Search

Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most common hematologic malignancy, remains incurable, and its incidence is rising. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T cell) therapy has emerged as a novel treatment, with the potential to improve the survival and quality of life of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we aim to provide a concise overview of the latest developments in CAR-T therapy, assess their potential implications for clinical practice, and evaluate their efficacy and safety outcomes based on the most up-to-date evidence. A literature search conducted from 1 January 2019 to 12 July 2023 on Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 2273 articles, of which 29 fulfilled the specified criteria for inclusion. Our results offer robust evidence supporting CAR-T cell therapy's efficacy in rrMM patients, with an encouraging 83.21% overall response rate (ORR). A generally safe profile was observed, with grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) at 7.12% and grade ≥ 3 neurotoxicity at 1.37%. A subgroup analysis revealed a significantly increased ORR in patients with fewer antimyeloma regimens, while grade ≥ 3 CRS was more common in those with a higher proportion of high-risk cytogenetics and prior exposure to BCMA therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy and bispecific T‐cell engagers (BsAb) have emerged as promising immunotherapeutic modalities in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of CAR‐T and BsAb therapies in MM patients with a prior history of allogeneic transplantation (allo‐HCT). Thirty‐three MM patients with prior allo‐HCT received CAR‐T (n = 24) or BsAb (n = 9) therapy. CAR‐T therapy demonstrated an ORR of 92% (67% ≥ CR), and 73% were MRD negative. BsAb therapy resulted in an ORR of 44% (44% ≥ CR) and 44% MRD negative. Safety analysis showed grade ≥3 AEs in 92% of CAR‐T and 56% of BsAb patients. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 83% of CAR‐T and 78% of BsAb recipients, while immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was observed in three CAR‐T patients. Infections of grade ≥3 were reported in 50% of CAR‐T and 44% of BsAb recipients. No exacerbation of graft‐versus‐host disease occurred except in one BsAb recipient. CAR‐T and BsAb therapies appear to be feasible, safe and provide deep and durable responses in MM patients with prior allo‐HCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable despite improvements in treatment options. B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is predominantly expressed in B‐lineage cells and represents a promising new target for MM. Teclistamab (TECVAYLITM) is the first T‐cell redirecting bispecific antibody approved for patients with MM. Targeting both CD3 receptor complex on T cells and BCMA on myeloma cells, teclistamab leads to T‐cell activation and subsequent lysis of BCMA+ cells. The recommended dose of teclistamab is 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneous weekly after two step‐up doses of 0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg, which was selected after review of safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic data. Exposure‐response analyses of efficacy and safety data were also used to confirm the teclistamab dose. Teclistamab resulted in a high rate of deep and durable responses (63% overall response, 45.5% complete response or better, with 22 months median duration of response) in patients with triple‐exposed relapsed/refractory MM. Common adverse reactions included cytokine release syndrome, hematologic abnormalities, and infections. Teclistamab is currently being investigated as monotherapy as well as combination therapy across different MM indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel; bb2121) is a B‐cell maturation antigen–directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved for treatment of patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. This analysis evaluated exposure–response (ER) relationships of ide‐cel with key efficacy end points and safety events. Ide‐cel exposure data were available from 127 patients treated at target doses of 150, 300, or 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells from the phase II KarMMa study (NCT03361748). Key exposure metrics, including area under the curve of the transgene level from 0 to 28 days and maximum transgene level, were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Logistic regression models, using both linear and maximum response function of exposure on the logit scale, were evaluated to quantify observed ER trends, and modified by including statistically significant individual covariates in a stepwise regression analysis. There was wide overlap of exposures across the target doses. ER relationships were observed for the overall and complete response rates, with higher response rates associated with higher exposures. Model‐based evaluations identified female sex and baseline serum monoclonal protein less than or equal to 10 g/L as predictive of a higher objective response rate and a higher complete response rate, respectively. ER relationships were observed for safety events of cytokine release syndrome requiring tocilizumab or corticosteroids. The established ER models were used to quantify the ide‐cel dose–response, which showed a positive benefit–risk assessment for the range of ide‐cel exposures associated with the target dose range of 150–450 × 106 CAR+ T cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs) have emerged as novel therapeutic modalities in the treatment of advanced hematological malignancies. BiTEs and BiAbs redirect T cells to attack tumors and facilitate T-cell-mediated cell death. Blinatumomab was the first BiTE to display proof-of-concept with its remarkable contribution towards the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nearly a decade later, several BiTEs/BiAbs targeting a range of tumor-associated antigens have transpired in the treatment of multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute myelogenous leukemia, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This review summarizes the most recent evidence emerging from clinical trials regarding the use of BiAbs and BiTEs in hematological malignancies whilst highlighting the limitations of these therapeutic options and providing practical insights towards overcoming these limitations. Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of hematological malignancies. By directing T cells towards specific tumor antigens, BiTEs and BiAbs facilitate the T-cell-mediated lysis of neoplastic cells. The success of blinatumomab, a CD19xCD3 BiTE, in acute lymphoblastic leukemia spearheaded the expansive development of BiTEs/BiAbs in the context of hematological neoplasms. Nearly a decade later, numerous BiTEs/BiAbs targeting a range of tumor-associated antigens have transpired in the treatment of multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute myelogenous leukemia, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, despite their generally favorable safety profiles, particular toxicities such as infections, cytokine release syndrome, myelosuppression, and neurotoxicity after BiAb/BiTE therapy raise valid concerns. Moreover, target antigen loss and the immunosuppressive microenvironment of hematological neoplasms facilitate resistance towards BiTEs/BiAbs. This review aims to highlight the most recent evidence from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of BiAbs/BiTEs. Additionally, the review will provide mechanistic insights into the limitations of BiAbs whilst outlining practical applications and strategies to overcome these limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma is the second-most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Despite ongoing advancement in therapeutic modalities, it remains an incurable disease with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%. The recent development and introduction of anti-BCMA immunotherapies into clinical practice, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies and bispecific antibodies, has radically shifted the treatment paradigm. However, despite the promising potential of these therapies for broader application, frequent and significant adverse effects have been reported, both in short- and in long-term settings, requiring increasing awareness and vigilance in the treating team, close monitoring, and prompt interventions with a multidisciplinary approach. In this review, we will discuss the toxicities associated with CAR-T cell and bispecific antibody therapies, focusing on results from major clinical studies and real-world observations. In addition, we will emphasize on effective strategies for prevention, monitoring and management, and provide expert recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few studies have reported the associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxic events (NEs) and efficacy after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). We present a retrospective study performed on 113 patients with R/R MM who received single anti-BCMA CAR T-cell, combined with anti-CD19 CAR T-cell or anti-CD138 CAR T-cell therapy. Eight patients were given G-CSF after successful management of CRS, and no CRS re-occurred thereafter. Of the remaining 105 patients that were finally analyzed, 72 (68.6%) received G-CSF (G-CSF group), and 33 (31.4%) did not (non G-CSF group). We mainly analyzed the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs in two groups of patients, as well as the associations of G-CSF timing, cumulative dose and cumulative time with CRS, NEs and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy. Both groups of patients had similar duration of grade 3–4 neutropenia, and the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs.There were also no differences in the incidence and severity of CRS or NEs between patients with the timing of G-CSF administration ≤3 days and those >3 days after CAR T-cell infusion. The incidence of CRS was greater in patients receiving cumulative doses of G-CSF >1500 μg or cumulative time of G-CSF administration >5 days. Among patients with CRS, there was no difference in the severity of CRS between patients who used G-CSF and those who did not. The duration of CRS in anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 CAR T-cell–treated patients was prolonged after G-CSF administration. There were no significant differences in the overall response rate at 1 and 3 months between the G-CSF group and the non–G-CSF group. Our results showed that low-dose or short-time use of G-CSF was not associated with the incidence or severity of CRS or NEs, and G-CSF administration did not influence the antitumor activity of CAR T-cell therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) have revolutionised multiple myeloma therapy, but adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and infections are common. This Policy Review presents a consensus from the European Myeloma Network on the prevention and management of these adverse events. Recommended measures include premedication, frequent assessing for symptoms and severity of cytokine release syndrome, step-up dosing for several BsAbs and some CAR T-cell therapies; corticosteroids; and tocilizumab in the case of cytokine release syndrome. Other anti-IL-6 drugs, high-dose corticosteroids, and anakinra might be considered in refractory cases. ICANS often arises concomitantly with cytokine release syndrome. Glucocorticosteroids in increasing doses are recommended if needed, as well as anakinra if the response is inadequate, and anticonvulsants if convulsions occur. Preventive measures against infections include antiviral and antibacterial drugs and administration of immunoglobulins. Treatment of infections and other complications is also addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has greatly transformed the treatment and prognosis of B-cell hematological malignancies. As CAR T-cell therapy continues to be more readily adopted and indications increase, the field's recognition of emerging toxicities will continue to grow. Among the adverse events associated with CAR T-cell therapy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are the most common toxicities, while thrombotic events represent an under-reported, life-endangering complication. To determine thrombosis incidence post CAR T-cell therapy, we performed a multi-center, retrospective study on CAR T-cell therapy adult patients (N = 140) from Indiana University Simon Cancer Center and the University of North Carolina Medical Center treated from 2017 to 2022 for relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, N = 3), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, N = 92), follicular lymphoma (FL, N = 9), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, N = 2), and multiple myeloma (MM, N = 34). We report 10 (7.14%) thrombotic events related to CAR T-cell therapy (DLBCL: N = 8, FL: N = 1, MM: N = 1) including 9 primary venous events and 1 arterial event that occurred with median time of 23.5 days post CAR T-cell infusion. In search of parameters associated with such events, we performed multivariate analyses of coagulation parameters (i.e., PT, PTT, and D-Dimer), scoring for adverse events (Padua Score and ISTH DIC Score) and grading for CAR T-cell toxicity severity (CRS grade and ICANS grade) and found that D-Dimer peak elevation and ICANS grade were significantly associated with post-CAR T-cell infusion thrombosis. While the pathophysiology of CAR T-cell associated coagulopathy remains unknown, our study serves to develop awareness of these emerging and unusual complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), leading to unprecedented responses in this patient population. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has been recently approved for treatment of triple-class exposed RRMM. We report real-life experiences with the commercial use of ide-cel in RRMM patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the first 16 triple-class exposed RRMM patients treated with ide-cel at a single academic center. We assessed toxicities, response to treatment, CAR T expansion and soluble BCMA (sBCMA) levels. Results: We identified 16 consecutive RRMM patients treated with ide-cel between 06–10/2022. Median age was 69 years, 6 (38%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics, 3 (19%) R-ISS stage III, and 5 (31%) extramedullary disease. Median number of previous treatment lines was 6 (3–12). Manufacturing success rate was 88% (6% required second lymphapheresis, 6% received an out-of-specification product). At 3 months, the overall response rate (ORR) was 69% (44% sCR, 6% CR, 19% VGPR). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 15 (94%) patients (88% G1, 6% G2), immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 1 (6% G1), febrile neutropenia in 11 (69%), and infections in 5 (31%). Prolonged hematologic toxicity occurred in 4/16 (25%) patients. Other non-hematological toxicities were elevated hepatic enzymes (38%), colitis (6%, G3) and DIC (6%, G2). Responses were more frequent in patients with higher CAR T expansion (100% vs 38%), and lack of decrease or plateau of sBCMA levels was typically observed in non-responders. Conclusions: We report one of the first cohorts of RRMM treated with commercial ide-cel. The ORR was 69% and safety profile was manageable, but prolonged hematologic toxicity still represents a major challenge. Responses correlated with in vivo CAR T cell expansion, underlining the need of further research to optimize CAR T expansion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Multiple myeloma, a cancer of the bone marrow, is the commonest cancer of adults in the Western World. Therapies have advanced dramatically in recent years, equating to improved survival and quality of life for patients, but those with resistant disease still have less favourable outcomes. Bispecific antibodies represent a new treatment option for patients with myeloma. These antibodies activate the patient's own T-cells to kill their tumour cells and have shown impressive results in relapsed refractory myeloma. In this review, we consider ways to improve the activity of these new therapies, as well as to reduce the risk of serious side effects. Bispecific antibodies are immune treatments. Given that the immune system is defective in myeloma, we discuss combining bispecific antibodies with other treatments to improve T-cell function in these patients. We also consider how to reduce the risk of cytokine release syndrome, an important side effect of these therapies. Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological neoplasm of adults in the Western world. Overall survival has doubled since the advent of proteosome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies. However, patients with adverse cytogenetics or high-risk disease as determined by the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) continue to have poorer outcomes, and triple-refractory patients have a median survival of less than 1 year. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) commonly bind to a tumour epitope along with CD3 on T-cells, leading to T-cell activation and tumour cell killing. These treatments show great promise in MM patients, with the first agent, teclistamab, receiving regulatory approval in 2022. Their potential utility is hampered by the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), a hallmark of MM, which may limit efficacy, and by undesirable adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and infections, some of which may be fatal. In this review, we first consider the means of enhancing the efficacy of BsAbs in MM. These include combining BsAbs with other drugs that ameliorate the effect of the immunosuppressive TME, improving target availability, the use of BsAbs directed against multiple target antigens, and the optimal time in the treatment pathway to employ BsAbs. We then discuss methods to improve safety, focusing on reducing infection rates associated with treatment-induced hypogammaglobulinaemia, and decreasing the frequency and severity of CRS. BsAbs offer a highly-active therapeutic option in MM. Improving the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents may enable more patients to benefit from these novel therapies and improve outcomes for patients with high-risk disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma has continued to evolve with the introduction of novel immunotherapies. This progress has translated to improved overall survival for patients, but an unmet need remains in the heavily pretreated and high-risk subsets of patients. Emerging immunotherapies in the form of CAR-T cell therapies have been approved for multiple myeloma. However, CAR-T cell therapy has logistical limitations and there is a need for immunotherapies that are readily available, safe, and effective in RRMM. Currently, pending approval, there are many "off the shelf" bispecific antibodies being developed that target BCMA, GPRC5D, FcRH5 and other cell surface proteins. Preliminary efficacy data has suggested that these bispecific antibody therapies have similar response rates (∼50–80%) in heavily pretreated patients. Similarly, to CAR-T cell therapy, cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome are adverse events of key interest and incidence range from ∼40 to 90% and 3 to 20%, respectively. In this review, we highlight the various bispecific immunotherapies under development in the treatment of multiple myeloma with a focus on the data from clinical phase I and II studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell‐based immunotherapy has been increasingly used in the clinic for cancer intervention over the past 5 years. CAR T‐cell therapy takes advantage of genetically‐modified T cells to express synthetic CAR molecules on the cell surface. To date, up to six CAR T cell therapy products have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of leukaemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. In addition, hundreds of CAR‐T products are currently under clinical trials to treat solid tumours. In both the fundamental research and clinical applications, CAR T cell immunotherapy has achieved exciting progress with remarkable remission or suppression of cancers. However, CAR T cell‐based immunotherapy still faces significant safety issues, as exemplified by "on‐target off‐tumour" cytotoxicity due to lack of strict antigen specificity. In addition, uncontrolled massive activation of infused CAR T cells may create severe systemic inflammation with cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. These challenges call for a need to combine nanotechnology and optogenetics with immunoengineering to develop spatiotemporally‐controllable CAR T cells, which enable wireless photo‐tunable activation of therapeutic immune cells to deliver personalised therapy in the tumour microenvironment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies often have poor response to traditional chemotherapy, and the response rates are worsening with subsequent lines of therapy. The treatment of hematologic malignancies has been the focus of a new type of immunotherapy known as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. OBJECTIVE: To review the currently approved CAR T-cell therapies for the management of patients with certain hematologic malignancies. DISCUSSION: CAR T-cell therapy uses the collective knowledge of the immune system to engineer genetically T-cells that can target various hematologic malignancies. To date, 5 CAR T-cell therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, including tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, and idecabtagene vicleucel. Currently, these drugs are indicated for the management of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), large B-cell lymphomas, mantle-cell lymphomas, follicular lymphoma, and multiple myeloma, and they result in high response rates and increased survival compared with historical treatments. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are the most common adverse events associated with CAR T-cell therapies, and are man- aged with supportive care, tocilizumab, and corticosteroids. This article reviews the 5 drugs' mechanism of action, response rates, survival rates, and incidence of CRS and ICANS. CONCLUSION: CAR T-cell therapy offers a relatively new treatment approach with high response rates for patients with relapsed or refractory ALL, various types of B-cell lymphomas, and multiple myeloma; however, the use of these therapies also involves a high incidence of serious side effects, namely, CRS and ICANS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a need for novel therapies for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a validated target. Teclistamab is a bispecific antibody that binds BCMA and CD3 to redirect T cells to multiple myeloma cells. The aim of the MajesTEC-1 study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of teclistamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Methods: This open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study enrolled patients with multiple myeloma who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to established therapies. Teclistamab was administered intravenously (range 0·3-19·2 μg/kg [once every 2 weeks] or 19·2-720 μg/kg [once per week]) or subcutaneously (range 80-3000 μg/kg [once per week]) in different cohorts, with step-up dosing for 38·4 μg/kg or higher doses. The primary objectives were to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (part one) and characterise teclistamab safety and tolerability at the recommended phase 2 dose (part two). Safety was assessed in all patients treated with at least one dose of teclistamab. Efficacy was analysed in response-evaluable patients (ie, patients who received at least one dose of teclistamab and had at least one post-baseline response evaluation). This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03145181.Findings: Between June 8, 2017, and March 29, 2021, 219 patients were screened for study inclusion, and 157 patients (median six previous therapy lines) were enrolled and received at least one dose of teclistamab (intravenous n=84; subcutaneous n=73). 40 patients were administered the recommended phase 2 dose, identified as once per week subcutaneous administration of teclistamab at 1500 μg/kg, after 60 μg/kg and 300 μg/kg step-up doses (median follow-up 6·1 months, IQR 3·6-8·2). There were no dose-limiting toxicities at the recommended phase 2 dose in part one. In the 40 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome in 28 (70%; all grade 1 or 2 events) and neutropenia in 26 (65%) patients (grade 3 or 4 in 16 [40%]). The overall response rate in response-evaluable patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose (n=40) was 65% (95% CI 48-79); 58% achieved a very good partial response or better. At the recommended phase 2 dose, the median duration of response was not reached. 22 (85%) of 26 responders were alive and continuing treatment after 7·1 months' median follow-up (IQR 5·1-9·1). At the recommended phase 2 dose, teclistamab exposure was maintained above target exposure levels, and consistent T-cell activation was reported.Interpretation: Teclistamab is a novel treatment approach for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. At the recommended phase 2 dose, teclistamab showed promising efficacy, with durable responses that deepened over time, and was well tolerated, supporting further clinical development.Funding: Janssen Research & Development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The chimera antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel and potential targeted therapy and has achieved satisfactory efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in recent years. However, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and clinical efficacy have become the major obstacles which limit the application of CAR-T in clinics. To explore the potential biomarkers in plasma for evaluating CRS and clinical efficacy, we performed metabolomic and lipidomic profiling of plasma samples from 17 relapsed or refractory MM patients received CAR-T therapy. Our study showed that glycerophosphocholine (GPC), an intermediate of platelet-activating factor (PAF)-like molecule, was significantly decreased when the participants underwent CRS, and the remarkable elevation of lysophosphatidylcholines (lysoPCs), which were catalyzed by lysoPC acyltransferase (LPCAT) was a distinct metabolism signature of relapsed or refractory MM patients with prognostic value post-CAR-T therapy. Both GPC and lysoPC are involved in platelet-activating factor (PAF) remodeling pathway. Besides, these findings were validated by LPCAT1 expression, a key factor in the PAF pathway, associated with poor outcome in three MM GEP datasets of MM. In conclusion, CAR-T therapy alters PAF synthesis in MM patients, and targeting PAF remodeling may be a promising strategy to enhance MM CAR-T therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Collectively, hematological malignancies account for the fourth most common malignancy. Myeloma and lymphoma are the most common types of hematological malignancies. Unfortunately, the management of refractory myeloma and lymphoma remains challenging. The discovery of new immunological therapies, namely chimeric antigen receptors T cells (CAR-T), outlined unprecedented B cell malignancies results. In this context, the CAR-T-based approach has led to the proliferation of many clinical studies. In this review, we will deal with the CAR-T structure, and we will summarize the primary clinical studies assessing the risks and benefits of CAR-T cell therapy. We will also deal with the adverse events and management of cytokine release syndromes/immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Subsequently, we will review potential future improvements to overcome refractoriness and improve expansion while decreasing CAR-T's off-target effects. The advances in the CAR-T platform represent a step forward with promising unlimited future possibilities that made it a paradigm-shifting for the management of B cell malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T-cell therapy, a unique platform technology highlighting precision medicine through utilization of molecular biology and cell-based therapeutics has shown unprecedented rates in patients with hematological malignancies such as acute lymphocyte leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM). With the approval of CD19-targeted CAR T-cells by the Food and Drug Administration in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and NHL, this technology is positioned for aggressive expansion to combination therapeutic opportunities and proof of principle towards utility in other malignant disorders. However, despite the impressive results seen with hematological malignancies, CAR T-cells have shown limited efficacy in solid tumors with several unsuccessful preclinical studies. Regardless, these attempts have provided us with a better understanding of the imminent challenges specific to solid tumors even if they have not so far led to expanded clinical treatment opportunities outside ALL/NHL/MM. This review summarizes our current understanding of CAR T-cell mechanism of action, while presenting the major limitations of CAR T-cell derived treatments in solid tumors. We further discuss recent findings and present new potential strategies to overcome the challenges facing solid tumor targeting by CAR T-cell platforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relapsed and refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) patients have very poor prognosis. Chimeric antigen receptor modified T (CAR T) cells is an emerging approach in treating hematopoietic malignancies. Here we conducted the clinical trial of a biepitope-targeting CAR T against B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) (LCAR-B38M) in 17 R/R MM cases. CAR T cells were i.v. infused after lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Two delivery methods, three infusions versus one infusion of the total CAR T dose, were tested in, respectively, 8 and 9 cases. No response differences were noted among the two delivery subgroups. Together, after CART cell infusion, 10 cases experienced a mild cytokine release syndrome (CRS), 6 had severe but manageable CRS, and 1 died of a very severe toxic reaction. The abundance of BCMA and cytogenetic marker del(17p) and the elevation of IL-6 were the key indicators for severe CRS. Among 17 cases, the overall response rate was 88.2%, with 13 achieving stringent complete response (sCR) and 2 reaching very good partial response (VGPR), while 1 was a nonresponder. With a median follow-up of 417 days, 8 patients remained in sCR or VGPR, whereas 6 relapsed after sCR and 1 had progressive disease (PD) after VGPR. CAR T cells were high in most cases with stable response but low in 6 out of 7 relapse/PD cases. Notably, positive anti-CAR antibody constituted a high-risk factor for relapse/PD, and patients who received prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had more durable response. Thus, biepitopic CAR T against BCMA represents a promising therapy for R/R MM, while most adverse effects are clinically manageable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematologic malignancy, despite the development of numerous innovative therapies during the past two decades. Immunotherapies are changing the treatment paradigm of MM and have improved the overall response and survival of patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM. B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), selectively expressed in normal and malignant plasma cells, has been targeted by several immunotherapeutic modalities. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, the breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy, have revolutionized the treatment of B cell malignancies and remarkably improved the prognosis of RRMM. BCMA-targeting CAR T cell therapy is the most developed CAR T cell therapy for MM, and the US Food and Drug Administration has already approved idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) for MM. However, the development of novel BCMA-targeting CAR T cell therapies remains in progress. This review focuses on BCMA-targeting CAR T cell therapy, covering all stages of investigational progress, including the innovative preclinical studies, the initial phase I clinical trials, and the more developed phase II clinical trials. It also discusses possible measures to improve the efficacy and safety of this therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: T cells modified with a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that targets BCMA, a protein expressed on malignant plasma cells, represent a novel treatment option for multiple myeloma. Despite initially eliminating the disease, the function of BCMA-directed CAR-T cells diminishes within a year of administration, leading to disease relapse. The aim of this research was to alter the cytokines used in the ex vivo expansion of anti-BCMA CAR-T cells, to avoid the development of an unfavorable phenotype that would impair in vivo function. We discovered that CAR-T cells expanded with IL-15 had reduced dysfunction and enhanced persistence compared to those grown with IL-2 or a combination of IL-15 and IL-7, which resulted in longer and improved anti-tumor responses in a mouse model. Therefore, the use of IL-15 alone in place of IL-2 or IL-15/IL-7 should be considered when designing CAR-T cell production protocols, to improve the duration of patient responses. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of B-lymphoid malignancies. For multiple myeloma (MM), B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR-T cells have achieved outstanding complete response rates, but unfortunately, patients often relapse within a year of receiving the therapy. Increased persistence and reduced dysfunction are crucial features that enhance the durability of CAR-T cell responses. One of the factors that influence CAR-T cell in vivo longevity and loss of function, but which has not yet been extensively studied for BCMA-directed CAR-T cells, are the cytokines used during their production. We here compared the impact of IL-2, IL-15 and a combination of IL-15/IL-7 on the phenotype and function of ARI2h, an academic BCMA-directed CAR-T cell that is currently being administered to MM patients. For this study, flow cytometry, in vitro cytotoxicity assays and analysis of cytokine release were performed. In addition, ARI2h cells expanded with IL-2, IL-15, or IL-15/IL-7 were injected into MM tumor-bearing mice to assess their in vivo efficacy. We demonstrated that each of the cytokine conditions was suitable for the expansion of ARI2h cells, with clear in vitro activity. Strikingly, however, IL-15-produced ARI2h cells had improved in vivo efficacy and persistence. When explored further, it was found that IL-15 drove a less-differentiated ARI2h phenotype, ameliorated parameters related to CAR-T cell dysfunction, and lowered the release of cytokines potentially involved in cytokine release syndrome and MM progression. Moreover, we observed that IL-15 was less potent in inducing T cell senescence and DNA damage accumulation, both of which may contribute to an unfavorable CAR-T cell phenotype. These findings show the superiority of IL-15 to IL-2 and IL-15/IL-7 in the quality of anti-BCMA CAR-T cells, particularly their efficacy and persistence, and as such, could improve the duration of responses if applied to the clinical production of CAR-T cells for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]