Search

Oba, K, Samukawa, M, Nakamura, K, Mikami, K, Suzumori, Y, Ishida, Y, Keeler, N, Saitoh, H, Yamanaka, M, and Tohyama, H. Influence of constant torque stretching at different stretching intensities on flexibility and mechanical properties of plantar flexors. J Strength Cond Res 35(3): 709-714, 2021-The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of constant torque stretching (CTS) at different stretching intensities on the maximal range of motion (ROM) and muscle-tendon unit (MTU) stiffness of plantar flexors. Fourteen healthy men performed 4 trials of differing stretch intensities: no stretching (control), 50, 75, and 100%. Stretch intensity was defined as maximum passive resistive torque predetermined at a familiarization trial. Each stretch trial consisted of 5 sets of 60-second CTS at the designated stretch intensity. Both maximal ROM and passive resistive torque were assessed during passive dorsiflexion, and MTU stiffness was calculated using the torque-angle curves measured before and after CTS. There were no significant differences in maximal ROM or MTU stiffness at the baseline condition. After the intervention, significantly greater maximal ROM and significantly lower MTU stiffness were observed in the 100% CTS condition than the control condition, whereas there were no significant differences between the submaximal intensity condition (i.e., 50 or 75% intensity) and the control condition. Therefore, our findings suggest that maximal intensity stretching is the most effective approach for improving both flexibility and MTU stiffness with CTS.

The different effects of intermittent and continuous stretching on the mechanical properties of the musculotendinous complex have been unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of intermittent and continuous stretching for the same duration on the range of motion (ROM), passive resistive torque (PRT), and musculotendinous stiffness (MTS) of ankle plantar flexors. Eighteen healthy young men participated in the study. Intermittent (four sets × 30 s) and continuous stretching (one set × 120 s) were performed in random orders on two separate days. Both stretching protocols were conducted using a dynamometer with a constant torque applied. ROM and PRT were determined using a dynamometer, and MTS was calculated using the torque–angle relationship measured before and after stretching. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was performed for all parameters. Both intermittent and continuous stretching significantly increased ROM and decreased PRT and MTS (p &lt, 0.05). Intermittent stretching led to greater changes in ROM and PRT than continuous stretching. However, the reduction in MTS did not differ between the two conditions. These results suggest that intermittent stretching is more effective in increasing ROM and changing the mechanical properties of the musculotendinous complex.

Objectives: To investigate the knee flexor torque-angle curve after hamstring strain injury using different muscle action types and angular velocities. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Controlled laboratory. Participants: Thirteen collegiate athletes injured hamstring strain (21.0 +/- 0.8 years; 173.9 +/- 6.5 cm; 70.1 +/- 10.5 kg). Main outcome measures: Concentric and eccentric knee flexor torque was measured at 60 & 300 degrees/sec. Peak torque and average torque every 10 degrees were determined from torque-angle curve and injured side was compared with non-injured side. Results: No significant differences were found in the concentric muscle actions. However, the eccentric peak torque was significantly lower on the injured side at 60 degrees/sec (p = 0.048) and at 300 degrees/sec (p = 0.002). The average eccentric torque was significantly lower on the injured side at 60 degrees/sec from 10 degrees to 20 degrees of knee flexion (p = 0.012-0.018) and at 300 degrees/sec from 10 degrees to 60 degrees of knee flexion (p = 0.005-0.049). Conclusion: The knee flexor torque-angle curve changes with eccentric muscle action after hamstring injury. Eccentric torque declines were close to full knee extension at 60 degrees/sec and a wide range of knee flexion at 300 degrees/sec. The assessment and rehabilitation of eccentric hamstring strength may be important to consider the effect of the angular velocity after hamstring strain injury. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Jump performance is affected by warm-up intensity and body temperature, but the time course effects have not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate time course effects on jump performance after warm-up at different intensities. Nine male athletes (age: 20.9 ± 1.0 years; height: 1.75 ± 0.03 m; weight: 66.4 ± 6.3 kg; mean ± SD) volunteered for this study. The participants performed three warm-ups at different intensities: 15 min at 80% VO(2) max, 15 min at 60% VO(2) max, and no warm-up (control). After each warm-up, counter movement jump (CMJ) height, vastus lateralis temperature, heart rate and subjective fatigue level were measured at three intervals: immediately after warm-up, 10 min after, and 20 min after, respectively. Significant main effects and interactions were found for muscle temperature (intensity: p < 0.01, η(2)(p) = 0.909; time: p < 0.01, η(2)(p) = 0.898; interaction: p < 0.01, η(2)(p) = 0.917). There was a significant increase of muscle temperature from the baseline after warm-up, which lasted for 20 min after warm-up with 80% VO(2) max and 60% VO(2) max (p < 0.01). Muscle temperature was significantly higher with warm-up at 80% VO(2) max than other conditions (P < 0.01). Significant main effects and interactions for CMJ height were found (intensity: p < 0.01, η(2)(p) = 0.762; time: p < 0.01, η(2)(p) = 0.810; interaction: p < 0.01, η(2)(p) = 0.696). Compared with the control conditions, CMJ height after 80% VO(2) max and 60% VO(2) max warm-ups were significantly higher (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). CMJ height at 20 min after warm-up was significantly higher for 80% VO(2) max warm-up than for 60% VO(2) max warm-up (p < 0.01). However, CMJ height at 10 min after 60% VO(2) max warm-up was not significantly different from the baseline (p < 0.05). These results showed that both high and moderate intensity warm-up can maintain an increase in muscle temperature for 20 min. Jump performance after high-intensity warm-up was increased for 20 min compared to a moderate intensity warm-up.