Search

Background: Timely recognition of sepsis in emergency department (ED) is challenging. We evaluated the impact of implementing the biomarker monocyte distribution width (MDW) at bedside, on the time to anti-infective administration., Methods: We conducted a before-and-after cohort study in the ED of an academic hospital in Paris, to compare sepsis patients care and outcomes, before and after the implementation of point of care (POC) MDW measurement in the ED. During post-implementation period (period-2), MDW was measured with complete blood count by ED nurses with results given in 2 min: if above 21.5 units, ED physicians were asked to consider sepsis and to start an anti-infectious as soon as possible. Primary endpoint was time to anti-infectious administration (TTA) from ED arrival, and secondary endpoints were TTA from sepsis onset (TTAS), length of stay, mortality, and hospitalization rates., Results: In total, 255 patients (period-1) and 180 patients (period-2) with sepsis were included. The TTA was 5.4 h (3.5-7.7) period-1 and 4.9 h (IQR 2.5-7.1) in period-2 (p = 0.06). MDW implementation significantly reduced the median TTAS from to 3.7 h (IQR 1.5-5.8) in period-1, to 2.2 h (IQR 0.5-4.5) in period-2 (p < 0.001). Mortality rates remained similar between the two periods (18% vs. 16% respectively, p = 0.4), as did hospitalization rates (93% vs. 91%, p = 0.4) and ED length of stay (7.2 h (5.3-9.8) vs 7.0 (5.4-9.4), p = 0.7)., Conclusion: Implementing POC MDW measurement in the ED protocols enhances the timeliness of anti-infective administration from sepsis onset, meeting current sepsis management guidelines., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Early sepsis diagnosis has emerged as one of the main challenges in the emergency room. Measurement of sepsis biomarkers is largely used in current practice to improve the diagnosis accuracy. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a recent new sepsis biomarker, available as part of the complete blood count with differential. The objective was to evaluate the performance of MDW for the detection of sepsis in the emergency department (ED) and to compare to procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP)., Methods: Subjects whose initial evaluation included a complete blood count were enrolled consecutively in 2 EDs in France and Spain and categorized per Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 criteria. The performance of MDW for sepsis detection was compared to that of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP)., Results: A total of 1,517 patients were analyzed: 837 men and 680 women, mean age 61 ± 19 years, 260 (17.1%) categorized as Sepsis-2 and 144 patients (9.5%) as Sepsis-3. The AUCs [95% confidence interval] for the diagnosis of Sepsis-2 were 0.81 [0.78-0.84] and 0.86 [0.84-0.88] for MDW and MDW combined with WBC, respectively. For Sepsis-3, MDW performance was 0.82 [0.79-0.85]. The performance of MDW combined with WBC for Sepsis-2 in a subgroup of patients with low sepsis pretest probability was 0.90 [0.84-0.95]. The AUC for sepsis detection using MDW combined with WBC was similar to CRP alone (0.85 [0.83-0.87]) and exceeded that of PCT. Combining the biomarkers did not improve the AUC. Compared to normal MDW, abnormal MDW increased the odds of Sepsis-2 by factor of 5.5 [4.2-7.1, 95% CI] and Sepsis-3 by 7.6 [5.1-11.3, 95% CI]., Conclusions: MDW in combination with WBC has the diagnostic accuracy to detect sepsis, particularly when assessed in patients with lower pretest sepsis probability. We suggest the use of MDW as a systematic screening test, used together with qSOFA score to improve the accuracy of sepsis diagnosis in the emergency department. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03588325).