Search

Purpose: For multiple myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by lenalidomide maintenance (LenMT) at 10–15 mg/day is considered standard of care. However, dose reductions due to side effects are common and median LenMT doses achieved over time may remain lower. Dose response during LenMT has never been investigated. Patients and Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, patients with multiple myeloma after ASCT and high-dose lenalidomide consolidation therapy (CT) at 25 mg/day were randomized to receive LenMT at either 25 or 5 mg/day. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Ninety-four patients (median age, 58 years) were randomized to either arm, with 22% having International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 and 22% being in complete remission (CR). After median follow-up of 46.7 months, median doses of 14.5 and 5 mg/day were achieved in the two arms; 53% of dose reductions occurring during CT. In the high- and the low-dose arm, median PFS was 44.8 and 33.0 months (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44–0.97; P = 0.032), 36% and 23% of patients had stringent CR as best response (P = 0.08), and 4-year OS was 79% and 67% (P = 0.16), respectively. Hematologic toxicity, grade ≥3 neutropenia, and infections were initially more common with LenMT 25 mg, but decreased after dose adjustments. SPM incidence and quality-of-life (QoL) scores in both arms were similar. Conclusions: LenMT dose correlated with efficacy and toxicity. High rates of dose reductions during CT argue against a high starting dose. However, continuous up- and down-titration for each patient to the current maximum tolerated dose is prudent.

Introduction Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comprise late complications following mutagenic treatment. Limited data is available on the outcome of patients (pts) developing therapy-related MDS and AML (tMDS, tAML) after treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). Methods From 1976 to 2011, 3814 pts were entered into the Düsseldorf MDS registry. We identified 200 pts with tMDS or tAML. Of those, 41 pts had also been diagnosed with multiple myeloma (mm-MDS/AML). We compared these 41 pts to pts with de novo MDS (n=3614) and to pts with tMDS with other underlying diseases (n=159, 55 pts with other hematological diseases (34.5%), 93 with solid tumors (58.5%) and 11 with other diseases (7%)). Patient characteristics Median time between MM diagnosis and the onset of MDS was 5.5 years (range 0-28.5 years). Median age at the time of diagnosis of mm-MDS/AML was 67.8 years (range 32.5-84.6 years). Of all 41 mm-MDS pts, 13 developed AML (32%). Median time to progression from MDS to AML was 5 months (range 0.5-68 months). According to the WHO classification of 2016, there were 7 MDS-SLD, 10 MDS-MLD, 1 MDS-RS SLD, 13 MDS-RS MLD, 7 MDS-EB I, 2 EB-2, 1 MDS del(5q). 58% of mm-MDS pts had a complex karyotype, mostly affecting chromosomes 5 (22%) and 7 (17%), less often affected were chromosomes 17 (13%), 20 (13%) and 21 (13%). At MDS diagnosis, 11 MM pts were in complete remission (22%), 29 pts showed partial remission (58%), and 10 pts a stable disease (20%). 84.4% of pts with mm-MDS/AML had received conventional chemotherapy, mostly anthracyclines and alkylating agents. 94.4% had received melphalan. 15% of pts had received novel agents including immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors. Results Both mm-MDS pts and tMDS pts were significantly younger than de novo MDS pts, however, there was no age difference between mm-MDS and tMDS (mm-MDS: mean 67.8 years, range 32-85, tMDS: mean 64.3 years, range 21-85, p Both mm-MDS pts and de novo MDS pts showed significantly more males than females (mm-MDS 67% male versus 33% female, de novo MDS 57% versus 43%, p When we compared risk group distribution according to IPSS-R we found significantly fewer mm-MDS pts to be in the lower risk categories (p More cell lineages were affected in mm-MDS and tMDS pts than in de novo MDS (p Progression to AML occurred significantly more often in mm-MDS pts. At 12 months we discovered 12% of de novo MDS pts to have transformed to AML, 19% of tMDS and 24% of mm-MDS. At 36 months, 20% of de novo MDS pts had transformed to AML, 34% of tMDS and 39% of mm-MDS (p When mm-MDS pts transformed to AML their survival was very poor, however, not significantly different compared to mm-MDS without AML transformation (7 months versus 11 months, p>0.05). Median survival of de novo MDS pts was 32 months (CI 29.940 - 34.192, range 1-345 months). In contrast, median overall survival of both mm-MDS and all other t-MDS was significantly shorter with 13 months in both groups (p Myeloma remission status had no impact on survival: pts in complete remission showed a median survival of 6 months (95% CI, range 0 - 35 months), pts with partial remission 7 months (95% CI, range 5 - 9 months) (p>0.05). Conclusion Pts developing a myeloid neoplasm after treatment for multiple myeloma present with biological characteristics similar to those seen in pts with other tMDS. However, both clinical and molecular features are more severe with higher bone marrow blast counts, worse karyotypes, a more unfavourable IPSS-R score, and a significantly higher rate of transformation to AML. Yet despite a more aggressive phenotype, prognosis is equally poor and independent of myeloma remission status in mm-MDS/AML pts suggesting secondary myeloid neoplasia to govern the stem cell niche independent of previous disease or treatment. Disclosures Boquoi: Celgene: Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Kobbe:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Medac: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Jazz: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; MSD: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Neovii: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Biotest: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Gattermann:Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Alexion: Research Funding. Germing:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Schroeder:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenk:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Introduction The LenaMain study is a prospective, randomized, open label, multicenter phase III trial which included 188 patients 3 months after first-line high dose treatment and autologous stem cell transplantation (NCT number: NCT00891384). Patients were equally randomized to receive either 25 (n = 94, arm A) or 5 mg (n = 94, arm B) lenalidomide maintenance until disease progression following a uniform 6 months of 25 mg lenalidomide consolidation. Final analysis after follow-up of 46.7 months was presented at ASCO 2018 (#8016) demonstrating an extended event-free survival for arm A (11.8 months, p=0.032) and an about 10% increase of grade 3/4 infections per year as main toxicity. Here we report analysis of quality of life (QoL) data as secondary endpoint of the study. Materials & Methods The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) was collected at baseline and then monthly at every new cycle. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale, the utility score and seven subscales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, physical functioning, role functioning, disease symptoms, and adverse effects of treatment) were compared between groups using a mixed model for repeated measures. Results Baseline questionnaire compliance was excellent (95.7%) and declined over time (82%, 76%, 71%, 54%, 49% after consolidation and after year 1, 2, 3 and 4 of maintenance, respectively). At baseline, GHS/QoL (67/67) and utility (0.73/0.72) scores for arm A/B were generally high and did not differ between both arms. The median GHS/QoL change between consolidation baseline and maintenance baseline was -1%. GHS/QoL scores appear constant for both treatment arms at most time points in the first 2 years of maintenance. Relevant improvements ≥ 5 points were observed in 30% of patients while improvements ≥ 15 points were observed in 20% of patients. During the same time a similar percentage of patients had relevant ≥ 5 and ≥15 point deteriorations, with a general tendency for a slight increase at the end of year 2. Notably, a greater number of deteriorations was found in the 5 mg lenalidomide arm. Mean GHS/QoL was constant during maintenance with a slight decrease of Utility values remained constant during maintenance (change from baseline 0.003, p=0.9 at year 1; 0.02, p=0.7 at year 2) and the overall pattern in the change over time does not appear to show any clear differences between the two treatment arms. Looking at QLQ-C30 subgroup domains after two years of maintenance, we observed a significantly higher change from baseline for diarrhea in the 25 mg lenalidomide arm, which may be a long-term drug-related effect. Conversely, role functioning was also significantly better in patients treated within the 25 mg lenalidomide arm. Other subgroups did not show significant differences after the second year. Overall GHS/QOL scores were not significantly different in patients with CR vs. ≥ vgPR. Similarly, there was no statistical difference in patients on treatment for 1, 2, 3 or 4 years of maintenance or in patients suffering from grade 3/4 adverse events or not. Thus, neither disease activity, nor duration of treatment nor high-grade toxicity biased our results. Conclusion The LenaMain trial shows that maintenance treatment with 25 mg lenalidomide vs. 5 mg significantly prolongs event-free survival. QoL, as secondary objective, was not different between both treatment arms, even showing a trend for improved QoL in the 25 mg lenalidomide treatment arm. Thus, QoL was not governed by the higher rate of infectious toxicity during high-dose lenalidomide maintenance. Disclosures Boquoi: Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Travel grant; Celgene: Other: Travel grant. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; ArtTempi: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy. Rummel:Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symbio: Honoraria. Kroeger:Sanofi: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mai:Celgene: Other: travel grant; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Onyx: Other: travel grant; Mundipharma: Other: travel grant. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding. Fenk:Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: travel grant; Janssen: Honoraria.

8016Background: While Len MT after high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (aBSCT) is standard of care in pts with MM, optimal dosage has not been established. Method...