1. The safety and efficacy of 12 versus 24 hours of tirofiban infusion in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Author
-
Topcu S, Karal H, Kaya A, Bakirci EM, Tanboga IH, Kurt M, Aksakal E, Acikel M, and Sevimli S
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Tirofiban, Tyrosine administration & dosage, Tyrosine adverse effects, Myocardial Infarction surgery, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Postoperative Care methods, Tyrosine analogs & derivatives
- Abstract
Aim: We aimed to investigate the 6-month efficacy and safety of postprocedural 12-hour tirofiban administration versus 24-hour tirofiban administration in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 349 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI. Following the administration of bolus tirofiban after primary PCI, those receiving a 12-hour tirofiban infusion as the maintenance dose were classified as group 1 (n = 123) while those receiving a 24-hour infusion were classified as group 2 (n = 226). In-hospital and 6-month major adverse cardiac events were recorded., Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding in-hospital efficacy (in-hospital death: 4.4% vs 5.7%, P = .600 and stent thrombosis 1.8% vs 1.6%, P = .921) and in-hospital safety (2.6% vs 1.6% for major bleeding and 5.3% vs 4.1% for minor bleeding, P = .562). During the 6-month follow-up period, the incidence of the recurrent revascularization (16.1% vs 15.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.05 [0.47-3.67]), the repeated nonfatal acute coronary syndrome and/or stent thrombosis (27% vs 24.4%, P = .598, OR = 1.02 [0.42-2.48]), and the cardiovascular deaths (6.6% vs 6.5%, P = .943, OR = 1.03 [0.43-2.43]) were comparable between group 1 and group 2., Conclusion: Our study revealed that 12-hour tirofiban administration versus 24-hour tirofiban administration in STEMI who underwent primary PCI was similar with respect to in-hospital efficacy and safety and major adverse cardiac events during 6-month follow-up., (© The Author(s) 2014.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF