Search

Background Analysis of Data to Advance Personalised Therapy with MR-Linac (ADAPT-MRL) is a multi-site, multinational, observational cohort registry designed to collect data on the use of the magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) for radiation therapy and patient outcomes. The registry will provide a linked repository of technical and clinical data that will form a platform for prospective studies and technology assessment. Methods Design: This registry aims to include an estimated 10,000 eligible participants across Australia and other countries over a 7- to 10-year period. Participants will undergo treatment and assessments in accordance with standard practice. Toxicity and survival outcomes will be assessed at baseline, during treatment, and with 3 monthly follow-up until 24 months, patient reported outcome measures will also be collected. Participants with a variety of cancers will be included. Discussion Data obtained from the ADAPT-MRL registry is expected to provide evidence on the safety and efficacy of the MR-Linac, a new technical innovation in radiation oncology. We expect this registry will generate data that will be used to optimise treatment techniques, MR-Linac software algorithms, evaluate participants’ outcomes and toxicities and to create a repository of adapted plans, anatomical and functional MR sequences linked to participants’ outcomes.

INTRODUCTION The magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) offers improved soft tissue visualization to guide daily adaptive radiotherapy treatment. This manuscript aims to report initial experience using a 1.5 T MRL in the first 6 months of operation, including training, workflows, timings and dosimetric accuracy. METHODS All staff received training in MRI safety and MRL workflows. Initial sites chosen for treatment were stereotactic and hypofractionated prostate, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic metastasis, prostate bed and bladder. The Adapt To Shape (ATS) workflow was chosen to be the focus of treatment as it is the most robust solution for daily adaptive radiotherapy. A workflow was created addressing patient suitability, simulation, planning, treatment and peer review. Treatment times were recorded breaking down into the various stages of treatment. RESULTS A total of 37 patients were treated and 317 fractions delivered (of which 313 were delivered using an ATS workflow) in our initial 6 months. Average treatment times over the entire period were 50 and 38 min for stereotactic and non-stereotactic treatments respectively. Average treatment times reduced each month. The average difference between reference planned and ionization chamber measured dose was 0.0 ± 1.4%. CONCLUSION The MRL was successfully established in an Australian setting. A focus on training and creating a detailed workflow from patient selection, review and treatment are paramount to establishing new treatment programmes.