Search

Background: Aedes mosquitoes pose a significant global threat as vectors for several debilitating arboviruses, including dengue, Zika, yellow fever, and chikungunya. Their unique breeding habits, behavior, and daytime activity complicate control efforts, prompting the search for innovative solutions. The sterile insect technique (SIT) and incompatible insect technique (IIT) are promising new techniques under investigation. This review synthesizes findings from field trials on SIT and/or IIT for Aedes mosquito control., Methods: A scoping review was conducted through comprehensive searches on Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, and preprint repositories up to April 25, 2024. Studies were initially screened for relevance based on their titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review conducted by two independent extractors. Only field trials with control groups were included, with the final assessment focusing on trials reporting epidemiological outcomes. Data were abstracted into templates, emphasizing study design, intervention details, and outcomes. The review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines., Results: The search identified 21 field trials in various countries against Aedes mosquitoes. These trials employed diverse methodologies and mosquito release strategies, achieving varying levels of mosquito population suppression. Notably, two SIT and two Wolbachia-based IIT trials reported epidemiological outcomes, including reductions in dengue incidence and associated risk ratios. However, the reliance on national surveillance data for assessing dengue incidence suggests caution due to the potential underreporting of subclinical cases., Conclusions: The review underscores the promise of SIT and IIT for controlling Aedes mosquito populations, citing successful reductions in mosquito densities and dengue transmission. However, it calls for more rigorous study designs and standardized methodologies, as well as the adoption of comprehensive frameworks to accurately assess the effectiveness of these interventions. Future research should focus on bridging gaps in real-world effectiveness by addressing factors such as feasibility, acceptability, scalability, and cost, which are crucial for guiding their successful large-scale deployment in any country., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The mosquitocidal activities of different fractions and a compound alizarin from the methanol extract of Rubia cordifolia roots were evaluated on larvae and pupae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Larvae and pupae were exposed to concentrations of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 ppm for fractions and 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 ppm for compound. After 24 h, the mortality was assessed and the LC50 and LC90 values were estimated for larvae and pupae. Among the 23 fractions screened, fraction 2 from the methanol extract of R. cordifolia showed good mosquitocidal activity against C. quinquefasciatus and A. aegypti. LC50 and LC90 values of fraction 2 were 3.53 and 7.26 ppm for C. quinquefasciatus and 3.86 and 8.28 ppm for A. aegypti larvae, and 3.76 and 7.50 ppm for C. quinquefasciatus and 3.92 and 8.05 ppm for A. aegypti pupae, respectively. Further, the isolated compound alizarin presented good larvicidal and pupicidal activities. LC50 and LC90 values of alizarin for larvae were 0.81 and 3.86 ppm against C. quinquefasciatus and 1.31 and 6.04 ppm for A. aegypti larvae, respectively. Similarly, the LC50 and LC90 values of alizarin for pupae were 1.97 and 4.79 ppm for C. quinquefasciatus and 2.05 and 5.59 ppm for A. aegypti pupae, respectively. The structure of the isolated compound was identified on the basis of spectroscopic analysis and compared with reported spectral data. The results indicated that alizarin could be used as a potential larvicide and pupicide.