Search

Background: In locally advanced, operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has shown results that are somewhat comparable to those of standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The impact of these neoadjuvant treatments on survival outcomes, however, has yet to be elucidated. Methods: This study included 489 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent surgery at Sichuan Cancer Hospital after receiving neoadjuvant treatment between June 2017 and September 2023. Patients were categorized into nCRT and nICT groups based on whether they received neoadjuvant treatment. To mitigate potential biases and balance covariates between the two cohorts, 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted using a caliper width of 0.05. Results: After PSM, the baseline characteristics of the 360 patients remained balanced between the two groups. The findings indicated a superior pathological response in the nCRT group, as evidenced by significantly greater rates of complete response (32.87% vs 14.58%, P < 0.001) and favorable tumor regression grade (TRG), as well as reduced ypT stages and less perineural and angioinvasion, despite comparable ypN stages. Despite the improvement in complete pathological response (pCR) in the nCRT group, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates did not significantly differ between the groups (DFS: 58.32% vs 56.16%, P = 0.67; OS: 69.96% vs 71.99%, P = 0.99). Crucially, The nICT group showed a lower incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events in Leukopenia (2.8% vs 29%; P < 0.001) and Neutropenia (2.8% vs 24%; P < 0.001) during neoadjuvant treatment, comparing with nCRT group. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that nICT followed by surgery offers comparable survival rates to nCRT, despite being less effective in pathologic outcomes. Nonetheless, nICT is a safe and feasible strategy for locally advanced ESCC, warranting further exploration to understand its impact on long-term survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background In the era of immunotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is used clinically but lacks of high‐level clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety and long‐term efficacy of NAIC followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by MIE. Methods A prospective, single‐center, open‐label, randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted at Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) + cisplatin (75 mg/m2) (toripalimab group) or paclitaxel + cisplatin alone (chemotherapy group) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. After surgery, the toripalimab group received toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 months). The primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). The pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were also assessed. Results Between May 15, 2020 and August 13, 2021, 252 ESCC patients ranging from T1N1‐3M0 to T2‐3N0‐3M0 were enrolled for interim analysis, with 127 in the toripalimab group and 125 in the chemotherapy group. The 1‐year EFS rate was 77.9% in the toripalimab group compared to 64.3% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 1.00; P = 0.05). The 1‐year OS rates were 94.1% and 83.0% in the toripalimab and chemotherapy groups, respectively (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.037). The patients in the toripalimab group had a higher pCR rate (18.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative Clavien‐Dindo grade IIIb or higher morbidity were 9.8% in the toripalimab group and 6.8% in the chemotherapy group, with no significant difference observed (P = 0.460). The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment‐related AEs did not differ between the two groups (12.5% versus 12.4%). Conclusions The interim results of this ongoing trial showed that in resectable ESCC, the addition of perioperative toripalimab to NAC is safe, may improve OS and might change the standard treatment in the future.

Novel neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (neoICT) has improved outcomes for patients with esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC), but challenges persist in low response rates and therapy resistance. Little is known about the intra-tumoral heterogeneity in the ESCC tumor microenvironment (TME) that underlies differential responses to neoadjuvant therapy. We applied single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiling and multiplexed immunofluorescence staining to thoroughly decipher the TME in ESCC specimens from a neoadjuvant anti-PD1 combination therapy clinical trial. The cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) population showed the significant alteration in abundance following neoadjuvant therapy. Specifically, IL6 + CCL2 + immunomodulatory CAFs and a novel CD248 + mechanoresponsive CAFs subset exhibited increasing infiltration. Mechanistically, CD248 + mechanoresponsive CAFs approached and lined the tumor nest to physically block the infiltration of CD8 + T cells and drug delivery, while IL6 + CCL2 + immunomodulatory CAFs induced therapeutic resistance with distinct IL-6 expression. Among patients treated with neoICT, we observed prominent CAF-T cell interactions. In particular, the NECTIN2-TIGIT ligand-receptor pair was enriched in treated samples, and TIGIT was identified as the major inhibitory checkpoint of T cells. Our findings demonstrate distinct alterations in TME constituent responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and identify functional phenotypes of CAFs associated with unfavorable therapeutic responses in patients. This provides potential targets to enhance responses to neoadjuvant therapy in ESCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is the standard preoperative treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Some studies reported neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) could improve pathological response with manageable safety. However, few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of NICT and NCT, especially survival outcomes. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of NICT and NCT after a median follow-up of 36.0 months. Methods: This was a retrospective study with a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Locally advanced ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy were reviewed. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Forty-five patients were identified in each group by PSM. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate in NICT and NCT group were 28.9% and 8.9% (P = 0.02). The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.396 (95% CI 0.171–0.919, p = 0.025) for RFS and 0.377 (95% CI 0.145–0.981, p = 0.038) for overall survival (OS), 3-year RFS was 80.6% and 62.1%, 3-year OS was 86.2% and 68.1%. Patients with pCR, MPR or downstaging had better 3-year RFS and 3-year OS. The incidences of postoperative complications and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar. Conclusion: This trial preliminarily shows that NICT improves pathological and survival outcomes over NCT for resectable locally advanced ESCC, with acceptable and manageable safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical studies have shown that programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors can activate T cells and inhibit cancer growth. Therefore, the use of a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is worth further exploration. Methods: Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study to receive two cycles of a preoperative combination of toripalimab, paclitaxel, and cisplatin. Efficacy was evaluated after two treatment cycles. The patients' postoperative pathological staging was analyzed and compared. Surgery was performed within 42 days of the start date of the last chemotherapy cycle. Results: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy achieved a high pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (29.0%), major pathological response rate (41.9%), and objective response rate (80.6%) and demonstrated statistically significant downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy (P <.05) with manageable treatment-related adverse effects. No significant association was found between PD-L1 level and pCR (P =.365). In addition, R0 resection was achieved in all 31 (100%) patients during surgery. For all the included patients, the one-year progression-free survival rate was 87.1% (95% CI: 75.3%-98.9%), the one-year overall survival (OS) rate was 96.8% (95% CI: 79.8%-95.9%), and the two-year OS rate was 83.9% (95% CI: 71.6%-92.2%). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that this combination may be a potential neoadjuvant therapy regimen in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy may benefit patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its impact requires further investigation. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. The study was registered in PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42022360893). Results: 60 studies of 3,632 patients were included. Comparing with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy showed higher pCR (RR: 4.71, 95% CI: 3.69, 6.02), MPR (RR, 3.20, 95% CI: 2.75, 3.74), and ORR (RR, 1.46, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.77), fewer surgical complications (RR: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.48, 0.94), higher R0 resection rate (RR: 1.06, 95%CI: 1.03, 1.10, I² = 52%), and longer 1-year and 2-year OS, without affecting TRAEs. For neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in NSCLC, the pooled pCR rate was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.39), MPR was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.63), and ORR was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.76). The pooled incidence of all grade TRAEswas 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.81), and that of >= grade 3 TRAEs was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.32). The surgical complications rate was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.18) and R0 resection rate was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). The pooled 1-year OS was 0.97 (95%CI: 0.96, 0.99), and 2-year OS was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.83, 0.94). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma, stage III or higher PD-L1 performed better. Notably, no significant differences were observed in pCR, MPR, and ORR between 2 or more treatment cycles. Pembrolizumab-, or toripalimab-based neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Conclusion: According to our analysis, reliable efficacy, safety, and survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for operable NSCLC were demonstrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, the use of immunochemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) has been increasing and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy has become the firstline treatment for advanced GC. However, few studies with small sample sizes have examined this treatment regimen to assess its effectiveness and safety in the neoadjuvant treatment phase of resectable local advanced GC. Materials and methods: Herein, we systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science for clinical trials on neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in advanced GC. The primary outcomes were effectiveness [evaluated by major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR)] and safety [assessed by grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and postoperative complications]. A meta-analysis of non-comparative binary results was performed to aggregate the primary outcomes. Direct comparative analysis was used to compare pooled results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) with nICT. The outcomes emerged as risk ratios (RR). Results: Five articles with 206 patients were included, and all of them were from the Chinese population. The pooled pCR and MPR rates were 26.5% (95% CI: 21.3%–33.3%) and 49.0% (95% CI: 42.3%–55.9%), while grade 3–4 TRAEs and post-operative complication rates were 20.0% (95% CI: 9.1%–39.8%) and 30.1% (95% CI: 23.1%–37.9%), respectively. Direct comparison showed that with the exception of grade 3–4 TRAEs and postoperative complications, all outcomes including pCR, MPR, and R0 resection rate favoured nICT to nCT.Conclusion: nICT is a promising strategy for use as an advisable neoadjuvant treatment for patients with advanced GC in Chinese population. However, more phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be required to further consolidate the efficacy and safety of this regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studying the application of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in the real world and evaluating its effectiveness and safety in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) are critically important. Methods: This study included the II-IIIB stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving NCT with or without PD-1 inhibitors and undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant treatments between January 2019 to August 2022. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results: A total of 66 patients receiving NICT and 101 patients receiving NCT were included in this study. As compared to NCT, NICT showed similar safety while not increasing the surgical difficulty. The ORR in the NICT and NCT groups was 74.2% and 53.5%, respectively, P = 0.009. A total of 44 patients (66.7%) in the NICT group and 21 patients (20.8%) in the NCT group showed major pathology response (MPR) (P <0.001). The pathology complete response (pCR) rate was also significantly higher in NICT group than that in NCT group (45.5% vs. 10.9%, P <0.001). After Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 42 pairs of patients were included in the analysis. The results showed no significant difference in the ORR between the two groups (52.3% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.118), and the proportions of MPR (76.2%) and pCR (50.0%) in NICT group were significantly higher than those of MPR (11.9%) and pCR (4.7%) in the NCT group (P <0.001). The patients with driver mutations might also benefit from NICT. Conclusions: As compared to NCT, the NICT could significantly increase the proportions of patients with pCR and MPR without increasing the operationrelated bleeding and operation time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare short and mid-term outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE) after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with locally advanced ESCC underwent open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy were retrospectively included from June 2019 to June 2021. The baseline characteristics, pathological data, short-and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared based on the surgical approach. Results: A total of 35 patients were included in the study. An open procedure was performed for 13 patients (37.1%), and 22 (62.9%) patients underwent MIE after neoadjuvant therapy. Compared with open group, MIE group had shorter operative times (350.8± 117.8 vs. 277.9 ± 30.2 min, P = 0.009). The total number of resected lymph nodes was not significantly different, but more left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes were harvested from the Open group (2.6 ± 3.2 vs. 0.9 ± 1.7, P = 0.047). The median follow-up time was 1.42 years (range, 0.35-2.59 years) from the first day of treatment. Three patients (8.6%) died during follow-up, one in the open surgery group and two in the MIE group. There were six (17.1%) patients developed recurrence, three in each group. The 2-year cumulative survival rates were 92.3 ± 7.4% and 89.5 ± 7.1% for the open and MIE groups, respectively. Overall survival was not different between the two surgical approaches. Conclusions: MIE might be safe and feasible for patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A dynamic graph inference framework named A2ST-GCM is proposed to effectively model tumour regions across time, enabling early prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) in neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and providing an assisting tool for the development of personalised treatment regimens for patients. • The designed adaptive graph convolution module can generate appropriate topologies for the intra-period and inter-period tumour regions and effectively extract spatio-temporal features within the tumour and along the time dimension. • A new weighted loss function is designed to effectively alleviate the problem of sample class imbalance in pCR prediction, further improving the performance and robustness of the model. • The intelligent imaging markers developed in this paper provide a simple and cost-effective assistant for identifying patients most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy on an individualised level and provide new ideas and methods for developing individualised organ preservation strategies. Accurate preoperative prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is crucial for refining and customising perioperative treatment decisions. However, the challenge persists in developing reliable, interpretable, and intelligent imaging markers using early-stage computed tomography (CT). Considering the dynamic evolution of tumours during treatment can offer additional discriminative insights, modelling the spatial and temporal relationships in pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment CT images may help address these challenges. This study proposes an adaptive spatio-temporal aware graph inference framework (A2ST-GCM) to learn potential correlations between tumour regions in the same period and across periods, generating an adaptive spatio-temporal topology, and effectively aggregating features. Specifically, the model first utilises the adaptive spatial graph convolution module (AS-GConv) to capture irregular spatial dependencies within tumour regions before and after treatment. Subsequently, the adaptive spatio-temporal graph convolution module (AST-GConv) is employed to model dynamic dependencies over time, effectively exploring the complementarity and correlation mechanisms among multiple spatio-temporal features, ultimately obtaining a spatio-temporal graph representation containing tumour heterogeneity information. Furthermore, this paper introduces a novel weighted loss function, effectively alleviating the class imbalance issue in predicting pCR. Quantitative experimental results demonstrate the outstanding performance of our model in pCR prediction. To the best of our knowledge, this paper represents the first attempt to apply graph networks to predicting pathological response in neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. It provides a potential auxiliary tool to evaluate pathological response, aiming to identify individuals who could benefit from surgery avoidance, thereby offering significant clinical benefits for patients undergoing personalised organ-preserving treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]