Search

Background: Surgery for non-palpable breast cancer may often be a challenging procedure. Recently, a magnetic seed (Magseed ® ) used for tumour localization has been developed. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) for sentinel lymph node (SN) detection is a novel tracer that may be injected up to four weeks preoperatively. This study is the first combining the magnetic seed and SPIO., Material and Methods: Patients planned for breast conserving surgery and SN-biopsy (SNB) were recruited from two units in Sweden. Patients underwent lesion localization with Magseed ® and SPIO injection (Magtrace™) by the breast radiologist in the preoperative period. Feasibility of successful lesion localization and excision together with a successful SNB detection was evaluated. Seed migration, number of SNs, specimen volume and calculated resection ratio (CRR) were reported.A survey of the physicians' experience was conducted., Results: Localization was performed at a median of three days before surgery (range 0-25). All 32 patients underwent microscopically radical resection with a CRR of 1.49. No seed migration was noticed. SNB was successful in all patients. A median of two SNs was retrieved. Radiologists and surgeons reported the procedure easy to learn and outperformed guidewire localization in terms of localization and excision time. They thought the technique facilitated planning localization and surgery., Conclusions: The combined magnetic technique provided accuracy in tumour localization and SN detection without excess tissue excision and with promising results for flexibility in delivery of care. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles perform comparably to radioisotope ± blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer, even when injected up to 8 weeks before surgery. Using superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles for sentinel lymph node detection after primary systemic therapy, and the maximum time frame of superparamagnetic iron nanoparticle administration have not been investigated. Methods: This cohort study included cN0/1-to-ycN0 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node detection or targeted axillary dissection. All patients received superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles either before primary systemic therapy or before surgery, and radioisotope on the day of surgery. Results: For 113 patients analysed, superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles were injected a median of 3 (range 0–248) days before surgery, with a 97.4% detection rate compared with 91.2% for radioisotope (P = 0.057). Concordance for radioisotope was 97.1% and this was not affected by timing of superparamagnetic iron nanoparticle injection (Kendall's tau 0.027; P = 0.746). The median sentinel lymph node yield was 3 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 2–3) for superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles and 2 (i.q.r. 2–3) for radioisotope (P < 0.001). In targeted axillary dissection, detection was 100% for superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles and 81.8% for radioisotope (P = 0.124). The index node was magnetic in 93.9% and radioactive in 66.7% (P = 0.007), an outcome that was not affected by any factors. For patients with metastases, superparamagnetic iron nanoparticle detection was 100% and radioisotope-based detection was 84.2% (P = 0.083), with superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles detecting more metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (median of 1 (i.q.r. 1–2) for superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles compared with a median of 1 (i.q.r. 0–1) for radioisotope; P = 0.005). Conclusion: Injection before primary systemic therapy is feasible and does not affect concordance with radioisotope. Superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles perform comparably to radioisotope, but detect more sentinel lymph nodes and have a higher rate of detection of metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. In this study, patients with breast cancer who received oncological treatment before surgery underwent axillary surgery by means of a superparamagnetic iron nanoparticle tracer, which was injected at any time point, ranging from the day before surgery to before the start of oncological treatment. All patients received a radioisotope tracer, the standard, as a comparator. The superparamagnetic iron nanoparticle detection rate and accuracy for sentinel lymph node detection were not affected by the time of injection (before or after preoperative oncological therapy) and superparamagnetic iron nanoparticles detected more lymph nodes, especially for patients with nodal metastases. Graphical abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Both superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) and blue dye (BD) have been reported to cause skin staining after breast-conserving surgery. SPIO is a novel tracer that has been shown to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer. Our study was the first to compare the incidence and size of skin staining between the two tracers. We reported on these outcomes in a preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial in which women received both SPIO and BD. This study investigated whether there was a difference in the incidence and size of skin staining between SPIO and BD after SLN-dissection. In all, 270 women were operated on with breast-conserving surgery and received SPIO, and 204 of these women also received BD. After 24 months of follow up, there was no statistically significant difference between the two tracers with regard to the size and incidence of skin staining. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) are a tracer for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection. In a preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial (SentiDose) we reported on skin staining after SPIO and blue dye (BD) injections. For SPIO, either a 1.5 mL retroareolar injection on the day of surgery or a 1.0 mL peritumoral/retroareolar injection 1–7 days before surgery was given. A 1.0 mL sub-/intradermal periareolar injection of BD was also administered to all these women. Staining was then assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. A total of 270 women received SPIO and were operated on with breast-conserving surgery. Of these, 204 women also received BD. A total of 58 (21.5%) women had an SPIO stain 6 months postoperatively with a median size of 6.8 cm2 (p = 0.56), while 51 (25.0%) had a BD stain with a median size of 8.5 cm2 (p = 0.93). The incidence and size of SPIO and BD staining decreased over time reciprocally. At 24 months, the incidence and median size of SPIO was 23 (8.6%) and 4 cm2, respectively. For BD, the incidence was 14 (6.3%, p = 0.13), and the median size was 3.5 cm2 (p = 0.18). There was, therefore, no statistically significant difference in the incidence or size of skin staining between SPIO and BD over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B Background: b SPIO is a SLN tracer that may reside in the tissue for several weeks after injection. B Conclusions b : Marking the SLN with SPIO seems to be an efficient technique to avoid upfront SLND for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS where SLND would be otherwise considered. [Extracted from the article]