Search

A metabotropic glutamate receptor coupled to phospholipase D (PLD‐mGluR) was discovered in the hippocampus over three decades ago. Its pharmacology and direct linkage to PLD activation are well established and indicate it is a highly atypical glutamate receptor. A receptor with the same pharmacology is present in spindle primary sensory terminals where its blockade can totally abolish, and its activation can double, the normal stretch‐evoked firing. We report here the first identification of this PLD‐mGluR protein, by capitalizing on its expression in primary mechanosensory terminals, developing an enriched source, pharmacological profiling to identify an optimal ligand, and then functionalizing it as a molecular tool. Evidence from immunofluorescence, western and far‐western blotting indicates PLD‐mGluR is homomeric GluK2, since GluK2 is the only glutamate receptor protein/receptor subunit present in spindle mechanosensory terminals. Its expression was also found in the lanceolate palisade ending of hair follicle, also known to contain the PLD‐mGluR. Finally, in a mouse model with ionotropic function ablated in the GluK2 subunit, spindle glutamatergic responses were still present, confirming it acts purely metabotropically. We conclude the PLD‐mGluR is a homomeric GluK2 kainate receptor signalling purely metabotropically and it is common to other, perhaps all, primary mechanosensory endings. What is the central question of this study?The metabotropic glutamate receptor coupled to phospholipase D (PLD‐mGluR) is a glutamate receptor previously only characterized pharmacologically but essential for maintaining stretch responsiveness in muscle spindle mechanosensory primary endings: what is the PLD‐mGluR protein?What is the main finding and its importance?PLD‐mGluR was identified as a homomeric GluK2 receptor signalling metabotropically. This identifies PLD‐mGluR 30 years after its discovery. This is important because: PLD‐mGluR is essential for muscle spindle stretch sensitivity; it is the first native kainate receptor shown to signal solely metabotropically; and, as it is the only GluR expressed in spindle mechanosensory endings, muscle spindles make a good functional assay of the native receptor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent single-cell transcriptome analyses have defined the molecular correlates of mouse proprioceptor subtypes innervating different muscles and end-organ receptors. Proprioceptor muscle subtypes present distinct molecular profiles according to the identity of the muscle they innervate and express gene programs involved in the control of target selectivity. Transcriptional profiling of proprioceptor receptor subtypes reveals up to seven molecularly distinct muscle spindle afferents, but only a single class of Golgi tendon organs, suggesting a higher need for precisely calibrated spindle feedback. Proprioceptor muscle-type identity becomes apparent concomitantly with muscle innervation, while receptor-type appears to be defined after end-organ innervation, indicating a differential reliance on intrinsic and extrinsic signals. The developmental dynamic of molecular identities suggests that proprioceptors undergo plastic changes in gene expression that reflect the needs of their different functional states. Proprioception, the sense of body position in space, has a critical role in the control of posture and movement. Aside from skin and joint receptors, the main sources of proprioceptive information in tetrapods are mechanoreceptive end organs in skeletal muscle: muscle spindles (MSs) and Golgi tendon organs (GTOs). The sensory neurons that innervate these receptors are divided into subtypes that detect discrete aspects of sensory information from muscles with different biomechanical functions. Despite the importance of proprioceptive neurons in motor control, the developmental mechanisms that control the acquisition of their distinct functional properties and positional identity are not yet clear. In this review, we discuss recent findings on the development of mouse proprioceptor subtypes and challenges in defining them at the molecular and functional level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The generation of an internal body model and its continuous update is essential in sensorimotor control. Although known to rely on proprioceptive sensory feedback, the underlying mechanism that transforms this sensory feedback into a dynamic body percept remains poorly understood. However, advances in the development of genetic tools for proprioceptive circuit elements, including the sensory receptors, are beginning to offer new and unprecedented leverage to dissect the central pathways responsible for proprioceptive encoding. Simultaneously, new data derived through emerging bionic neural machine–interface technologies reveal clues regarding the relative importance of kinesthetic sensory feedback and insights into the functional proprioceptive substrates that underlie natural motor behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proprioceptive feedback from Group Ia/II muscle spindle afferents and Group Ib Golgi tendon afferents is critical for the normal execution of most motor tasks, yet how these distinct proprioceptor subtypes emerge during development remains poorly understood. Using molecular genetic approaches in mice of either sex, we identified 24 transcripts that have not previously been associated with a proprioceptor identity. Combinatorial expression analyses of these markers reveal at least three molecularly distinct proprioceptor subtypes. In addition, we find that 12 of these transcripts are expressed well after proprioceptors innervate their respective sensory receptors, and expression of three of these markers, including the heart development molecule Hegl, is significantly reduced in mice that lack muscle spindles. These data reveal He1 as a putative marker for proprioceptive muscle spindle afferents. Moreover, they suggest that the phenotypic specialization of functionally distinct proprioceptor subtypes depends, in part, on extrinsic sensory receptor organ-derived signals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]