitoring to predict and/or prevent neurovascular deficits during EEA to skull base surgery., Methods: We retrospectively identified 999 consecutive patients who had intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during EEA skull base surgery at our institution. A total of 976 patients had SSEP monitoring and a documented postoperative neurological examination., Results: The incidence of changes in SSEP during the procedure was 20 of 976 (2%). The incidence of new postoperative neurological deficits was 5 of 976 (0.5%). The positive and negative predictive values of SSEPs during EEA to predict neurovascular deficits were 80.00% and 99.79%, respectively., Conclusion: Intraoperative SSEP monitoring was able to identify impending risk to neurovascular structures to prevent permanent postoperative neurological deficits. We advocate a comprehensive approach to neurophysiological monitoring during EEAs, including SSEPs, spontaneous and triggered electromyography of the cranial nerves III through XII, brainstem auditory evoked potentials, and electroencephalogram, depending on the surgical approach and location of the neural structures at risk.

Hemifacial spasm is a socially disabling condition that manifests as intermittent involuntary twitching of the eyelid and progresses to muscle contractions of the entire hemiface. Patients receiving microvascular decompression of the facial nerve demonstrate an abnormal lateral spread response (LSR) in peripheral branches during facial electromyography. The authors retrospectively evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative clinical characteristics and the efficacy of intraoperative monitoring in predicting short- and long-term relief after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Microvascular decompression was performed in 293 patients with hemifacial spasm, and LSR was recorded during intraoperative facial electromyography monitoring. In 259 (87.7%) of the 293 patients, the LSR was attainable. Patient outcome was evaluated on the basis of whether the LSR disappeared or persisted after decompression. The mean follow-up period was 54.5 months (range, 9-102 months). A total of 88.0% of patients experienced immediate postoperative relief of spasm; 90.8% had relief at discharge, and 92.3% had relief at follow-up. Preoperative facial weakness and platysmal spasm correlated with persistent postoperative spasm, with similar trends at follow-up. In 207 patients, the LSR disappeared intraoperatively after decompression (group I), and in the remaining 52 patients, the LSR persisted intraoperatively despite decompression (group II). There was a significant difference in spasm relief between both groups within 24 hours of surgery (94.7% vs. 67.3%) (P < 0.0001) and at discharge (94.2% vs. 76.9%) (P = 0.001), but not at follow-up (93.3% vs. 94.4%) (P = 1.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated independent predictability of residual LSR for present spasm within 24 hours of surgery and at discharge but not at follow-up. Facial electromyography monitoring of the LSR during microvascular decompression is an effective tool in ensuring a complete decompression with long-lasting effects. Although LSR results predict short-term outcomes, long-term outcomes are not as reliant on LSR activity.

Object: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is being currently used to treat medically refractory pain syndromes involving the face, trunk, and extremities. Unlike thoracic SCS surgery, during which patients can be awakened from conscious sedation to confirm good lead placement, safe placement of paddle leads in the cervical spine has required general anesthesia. Using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, which is routinely performed during these cases at the authors' institution, the authors developed an electrophysiological technique to intraoperatively lateralize lead placement in the cervical epidural space., Methods: Data from 44 patients undergoing median and tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during cervical laminectomy or hemilaminectomy for placement or replacement of dorsal column stimulators were retrospectively reviewed. Paddle leads were positioned laterally or just off midline and parallel to the axis of the cervical spinal cord to effectively treat what was most commonly a predominant unilateral pain syndrome. During SSEP recording, the spinal cord stimulator was activated at 1.0 V and increased in increments of 1.0 V to a maximum of 6.0 V. A unilateral reduction or abolishment of SSEP amplitude was regarded as an indicator of lateralized placement of the stimulator. A bilateral diminutive effect on SSEPs was interpreted as a midline or near midline lead placement., Results: Epidural stimulation abolished or significantly reduced SSEP amplitudes in all patients undergoing placement for a unilateral pain syndrome. In 15 patients, electrodes were repositioned intraoperatively to achieve the most robust SSEP amplitude reduction or abolishment using the lowest epidural stimulation intensity. In all cases in which a significant unilateral reduction in SSEP was observed, the patient reported postoperative sensory alterations in target locations predicted by intraoperative SSEP changes. Placement of cervical spinal cord stimulators for bilateral pain syndromes often resulted in bilateral but asymmetrical SSEP changes. In no cases were significant SSEP changes, other than those induced using the device to directly stimulate the dorsal surface of the spinal cord, observed. No case of new postoperative neurological deficit was observed., Conclusions: Somatosensory evoked potentials can be used safely and successfully for predicting the lateralization of cervical spinal cord stimulator placement. Moreover, they can also intraoperatively alert the surgical team to inadvertent displacement of a lead during anchoring. Further studies are needed to determine whether apart from assisting with proper lateralization, SSEP collision testing may help to optimize electrode positioning and improve pain control outcomes.

Background Context: Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring has been shown to reduce the incidence of new postoperative neurological deficits in scoliosis surgery. However, its usefulness during cervical spine surgery remains a subject of debate., Purpose: To determine the utility of intraoperative SSEP monitoring in a specific patient population (those with cervical radiculopathy in the absence of myelopathy) who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery., Study Design: Retrospective review., Patient Sample: A total of 1,039 nonmyelopathic patients who underwent single or multilevel ACDF surgery. The control group (462 patients) did not have intraoperative SSEP monitoring, whereas the monitored group (577 patients) had continuous intraoperative SSEP monitoring performed., Outcome Measure: A new postoperative neurological deficit., Methods: SSEP tracings were reviewed for all 577 patients in the monitored group and all significant signal changes were noted. Medical records were reviewed for all 1,039 patients to determine if any new neurological deficits developed in the immediate postoperative period., Results: None of the patients in the control group had any new postoperative neurological deficits. In the monitored group there were six instances of transient SSEP changes (1 due to suspected carotid artery compression; 5 thought to be due to transient hypotension) which resolved with the appropriate intraoperative intervention (repositioning of retractors; raising the arterial blood pressure). Upon waking up from anesthesia, one patient in the monitored group had a new neurological deficit (partial central cord syndrome) despite normal intraoperative SSEP signals., Conclusions: ACDF appears to be a safe surgical procedure with a low incidence of iatrogenic neurological injury. Transient SSEP signal changes, which improved with intraoperative interventions, were not associated with new postoperative neurological deficits. An intraoperative neurological deficit is possible despite normal SSEP signals.

Study Design: Retrospective review., Objectives: To review consecutive cases of cervical spine corpectomy surgery performed with intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring., Summary of Background Data: There is controversy about the utility of SSEP monitoring during anterior cervical spine surgery. There is no study in the literature that has specifically evaluated the utility of SSEP monitoring for cervical spine corpectomy surgery., Methods: Intraoperative SSEP tracings for 508 patients (average age, 55.7 years; 268 male, 240 female) who underwent anterior cervical fusion with single-level or multilevel corpectomies were reviewed. Intraoperative and postoperative records were analyzed to determine if any new neurologic deficits developed when the patients woke up from anesthesia., Results: The overall incidence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit in this series of patients was 2.4% (11 with nerve root injury, 1 with quadriplegia). The incidence of significant SSEP changes was 5.3% (27 of 508 patients). The most common identifiable cause of SSEP changes was hypotension, and the most common neurologic deficit was deltoid (C5) weakness. One patient had irreversible SSEP changes, and he woke up with new-onset quadriplegia. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative SSEP monitoring for detecting impending or resultant intraoperative iatrogenic neurologic injury were 77.1% and 100%, respectively. However, if the isolated nerve root injuries are removed from the analysis, then both the calculated sensitivity and the negative predictive values were 100%., Conclusions: Intraoperative SSEP monitoring can alert the surgeon to adverse iatrogenic intraoperative events with potential for neurologic injury. Most SSEP signal changes are reversible and do not result in a clinical deficit. Isolated nerve root injury appears to be the most common iatrogenic intraoperative injury during cervical spine corpectomy surgery.