Search

Smooth muscle myosin and smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (smHMM) are activated by regulatory light chain phosphorylation, but the mechanism remains unclear. Dephosphorylated, inactive smHMM assumes a closed conformation with asymmetric intramolecular head-head interactions between motor domains. The "free head" can bind to actin, but the actin binding interface of the "blocked head" is involved in interactions with the free head. We report here a three-dimensional structure for phosphorylated, active smHMM obtained using electron crystallography of two-dimensional arrays. Head-head interactions of phosphorylated smHMM resemble those found in the dephosphorylated state but occur between different molecules, not within the same molecule. The light chain binding domain structure of phosphorylated smHMM differs markedly from that of the "blocked" head of dephosphorylated smHMM. We hypothesize that regulatory light chain phosphorylation opens the inhibited conformation primarily by its effect on the blocked head. Singly phosphorylated smHMM is not compatible with the closed conformation if the blocked head is phosphorylated. This concept has implications for the extent of myosin activation at low levels of phosphorylation in smooth muscle., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Smooth muscle myosin is activated by regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation. In the unphosphorylated state the activity of both heads is suppressed due to an asymmetric, intramolecular interaction between the heads. The properties of myosin with only one of its two RLCs phosphorylated, a state likely to be present both during the activation and the relaxation phase of smooth muscle, is less certain despite much investigation. Here we further characterize the mechanical properties of an expressed heavy meromyosin (HMM) construct with only one of its RLCs phosphorylated (HMM-1P). This construct was previously shown to have more than 50% of the ATPase activity of fully phosphorylated myosin (HMM-2P) and to move actin at the same speed in a motility assay as HMM-2P (Rovner, A. S., Fagnant, P. M., and Trybus, K. M. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 5280-5289). Here we show that the unitary step size and attachment time to actin of HMM-1P is indistinguishable from that of HMM-2P. Force-velocity measurements on small ensembles show that HMM-1P can generate approximately half the force of HMM-2P, which may relate to the observed duty ratio of HMM-1P being approximately half that of HMM-2P. Therefore, single-phosphorylated smooth muscle HMM molecules are active species, and the head associated with the unphosphorylated RLC is mechanically competent, allowing it to make a substantial contribution to both motion and force generation during smooth muscle contraction.

Regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation activates smooth and non-muscle myosin II, but it has not been established if phosphorylation of one head turns on the whole molecule. Baculovirus expression and affinity chromatography were used to isolate heavy meromyosin (HMM) containing one phosphorylated and one dephosphorylated RLC (1-P HMM). Motility and steady-state ATPase assays indicated that 1-P HMM is nearly as active as HMM with two phosphorylated heads (2-P HMM). Single-turnover experiments further showed that both the dephosphorylated and phosphorylated heads of 1-P HMM can be activated by actin. Singly phosphorylated full-length myosin was also an active species with two cycling heads. Our results suggest that phosphorylation of one RLC abolishes the asymmetric inhibited state formed by dephosphorylated myosin [Liu, J., et al. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 329, 963-972], allowing activation of both the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated heads. These findings help explain how smooth muscles are able to generate high levels of stress with low phosphorylation levels.

Much interest has centered on two surface loops in the motor domain to explain the differences in enzymatic and mechanical properties of myosin isoforms. We showed that two invariant lysines at the C-terminal end of loop 2, which is part of the actin-binding interface, are required to obtain actin activation [Joel et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2998-3003]. Here we investigate the effects of increasing positive charge in the variable portion of loop 2 of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (smHMM). Increasing the net positive charge by +4 increased the affinity for actin in the presence and absence of ATP. The K(m) for actin-activated ATPase activity decreased 15-fold, but V(max) was unchanged, showing that "weak binding" of myosin for actin can be significantly strengthened without increasing the rate-limiting step for V(max). The mutant HMM had slower rates of in vitro motility and ADP release compared to WT HMM. ADP release and motility, which were both salt-dependent, correlated linearly with each other. Loop 2 thus plays a major role in setting the affinity for actin but also affects ADP release and motility. Because the actin- and nucleotide-binding regions communicate, mutations to one region can impact multiple facets of myosin's mechanical and enzymatic properties.

The interaction between the two heads of myosin II during motion and force production is poorly understood. To examine this issue, we developed an expression and purification strategy to isolate homogeneous populations of heterodimeric smooth muscle heavy meromyosins containing heads with different properties. As an extreme example, we characterized a heterodimer containing one native head and one head locked in a "weak binding" state by a point mutation in switch 2 (E470A). The in vitro actin filament motility of this heterodimer was the same as the homodimeric control with two cycling heads, suggesting that only one head of a pair actively interacts with actin to generate maximal velocity. A second naturally occurring heterodimer contained two cycling heads with 2-fold different activity, due to the presence or absence of a 7-amino acid insert near the active site. Enzymatically this (+/-) insert heterodimer was indistinguishable from a (50:50) mixture of the two homodimers, but its motility averaged 17% less than that of the mixture. These data suggest that one head of a heterodimer can disproportionately affect the mechanics of double-headed myosin, a finding relevant to our understanding of heterozygous mutant myosins found in disease states like familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Crystallographic data for several myosin isoforms have provided evidence for at least two conformations in the absence of actin: a prehydrolysis state that is similar to the original nucleotide-free chicken skeletal subfragment-1 (S1) structure, and a transition-state structure that favors hydrolysis. These weak-binding states differ in the extent of closure of the cleft that divides the actin-binding region of the myosin and the position of the light chain binding domain or lever arm that is believed to be associated with force generation. Previously, we provided insights into the interaction of smooth-muscle S1 with actin by computer-based fitting of crystal structures into three-dimensional reconstructions obtained by electron cryomicroscopy. Here, we analyze the conformations of actin-bound chicken skeletal muscle S1. We conclude that both myosin isoforms in the nucleotide-free, actin-bound state can achieve a more tightly closed cleft, a more downward position of the lever arm, and more stable surface loops than those seen in the available crystal structures, indicating the existence of unique actin-bound conformations.

Myosin V is a double-headed unconventional myosin that has been implicated in organelle transport. To perform this role, myosin V may have a high duty cycle. To test this hypothesis and understand the properties of this molecule at the molecular level, we used the laser trap and in vitro motility assay to characterize the mechanics of heavy meromyosin-like fragments of myosin V (M5(HMM)) expressed in the Baculovirus system. The relationship between actin filament velocity and the number of interacting M5(HMM) molecules indicates a duty cycle of > or =50%. This high duty cycle would allow actin filament translocation and thus organelle transport by a few M5(HMM) molecules. Single molecule displacement data showed predominantly single step events of 20 nm and an occasional second step to 37 nm. The 20-nm unitary step represents the myosin V working stroke and is independent of the mode of M5(HMM) attachment to the motility surface or light chain content. The large M5(HMM) working stroke is consistent with the myosin V neck acting as a mechanical lever. The second step is characterized by an increased displacement variance, suggesting a model for how the two heads of myosin V function in processive motion.

Regulation of the actin-activated ATPase of smooth muscle myosin II is known to involve an interaction between the two heads that is controlled by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain. However, the three-dimensional structure of this inactivated form has been unknown. We have used a lipid monolayer to obtain two-dimensional crystalline arrays of the unphosphorylated inactive form of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin suitable for structural studies by electron cryomicroscopy of unstained, frozen-hydrated specimens. The three-dimensional structure reveals an asymmetric interaction between the two myosin heads. The ATPase activity of one head is sterically "blocked" because part of its actin-binding interface is positioned onto the converter domain of the second head. ATPase activity of the second head, which can bind actin, appears to be inhibited through stabilization of converter domain movements needed to release phosphate and achieve strong actin binding. When the subfragment 2 domain of heavy meromyosin is oriented as it would be in an actomyosin filament lattice, the position of the heads is very different from that needed to bind actin, suggesting an additional contribution to ATPase inhibition in situ.

The emerging view of smooth/nonmuscle myosin regulation suggests that the attainment of the completely inhibited state requires numerous weak interactions between components of the two heads and the myosin rod. To further examine the nature of the structural requirements for regulation, we engineered smooth muscle heavy meromyosin molecules that contained one complete head and truncations of the second head. These truncations eliminated the motor domain but retained two, one, or no light chains. All constructs contained 37 heptads of rod sequence. None of the truncated constructs displayed complete regulation of both ATPase and motility, reinforcing the idea that interactions between motor domains are necessary for complete regulation. Surprisingly, the rate of ADP release was slowed by regulatory light chain dephosphorylation of the truncated construct that contained all four light chains and one motor domain. These data suggest that there is a second step (ADP release) in the smooth muscle myosin-actin-activated ATPase cycle that is modulated by regulatory light chain phosphorylation. This may be part of the mechanism underlying "latch" in smooth muscle.

This article describes methods for expressing and obtaining purified smooth muscle myosin subfragments using the baculovirus/insect cell expression system, as well as methods for purifying whole myosin from tissue. Protocols for several gel assays that are routinely used with myosin are given, including gels to monitor light chain phosphorylation state and native gels to determine protein homogeneity. Steady-state myosin ATPase and actin-activated ATPase determinations are described, as are some of the more basic transient-state kinetic parameters that can be measured. The in vitro motility assay, in which the rate of actin movement over myosin or its subfragments is quantified, is also presented., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)

Structural data led to the proposal that the molecular motor myosin moves actin by a swinging of the light chain binding domain, or "neck." To test the hypothesis that the neck functions as a mechanical lever, smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) mutants were expressed with shorter or longer necks by either deleting or adding light chain binding sites. The mutant HMMs were characterized kinetically and mechanically, with emphasis on measurements of unitary displacements and forces in the laser trap assay. Two shorter necked constructs had smaller unitary step sizes and moved actin more slowly than WT HMM in the motility assay. A longer necked construct that contained an additional essential light chain binding site exhibited a 1.4-fold increase in the unitary step size compared with its control. Kinetic changes were also observed with several of the constructs. The mutant lacking a neck produced force at a somewhat reduced level, while the force exerted by the giraffe construct was higher than control. The single molecule displacement and force data support the hypothesis that the neck functions as a rigid lever, with the fulcrum for movement and force located at a point within the motor domain.

The structural basis for the phosphoryla- tion-dependent regulation of smooth muscle myosin ATPase activity was investigated by forming two- dimensional (2-D) crystalline arrays of expressed unphosphorylated and thiophosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) on positively charged lipid monolayers. A comparison of averaged 2-D projections of both forms at 2.3-nm resolution reveals distinct structural differences. In the active, thiophosphorylated form, the two heads of HMM interact intermolecularly with adjacent molecules. In the unphosphorylated or inhibited state, intramolecular interactions position the actin-binding interface of one head onto the converter domain of the second head, thus providing a mechanism whereby the activity of both heads could be inhibited.

Phasic and tonic smooth muscles express two myosin heavy chain isoforms that differ by only a seven amino acid insert in a flexible surface loop located near the nucleotide-binding site. The inserted isoform found predominantly in phasic muscle has two times the actin-activated ATPase activity and in vitro actin filament velocity as the non-insert isoform found mainly in tonic muscle (Kelley, C.A., Takahashi, M., Yu, J.H. & Adelstein, R.S. 1993. J Biol Chem 268, 12848, Rovner, A.S., Freyzon, Y. & Trybus, K.M. 1997. J Musc Res Cell Motil 18, 103). We used a laser trap to characterize the molecular mechanics of the inserted isoform [(+)insert] and of a mutant lacking the insert [(-)insert], which is analogous to the isoform found in tonic muscles. The constructs were expressed in the baculovirus/insect cell system. Unitary displacements (Duni) were similar for both the constructs (approximately 10 nm) but the attachment time (ton) for the (-)insert was two times that of the (+)insert. These data suggest that the insert in the nucleotide-binding loop does not affect the inherent mechanics of the myosin molecule but rather the kinetics of the cross-bridge cycle.

The crystal structures of an expressed vertebrate smooth muscle myosin motor domain (MD) and a motor domain-essential light chain (ELC) complex (MDE), both with a transition state analog (MgADP x AIF4-) in the active site, have been determined to 2.9 A and 3.5 A resolution, respectively. The MDE structure with an ATP analog (MgADP x BeFx) was also determined to 3.6 A resolution. In all three structures, a domain of the C-terminal region, the "converter," is rotated approximately 70 degrees from that in nucleotide-free skeletal subfragment 1 (S1). We have found that the MDE-BeFx and MDE-AIF4- structures are almost identical, consistent with the fact that they both bind weakly to actin. A comparison of the lever arm positions in MDE-AIF4- and in nucleotide-free skeletal S1 shows that a potential displacement of approximately 10 nm can be achieved during the power stroke.

Interactions between the dephosphorylated regulatory light chains (RLCs) of smooth muscle myosin are involved in maintaining the enzymatically "off" state. Expressed chimeric smooth muscle heavy meromyosins containing skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain (HC) sequences were used to assess the relative importance of the light chain-binding domain (or "neck") to regulation. Surprisingly, regulation remained intact with a skeletal RLC-binding site. A chimera with the entire alpha-helical neck composed of skeletal HC sequence showed 2-fold regulation of motility and nearly 5-fold regulation of actin-activated ATPase activity. Complete activation of the dephosphorylated state (i.e. complete loss of regulation) occurred when skeletal HC sequence extended from the head/rod junction to the SH1-SH2 helix. Smooth muscle-specific sequences near the motor domain may therefore position the regulatory domain in a way that optimizes RLC-rod-head interactions, thus enabling a completely off state when the RLC is dephosphorylated. Conversely, a chimera that joins the motor domain from unconventional myosin V to the smooth muscle myosin neck and rod showed only 2-fold regulation. The presence of the smooth muscle light chain-binding region and rod is therefore not sufficient to confer complete phosphorylation-dependent regulation upon all motor domains of the myosin family.

The striated muscle myosin of Placopecten moves actin faster in in vitro motility assays and has a higher actin-activated ATPase turnover rate than the myosin of the catch muscle. The heavy chain sequences of the two PlacoS1s are almost identical except at the surface loop 1 near the nucleotide binding pocket, where the two sequences vary significantly. Argopecten striated muscle myosin is 96% identical to Placopecten striated myosin, and both move actin with a similar velocity. To identify the individual kinetic steps which differ between these myosins, we completed a transient kinetic characterization of the three myosin S1s. The two striated S1s have similar rates of nucleotide binding to S1 and to acto.S1. The largest differences between the two are in the rate of ADP dissociation from S1 and affinity of ADP to S1, which differ by a factor of 2. The rates of nucleotide binding, nucleotide dissociation and affinity to nucleotides of the two Placopecten S1s are similar and agree within a factor of 2. In contrast, the affinity of acto.S1 for ADP is nine times weaker for the striated acto.S1 than for the catch acto.S1, compatible with the differences in motility of the Placopectenmyosins. Thus the differences in ADP affinity to acto.S1 and in the in vitro motility can be attributed to the differences in surface loop 1.

Regulation of a variety of cellular contractile events requires that vertebrate smooth and non-muscle myosin II can achieve an "off" state. To examine the role of the myosin rod in this process, we determined the minimal size at which a myosin molecule is capable of regulation via light chain phosphorylation. Expressed smooth muscle myosin subfragments with as many as 100 amino acids of the coiled-coil rod sequence did not dimerize and were active independently of phosphorylation. To test whether dimerization per se restores regulation of ATPase activity, mutants were expressed with varying lengths of rod sequence, followed by C-terminal leucine zippers to stabilize the coiled-coil. Dimerization restored partial regulation, but the presence of a length of rod approximately equal to the myosin head was necessary to achieve a completely off state. Partially regulated short dimers could be converted into fully regulated molecules by addition of native rod sequence after the zipper. These results suggest that the myosin rod mediates specific interactions with the head that are required to obtain the completely inactive state of vertebrate smooth and non-muscle myosins. If these interactions are prohibited under cellular conditions, unphosphorylated crossbridges can slowly cycle.

Regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation is necessary to activate smooth muscle myosin, unlike constitutively active striated muscle myosins. Here we show that an actin-binding surface loop located at the 50/20-kDa junction contributes to this fundamental difference between myosins. Substitution of the native actin-binding loop of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) with that from either skeletal or beta-cardiac myosin caused the chimeric HMMs to become unregulated like the myosin from which the loop was derived. Dephosphorylated chimeric HMMs gained the ability to move actin in a motility assay and had 50-70% of the actin-activated ATPase activity of phosphorylated wild-type HMM. Direct binding measurements showed that the affinity of HMM for actin in the presence of MgATP was unaffected by loop substitution; thus the rate of a step other than binding is increased. Phosphorylation of the chimeras did not lead to a higher Vmax than obtained for wild-type HMM. In the absence of actin, a foreign loop did not affect nucleotide trapping. Native regulated molecules have thus evolved a loop sequence which prevents rapid product release by actin when the RLC is dephosphorylated, thereby allowing activity to be controlled by RLC phosphorylation.