21 results on '"Turkbey, Baris"'
Search Results
2. Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer
- Author
-
Mehralivand, Sherif, Sidana, Abhinav, Maruf, Mahir, Choyke, Peter L., Pinto, Peter A., and Turkbey, Baris
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update.
- Author
-
Turkbey, Baris, Oto, Aytekin, Allen, Brian C., Akin, Oguz, Alexander, Lauren F., Ari, Mim, Froemming, Adam T., Fulgham, Pat F., Gettle, Lori Mankowski, Maranchie, Jodi K., Rosenthal, Seth A., Schieda, Nicola, Schuster, David M., Venkatesan, Aradhana M., and Lockhart, Mark E.
- Abstract
Prostate cancer has a wide spectrum ranging between low-grade localized disease and castrate-resistant metastatic disease. Although whole gland and systematic therapies result in cure in the majority of patients, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer can still occur. Imaging approaches including anatomic, functional, and molecular modalities are continuously expanding. Currently, recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer is grouped in three major categories: 1) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy, 2) Clinical concern for residual or recurrent disease after nonsurgical local and pelvic treatments, and 3) Metastatic prostate cancer treated by systemic therapy (androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy). This document is a review of the current literature regarding imaging in these settings and the resulting recommendations for imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy
- Author
-
Sankineni, Sandeep, George, Arvin K., Brown, Anna M., Rais-Bahrami, Soroush, Wood, Bradford J., Merino, Maria J., Pinto, Peter A., Choyke, Peter L., and Turkbey, Baris
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy
- Author
-
Brown, Anna M., Elbuluk, Osama, Mertan, Francesca, Sankineni, Sandeep, Margolis, Daniel J., Wood, Bradford J., Pinto, Peter A., Choyke, Peter L., and Turkbey, Baris
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Comparison of calculated and acquired high b value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer
- Author
-
Grant, Kinzya B., Agarwal, Harsh K., Shih, Joanna H., Bernardo, Marcelino, Pang, Yuxi, Daar, Dagane, Merino, Maria J., Wood, Bradford J., Pinto, Peter A., Choyke, Peter L., and Turkbey, Baris
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Functional and molecular imaging of localized and recurrent prostate cancer
- Author
-
Grant, Kinzya, Lindenberg, Maria L., Shebel, Haytham, Pang, Yuxi, Agarwal, Harsh K., Bernardo, Marcelino, Kurdziel, Karen A., Turkbey, Baris, and Choyke, Peter L.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Imaging Prostate Cancer: An Update on Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Author
-
Bouchelouche, Kirsten, Turkbey, Baris, Choyke, Peter, and Capala, Jacek
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Detection of failure patterns using advanced imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence following low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Salerno, Kilian E., Turkbey, Baris, Lindenberg, Liza, Mena, Esther, Schott, Erica E., Brennan, Alexandra K., Roy, Soumyajit, Shankavaram, Uma, Patel, Krishnan, Cooley-Zgela, Theresa, McKinney, Yolanda, Wood, Bradford J., Pinto, Peter A., Choyke, Peter, and Citrin, Deborah E.
- Subjects
- *
PROSTATE cancer , *LOW dose rate brachytherapy , *RADIOISOTOPE brachytherapy , *EXTERNAL beam radiotherapy , *SEMINAL vesicles , *DISEASE relapse - Abstract
This study describes the pattern of failure in patients with biochemical (BCR) recurrence after low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as a component of definitive treatment for prostate cancer. Patients with BCR after LDR brachytherapy ± external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were enrolled on prospective IRB approved advanced imaging protocols. Patients underwent 3T multiparametric MRI (mpMRI); a subset underwent prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET/CT. Pathologic confirmation was obtained unless contraindicated. Between January 2011 and April 2021, 51 patients with BCR after brachytherapy (n = 36) or brachytherapy + EBRT (n = 15) underwent mpMRI and were included in this analysis. Of 38 patients with available dosimetry, only two had D90<90%. The prostate and seminal vesicles were a site of failure in 66.7% (n = 34) and 39.2% (n = 20), respectively. PET/CT (n = 32 patients) more often identified lesions pelvic lymph nodes (50%; n = 16) and distant metastases (18.8%; n = 6), than mpMRI. Isolated nodal disease (9.8%; n = 5) and distant metastases (n = 1) without local recurrence were uncommon. Recurrence within the prostate was located in the transition zone in 48.5%, central or midline in 45.5%, and anterior in 36.4% of patients. In this cohort of patients with BCR after LDR brachytherapy ± EBRT, the predominant recurrence pattern was local (prostate ± seminal vesicles) with frequent occurrence in the anterior prostate and transition zone. mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT provided complementary information to localize sites of recurrence, with PSMA PET/CT often confirming mpMRI findings and identifying occult nodal or distant metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Quantitative Prostate MRI.
- Author
-
Schieda, Nicola, Lim, Christopher S., Zabihollahy, Fatemeh, Abreu‐Gomez, Jorge, Krishna, Satheesh, Woo, Sungmin, Melkus, Gerd, Ukwatta, Eran, Turkbey, Baris, and Abreu-Gomez, Jorge
- Subjects
PROSTATE ,PROSTATE cancer ,MAGNETIC resonance imaging ,ARTIFICIAL neural networks ,IMAGE analysis ,TUMOR grading - Abstract
Prostate MRI is reported in clinical practice using the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS). PI-RADS aims to standardize, as much as possible, the acquisition, interpretation, reporting, and ultimately the performance of prostate MRI. PI-RADS relies upon mainly subjective analysis of MR imaging findings, with very few incorporated quantitative features. The shortcomings of PI-RADS are mainly: low-to-moderate interobserver agreement and modest accuracy for detection of clinically significant tumors in the transition zone. The use of a more quantitative analysis of prostate MR imaging findings is therefore of interest. Quantitative MR imaging features including: tumor size and volume, tumor length of capsular contact, tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics, tumor T1 and T2 relaxation times, tumor shape, and texture analyses have all shown value for improving characterization of observations detected on prostate MRI and for differentiating between tumors by their pathological grade and stage. Quantitative analysis may therefore improve diagnostic accuracy for detection of cancer and could be a noninvasive means to predict patient prognosis and guide management. Since quantitative analysis of prostate MRI is less dependent on an individual users' assessment, it could also improve interobserver agreement. Semi- and fully automated analysis of quantitative (radiomic) MRI features using artificial neural networks represent the next step in quantitative prostate MRI and are now being actively studied. Validation, through high-quality multicenter studies assessing diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection, in the domain of quantitative prostate MRI is needed. This article reviews advances in quantitative prostate MRI, highlighting the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging techniques, as well as discussing opportunities and challenges for evaluation of prostate MRI in clinical practice when using quantitative assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.
- Author
-
Smith, Clayton P., Harmon, Stephanie A., Barrett, Tristan, Bittencourt, Leonardo K., Law, Yan Mee, Shebel, Haytham, An, Julie Y., Czarniecki, Marcin, Mehralivand, Sherif, Coskun, Mehmet, Wood, Bradford J., Pinto, Peter A., Shih, Joanna H., Choyke, Peter L., and Turkbey, Baris
- Subjects
RESEARCH ,ULTRASONIC imaging ,BIOPSY ,RESEARCH evaluation ,WEIGHTS & measures ,RESEARCH methodology ,MAGNETIC resonance imaging ,CONTRAST media ,PROSTATE ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,EVALUATION research ,MEDICAL cooperation ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RESEARCH funding ,PROSTATE-specific antigen ,RESEARCH bias ,PROSTATE tumors ,ALGORITHMS - Abstract
Background: The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) has been in use since 2015; while interreader reproducibility has been studied, there has been a paucity of studies investigating the intrareader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2.Purpose: To evaluate both intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2 in the assessment of intraprostatic lesions using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).Study Type: Retrospective.Population/subjects: In all, 102 consecutive biopsy-naïve patients who underwent prostate MRI and subsequent MR/transrectal ultrasonography (MR/TRUS)-guided biopsy.Field Strength/sequences: Prostate mpMRI at 3T using endorectal with phased array surface coils (TW MRI, DW MRI with ADC maps and b2000 DW MRI, DCE MRI).Assessment: Previously detected and biopsied lesions were scored by four readers from four different institutions using PI-RADSv2. Readers scored lesions during two readout rounds with a 4-week washout period.Statistical Tests: Kappa (κ) statistics and specific agreement (Po ) were calculated to quantify intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2 scoring. Lesion measurement agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Results: Overall intrareader reproducibility was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.43-0.67, Po = 0.60-0.77), while overall interreader reproducibility was poor to moderate (κ = 0.24, Po = 46). Readers with more experience showed greater interreader reproducibility than readers with intermediate experience in the whole prostate (P = 0.026) and peripheral zone (P = 0.002). Sequence-specific interreader agreement for all readers was similar to the overall PI-RADSv2 score, with κ = 0.24, 0.24, and 0.23 and Po = 0.47, 0.44, and 0.54 in T2 -weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE), respectively. Overall intrareader and interreader ICC for lesion measurement was 0.82 and 0.71, respectively.Data Conclusion: PI-RADSv2 provides moderate intrareader reproducibility, poor interreader reproducibility, and moderate interreader lesion measurement reproducibility. These findings suggest a need for more standardized reader training in prostate MRI.Level Of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The Problems with the Kappa Statistic as a Metric of Interobserver Agreement on Lesion Detection Using a Third-reader Approach When Locations Are Not Prespecified.
- Author
-
Shih, Joanna H., Greer, Matthew D., and Turkbey, Baris
- Abstract
Rationale and Objectives: To point out the problems with Cohen kappa statistic and to explore alternative metrics to determine interobserver agreement on lesion detection when locations are not prespecified.Materials and Methods: Use of kappa and two alternative methods, namely index of specific agreement (ISA) and modified kappa, for measuring interobserver agreement on the location of detected lesions are presented. These indices of agreement are illustrated by application to a retrospective multireader study in which nine readers detected and scored prostate cancer lesions in 163 consecutive patients (n = 110 cases, n = 53 controls) using the guideline of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Results: The proposed modified kappa, which properly corrects for the amount of agreement by chance, is shown to be approximately equivalent to the ISA. In the prostate cancer data, average kappa, modified kappa, and ISA equaled 30%, 55%, and 57%, respectively, for all lesions and 20%, 87%, and 87%, respectively, for index lesions.Conclusions: The application of kappa could result in a substantial downward bias in reader agreement on lesion detection when locations are not prespecified. ISA is recommended for assessment of reader agreement on lesion detection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Evaluating the Role of mpMRI in Prostate Cancer Assessment.
- Author
-
Mertan, Francesca V., Berman, Rose, Szajek, Kathryn, Pinto, Peter A., Choyke, Peter L., and Turkbey, Baris
- Subjects
MAGNETIC resonance imaging ,DIAGNOSIS ,PROSTATE cancer ,BIOPSY ,PROSTATE cancer treatment ,PROSTATE-specific antigen - Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among American men. The role of multi-parametric MRI has recently gained more importance in detection of prostate cancer, its targeted biopsy, and focal therapy guidance. In this review, uses of multi-parametric MRI in prostate cancer assessment and treatment are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen ( PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies.
- Author
-
Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush, Siddiqui, M. Minhaj, Vourganti, Srinivas, Turkbey, Baris, Rastinehad, Ardeshir R., Stamatakis, Lambros, Truong, Hong, Walton‐Diaz, Annerleim, Hoang, Anthony N., Nix, Jeffrey W., Merino, Maria J., Wood, Bradford J., Simon, Richard M., Choyke, Peter L., and Pinto, Peter A.
- Subjects
PROSTATE-specific antigen ,PROSTATE cancer ,DIGITAL rectal examination ,BIOPSY ,MEN'S health ,MAGNETIC resonance imaging - Abstract
Objectives To determine the diagnostic yield of analysing biparametric ( T2- and diffusion-weighted) magnetic resonance imaging ( B- MRI) for prostate cancer detection compared with standard digital rectal examination ( DRE) and prostate-specific antigen ( PSA)-based screening. Patients and Methods Review of patients who were enrolled in a trial to undergo multiparametric-prostate ( MP)- MRI and MR/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy at our institution identified 143 men who underwent MP-MRI in addition to standard DRE and PSA-based prostate cancer screening before any prostate biopsy. Patient demographics, DRE staging, PSA level, PSA density ( PSAD), and B- MRI findings were assessed for association with prostate cancer detection on biopsy. Results Men with detected prostate cancer tended to be older, with a higher PSA level, higher PSAD, and more screen-positive lesions ( SPL) on B- MRI. B- MRI performed well for the detection of prostate cancer with an area under the curve ( AUC) of 0.80 (compared with 0.66 and 0.74 for PSA level and PSAD, respectively). We derived combined PSA and MRI-based formulas for detection of prostate cancer with optimised thresholds. (i) for PSA and B- MRI: PSA level + 6 x (the number of SPL) > 14 and (ii) for PSAD and B- MRI: 14 × ( PSAD) + (the number of SPL) >4.25. AUC for equations 1 and 2 were 0.83 and 0.87 and overall accuracy of prostate cancer detection was 79% in both models. Conclusions The number of lesions positive on B- MRI outperforms PSA alone in detection of prostate cancer. Furthermore, this imaging criteria coupled as an adjunct with PSA level and PSAD, provides even more accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Incorporating imaging into personalized medicine for the detection of prostate cancer: Pharmacological research—Urogenital pharmacology.
- Author
-
Mertan, Francesca and Turkbey, Baris
- Subjects
- *
DIAGNOSIS , *PROSTATE cancer , *PROSTATE , *DRUG administration , *LITERATURE reviews , *MEDICAL care , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging - Abstract
Imaging has played an important role in the administration of personalized medicine. From diagnosing diseases to guiding therapies, imaging has become an all-encompassing modality. With respect to prostate cancer, personalized management of the disease has been transformed by imaging. Specifically, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as a vital player in the detection, characterization, and localization of the disease thus making the incorporation of imaging in personalized prostate cancer management integral. In this review, the current role of imaging in personalized medicine for the management of prostate cancer is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Comparison of endorectal coil and nonendorectal coil T2W and diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla for localizing prostate cancer: Correlation with whole-mount histopathology.
- Author
-
Turkbey, Baris, Merino, Maria J., Gallardo, Elma Carvajal, Shah, Vijay, Aras, Omer, Bernardo, Marcelino, Mena, Esther, Daar, Dagane, Rastinehad, Ardeshir R., Linehan, W. Marston, Wood, Bradford J., Pinto, Peter A., and Choyke, Peter L.
- Abstract
Purpose To compare utility of T2-weighted (T2W) MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) obtained with and without an endorectal coil at 3 Tesla (T) for localizing prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved study included 20 patients (median prostate-specific antigen, 8.4 ng/mL). Patients underwent consecutive prostate MRIs at 3T, first with a surface coil alone, then with combination of surface, endorectal coils (dual coil) followed by robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Lesions were mapped at time of acquisition on dual-coil T2W, DWI-MRI. To avoid bias, 6 months later nonendorectal coil T2W, DWI-MRI were mapped. Both MRI evaluations were performed by two readers blinded to pathology with differences resolved by consensus. A lesion-based correlation with whole-mount histopathology was performed. Results At histopathology 51 cancer foci were present ranging in size from 2 to 60 mm. The sensitivity of the endorectal dual-coil, nonendorectal coil MRIs were 0.76, 0.45, respectively. PPVs for endorectal dual-coil, nonendorectal coil MRI were 0.80, 0.64, respectively. Mean size of detected lesions with nonendorectal coil MRI were larger than those detected by dual-coil MRI (22 mm versus 17.4 mm). Conclusion Dual-coil prostate MRI detected more cancer foci than nonendorectal coil MRI. While nonendorectal coil MRI is an attractive alternative, physicians performing prostate MRI should be aware of its limitations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1443-1448. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Very distal apical prostate tumours: identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla.
- Author
-
Nix, Jeffrey W., Turkbey, Baris, Hoang, Anthony, Volkin, Dmitry, Yerram, Nitin, Chua, Celene, Linehan, W. Marston, Wood, Bradford, Choyke, Peter, and Pinto, Peter A.
- Subjects
- *
PROSTATE cancer , *MEDICAL imaging systems , *SEXTANTS , *BIOPSY , *CANCER patients , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging - Abstract
Study Type - Diagnosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? MRI has been shown to improve prostate cancer detection rates. Pinto et al. ( J Urol 2011; 86: 1281-5) reported their outcomes on 101 patients with low, moderate or high suspicion lesions on multiparametric MRI that were subsequently targeted via an MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy platform. The prostate cancer detection rates were 27%, 66% and 89% respectively. Sciarra et al. ( Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 1875-83) performed a prospective trial in 180 patients with prior negative biopsy and persistent PSA elevation. Patients were randomized to either MRI targeted biopsy followed by random 12-core TRUS biopsy vs random TRUS guided biopsy alone. Prostate cancer detection in the MRI targeted group was 45.5% vs 24.4% in the random group. Although MRI has been shown to improve prostate cancer detection rates, there has not previously been any work looking at the ability of MRI to detect prostate cancer localized to the very distal apex of the prostate. This is an important topic in that it might lead clinicians to counsel their patients in treatment decisions if it is felt that a treatment might not treat this section of the prostate well, e.g. high intensity focused ultrasound therapy that might spare the distal apex. OBJECTIVE To describe an undescribed 'very distal' apical prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) since apical prostate cancer can be difficult to detect in transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and might therefore be missed in treatment decisions such as high intensity focused ultrasound or surgical therapy., PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2011 to December 2012 a total of 210 consecutive patients underwent 3 T mpMRI with endorectal coil followed by our previously described MRI/ultrasound image fused and directed TRUS biopsies., Patients also underwent 12-core TRUS sextant biopsies., The inclusion criteria required at least one distal apical prostate lesion visualized on mpMRI and targeted for biopsy., RESULTS A total of 38 men (median age 62 years, median PSA 7.68 ng/dL) were identified as having distal apical prostate cancer on mpMRI., Thirteen patients (34%) had a prior diagnosis of cancer and were on active surveillance protocols while 25 (66%) did not. Of those patients, 21 (55%) had undergone a median of two prior negative biopsies., Twenty-two patients (58%) were positive on biopsy for prostate cancer. On breakdown of patients who were positive, 17 (77%) were positive on TRUS random biopsies and 21 (95%) were positive on MRI targeted biopsies with the majority of patients having multifocal disease., At the distal apical lesions of interest, 80% were positive on MRI targeted biopsy. In addition 33% of these patients were upgraded based on MRI targeted biopsy at the distal lesion., CONCLUSIONS Very distal apical prostate cancer can be accurately detected and sampled with mpMRI and subsequent MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy., This may aid clinicians and patients in decision making for therapeutic modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion.
- Author
-
Turkbey, Baris, Sheng Xu, Kruecker, Jochen, Locklin, Julia, Yuxi Pang, Bernardo, Marcelino, Merino, Maria J., Wood, Bradford J., Choyke, Peter L., and Pinto, Peter A.
- Subjects
- *
PROSTATE cancer , *DIAGNOSIS , *PROSTATE-specific antigen , *CANCER in men , *BIOPSY , *MEDICAL imaging systems , *ULTRASONIC imaging - Abstract
Study Type - Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b Currently, systematic prostate biopsies are obtained with minimal information about their actual location. This study demonstrates that a electromagnetically tracked ultrasound probe can be used to guide biopsies into specific areas of the prostate. By registering the ultrasound to an MRI scan of the prostate, obtained prior to biopsy, it is possible to accurately map the location of biopsies. Thus, if a patient requires a repeat biopsy, or there is a question about whether a specific area of the prostate was sampled, this system can be used to more accurately guide biopsies in the future. To develop a system that documents the location of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies by fusing them to MRI scans obtained prior to biopsy, as the actual location of prostate biopsies is rarely known. Fifty patients (median age 61) with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 5.8 ng/ml underwent 3T endorectal coil MRI prior to biopsy. 3D TRUS images were obtained just prior to standard TRUS-guided 12-core sextant biopsies wherein an electromagnetic positioning device was attached to the needle guide and TRUS probe in order to track the position of each needle pass. The 3D-TRUS image documenting the location of each biopsy was fused electronically to the T2-weighted MRI. Each biopsy needle track was marked on the TRUS images and these were then transposed onto the MRI. Each biopsy site was classified pathologically as positive or negative for cancer and the Gleason score was determined. The location of all ( n= 605) needle biopsy tracks was successfully documented on the T2-weighted (T2W) MRI. Among 50 patients, 20 had 56 positive cores. At the sites of biopsy, T2W signal was considered 'positive' for cancer (i.e. low in signal intensity) in 34 of 56 sites. It is feasible to document the location of TRUS-guided prostate biopsies on pre-procedure MRI by fusing the pre-procedure TRUS to an endorectal coil MRI using electromagnetic needle tracking. This procedure may be useful in documenting the location of prior biopsies, improving quality control and thereby avoiding under-sampling of the prostate as well as directing subsequent biopsies to regions of the prostate not previously sampled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Evaluation of a Deep Learning-based Algorithm for Post-Radiotherapy Prostate Cancer Local Recurrence Detection Using Biparametric MRI.
- Author
-
Yilmaz, Enis C., Harmon, Stephanie A., Belue, Mason J., Merriman, Katie M., Phelps, Tim E., Lin, Yue, Garcia, Charisse, Hazen, Lindsey, Patel, Krishnan R., Merino, Maria J., Wood, Bradford J., Choyke, Peter L., Pinto, Peter A., Citrin, Deborah E., and Turkbey, Baris
- Subjects
- *
CANCER relapse , *EXTERNAL beam radiotherapy , *PROSTATE cancer , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging - Abstract
• Detection of local recurrence in patients with prior radiotherapy is challenging. • A bpMRI-based AI model detected most locally radiorecurrent cancers. • The AI model performance was comparably better in patients with larger glands. • The AI detection rates were higher in external beam radiation therapy group. To evaluate a biparametric MRI (bpMRI)-based artificial intelligence (AI) model for the detection of local prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence in patients with radiotherapy history. This study included post-radiotherapy patients undergoing multiparametric MRI and subsequent MRI/US fusion-guided and/or systematic biopsy. Histopathology results were used as ground truth. The recurrent cancer detection sensitivity of a bpMRI-based AI model, which was developed on a large dataset to primarily identify lesions in treatment-naïve patients, was compared to a prospective radiologist assessment using the Wald test. Subanalysis was conducted on patients stratified by the treatment modality (external beam radiation treatment [EBRT] and brachytherapy) and the prostate volume quartiles. Of the 62 patients included (median age = 70 years; median PSA = 3.51 ng/ml; median prostate volume = 27.55 ml), 56 recurrent PCa foci were identified within 46 patients. The AI model detected 40 lesions in 35 patients. The AI model performance was lower than the prospective radiology interpretation (Rad) on a patient-(AI: 76.1% vs. Rad: 91.3%, p = 0.02) and lesion-level (AI: 71.4% vs. Rad: 87.5%, p = 0.01). The mean number of false positives per patient was 0.35 (range: 0–2). The AI model performance was higher in EBRT group both on patient-level (EBRT: 81.5% [22/27] vs. brachytherapy: 68.4% [13/19]) and lesion-level (EBRT: 79.4% [27/34] vs. brachytherapy: 59.1% [13/22]). In patients with gland volumes >34 ml (n = 25), detection sensitivities were 100% (11/11) and 94.1% (16/17) on patient- and lesion-level, respectively. The reported bpMRI-based AI model detected the majority of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Further testing including external validation of this model is warranted prior to clinical implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions.
- Author
-
Padhani, Anwar R., Weinreb, Jeffrey, Rosenkrantz, Andrew B., Villeirs, Geert, Turkbey, Baris, and Barentsz, Jelle
- Subjects
- *
ENDORECTAL ultrasonography , *PROSTATE cancer , *PROSTATE , *UROLOGISTS , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging - Abstract
Abstract Context The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 analysis system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) detection of prostate cancer (PCa) is based on PI-RADS v1, accumulated scientific evidence, and expert consensus opinion. Objective To summarize the accuracy, strengths and weaknesses of PI-RADS v2, discuss pathway implications of its use and outline opportunities for improvements and future developments. Evidence acquisition For this consensus expert opinion from the PI-RADS steering committee, clinical studies, systematic reviews, and professional guidelines for mpMRI PCa detection were evaluated. We focused on the performance characteristics of PI-RADS v2, comparing data to systems based on clinicoradiologic Likert scales and non–PI-RADS v2 imaging only. Evidence selections were based on high-quality, prospective, histologically verified data, with minimal patient selection and verifications biases. Evidence synthesis It has been shown that the test performance of PI-RADS v2 in research and clinical practice retains higher accuracy over systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsies for PCa diagnosis. PI-RADS v2 fails to detect all cancers but does detect the majority of tumors capable of causing patient harm, which should not be missed. Test performance depends on the definition and prevalence of clinically significant disease. Good performance can be attained in practice when the quality of the diagnostic process can be assured, together with joint working of robustly trained radiologists and urologists, conducting biopsy procedures within multidisciplinary teams. Conclusions It has been shown that the test performance of PI-RADS v2 in research and clinical practice is improved, retaining higher accuracy over systematic TRUS biopsies for PCa diagnosis. Patient summary Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-directed biopsies using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System improves the detection of prostate cancers likely to cause harm, and at the same time decreases the detection of disease that does not lead to harms if left untreated. The keys to success are high-quality imaging, reporting, and biopsies by radiologists and urologists working together in multidisciplinary teams. Take Home Message Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-directed biopsies using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System improves the detection of prostate cancers likely to cause harm, and at the same time decreases the detection of disease that does not lead to harm if left untreated. The keys to success are high-quality imaging, reporting, and biopsies by radiologists and urologists working together in multidisciplinary teams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
- Author
-
Muller, Berrend G., Kaushal, Aradhana, Sankineni, Sandeep, Lita, Elena, Hoang, Anthony N., George, Arvin K., Rais-Bahrami, Soroush, Kruecker, Jochen, Yan, Pingkun, Xu, Sheng, de la Rosette, Jean J., Merino, Maria J., Wood, Bradford J., Pinto, Peter A., Choyke, Peter L., and Turkbey, Baris
- Subjects
- *
CANCER relapse , *PROSTATE tumors , *BIOPSY , *DIAGNOSTIC imaging , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging , *COMPUTERS in medicine , *PROSTATECTOMY , *ULTRASONIC imaging , *PROSTATE-specific antigen , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *DIAGNOSIS - Abstract
Objective: Approximately 15% of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer develop local recurrence, which is heralded by a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Early detection and treatment of recurrence improves the outcome of salvage treatment. We investigated the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-guided biopsy (FGB) combined with "cognitive biopsy" to confirm local recurrence of prostate cancer after RP.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study conducted between January 2010 and December 2014, patients with rising PSA levels after RP who had no known evidence of distant metastases underwent mpMRI including T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI at 3 Tesla, and subsequent MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy with cognitive assistance. The detection rate of locally recurrent disease was determined.Results: A total of 10 patients (mean age = 67y, mean PSA level = 3.44ng/ml) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 10 patients, all had positive findings suspicious for local recurrence on mpMRI per entrance criterion. The most important features on mpMRI were early enhancement on DCE MR images and hypointensity on T2W images. The average lesion diameter on mpMRI was 1.12cm (range: 0.40-2.20cm). All suspicious lesions (16/16, 100%) were positive on T2W MR images, 14 (89%) showed positive features on apparent diffusion coefficient maps of diffusion-weighted images, and 16 (100%) were positive on DCE MR images. MRI-TRUS FGBs were positive in 10/16 lesions (62.5%) and 8/10 (80%) patients.Conclusion: MRI-TRUS FGB with cognitive assistance is able to detect and diagnose locally recurrent lesions after RP, even at low PSA levels. This may facilitate early detection of recurrent disease and improve salvage treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.