Search

Background: Splenic injury frequently occurs after blunt abdominal trauma; however, limited epidemiological data regarding mortality are available. We aimed to investigate mortality rate trends after blunt splenic injury in Japan. Methods: We retrospectively identified 1,721 adults with blunt splenic injury (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma splenic injury scale grades III–V) from the 2004–2014 Japan Trauma Data Bank. We grouped the records of these patients into 3 time phases: phase I (2004–2008), phase II (2009–2012), and phase III (2013–2014). Over the 3 phases, we analysed 30-day mortality rates and investigated their association with the prevalence of certain initial interventions (Mantel-Haenszel trend test). We further performed multiple imputation and multivariable analyses for comparing the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent TAE or splenectomy/splenorrhaphy, adjusting for known potential confounders and for within-hospital clustering using generalised estimating equation. Results: Over time, there was a significant decrease in 30-day mortality after splenic injury (p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that mortality significantly decreased over time (from phase I to phase II, odds ratio: 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.22–0.67; from phase I to phase III, odds ratio: 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.19–0.62) for the overall cohort. While the 30-day mortality for splenectomy/splenorrhaphy diminished significantly over time (p = 0.01), there were no significant differences regarding mortality for non-operative management, with or without transcatheter arterial embolisation (p = 0.43, p = 0.29, respectively). Conclusions: In Japan, in-hospital 30-day mortality rates decreased significantly after splenic injury between 2004 and 2014, even after adjustment for within-hospital clustering and other factors independently associated with mortality. Over time, mortality rates decreased significantly after splenectomy/splenorrhaphy, but not after non-operative management. This information is useful for clinicians when making decisions about treatments for patients with blunt splenic injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Importance: Complex pelvic injuries are among the types of trauma with the highest mortality. Treatment strategies should be based on the hemodynamic status, the anatomical type of fracture, and the associated injuries. Combination therapies, including preperitoneal pelvic packing, temporary mechanical stabilization, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, and angioembolization, are recommended for pelvic injuries.Objective: To investigate the effect of urgent angioembolization alone on severe pelvic injury-associated mortality.Design, Settings, and Participants: We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank database, a multicenter observational study, to retrospectively identify adult patients with isolated blunt pelvic injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score: 3-5) from 2004 to 2018.Outcome Measures and Analysis: The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. We subdivided patients into two groups, those who underwent urgent angioembolization and non-urgent angioembolization, and compared their mortality rates. We performed multiple imputation and multivariable analyzes to compare the mortality rates between groups after adjusting for known potential confounding factors (age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, systolic blood pressure on hospital arrival, Injury Severity Score, pelvic AIS score, laparotomy, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, and external fixation) and for within-hospital clustering using the generalized estimating equation.Main Results: We analyzed 4207 of 345,932 trauma patients, of whom 799 underwent urgent angioembolization. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in the urgent embolization group than in the non-urgent embolization group (7.4 vs. 4.0%; p < 0.01). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that the mortality rates of patients with urgent angioembolization significantly decreased after adjusting for factors independently associated with mortality (odds ratio: 0.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.96; p = 0.03).Conclusion: Urgent angioembolization may be an effective treatment for severe pelvic injury regardless of the pelvic AIS score and the systolic blood pressure on hospital arrival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]