Search

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy with historically poor outcomes and no worldwide consensus treatment approach. Unique among most hematologic malignancies for its frequent cutaneous involvement, BPDCN can also invade other extramedullary compartments, including the central nervous system. Generally affecting older adults, many patients are unfit to receive intensive chemotherapy, and although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is preferred for younger, fit individuals, not all are eligible. One recent therapeutic breakthrough is that all BPDCNs express CD123 (IL3Rα) and that this accessible surface marker can be pharmacologically targeted. The first-in-class agent for BPDCN, tagraxofusp, which targets CD123, was approved in December 2018 in the United States for patients with BPDCN aged ≥2 years. Despite favorable response rates in the frontline setting, many patients still relapse in the setting of monotherapy, and outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory BPDCN remain dismal. Therefore, novel approaches targeting both CD123 and other targets are actively being investigated. To begin to formally address the state of the field, we formed a new collaborative initiative, the North American BPDCN Consortium (NABC). This group of experts, which includes a multidisciplinary panel of hematologists/oncologists, hematopoietic stem cell transplant physicians, pathologists, dermatologists, and pediatric oncologists, was tasked with defining the current standard of care in the field and identifying the most important research questions and future directions in BPDCN. The position findings of the NABC's inaugural meetings are presented herein., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a hematologic malignancy associated with overexpression of CD123. Allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) directed against CD123 in BPDCN have been studied in clinical trials. We performed post-mortem analysis of a patient treated with anti-CD123 CAR-T to elucidate cause of death, development of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and tissue distribution of UCART123 cells., Methods: A post-mortem multidisciplinary clinicopathologic analysis was performed with digital droplet polymerase chain reaction of isolated blood and tissue ribonucleic acid (RNA) to evaluate tissue distribution of infused CAR-T. Multiparameter flow cytometry for detection of CAR-T was used for whole blood samples. Cytokine levels in plasma were measured using multiplex bead assay. Gene expression profiling on isolated RNA was performed using semi-custom Nanostring immune gene panel and RNA-sequence method. RNA in situ hybridization was performed using CAR-specific probe., Results: The patient developed severe clinical CRS refractory to corticosteroids, tocilizumab, and lymphodepletion. Despite significant reduction in BPDCN lesions, the patient passed away on day 9 of CAR-T. Autopsy results show that following lymphodepletion and UCART123 administration, the patient remained severely lymphopenic with few UCART123 cells detected, predominantly localized to spleen., Conclusions: No definitive cause of death was determined, but we hypothesized that the patient may have succumbed to CAR-T-mediated cardiopulmonary toxicity. UCART123 cells displayed low overall distribution, with predominance in immune organs and tissues. Mechanism of CRS development is still poorly understood in patients receiving CAR-T therapy. Future directions in the field developing CD123-targeted agents in BPDCN are discussed., Competing Interests: Disclosure of Conflict of Interest M Konopleva: Consulting/honorarium: AbbVie, Genentech, F. Hoffman La-Roche, Stemline Therapeutics, Amgen, Forty-Seven, and Kisoji. Research funding/clinical trials support: AbbVie, Genentech, F. Hoffman La-Roche, Eli Lilly, Cellectis, Calithera, Ablynx, Stemline Therapeutics, Agios, Ascentage, and Astra Zeneca. Stock options/Royalties: Reata Pharmaceutical. N Pemmaraju: Consulting/honorarium: Celgene, Stemline, Incyte Corporation, Novartis, MustangBio, Roche Diagnostics, and LFB. Research funding/clinical trials support from Stemline, Novartis, Abbvie, Samus, Cellectis, Plexxikon, Daiichi-Sankyo, Affymetrix, and SagerStrong Foundation. M Guzman: Consulting/honorarium: SeqRx. Research funding: AI Therapeutics, TemedOn, Cellectis. S Neelapu: Consulting fees or honorarium from Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene Therapeutics, Athenex, Incyte, Precision Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Adicet Bio, Calibr, Unum Therapeutics, Bluebird Bio, Sana Biotechnology, Caribou, Astellas Pharma, Sellas Life Sciences; research funding from Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Poseida, Cellectis, Celgene, Karus Therapeutics, Unum Therapeutics (Cogent Biosciences), Allogene, Precision BioSciences, Acerta and Adicet Bio; royalty income from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; stock options from Longbow Immunotherapy; and patents related to cell therapy. MG Frattini: Employment and Equity ownership: Cellectis, Inc. A Garton: Employment and Equity ownership: Cellectis, Inc. J. Smith: Employment and Equity ownership: Cellectis, S.A., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy arising from precursor dendritic cells. BPDCN cells characteristically express several markers on their cell surfaces including CD123, CD4, and CD56. Because of its rarity and challenging clinical presentation, there was no standard of care in managing BPDCN for decades and its prognosis overall was poor. However, as understanding of this rare neoplasm has increased, so have treatment options. The conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens once used in the treatment of BPDCN were modest in their impact on disease relapse until paired with hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Although recent data suggest that there still remains a role for chemotherapeutic agents, targeted modalities have expanded the overall BPDCN treatment landscape. The CD123-targeted agent, tagraxofusp, was the first Food and Drug Administration-approved monotherapy in the treatment of BPDCN. Since its inception, several CD123-targeted and other cell-surface agents have been investigated, with many agents still in the preclinical stages. Although relapsed/refractory disease and central nervous system disease both remain formidable areas of research, there are several promising therapeutic approaches that could have a significant impact on the trajectory of treatment. This review will provide detailed insight on the novel drugs currently in use and those being explored in the management of BPDCN., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a clinically aggressive blood cancer, often involving the skin, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and central nervous system (CNS) in 20% to 30% of patients. Despite significant progress in CD123- and BCL-2-targeted therapy, most patients are not cured without hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and CNS relapses occur quite frequently. Combination approaches with targeted and chemotherapy agents plus incorporation of prophylactic CNS-directed therapy are urgently needed. In this setting, we sought to analyze outcomes using the cytotoxic chemotherapy backbone regimen hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (HCVAD). We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with BPDCN (n = 100), evaluating complete remission (CR) and median overall survival (OS) among 3 groups: those who received frontline HCVAD-based therapy (n = 35), SL-401 (n = 37), or other regimens (n = 28). HCVAD-based regimens yielded higher CR (80% vs 59% vs 43%; P = .01). There was no significant difference in OS (28.3 vs 13.7 vs 22.8 months; P = .41) or remission duration probability among treatment groups (38.6 vs not reached vs 10.2 months; P = .24). HSCT was performed in 51% vs 49% vs 38%, respectively (P = .455). These results suggest a continued important role for HCVAD-based chemotherapy in BPDCN, even in the modern targeted-therapy era, with high CR rates in the frontline setting. Further studies must establish the clinical activity, feasibility, and safety of doublet/triplet combinations of targeted therapies plus cytotoxic agents and the addition of CNS prophylaxis, with the ultimate goal of durable long-term remission for patients with BPDCN., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Introduction: Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive hematologic malignancy with historically poor outcomes for patients, often refractory to traditional chemotherapy. Recent research has focused on targeted therapy to improve responses and limit potential toxicity., Areas Covered: CD123 (also known as IL-3 Rα) is a cell surface marker and attractive therapeutic target for many myeloid malignancies, particularly BPDCN, whose cells ubiquitously overexpress CD123. We review the history of CD123 research regarding BPDCN, recent advances including FDA approval of tagraxofusp (formerly SL-401) for BPDCN, and ongoing clinical studies utilizing novel therapeutic strategies to target CD123., Expert Opinion: The approval of tagraxofusp for the treatment of BPDCN in December 2018 drastically changed the treatment landscape for patients with this rare neoplasm. While tagraxofusp is better tolerated than traditional multi-agent chemotherapy regimens, it requires close monitoring and sound clinical judgment by providers to prevent and mitigate severe treatment-related complications with special attention to the recognition and management of capillary leak syndrome (CLS). Several other promising strategies for targeting CD123 in BPDCN are currently under investigation, including antibody-drug conjugates, T-cell engagers, and CAR-T cellular therapeutics. These CD123 targeted approaches may soon become standard of care for patients with this difficult to treat malignancy.

There is growing Internet and social media use among patients with rare blood cancers, notably myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). A 38-item online questionnaire was developed to assess patients' ( n  = 983) disease understanding and use of online resources regarding MPN. Many responders (74%) reported unawareness of additional mutations beyond their primary molecular marker(s); 32% were unsure of their prognostic risk stratification. Additionally, 89% reported using online resources (Facebook (61%); Google/Google+ (42%); YouTube (34%); blogs (26%); Twitter (5%)) to seek information about MPN. Despite this, results showed many gaps in patients' basic disease knowledge. Our findings suggest an important difference in social media habits between physicians and patients: physicians are rapidly adopting Twitter as their preferred medium for sharing medical knowledge; however, patients often prefer other social mediums. Educational campaigns should be designed in more personalized ways, aiming to fit a variety of online platforms to maximize reach and impact for patients with MPN.