Search

Purpose: To address this evidence gap and validate short-term OS at less than 5 years as a reliable surrogate endpoint for 5-year OS., Methods: We analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, focusing on non-metastatic NPC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015. Patients were categorized into radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups., Results: This retrospective study examined 2,047 non-metastatic NPC patients. Among them, 217 received radiotherapy, and 1,830 received chemoradiotherapy. Our analysis results indicated that the 4-year OS may serve as a reliable surrogate endpoint for patients with AJCC clinical stage I (80 vs. 78%, P = 0.250), regardless of the treatment received. Specifically, in the radiotherapy group, patients with stage I, T0-T1, and N0 NPC showed similar OS rates at 4 and 5 years (83 vs. 82%, P = 1.000; 78 vs. 76%, P = 0.250; 78 vs. 77%, P = 0.500, respectively). Similarly, patients with stage II-IV, T2-T4, and N1-3 NPC showed no significant difference in OS rates between 3 and 5 years (57 vs. 51%, P = 0.063; 52 vs. 46%, P = 0.250; 54 vs. 46%, P = 0.125, respectively) in the radiotherapy group. In the chemoradiotherapy group, only the 3-year OS rate did not significantly differ from that at 5 years in stage I patients (79vs. 72%, P = 0.063)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that short-term surrogate endpoints may be valuable for evaluating 5-year OS outcomes in NPC patients in non-endemic areas., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: To assess the maximal lymph nodal diameter on the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).This study extracted NPC patients between 2004 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Included patients were divided into 3 groups: ≤3 cm, >3-6 cm, and >6 cm based on the maximal lymph nodal diameter. Cumulative survival curves of 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method between the 3 groups.The 5-year OS (64.0% vs 59.3%, P = .240) and CSS (71.8% vs 67.0%, P = .242) of ≤3 cm and >3-6 cm groups were not different. In contrast, the 5-year OS and CSS were different between >6 cm and ≤3 cm groups, and between >6 cm and >3-6 cm groups. The stratified hazard ratio of OS and CSS was 1.75 (95% confidence interval: 1.25-2.45; P = .001) and 1.77 (95% confidence interval: 1.20-2.60; P = .004) for the >6 cm group in the multivariate regression analysis.It is reasonable that the maximal lymph nodal diameter with >6 cm is classified as stage N3 of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for NPC., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purposes: To evaluate retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis on N stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)., Methods: NPC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2016. Pathologically confirmed patients with complete data of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis were investigated. The included patients were divided into N1a and N1b groups. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses., Results: This retrospective cohort study examined 759 patients: 70 who were stage N1a and 689 who were stage N1b. Before PSM, N1a group was associated with similar 5-year OS (77.7% vs. 72.4%; P = 0.15) and CSS (85.6% vs. 79.9%; P = 0.09) compared to N1b group. After PSM, a similar OS (75.0% vs. 60.7%; P = 0.12) was found between the radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups. However, N1a group showed a better 5-year CSS (83.8% vs. 71.1%; P = 0.04) compared to N1b group. Stage N1b was an independent risk prognostic factor for CSS (hazard ratio = 2.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-6.34; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: OS was not different between N1a and N1b groups. Retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis defined as stage N1 of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system is reasonable., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

To identify predictors for improvement of xerostomia in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Patients diagnosed with stage I-IVb NPC (according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer) between September 2015 and March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients received IMRT. Predictors for improvement of xerostomia were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the most appropriate cut-off values for predicting factors.This study included 195 patients: xerostomia improved in 109 patients and xerostomia remained unchanged in 86 patients. Volume of the parotid gland ≤52.2 cm was a risk factor for xerostomia improvement (odds ratio [OR] = 3.506, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.932-6.362, P = .001). The mean dose of <39 Gy to the ipsilateral parotid gland was a protective factor (OR = 0.417, 95% CI: 0.271-0.641, P = .001). V30 of the contralateral parotid gland ≤52% was a protective factor (OR = 0.593, 95% CI: 0.462-0.760, P = .001).Volume of the parotid gland, the mean dose of the ipsilateral parotid gland, and V30 of the contralateral parotid gland were independent predictors for improvement of xerostomia.

Identification of predictive factors of chemotherapy use and assessment of the roles of these factors in prognosis will aid therapeutic decision-making in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Using logistic regression, we retrospectively assessed factors predicting chemotherapy use in 251 stage II (2010  UICC/AJCC staging system) NPC patients. Five-year overall survival (OS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed based on the predictive factors.Logistic regression found that N1 stage was an independent factor predicting chemotherapy use in stage II NPC patients. However, 5-year OS (96.5% vs 94.9%, P = .564), LRFS (98.2% vs 96.9%, P = .652), and DMFS (95.9% vs 97.6%, P = .560) did not differ between N0 and N1 stage patients. Moreover, addition of chemotherapy use did not improve treatment outcomes in N1 stage compared with radiotherapy alone.N1 stage predicted chemotherapy use in stage II NPC patients. But, the addition of chemotherapy did not provide a survival benefit.

Purpose: To identify whether chemoradiotherapy improves survival of stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods: NPC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. Pathologically confirmed stage T1N0M0 (the 7th edition AJCC) were investigated. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses. Results: This study included 91 (40.27%) patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 135 (59.73%) patients in the radiotherapy group. Before PSM, chemoradiotherapy was associated with worse 3-year OS (74.31 vs 87.23%; P = 0.025) and 5-year OS (64.28 vs 83.12%; P = 0.001) compared to those associated with radiotherapy. Similarly, chemoradiotherapy showed worse 3-year CSS (87.01 vs 96.97%; P = 0.028) and 5-year CSS (80.39 vs. 96.97%; P = 0.002) than those of radiotherapy. After PSM, chemoradiotherapy revealed worse 5-year OS (63.10 vs. 82.49%; P = 0.031) and CSS (80.95 vs. 93.70%; P = 0.016) than radiotherapy. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that chemoradiotherapy was an independent risk prognostic factor for OS and CSS before and after PSM. Conclusion: Radiotherapy alone is recommended for stage I NPC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate dosimetry of submandibular glands on xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: From September 2015 to March 2016, 195 NPC patients were investigated. Xerostomia was evaluated at 12 months after treatment via the RTOG/EORTC system. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize feature selection for grades 2–3 xerostomia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build a predicting model incorporating the feature selected in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the predicting model were assessed using the C-index, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Results: The V30 of the parotid glands was selected based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. The nomogram displayed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.698 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.626–0.771) and good calibration (model 1). Addition of the dosimetric parameters including the mean dose to the submandibular glands, V50 of the submandibular glands, and volume of the submandibular glands to the model 1 failed to show incremental prognostic value (model 2). The model 2 showed a C-index of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.632–0.776). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model 1 was clinically useful when intervention was decided at the possibility threshold of > 20%. Within this range, net benefit was comparable between the model 1 and model 2. Conclusion: PGv30 was a major predictive factor of grades 2–3 xerostomia for NPC. In contrast, the mean dose to the submandibular glands, V50 of the submandibular glands, and volume of the submandibular glands were not independent predictive factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]