Search

Purpose: Positron emission tomography imaging of zirconium-89-labelled monoclonal antibodies (89Zr-Immuno-PET) allows for visualisation and quantification of antibody uptake in tumours in vivo. Patlak linearization provides distribution volume (VT) and nett influx rate (Ki) values, representing reversible and irreversible uptake, respectively. Standardised uptake value (SUV) and tumour-to-plasma/tumour-to-blood ratio (TPR/TBR) are often used, but their validity depends on the comparability of plasma kinetics and clearances. This study assesses the validity of SUV, TPR and TBR against Patlak Ki for quantifying irreversible 89Zr-Immuno-PET uptake in tumours. Methods: Ten patients received 37 MBq 10 mg 89Zr-anti-EGFR with 500 mg/m2 unlabelled mAbs. Five patients received two doses of 37 MBq 89Zr-anti-HER3: 8–24 mg for the first administration and 24 mg–30 mg/kg for the second. Seven tumours from four patients showed 89Zr-anti-EGFR uptake, and 18 tumours from five patients showed 89Zr-anti-HER3 uptake. SUVpeak, TPRpeak and TBRpeak values were obtained from one to six days p.i. Patlak linearization was applied to tumour time activity curves and plasma samples to obtain Ki. Results: For 89Zr-anti-EGFR, there was a small variability along the linear regression line between SUV (− 0.51–0.57), TPR (− 0.06‒0.11) and TBR (− 0.13‒0.16) on day 6 versus Ki. Similar doses of 89Zr-anti-HER3 showed similar variability for SUV (− 1.3‒1.0), TPR (− 1.1‒0.53) and TBR (− 1.5‒0.72) on day 5 versus Ki. However, for the second administration of 89Zr-anti-HER3 with a large variability in administered mass doses, SUV showed a larger variability (− 1.4‒2.3) along the regression line with Ki, which improved when using TPR (− 0.38–0.32) or TBR (− 0.56‒0.46). Conclusion: SUV, TPR and TBR at late time points were valid for quantifying irreversible lesional 89Zr-Immuno-PET uptake when constant mass doses were administered. However, for variable mass doses, only TPR and TBR provided reliable values for irreversible uptake, but not SUV, because SUV does not take patient and mass dose-specific plasma clearance into account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Zirconium-89-immuno-positron emission tomography (89Zr-immuno-PET) has enabled visualization of zirconium-89 labelled monoclonal antibody (89Zr-mAb) uptake in organs and tumors in vivo. Patlak linearization of 89Zr-immuno-PET quantification data allows for separation of reversible and irreversible uptake, by combining multiple blood samples and PET images at different days. As one can obtain only a limited number of blood samples and scans per patient, choosing the optimal time points is important. Tissue activity concentration curves were simulated to evaluate the effect of imaging time points on Patlak results, considering different time points, input functions, noise levels and levels of reversible and irreversible uptake. Methods: Based on 89Zr-mAb input functions and reference values for reversible (VT) and irreversible (Ki) uptake from literature, multiple tissue activity curves were simulated. Three different 89Zr-mAb input functions, five time points between 24 and 192 h p.i., noise levels of 5, 10 and 15%, and three reference Ki and VT values were considered. Simulated Ki and VT were calculated (Patlak linearization) for a thousand repetitions. Accuracy and precision of Patlak linearization were evaluated by comparing simulated Ki and VT with reference values. Results: Simulations showed that Ki is always underestimated. Inclusion of time point 24 h p.i. reduced bias and variability in VT, and slightly reduced bias and variability in Ki, as compared to combinations of three later time points. After inclusion of 24 h p.i., minimal differences were found in bias and variability between different combinations of later imaging time points, despite different input functions, noise levels and reference values. Conclusion: Inclusion of a blood sample and PET scan at 24 h p.i. improves accuracy and precision of Patlak results for 89Zr-immuno-PET; the exact timing of the two later time points is not critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]