Search

The objective of this study was to describe and compare the burden of treatment (BOT) and the quality of life (QoL) in early high efficacy therapy (HET) vs. escalation therapy in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients included in RelevarEM, the Argentinean registry of MS (RelevarEM, NCT 03,375,177)., Methods: cross sectional study conducted between September and December 2022. Participating patients were adults, RRMS patients who initiated (during the last three years) their treatment with a HET (natalizumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab, cladribine) or with escalation treatment (beta interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod). Clinical and demographic aspect were collected. QoL and BOT was measured with the validated to Spanish MusiQol and BOT questionnaire. Propensity score (PS)-based nearest-neighbor matching was applied to homogenize groups. Comparisons were be done using a linear regression analysis model stratified by matched pairs, with BOT and QoL assessments as main outcomes., Results: 269 patients were included in the analysis, mean age 33.7 ± 5.7 years, 193 (71.7 %) were female. A total of 136 patients were on early HET while 133 were on escalation therapy. In the entire group the mean total BOT score (±SD) was 48.5 ± 15.3 while in the group of patients receiving early HET we observed that the mean BOT score (±SD) was 43.5 ± 12.2 vs. 54.3 ± 13.3 in escalation treatment (p < 0.0001). Regarding the score QoL (±SD), in the entire sample we observed a global score of 77.4 ± 11.2. When we stratified groups, in HET (±SD) it was 81.3 ± 14 vs. 74.1 ± 18.3 in escalation therapy (p = 0.0003)., Conclusion: in this multicenter study that included 269 patients from Argentina we observed in early HET a significantly lower BOT and higher QoL than patients receiving escalation therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be classified according to the efficacy in which they prevent inflammatory activity. To date, there are limited data regarding the use of high-efficacy treatments (HETs) in Latin America (LATAM). We aimed to analyze the use of HETs in Argentina, focusing on the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the patients who use these treatments and the changes in the trend of use over the years., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done using the Argentina MS patient registry, RelevarEM. Patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) according to validated diagnostic criteria and under treatment with natalizumab, alemtuzumab, cladribine, rituximab or ocrelizumab were included., Results: Out of 2450 RRMS patients under a DMT, 462 (19%) were on HETs. One third of those patients (35%) received HETs as the first treatment. The most frequent reason for switching to HETs was treatment failure to previous DMT (77%). The time from MS diagnosis to the first HET in treatment-naive patients was less than one year (IQR: 0-1 year) and in treatment-experienced patients it was 5 years (IQR: 3-9 years). Between 2015 and 2017 (P1), 729 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 85 (11.65%) were HETs. Between 2018 and 2020 (P2), 961 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 284 (29.55%) were HETs. When comparing P2 with P1, a significant increase in the use of HETs was observed (p < 0.01). The most frequently used HETs were alemtuzumab (50.59%) in P1, and cladribine (45.20%) in P2., Conclusion: The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients under HET in Argentina were identified. Based on a real-world setting, we found a significant trend towards and a rapid increase in the use of HETs in clinical practice in patients with RRMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Irrestrictive research grants from Biogen Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina, and Roche Argentina allowed the development and implementation of the RELEVAREM Registry. Those grants did not interfere in the development plan, variables, PI selection, patient information nor other aspects of the Registry. Authors declare no conflict of interest with the research done., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine by a conjoint analysis the preferences for a range of disease-modifying treatment attributes in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and treating neurologists., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study throughout Argentina between August 2020 and February 2021. Participating patients were adults with relapsing-remitting MS, who had received a long-term specific disease-modifying treatment for at least the past 3 months and their treating neurologist. Patients and neurologist were sampled from the Argentinean MS patient registry (RelevarEM). We applied the methodology of conjoint analysis. Patient preferences for hypothetical treatment were collected from the overall sample and from stratified subgroups according to the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score. An ordinary least squares regression model was used to estimate parameters., Results: A total of 275 patients from 25 centers (31 principal investigators) were included, mean age was 43.2 ± 10.9 years, 59.6% were female, and mean EDSS was 3.1 ± 2. For the entire sample, we observed that patients had higher preferences for treatments with lower side effect risks (28.7 relative preference [RP]), lower frequency of administration (21.4 RP), and higher impact on relapses (19.6 RP). Patients with a higher EDSS give significantly greater importance to a less frequent administration regime and the oral route than patients with a lower EDSS (23.5 RP vs 20.1 [P =.02] and 17.1 vs 15.3 [P =.03], respectively). For neurologists, the most important attribute was to prevent disease progression (RP 29.3)., Conclusion: Our study contributes to the understanding of treatment selection preferences from the perspectives of both patient and neurologists., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Escalation (ES) and early high-efficacy (EHE) therapies have been the main treatment strategies adopted in multiple sclerosis (MS) in recent years. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of EHE versus ES strategies in MS patients from Argentina., Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Argentina. Eligible patients were categorized into 2 groups as follows: EHE if received natalizumab, ocrelizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, or cladribine; and ES if received interferon β, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, or fingolimod as initial therapy. The primary outcome was confirmed disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] increase). Additional outcomes included the proportion of patients and time to: EDSS 6; new relapses; new T2-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions; no evidence of disease activity; and specific adverse events. Propensity score-based nearest-neighbor matching (without replacement) was applied to homogenize the sample, and Cox regression model stratified by matched pairs was used for the analysis., Results: After propensity score matching, 193 and 112 patients were retained in the ES and EHE groups, respectively. The EHE significantly decreased the risk of EDSS progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.40-0.98; P = 0.04), relapses (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = 0.006), and new MRI activity during follow-up (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in specific adverse events between groups., Conclusions: Our study shows that EHE therapies prevent disease progression, relapses, and new MRI lesions and demonstrated no increased risk of specific adverse events when compared with ES therapy. These data should be considered when selecting a specific treatment for MS patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: E.C. has received fees for consultations as a scientific advisory board member and for travel to meetings, conferences, and clinical trials of the following companies: Avanir, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. J.I.R. has received honoraria from Novartis as a scientific advisor. He has received travel grants and attended courses and conferences on behalf of Merck Serono Argentina and Novartis Argentina. L.P. has received honoraria for scientific and research grants from Teva Tuteur, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, and Bayer Schering. N.D. has received honoraria from Bayer, Genzyme, and Merck as a scientific advisor. She has received honoraria from Bayer, Merck, and Genzyme for scientific lectures and has participated as a principal investigator in studies from Bayer, Teva-Tuteur, Novartis, Genzyme, Biogen, Sanofi, Teva, Roche, and Merck. E.C.C., P.A.L. J.P.P., and A.C. have received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, and other activities with Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, Roche, and Bayer. R.A. and O.G. have received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, and other activities from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Roche., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In multiple sclerosis demographics there is a well-known female prevalence and male patients have been less specifically evaluated in clinical studies, though some clinical differences have been reported between sexes., Objective: The objective of this study was to assess clinical and demographic differences between male and female patients included in the national Argentine MS Registry-RelevarEM., Material and Methods: This study was observational, retrospective, and was based on the data of 3099 MS patients included as of 04 April 2021. The statistical analysis plan included bivariate analyses with the crude data and also after adjustment for the MS phenotype, further categorized as progressive-onset MS or relapsing-onset MS. In the adjusted analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio was compared to the crude odds ratio, to account for the phenotype as a confounder., Results: The data from 1,074 (34.7%) men and 2,025 (65.3%) women with MS diagnosis were analysed. Males presented primary progressive disease two times more often than women (11% and 5%, respectively). In the crude analyses by sex, the presence of exclusively infratentorial lesions in the magnetic resonance imaging studies was more frequent in males than in females, but after adjustment by MS onset phenotype, such difference was only present in males with relapsing-onset MS (p = 0.00006). Similarly, worse Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were confirmed only in men with relapsing-onset disease after phenotype adjustment (p = 0.02)., Conclusion: We did not find any statistically significant clinical or demographic difference between sexes when the progressive MS phenotype was specifically considered. However, the differences we found between the clinical phenotypes are in line with the literature and highlight the importance of stratifying the analyses by sex and phenotype when designing MS studies., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: A period of diagnostic uncertainty often characterizes the clinical transition from relapsing to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS)., Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the length of time required to reclassify relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients who have clinically transitioned to SPMS (diagnosis uncertainty)., Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted in Argentina, identifying in every center all patients with diagnosis of MS who transitioned from RRMS to SPMS during the follow-up. We identified the dates of the last definitive RRMS and first definitive SPMS diagnoses for diagnostic uncertainty. The time required to reclassify RRMS who transitioned to SPMS and the time from disease onset to reclassify SPMS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: A total of 170 patients were included, where the mean age at disease onset (first symptom) was 36 ± 6 years; the length of time required to reclassify RRMS patients who transitioned to SPMS was 3.3 ± 1.1 years (range = 1-7 years); and the time from disease onset to classify SPMS was 19.4 ± 8.5 years (range = 16-35 years)., Conclusion: A period of diagnostic uncertainty regarding the transition from RRMS to SPMS was present in many of our patients, with a mean time of 3.3 years.

Background: Despite the abundance of information concerning ocrelizumab in phase III clinical trials, there is scarce evidence regarding real-world patient profiles., Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence with treatment among patients who used ocrelizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis in Latin America., Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study in Argentina, Chile and Mexico. Medical record databases on patients who received ocrelizumab were analyzed. Demographic and clinical variables were described, along with effectiveness outcomes, which included the proportions of patients free from clinical relapses, from disability progression and from new or enlarging T2 or T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, on annual magnetic resonance imaging., Results: A total of 81 patients were included. The most frequent phenotype was relapsing-remitting MS, in 64.2% of the patients. The mean age at study entry was 41.3 ± 12.0 years and 51.8% were women. A total of 38% had had relapse activity during the 12 months before starting on ocrelizumab, with a mean relapse rate of 1.3 ± 0.6 during that period. 75% were free from clinical relapses and 91% were free from gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the relapsing-remitting course. Ocrelizumab discontinuation during the first 12 months was observed in three patients (3.7%). The mean persistence observed during the first-year follow-up was 338 ± 24 days., Conclusions: Our study is in line with previous randomized clinical trials and recent real-world studies describing patient profiles, effectiveness and persistence regarding ocrelizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis patients in Latin America.

The objective was to evaluate the interval from first symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) to diagnosis with the introduction of MS diagnostic criteria in a Latin American (LATAM) population., Methods: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) completed a survey in 12 LATAM countries. Date of disease onset (first relapse) and date of diagnosis (confirmed disease) were required. Survival probabilities were evaluated for 5 diagnosis epoch groups: group 1: 1983-2000 Poser; group 2: 2001-2004 McDonald's first version; group 3: 2005-2009 revisions of 2005; group 4: 2010-2016 revisions of 2010; and group 5: 2017-2019 revisions of 2017., Results: 1188 (75.6% females) patients were included. Mean time from disease onset to diagnosis in group 1 was 21 ± 8 months; in group 2, 19 ± 7 months; in group 3, 16 ± 10 months; in group 4, 9.6 ± 8.5 months; and in group 5, 8.2 ± 10 months. Significant differences were observed between groups 1, 2, 3 vs. 4 and 5 (p<0.001), while no differences were observed between groups 4 and 5 (p=0.08)., Conclusion: We observed a significant shortening of time from MS onset to diagnosis with the adoption of new diagnostic criteria in LATAM., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative and inflammatory disease. The adaptation to MS depends on the effectiveness of coping, which moderates the process of adaptation and psychological well-being., Objectives: We aimed to analyze the coping strategies of an Argentinean population of patients with MS (PwMS) and their association with clinical variables and health-related quality of life (QoL)., Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Screening instruments: Demographics and clinical data, coping strategies (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced, [COPE-28]), health-related QoL (MS Impact Scale, [MSIS-29]), Fatigue Severity Scale, and physical disability (self-administrated Expanded Disability Status Scale, [EDSS])., Results: We included 249 PwMS. Most responders were female (74.7%) with a mean age at survey of 38.6 (±10.7) and had a MS duration of 7.3 years (range: 1-43 years) and a mean EDSS of 1.9 (±1.8). Younger age (r = -0.17), active MS (r = 0.25), higher fatigue (r = 0.22), MSIS-29 total (r = 0.34), MSIS-physical (r = 0.26), MSIS-psychological scores (r = 0.44), higher scores for perception of both severity of MS (r = 0.12) and wheelchair-dependency (r = 0.14) correlated significantly with the use of maladaptive coping strategies. However, active MS (β2.10, p = 0.01), MSIS-psychological score (β0.28, p < 0.0001), high education level (β - 1.15, p = 0.04), and EDSS (β - 0.84, p = 0.0001) were independent predictors of the utilization of maladaptive coping strategies after having applied multivariate analysis via linear regression., Conclusions: Maladaptive coping strategies used by PwMS are associated with relevant clinical aspects of the disease and with worse health-related QoL scores.

Introduction: Over the past decade, numerous disease modifying drugs (DMDs) for relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have been approved in Argentina. The use of oral DMDs (oDMDs) has increased in recent years, although real-life data in our region is limited. We aimed to describe the tendency in the use of oDMDs (as first treatment option or after switch) in relationship with their approval in Argentina., Methods: A retrospective study in a cohort of MS patients from five Argentinian MS centers was conducted. Regarding the availability of different oDMDs in Argentina, we define three periods (P1-3): P1: 2012 - 2014; P2: 2015 - 2017 and P3: 2018 - 2020. An analysis was performed comparing between these three periods to assess the tendency for oDMDs use over time., Result: The most frequently prescribed treatment as first DMD was: interferon beta 1a (40%) in P1, fingolimod (37.3%) in P2 and also fingolimod (35%) in P3. We found an increase in the use of oDMTs as initial treatment over time (P1: 17.7%, P2: 63.9% and P3: 65.0%; Chi-square = 41.9 p <0.01). We also found a tendency to increase the use of oDMTs after a first switch (P1: 45.5%, P2: 60.1% and P3 78.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that disease evolution (OR=1.06, p=0.04), and year of treatment initiation (OR=1.01 p<0.01) were independently associated with choice of oDMTs., Conclusion: This study identified an increasing tendency for the use of oDMDs as initial treatment of RMS in relationship with their approval in Argentina., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To investigate the frequency, phenotype, function, and longitudinal repertoire of mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) patients. Methods: Forty-five RRMS patients in remission, 20 RRMS patients experiencing exacerbations, 15 PPMS patients, and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were included in the study. MAIT cells were identified phenotypically as CD3 + TCRγδ - Vα7.2 + CD161 high . In 15 patients, MAIT cell number and MRI lesions were evaluated every 6 months, for 36 months. MAIT cell TCRVβ repertoire was defined using single-cell cloning and mRNA sequencing. Results: Circulating MAIT cells were significantly reduced in both RRMS and PPMS patients, particularly during exacerbations, compared to healthy subjects. This decrease was accompanied by pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-17, and GM-CSF). Three months post-exacerbation, peripheral blood MAIT cell percentages increased significantly along with clinical recovery. Likewise, we observed inverse correlation between MRI lesions and peripheral blood MAIT cell numbers. In paired samples, MAIT cell percentage was significantly higher in CSF than in peripheral blood, suggesting MAIT cell migration through the blood-brain barrier. Finally, MAIT cells showed limited TCRVβ repertoires, in both CSF and peripheral blood, which remained stable over time. Conclusions: MAIT cell levels correlated with MS course both clinically and radiologically, showing marked and sustained oligoclonality. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of pathophysiological phenomena underlying the course of MS, and discovery of MAIT cell inhibitors could pave the way for the development of new therapeutic strategies., (Copyright © 2019 Carnero Contentti, Farez and Correale.)

One of the biggest challenges in multiple sclerosis (MS) is the definition of treatment response/failure in order to optimize treatment decisions in affected patients. The objective of this consensus was to review how disease activity should be assessed and to propose recommendations on the identification of treatment failure in RRMS patients in Argentina., Methods: A panel of experts in neurology from Argentina, dedicated to the diagnosis and care of MS patients, gathered both virtually and in person during 2016 and 2017 to carry out a consensus recommendation on the identification of treatment failure in RRMS patients. To achieve consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used., Results: Recommendations were established based on published evidence and the expert opinion. Recommendations focused on disease management, disease activity markers and treatment failure identification were determined. Main consensus were: ≥2 relapses during the first year of treatment and/or ≥3 new or enlarged T2 or T1 GAD+ lesions and/or sustained increase of ≥2 points in EDSS or ≥100% in T25FW defines treatment failure in RRMS patients., Conclusions: The recommendations of this consensus guidelines attempts to optimize the health care and management of patients with MS in Argentina., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)