Search

5-Azacytidine is an effective therapy in high risk MDS and oligoblastic AML. This "real life" analysis was made on 185 patients treated with 5-azacytidine in 10 centers afferent to REL ("Rete Ematologica Lombarda"), a network in Lombardia region. The aim was to assess the influence of disease and comorbidity risk assessments on the survival. The results confirm the utility of 5-azacitidine in prolonging OS regardless of advanced age and the presence of comorbidities. They also encourage an early treatment since patients with IPSS-R High risk MDS have better outcome with respect to Very High risk ones. According to the IPSS cytogenetic risk, there was no difference in the outcome between Intermediate and High risk patients. Nevertheless, a poorer cytogenetic risk, according to the IPSS-R cytogenetic stratification, negatively influenced the outcome., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The medullar blast count is a milestone in the prognostic assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The optical microscopy (OM) may sometimes be inaccurate in this disease. The aim of this work is to test the flow immunocytometric (FCM) determinations of medullar immature cells (CD45(±) ) and the expression, among them, of CD33, CD34, and CD117 markers, for their prognostic relevance., Methods: In a retrospective analysis of 98 patients affected by MDS, the IPSS was re-calculated by means of the FCM determination of blasts. Survival of patients at low or intermediate-1 IPSS risk was compared with the survival of patients at intermediate-2 or high IPSS risk. In the 64 cases with OM blast count lower than 5%, the survival of patients with the FCM count of medullar blasts ≤2% was compared with that of patients with FCM count >2%., Results: Each single marker had a prognostic weight comparable to the optical blast count. The FCM blast count was particularly efficient in distinguishing the risk of having up to 2% or more than 2% of blasts in patients without OM excess of blasts., Conclusion: This method is interesting as prognostic tool, especially in patients without excess of blast., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

To analyze the unpredicted event of hematological improvement (HI) during iron-chelation therapy (ICT), we reviewed a series of 53 myelodysplastic patients with transfusion dependency in a retrospective study involving 8 centers afferent to the "Rete Ematologica Lombarda". According to the IWG response criteria published in the year 2000, we observed erythroid responses in 19 patients (35.1%), 5 major (9.2%) and 14 minor (25.9%). In the assessable patients, platelet response was 8/13 (61%) and neutrophil response was 13/17 (76.4%). Only in patients with erythroid improvement, multilineage responses were observed. Apparently, patients with greater erythropoiesis dysfunction may take more advantage., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The Hellström-Lindberg score (HLS) (1997) is designed to predict erythroid response to erythropoietin treatment in myelodysplastic patients. In order to test the validity of this scoring system, 58 patients affected by myelodysplastic syndrome, treated with a "standard dose" approach between 2001 and 2010, were analyzed. The response to erythropoietin treatment was evaluated in accordance with the "international working group" (IWG) criteria. Among the patients only two were scored "poor," 12 "intermediate," and 44 "good" (15 of whom were scored "3" and 29 "4"). Although the system was verified as a predictive tool for response to erythropoietin therapy, we noted that of patients scored as "good," those with a numerical score of "4" responded more frequently than did those scored "3", as evaluated under both the 2006- and 2000-IWG ("major response") criteria. The modest response rate in patients scoring "3" did not show a difference in response rate in comparison to the "intermediate" group. The present data suggest that only patients scoring "4" on the scale may show an adequate response to the standard dose erythropoietin therapy, while frontline high-dose therapy should be offered to other patients. A further analysis considering endogenous erythropoietin as a possible determinant of response revealed the optimal cut-off value of 80 mIU/mL, instead of the value of 100 mIU/mL utilized by the HLS.

We studied circulating (C)CD34(+) cells by flow cytometry in 96 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) at diagnosis, and in a subset of 35 cases during follow-up. CCD34(+) counts were stratified within both International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and World Health Organization (WHO) categories. Counts >10/microl were associated with poorer leukemia-free survival, a prognostic value for evolution independent from that of WHO, and a higher progression probability within intermediate-risk IPSS and WHO classes. When serial measurements were performed, counts >10/microl more frequently correlated to evolution. Separating newly diagnosed patients on the basis of 10/microl cut-off of circulating CD34(+) cells retains prognostic utility, especially in intermediate-risk MDS.

Background and Objectives: Novel therapeutic agents and strategies have been introduced into the management of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the last years. This has led to more treatment options and a better chance of long-term survival for MDS patients, but also to uncertainty regarding the optimal use and possible side effects of these treatments. The Italian Society of Hematology commissioned a project to develop guidelines for the therapy of MDS using evidence-based knowledge and consensus-formation techniques., Design and Methods: An Advisory Council (AC) shaped the project around a series of key clinical questions, performed a systematic search for evidence and graded the available evidence according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). A list of clinical questions was mailed to each of 10 senior hematologists composing the Expert Panel (EP): the panelists were asked to rank the most relevant questions, and to formulate answers to the questions according to the tables of evidence. A scenario phase followed, so as to reach a consensus on the three top ranked questions. The EP was asked to score patient profiles as appropriate or not appropriate for the therapeutic strategy under scrutiny, according to the RAND technique. Finally, from September 2001 to January 2002, four Consensus Conferences conducted according to the Nominal Group Technique were held in Milan, Italy. The overall goal of the conferences was to take a final decision upon the appropriateness of the uncertain scenarios and of the uncertain responses to the clinical questions., Results: Evidence was judged sufficient for providing recommendations on the use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, leukemia-like chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, low-dose chemotherapy, danazol, immunosuppressive therapy, hypomethylating agents and hematopoietic growth factors. Specific recommendations for supportive therapy, including iron chelation, were issued. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was unanimously considered as the only curative treatment for MDS patients, and recommendations on its use were agreed based on patient's age, risk, clinical features and donor availability. AML-like chemotherapy was also considered a valuable therapeutic option for subsets of MDS patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation was recommended for patients who lack an HLA identical donor and have achieved complete remission with AML-like chemotherapy. Decitabine, recombinant human erythropoietin and immunosuppressive therapy were judged valuable therapeutic options for subsets of MDS patients whereas low-dose cytarabine was not. Specific therapeutic strategies for those subjects younger than 18 years or older than 75 years and the strategy of watchful waiting were decided by patient-oriented questions., Interpretation and Conclusions: Using evidence and consensus, recommendations for the treatment of MDS were issued. Statements were graded according to the strength of the supporting evidence and uncertainty was explicitly declared.

Abstract: We studied circulating (C)CD34+ cells by flow cytometry in 96 patients with myelodisplastic syndromes (MDS) at diagnosis, and in a subset of 35 cases during follow-up. CCD34+ counts were stratified within both International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and World Health Organization (WHO) categories. Counts >10/μl were associated with poorer leukemia-free survival, a prognostic value for evolution independent from that of WHO, and a higher progression probability within intermediate-risk IPSS and WHO classes. When serial measurements were performed, counts >10/μl more frequently correlated to evolution. Separating newly diagnosed patients on the basis of 10/μl cut-off of circulating CD34+ cells retains prognostic utility, especially in intermediate-risk MDS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]