Search

Therapeutic proteins such as monoclonal antibodies and their derivatives, fusions proteins, hormone analogs and enzymes for replacement therapy are an ever-growing mainstay in our pharmacopoeia. While a growing number of these medications are developed for and used in younger and younger pediatric patients, knowledge gaps in the basic understanding of the molecular and physiologic processes governing the disposition of these compounds in the human body and their modulation by age and childhood development are a hindrance to the effective and timely development and clinical use of these compounds, especially in very young pediatric patient populations. This is particularly the case for the widespread lack of information on the ontogeny and age-associated expression and function of receptor systems that are involved in the molecular processes driving the pharmacokinetics of these compounds. This article briefly highlights three receptor systems as examples, the neonatal Fc receptor, the asialoglycoprotein receptor, and the mannose receptor. It furthermore provides suggestions on how these gaps should be addressed and prioritized to provide the field of pediatric clinical pharmacology the urgently needed tools for a more effective development and clinical utilization of this important class of drugs with rapidly evolving importance as cornerstone in pediatric pharmacotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In selecting optimal dosing regimens in support of the clinical use of monoclonal antibodies and other therapeutic proteins in pediatric indications, the unique pharmacokinetic properties of this class of biologics, as well as the underlying physiologic and pathophysiologic processes and their modulation by childhood growth and development, needs to be appreciated. During drug development, first‐in‐pediatric dose selection is a capstone event in the pediatric investigation plan that relies heavily on extrapolation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from adult to pediatric populations. It is facilitated by combinations of pharmacometric approaches, including allometry, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, and population pharmacokinetic analyses, although data on reliability and qualification of some of these tools in the context of therapeutic proteins are still limited but emerging. Presented data suggest nonlinear relationships between body weight and both clearance and volume of distribution for therapeutic proteins in pediatric populations, with allometric exponents of 0.75 and 0.8, respectively. For newborns and infants (<1 year), even higher nonlinearity seems to occur. Translation of the quantitative characterization of the pediatric pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins into dosing regimens for the drug label requires compromising between precision dosing and clinical practicability, with tiered dosing algorithms based on size or age strata being the currently most frequently applied methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives are increasingly used in pediatric pharmacotherapy, and the number of antibody-based drug products with approved pediatric indications is continuously growing. In most instances, pediatric use is being pursued after the efficacy and safety of novel antibody medications have been established in adult indications. The pediatric extrapolation exercise that is frequently used in this context to bridge efficacy and safety from adults to children is oftentimes challenged through uncertainties and knowledge gaps in how to reliably extrapolate pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology of mAbs to different pediatric age groups, and how to derive age-appropriate dosing regimens that strike a balance between precision dosing and practicability. The article highlights some of the pharmacokinetic and clinical pharmacology challenges with regard to therapeutic use of mAbs and antibody derivatives in children, including immunogenicity events. Although considering body size-based differences in drug disposition can account for many of the perceived and actual differences in the distribution and elimination of antibody-based therapeutics between children and adults, increasing evidence suggests potential or actual age-associated differences beyond size differences, especially for young pediatric patients such as newborns and infants. To overcome age-associated differences in antibody disposition, various different dosing approaches have been applied to ensure safe and efficacious antibody exposure for pediatric populations of different ages. The development of such dosing regimens and the associated pathway to pediatric indication approval is illustrated in more detail for two antibody-based biologics, the fusion protein abatacept and the mAb tocilizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have developed in the last two decades into the backbone of pharmacotherapeutic interventions in a variety of indications, with currently more than 40 mAbs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and several dozens more in clinical development. This tutorial will review major drug disposition processes relevant for mAbs, and will highlight product-specific and patient-specific factors that modulate their pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior and need to be considered for successful clinical therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The confluence of rapid scientific advancements especially in protein engineering and recombinant technology, unmet medical needs, and commercial incentives have led to the development of the next generation of therapeutic proteins. Bispecific antibody constructs are one of the novel strategies that is being pursued, combining the ability to bind simultaneously to two distinct targets and the advantages of purpose-designed and optimized antibody-based scaffolds. Their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, including their immunogenic potential, are closely related to their structural features and ability to interact with disposition mechanisms of immunoglobulin molecules. Catumaxomab and blinatumomab are bispecific constructs that are approved for clinical use and have provided clinical pharmacology data for this novel class of therapeutics. This knowledgebase on the clinical behavior of bispecific therapeutic proteins is poised to rapidly evolve over the next few years with many development programs having entered the clinical development stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Target specificity and generally good tolerability of therapeutic proteins (TPs) present desirable treatment opportunities for pediatric patients. However, little is known on the ontogeny of processes related to the pharmacokinetics (PK) and disposition of TPs. The science, regulatory requirements and strategy of developing TPs for children are evolving. Our current review of TPs, (with focus on monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins) that were approved for pediatric use indicates that dose-selection for pediatric pivotal studies is often based on adult PK information alone. This approach might not be sufficient if more complex PK properties than simple linear PK are present. Body weight-based dosing for pediatric patients directly scaled down from adult dosing can lead to under-exposure in young pediatric patients who are usually in the lowest body-weight range. Tiered-fixed dosing can be reasonably effective for TPs in achieving comparable exposure in children over a wide age range. The uniqueness of the pediatric population, the practical challenges in conducting clinical studies in this population, as well as regulations from health authorities warrant including pharmacometrics as an integral component of pediatric drug development. We propose a framework distinct from previous proposals, to guide clinical pharmacology strategy for pediatric drug development specifically for TPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A biosimilar is intended to be highly similar to a reference biologic such that any differences in quality attributes (i.e., molecular characteristics) do not affect safety or efficacy. Achieving this benchmark for biologics, especially large glycoproteins such as monoclonal antibodies, is challenging given their complex structure and manufacturing. Regulatory guidance on biosimilars issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada and European Medicines Agency indicates that, in addition to a demonstration of a high degree of similarity in quality attributes, a reduced number of nonclinical and clinical comparative studies can be sufficient for approval. Following a tiered approach, clinical studies are required to address concerns about possible clinically significant differences that remain after laboratory and nonclinical evaluations. Consequently, a critical question arises: can clinical studies that satisfy concerns regarding safety and efficacy in one condition support "indication extrapolation" to other conditions? This question will be addressed by reviewing the case of a biosimilar to infliximab that was approved recently in South Korea, Europe, and Canada for multiple indications through extrapolation. The principles discussed should also apply to biosimilars of other monoclonal antibodies that are approved to treat multiple distinct conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]