Search

Objectives: We sought to determine whether the prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG) improves the diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome., Background: The ECG is the most widely used screening test for evaluating patients with chest pain., Methods: Prehospital and in-hospital ECGs were obtained in 3,027 consecutive patients with symptoms of suspected acute myocardial infarction, 362 of whom were randomized to prehospital versus hospital thrombolysis and 2,665 of whom did not participate in the randomized trial. Prehospital and hospital records were abstracted for clinical characteristics and diagnostic outcome., Results: ST segment and T and Q wave abnormalities suggestive of myocardial ischemia or infarction were more common on both the prehospital and hospital ECGs of patients with as compared with those without acute coronary syndromes (p < or = 0.00001). Those with prehospital thrombolysis were more likely to show resolution of ST segment elevation by the time of hospital admission (14% vs. 5% in patients treated in the hospital, p = 0.004). In patients not considered for prehospital thrombolysis, both persistent and transient ST segment and T or Q wave abnormalities discriminated those with from those without acute coronary ischemia or infarction. Compared with ST segment elevation on a single ECG, added consideration of dynamic changes in ST segment elevation between serial ECGs improved the sensitivity for an acute coronary syndrome from 34% to 46% and reduced specificity from 96% to 93% (both p < 0.00004). Overall, compared with abnormalities observed on a single ECG, consideration of serial evolution in ST segment, T or Q wave or left bundle branch block (LBBB) abnormalities between the prehospital and initial hospital ECG improved the diagnostic sensitivity for an acute coronary syndrome from 80% to 87%, with a fall in specificity from 60% to 50% (both p < 0.000006)., Conclusions: ECG abnormalities are an early manifestation of acute coronary syndromes and can be identified by the prehospital ECG. Compared with a single ECG, the additional effect of evolving ST segment, T or Q waves or LBBB between serially obtained prehospital and hospital ECGs enhanced the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes, but with a fall in specificity.

The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial of prehospital versus hospital administration of thrombolytic therapy markedly reduced hospital treatment times, but the 2 groups had similar outcomes. However, patients treated < 70 minutes from symptom onset had better short-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term influence of very early thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction. A total of 360 patients were followed for vital status and cardiac-related hospital admissions over a period of 34 +/- 16 months. Patients enrolled in the trial had symptoms for < or = 6 hours, ST-segment elevation on the prehospital electrocardiogram, and no risk factors for serious bleeding. They received aspirin and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator either before or after hospital arrival. Primary end points in this study included long-term survival and survival free of death or readmission to the hospital for angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or revascularization. Two-year survival was 89% for prehospital- and 91% for hospital-treated patients (p = 0.46). Event-free survival at 2 years was 56% and 64% for prehospital- and hospital-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.42). In patients treated < 70 minutes from symptom onset, 2-year survival was 98%, and it was 88% for those treated later (p = 0.12). Two-year event-free survival was 65% for patients treated early and 59% for patients treated later (p = 0.80). In this trial, poorer long-term survival was associated with advanced age, history of congestive heart failure, and coronary artery bypass surgery performed before the index hospitalization, but not with time to treatment.

This study compared the presentation (symptoms and signs), treatment, and outcome of 1,097 consecutive patients (851 men and 246 women) from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project Registry with confirmed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), all of whom were initially evaluated in the prehospital setting, met clinical criteria for possible thrombolysis, and were followed throughout their hospital course. Women were older than men and had a higher prevalence of known cardiovascular risk factors, including systemic hypertension and congestive heart failure. The presentation of AMI with respect to symptoms, delay, and hemodynamic and electrocardiographic findings was for the most part indistinguishable between mean and women. Women appeared "undertreated" early in the course of AMI and were half as likely as men to undergo acute catheterization, angioplasty, thrombolysis, or coronary bypass surgery (odds ratio 0.5 [0.3 to 0.7]). The risk for hospital mortality in women was almost twice that for men (odds ratio 1.95 [1.01 to 3.8]). Hospital mortality after AMI was also independently predicted by older age, early evidence of hemodynamic instability, and an intraventricular conduction abnormality on the initial electrocardiogram. Although similar in its presentation, AMI in women is not as aggressively treated, and results in a less favorable outcome than in men. Gender as well as nongender-specific risk factors are important in assessing risk and the likelihood of early intervention after AMI.

The findings in 3,256 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction were tabulated to assess the history, treatments and outcome in the elderly; 1,848 patients (56%) were greater than 65 years of age, including 28% who were aged greater than or equal to 75 years. The incidence of prior angina, hypertension and heart failure (only 3% of patients less than 55 years of age had a history of heart failure compared with 24% greater than or equal to 75 years old) was found to increase with age. Twenty-nine percent of patients less than 75 years of age were treated with a systemic thrombolytic drug compared with only 5% of patients older than 75 years. Mortality rates increased strikingly with advanced age (less than 2% in patients less than or equal to 55, 4.6% in those 55 to 64, 12.3% in those 65 to 74 and 17.8% in those greater than or equal to 75 years). Both the incidence of complicating illness and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) increased with age. In a multivariate analysis of outcome in older patients (greater than or equal to 65 years), adverse events were related to both prior history of heart failure (odds ratio 3.9) and increasing age (odds ratio 1.4 per each decade of age). Outcome was not improved by treatment with thrombolytic drugs, but these agents were prescribed to only 12% of patients greater than 65 years of age, thereby reducing the power for detecting such an effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)