Search

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) diagnostics using real-time quantitative PCR analysis of rearranged immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements are nowadays implemented in most treatment protocols for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Within the EuroMRD Consortium, we aim to provide comparable, high-quality MRD diagnostics, allowing appropriate risk-group classification for patients and inter-protocol comparisons. To this end, we set up a quality assessment scheme, that was gradually optimized and updated over the last 20 years, and that now includes participants from around 70 laboratories worldwide. We here describe the design and analysis of our quality assessment scheme. In addition, we here report revised data interpretation guidelines, based on our newly generated data and extensive discussions between experts. The main novelty is the partial re-definition of the "positive below quantitative range" category by two new categories, "MRD low positive, below quantitative range" and "MRD of uncertain significance". The quality assessment program and revised guidelines will ensure reproducible and accurate MRD data for ALL patients. Within the Consortium, similar programs and guidelines have been introduced for other lymphoid diseases (e.g., B-cell lymphoma), for new technological platforms (e.g., digital droplet PCR or Next-Generation Sequencing), and for other patient-specific MRD PCR-based targets (e.g., fusion genes)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In this study, we compared immunoglobulin heavy-chain-gene-based minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to assess whether NGS could overcome some limitations of RQ-PCR and further increase sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and reproducibility. In total, 378 samples from 55 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or multiple myeloma (MM) were investigated for clonotype identification, clonotype identity and comparability of MRD results. Forty-five clonotypes were identified by RQ-PCR and 49 by NGS. Clonotypes identified by both tools were identical or >97% homologous in 96% of cases. Both tools were able to routinely reach a sensitivity level of 1 × E-05. A good correlation of MRD results was observed (R=0.791, P<0.001), with excellent concordance in 79.6% of cases. Few discordant cases were observed across all disease subtypes. NGS showed at least the same level of sensitivity as allele-specific oligonucleotides-PCR, without the need for patient-specific reagents. We conclude that NGS is an effective tool for MRD monitoring in ALL, MCL and MM. Prospective comparative analysis of unselected cases is required to validate the clinical impact of NGS-based MRD assessment.

Quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD) by real-time PCR directed to TCR and Ig gene rearrangements allows a refined evaluation of response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL prospectively evaluated molecular response after induction/consolidation chemotherapy according to standardized methods and terminology in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL. The cytologic complete response (CR) rate was 89% after induction phases 1 and 2. At this time point the molecular CR rate was 70% in 580 patients with cytologic CR and evaluable MRD. Patients with molecular CR after consolidation had a significantly higher probability of continuous complete remission (CCR; 74% vs 35%; P < .0001) and of overall survival (80% vs 42%; P = .0001) compared with patients with molecular failure. Patients with molecular failure without stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first CR relapsed after a median time of 7.6 months; CCR and survival at 5 years only reached 12% and 33%, respectively. Quantitative MRD assessment identified patients with molecular failure as a new high-risk group. These patients display resistance to conventional drugs and are candidates for treatment with targeted, experimental drugs and allogeneic SCT. Molecular response was shown to be highly predictive for outcome and therefore constitutes a relevant study end point. The studies are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00199056 and NCT00198991.