Search

The cardioprotective efficacy of the pyrazolinone-piperidine dipeptide growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) CP-424,391 was studied in an in vivo rabbit model of ischemia and reperfusion. CP-424,391 was administered at 25 mg/kg p.o. x 7 days. Ischemia was induced by left coronary artery occlusion for 30 min, after which the heart was reperfused for 2 h. At the end of reperfusion, animals were euthanized and the infarct size was determined. The area at risk of infarct was not different between the control (45.8+/-3.7%, n=6) and CP-424,391-treated groups (36.9+/-4.3%, n=11). The infarct size of the control animals was 49.5+/-7.1% and was significantly (P<0.05) lower in the CP-424,391-treated group (infarct size=17.3+/-3.0). There was a trend, albeit not significant, for the left ventricular function to recover to a greater extent in CP-424,391-treated rabbits. Thus, the treatment of rabbits for 7 days with CP-424,391 was cardioprotective against ischemia/reperfusion injury.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different administration protocols on the cardioprotective efficacy of the non-selective, irreversible caspase inhibitors N-benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone (zVAD.fmk) and bocaspartyl-(OMe)-fluoromethylketone (BocD.fmk) in a rat in vivo ischemia and reperfusion paradigm. Hearts were made ischemic for 45 min and reperfused for 180 min. Under these conditions, it was determined that zVAD.fmk was cardioprotective when administered before or after the onset of ischemia, whereas BocD.fmk was efficacious only when administered before the onset of ischemia. This is the first report of in vivo cardioprotection by a caspase inhibitor when administered after the onset of ischemia.

Cardioprotective effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and ramiprilat were studied in two in vivo canine models of myocardial ischemic injury: 90 min of regional ischemia with 18 h reperfusion (protocol I) and 6 h of continuous ischemia without reperfusion (protocol II). In protocol I, neither ramiprilat (50 micrograms/kg) nor captopril (5 mg/kg + 0.25 mg/kg/h) reduced infarct size after 18 h of reperfusion (vs. controls). In protocol II, drugs were administered directly into both left anterior descending coronary artery and left circumflex branch. Compared to controls, continuous intracoronary administration of ramiprilat (40 ng/kg/min) or captopril (400 ng/kg/min) did not reduce infarct size. Thus neither captopril nor ramiprilat protected the heart from injury under conditions of ischemia with reperfusion or ischemia without reperfusion.

This review describes methodologies used to study experimental myocardial ischemic and reperfusion injury. Myocardial reperfusion injury may be manifest as myocardial stunning, ventricular arrhythmias, coronary vascular dysfunction, or the extension of the area of myocyte necrosis beyond that due to the ischemic insult alone. This review discusses methodology pertaining to the latter form of reperfusion injury. The pathophysiology of the reperfusion injury process is complex, including primarily cellular and humoral components of inflammation, as well as myocellular ionic and metabolic disturbances. Since the extent of injury may be influenced by methodological considerations this review aims to discuss the principle means of characterizing reperfusion injury in the experimental setting. The methods discussed are principally those related to in vivo research. Where appropriate, advantages, disadvantages, or alternate methods will be presented. Lastly, as understanding of the pathophysiology of reperfusion injury increases, newer techniques utilizing murine models, the study of apoptotic cell death, and the role of gender may be used more frequently and are thus briefly reviewed.

We assessed ranolazine's potential to reduce myocardial injury resulting from 90-min occlusion and 18-h reperfusion of left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) in anesthetized dogs. Ranolazine, a putative antianginal agent, has exhibited positive results in a variety of experimental models associated with the ischemic myocardium. Previous studies demonstrated that ranolazine possesses a mechanism of action involving increases in the amount of active pyruvate dehydrogenase during ischemia, suggesting that the compound may act to promote glucose utilization. Ranolazine was administered as a bolus of 3.3 mg/kg, followed by a constant infusion of 7.2 mg/kg/h for 20 h. The loading dose was administered 30 min before LCX occlusion. Control animals received appropriate volumes of vehicles (loading and infusion). Hemodynamics were unchanged between ranolazine and vehicle groups. Three animals in each group were excluded because of ventricular fibrillation (VF). There was no difference in degree of ST segment change between control and ranolazine-treated groups at any time during LCX occlusion. The area at risk (AAR) of infarct was 40.1 +/- 1.7 and 38.9 +/- 1.3% in control-treated (n = 13) and randolazine-treated (n = 8) animals, respectively (p = 0.631). Myocardial infarct size (IS) was 31.7 +/- 5.2 and 36.6 +/- 8.5% in control and ranolazine-treated animals, respectively (p = 0.603). No significant changes were observed in plasma content of enzymatic markers at 0.5, 2.0, and 18.0 h of reperfusion. The results of this in vivo study indicate that ranolazine did not provide protection from injury to regionally ischemic and reperfused myocardium despite its reported antiischemic activity.