Search

Self-motion is known to be falsely perceived during exposure to the movement of visual surroundings. This illusory perception of visually-induced self-motion is known as "vection." The present study was conducted to examine the relative strengths of vection versus whole-body angular acceleration as they determine perceived self-rotation under conditions in which they individually provide conflicting information. Each subject was rotated for 90 s about a vertical axis at a constant acceleration, and a large-field visual surround in front of the subject was simultaneously rotated at a constant acceleration in the same direction, but at a magnitude of acceleration twice that of the body. This stimulus condition creates a sensory conflict between information from the vestibular/somatosensory systems and information from the visual system with respect to the direction of self-rotation. The subject eventually perceived self-acceleration in the direction of circular vection (CV), even though he or she was actually being accelerated in the direction opposite to CV. When the magnitude of contradictory chair acceleration exceeded the vestibular perceptual threshold, the onset latency of CV was significantly delayed. Our results suggest that visual information contributes to the perception of self-acceleration, and that illusory self-motion could overwhelm the feeling of self-acceleration due to inertial motion. CV would thus be a significant factor in determining spatial orientation in certain operational environments and flight conditions.

We used optokinetic stimulation (OKS) in eighteen normal adults aged 18-30 years to investigate vertical self-motion perception. In order to induce self-rotation, either a stripe pattern or a random dot pattern was projected onto the inner wall of a hemispherical dome with a diameter of 150 cm. The pattern was rotated either about the subject's vertical axis (yaw) or about the subject's interaural axis (pitch) for 80 s at a constant acceleration of 1 deg/s2. Stimuli were randomly repeated three to four times in each direction. The latency of onset as well as the perceived intensity of circular vection (CV) was measured for each stimulus presentation. CV latencies for upward rotational stimulation were significantly longer than those for downward rotational stimulation under both types of stimulus conditions. There was no significant difference in CV latency between rightward and leftward rotational stimulation. For most subjects, the magnitudes of the perceived CV for rightward rotational stimulation were equal to those for leftward rotational stimulation, whereas the magnitudes of the perceived CV for vertical stimulation showed large intersubject variability. These results provide additional evidence that fundamental differences exist between different types of self-motion. Possible explanations for the directional asymmetry in vertical perception of self-motion will also be discussed.

1. The complex spike (CS) of the floccular Purkinje cell has been reported to be driven by retinal image movement in the rabbit, the rat, and the monkey, but not yet in the cat, in which the floccular neuronal network is well known. We recorded the CS activity together with concomitant simple spike (SS) activity of the floccular Purkinje cells that responded to large-field visual pattern movement in the anesthetized cat. 2. On the basis of the direction selectivity we divided the cells into two major types: the horizontal type that preferred horizontal stimuli and the vertical type that preferred vertical stimuli. The CS activity of the horizontal-type cell increased during stimuli directed contralaterally to the recording site and decreased during ipsilaterally directed stimuli, whereas that of the vertical-type cell increased during upward stimuli and decreased during downward stimuli. 3. In both types the CS response was larger at lower-velocity stimuli and the response was well maintained at higher-velocity stimuli < or = 180 degrees/s tested. The mean response decline was only 50% at stimulus velocities 90-150 degrees/s compared with the response amplitude at 2 degrees/s stimulus velocity. 4. The majority of the horizontal-type cells were modulated by the stimuli presented to either eye and the dominant eye was ipsilateral to the recording site. The majority of the vertical-type cells were also modulated by the stimuli presented to either eye without obvious differences between two eyes. 5. In both types the receptive field of the ipsilateral eye always included the area centralis and extended widely on both visual hemifields. The receptive field of the contralateral eye also included the area centralis and was usually restricted within the ipsilateral visual hemifield. The stimuli of small visual field (15 degrees x 15 degrees) projecting to the area centralis evoked especially large responses (70% of the full-screen response). 6. The CS and SS responses were reciprocal to each other, that is, when the CS firing increased the SS firing decreased and vice versa. 7. These CS responses are well suited for the direction detection of large-field retinal image motion at a wide velocity range. In light of the present unitary spike data together with the anatomic and eye movement data reported previously, we conclude that the cat flocculus is responsible for reduction of the large-field retinal image motion by producing eye movement in the same direction with the visual motion.

In ketamine anesthetized cats, complex spike (CS) responses to movement of a large-field visual surround (optokinetic stimulus) were recorded in the cerebellar flocculus. Two types of Purkinje cells were found. One type showed increased CS activity to optokinetic stimuli directed contralaterally to the recording site and decreased activity to stimuli directed ipsilaterally. The modulation occurred in both monocular (responses to the stimuli for only the ipsilateral eye) and binocular forms (dominant eye, ipsilateral). The other type of cell showed increased CS activity during upward optokinetic stimuli and decreased activity during downward stimuli. The responses occurred only in the binocular form. The dominant eye was either ipsilateral or contralateral with respect to the recording site. Thus, there are two types of Purkinje cells in the cat flocculus: horizontal type cell showing CS modulation during horizontal optokinetic stimuli, and vertical type cell showing CS modulation during vertical optokinetic stimuli.

In the cat cerebellar flocculus without cerebrum but with intact accessory optic tract, complex spike (CS) responses to horizontal optokinetic stimuli (velocity-step at 2 degrees/s) were investigated. The directionally selective CS responses were present only during the short-duration stimuli but not during the continuous unidirectional stimuli. Following the end of the stimuli during the stationary surround phase, the CS activity was modulated in a manner opposite to the preceding CS response during the stimulation. These CS responses cannot simply be interpreted as sensory responses to the retinal slip input; they may in fact be deeply associated with the motor control command of the eye movement which would be elicited by the retinal slip.