1. Antiplatelet effect of thienopyridine (clopidogrel or prasugrel) pretreatment in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.
- Author
-
Beigel R, Fefer P, Rosenberg N, Novikov I, Elian D, Fink N, Segev A, Guetta V, Hod H, and Matetzky S
- Subjects
- Clopidogrel, Coronary Angiography, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction diagnosis, Myocardial Infarction physiopathology, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors administration & dosage, Prasugrel Hydrochloride, Prospective Studies, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists administration & dosage, Ticlopidine administration & dosage, Treatment Outcome, Electrocardiography, Myocardial Infarction therapy, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Piperazines administration & dosage, Pyridines administration & dosage, Thiophenes administration & dosage, Ticlopidine analogs & derivatives
- Abstract
Although previous retrospective studies have suggested the clinical benefits of clopidogrel pretreatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the antiplatelet effect of thienopyridines during a narrow door-to-balloon time frame has not been evaluated. Seventy-nine consecutive patients with STEMI were treated with either 600 mg of clopidogrel (n = 49) or 60 mg of prasugrel (n = 30) loading on admission. All patients underwent PPCI with a door-to-balloon time of 48 ± 20 minutes. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation (PA) was determined by light transmission aggregometry before thienopyridine loading, at PPCI, and after 72 hours. Baseline ADP-induced PA was comparable in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients (79 ± 10% vs 76 ± 9%, p = 0.2). Although ADP-induced PA was reduced significantly in both clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients (p <0.01 for both), it was significantly lesser in prasugrel-treated patients (63 ± 18% vs 74 ± 12%, p = 0.002). Yet, <50% of the prasugrel-treated patients achieved adequate platelet inhibition (ADP-induced PA <70%) at PPCI. Prasugrel-treated patients, compared with clopidogrel-treated patients, were more likely to have Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction myocardial perfusion grade of ≥2 (79% vs 49%, p = 0.01), lower Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count (10.2 ± 5.7 vs 13.6 ± 7.2, p = 0.03), and a numerically greater incidence of early ST-segment resolution >50% (26 of 30 [87%] vs 35 of 49 [71%], p = 0.1), suggesting better myocardial reperfusion. In conclusion, overall, prasugrel compared with clopidogrel pretreatment resulted in greater platelet inhibition at PPCI, but even with prasugrel, only <50% of the patients achieved early adequate platelet response., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF