Search

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a degenerative disease of the central nervous system in which auto-immunity-induced demyelination occurs. MS is thought to be caused by a complex interplay of environmental and genetic risk factors. While most genetic studies have focused on identifying common genetic variants for MS through genome-wide association studies, the objective of the present study was to identify rare genetic variants contributing to MS susceptibility. We used whole exome sequencing (WES) followed by co-segregation analyses in nine multi-incident families with two to four affected individuals. WES was performed in 31 family members with and without MS. After applying a suite of selection criteria, co-segregation analyses for a number of rare variants selected from the WES results were performed, adding 24 family members. This approach resulted in 12 exonic rare variants that showed acceptable co-segregation with MS within the nine families, implicating the genes MBP , PLK1 , MECP2 , MTMR7 , TOX3 , CPT1A , SORCS1 , TRIM66 , ITPR3 , TTC28 , CACNA1F , and PRAM1 . Of these, three genes ( MBP , MECP2 , and CPT1A ) have been previously reported as carrying MS-related rare variants. Six additional genes ( MTMR7 , TOX3 , SORCS1 , ITPR3 , TTC28 , and PRAM1 ) have also been implicated in MS through common genetic variants. The proteins encoded by all twelve genes containing rare variants interact in a molecular framework that points to biological processes involved in (de-/re-)myelination and auto-immunity. Our approach provides clues to possible molecular mechanisms underlying MS that should be studied further in cellular and/or animal models.

Background: Since decision making about treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is preference sensitive, shared decision making between patient and healthcare professional should take place. Patient decision aids could support this shared decision making process by providing information about the disease and the treatment options, to elicit the patient's preference and to support patients and healthcare professionals in discussing these preferences and matching them with a treatment. Therefore, a prototype of a patient decision aid for MS patients in the Netherlands-based on the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) -was developed, following the recommendations of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. MCDA was chosen as it might reduce cognitive burden of considering treatment options and matching patient preferences with the treatment options., Results: After determining the scope to include DMDs labelled for relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome, users' informational needs were assessed using focus groups (N = 19 patients) and best-worst scaling surveys with patients (N = 185), neurologists and nurses (N = 60) to determine which information about DMDs should be included in the patient decision aid. Next, an online format and computer-based delivery of the patient decision aid was chosen to enable embedding of MCDA. A literature review was conducting to collect evidence on the effectiveness and burden of use of the DMDs. A prototype was developed next, and alpha testing to evaluate its comprehensibility and usability with in total thirteen patients and four healthcare professionals identified several issues regarding content and framing, methods for weighting importance of criteria in the MCDA structure, and the presentation of the conclusions of the patient decision aid ranking the treatment options according to the patient's preferences. Adaptations were made accordingly, but verification of the rankings provided, validation of the patient decision aid, evaluation of the feasibility of implementation and assessing its value for supporting shared decision making should be addressed in further development of the patient decision aid., Conclusion: This paper aimed to provide more transparency regarding the developmental process of an MCDA-based patient decision aid for treatment decisions for MS and the challenges faced during this process. Issues identified in the prototype were resolved as much as possible, though some issues remain. Further development is needed to overcome these issues before beta pilot testing with patients and healthcare professionals at the point of clinical decision-making can take place to ultimately enable making conclusions about the value of the MCDA-based patient decision aid for MS patients, healthcare professionals and the quality of care.

Objective: To determine whether natalizumab efficacy is maintained when switching to personalized extended interval dosing based on individual natalizumab trough concentrations in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)., Methods: This was a prospective multicenter single-arm trial with 1 year follow-up and a 1-year extension phase. Participants were adult persons with RRMS treated with natalizumab without disease activity in the year prior to enrollment. The natalizumab treatment interval was based on longitudinal natalizumab trough concentrations. Patients received 3 monthly MRI scans, relapse assessments, and disability scoring during follow-up. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on MRI. Secondary endpoints were new/enlarging T2 lesions on MRI and relapses and progression on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) during follow-up and extension phase., Results: Sixty-one patients were included. Eighty-four percent extended the interval from a 4-week interval to a 5- to 7-week interval. No patient developed gadolinium-enhancing lesions (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-7.4%) during follow-up. No new/enlarging T2 lesions (95% CI 0%-7.4%) or relapses (95% CI 0%-7.4%) were reported during follow-up and in the extension phase. Median EDSS was comparable at baseline (3.0, interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-5.0) and after follow-up (3.0, IQR 2.0-5.0)., Conclusion: Personalized extended interval dosing did not induce recurrence of MS disease activity. Natalizumab efficacy was maintained in stable patients with RRMS receiving personalized extended interval dosing based on individual natalizumab concentrations., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that personalized extended interval dosing of natalizumab does not result in recurrence of disease activity in stable patients with RRMS., (© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.)

Approximately 34-65% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are confronted with cognitive problems sooner or later. These include problems with the speed of information processing, memory, attention and executive functioning. Cognitive problems in patients with MS are currently often not examined on a routine basis and therefore remain unrecognised, or are not recognised in time. This may have a negative impact on their work and lead to social problems. In this article, we talk about the importance of early recognition of cognitive problems in patients with MS. Routine questioning about cognitive problems and the use of a short screening test are first steps in the right direction.

Peter Joseph Jongen,1,2 Wim A Lemmens,3 Raymond Hupperts,4 Erwin LJ Hoogervorst,5 Hans M Schrijver,6 Astrid Slettenaar,7 Els L de Schryver,8 Jan Boringa,9 Esther van Noort,10 Rogier Donders3 1Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University Groningen, Groningen, 2MS4 Research Institute, 3Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, 4Department of Neurology, Zuijderland Medisch Centrum Sittard, Sittard, 5Department of Neurology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, 6Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, 7Department of Neurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, 8Department of Neurology, Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Leiderdorp, 9Department of Neurology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, 10Curavista BV, Geertruidenberg, the Netherlands Background: In multiple sclerosis patients, the persistence of, and adherence to, disease-modifying treatment are often insufficient. The degree of persistence and adherence may relate to the care received from various disciplines. Methods: In an observational study of 203 patients treated with glatiramer acetate 20 mg subcutaneous daily, we assess the persistence and adherence in relation to the amount of care received in various disciplines. The frequencies and durations of care per discipline were reported by patients online, as were missed doses and eventual treatment discontinuation. The associations between the care provided by neurologists, nurses, psychologists, pharmacists, and rehabilitative doctors and persistence and adherence were the primary outcomes; the associations between care received from general practitioners, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, social workers, dieticians, home caregivers, informal caregivers, other medical specialists, and other caregivers and persistence and adherence were secondary outcomes. Results: It was found that the 12-month persistence rate was 62% and that 85% of the persistent patients were 95% adherent (missed

Objective: To validate the newly developed Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) in a large, well characterized, independent group of MS patients by investigating the relation between the MSIS-29 and the Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the MS Functional Composite (MSFC). Methods: Two hundred MS patients were recruited at our outpatient department. At the same visit GNDS, EDSS, MSFC and MSIS-29 were assessed. Data obtained from GNDS, EDSS and MSFC assessment were compared to both physical and psychological impact scores of the MSIS-29. In addition the contribution of GNDS subcategories, EDSS functional systems and MSFC components to the physical and psychological impact scores of the MSIS-29 was studied. Results: Median scores were 37.5 for the physical and 22.2 for the psychological impact score of the MSIS-29, 13.0 for GNDS and 4.0 for EDSS. Mean MSFC was 0.07. The physical impact score showed good correlations with both GNDS (0.79) and EDSS (0.68) and a moderate correlation with the MSFC ( (-0.53). The psychological impact score showed weak correlations with EDSS (0.22) and MSFC ( (-0.30) and a moderately strong correlation with the GNDS (0.58). In 50 (25%) patients, scores on physical and psychological impact scales diverted, i. e., a relative high score on one scale combined with a relative low score on the other scale. This was related to the clinical disease course. Conclusion: Our study supports the use of the MSIS-29 as a measure for the assessment of physical impact of MS on normal daily life. In addition, our data provides a deeper understanding of the factors that determine both physical and psychological disease impact. Discrepancies between the latter two aspects deserve further attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients develop varying degrees of cerebral atrophy, which may already begin at disease onset. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of steroid treatment on cerebral volume in MS patients. Methods: Thirty-five MS patients participating in a clinical trial of oral interferon beta, which included monthly MRI, were included in this study. They suffered from an acute relapse and were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (IV-MP); 13 of the patients were treated with oral prednisolone tapering after IV-MP. The last MRI scan before and the first (and second for oral tapering patients) scan after IV-MP treatment were used for measuring parenchymal fraction (PF) and ventricular fraction (VF). Changes in PF and VF were analysed using Student's t test. Results: For the total population no significant changes in PF or VF were found. However, the subgroup of patients receiving oral tapering after IV-MP showed changes, compatible with atrophy in both PF and VF, that were significant immediately after IV-MP treatment and still persisted (though not statistically significant anymore) after a mean interval of 30 days. The magnitude of these changes was about the same as the annual change in cerebral volume as reported in natural history studies. Conclusion: Our data indicate that short courses of intravenous steroids (restricted to three or five days) have no major impact, whereas prolonged treatment with oral tapering does significantly affect brain volume. These findings are important for longitudinal studies and clinical trials in which brain volume is used as an outcome measure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]