Search

Background: Breast cancer has, due its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular variety of breast cancer is luminal subtype that expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and hormonal therapy represents a major treatment modality in all stages of ER positive breast cancers. Acquired mutations in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of ERα, referred as ESR1 mutation, result in resistance to different endocrine therapies leading to disease progression or recurrence. Recent studies reviled that these ESR1 mutations lead to constitutive activity of the estrogen receptor ER, meaning that the receptor is active in absence of its ligand conferring resistance against endocrine therapy and tumor growth. Published studies have not yet been able to determine the exact prevalence rate of ESR1 mutations, but set the outer boundaries between 11-55%., Purpose: The goal of the present study is to determine the frequency rate of ESR1 mutations in ER positive recurrent breast cancer by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technique., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of Antwerp University Hospital. The seven most common ESR1mutations (c.1138G>C (p. (E380Q)), c.1610A>G (p.(Y537C)), c.1613A>G (p.(p.D538G)), c.1607T>G (p.(L536R)), c.1387T>C (p.S463R)), c.16410A>C (p.(Y537S)), c.609T>A (p.(Y537N)) were assessed in available baseline plasma samples of 21 patients with ER positive recurrent breast cancer. Inclusion criteria for study participation were: female, age above 18 years, ER positive breast cancer, 5years adjuvant hormonal therapy of primary disease, and disease recurrence or metastasis during or after stop of endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations were analyzed in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)., Results: cfDNA was obtained from 21 patients with recurrent breast cancer. ESR1 mutations were found in 4/21 (19%; 95% CI, 5%-42%). The test sensitivity was lower than the targeted value <0.1% in 29% of patients (6/21). No significant statistical difference in baseline clinical characteristics was observed in patients with wild-type and mutant ER (p>0.05). Adjuvant endocrine therapy for primary disease was Tamoxifen (TAM) for 57% of patients (12 of 21) of whom 8 patients had received aromatase inhibitor (AI) after two years, while 43% of patients (9 of 21) had received AI as first line adjuvant hormonal therapy. All the patients had received aromatase inhibitor AI therapy in first or second line therapy with initially a variable period of good response., Conclusion: ESR1 mutation analysis could be determined in archived plasma samples using simple non-invasive methods. In the future, screening for mutation status could improve the therapeutic strategies in controlling ER signaling before the occurrence of wide spread disease metastasis., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study the recurrence of breast cancer among patients who were using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS)., Design: A retrospective, controlled cohort analysis., Setting: Six Belgian hospitals., Patient(s): We identified 79 breast cancer patients who used the LNG IUS, and we selected a control group of 120 patients with no history of LNG IUS use and who were closely matched for age at diagnosis, tumor stage, tumor grade, and treatment modalities. Two subgroups were identified: [1] breast cancer patients who continued using the LNG IUS after diagnosis and [2] breast cancer patients who began using an LNG IUS after treatment for breast cancer., Intervention(s): Patient's data were collected and survival analysis was performed., Main Outcome Measure(s): Breast cancer recurrence rate., Result(s): There was a recurrence rate of 21.5% (17/79) among LNG IUS users and of 16.6% (20/120) among the control group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-4.00; no statistically significant difference). Subgroup analysis showed that women using the LNG IUS (n = 38) at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (and who continued its use) had a statistically significantly increased risk of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-11.35) compared with patients in the control group. There was 47.4% (18/38) nodal involvement in this subgroup, and all patients who recurred had metastatic disease., Conclusion(s): Overall, we did not find an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence associated with use of the LNG-IUS. However, in a subgroup analysis of women who developed breast cancer while using an LNG IUS and who continued to use the LNG IUS, we found a higher risk of recurrence of borderline statistical significance. Additional research is needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Background: We have recently shown the prognostic value of growth pattern classification in non-small cell lung cancer. The aim of this study is to validate the hypothesis that these growth patterns have a distinct angiogenic and proliferative profile., Methods: Hematoxylin-eosin stained tissue sections of 239 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were classified into growth patterns. One representative tissue section per patient was double immunostained with CD34 and Ki-67 antibodies. Endothelial cell proliferation fraction, tumor cell proliferation fraction, microvessel density, and Chalkley count were assessed at the invading front and the center of the selected tumor section., Results: According to the growth pattern classification, 161 patients (67.4%) had a destructive, 33 (13.8%) a papillary, and 45 (18.8%) an alveolar growth pattern. There were significant differences in endothelial cell proliferation fraction (p < 0.001), tumor cell proliferation fraction (p < 0.001), microvessel density (p < 0.001), and Chalkley count (p < 0.001) between the growth patterns. Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that a low endothelial cell proliferation fraction was consistently an independent prognostic factor for overall poor (hazard ratio = 0.93; confidence interval: 0.88 to 0.97, p = 0.002) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.94; confidence interval: 0.89 to 0.98, p = 0.007)., Conclusions: Growth patterns have a distinct angiogenic and proliferative profile. In non-small cell lung cancer, a low degree of angiogenesis (a low endothelial cell proliferation fraction) is associated with poor prognosis.

Objectives: To investigate how physicians felt about HRT use in breast cancer survivors a half year after the WHI trial., Methods: In December 2002, a questionnaire was conducted in Flanders (Belgium). The survey contained a presentation of a 35-year-old breast cancer survivor who presented with climacteric symptoms after treatment with tamoxifen., Results: With a response rate of 33.65%, a majority of the physicians did not prescribe classical oral HRT (5.40%) in this patient. Physicians prefer to prescribe tibolone (30.68%) or other alternative treatment (50.00%). The main reason was the fear for increased recurrence of breast cancer. Furthermore the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial and its attention in the media, a half year prior to the survey, influenced one-third of the physician's prescribing attitude., Conclusions: Two-thirds of the physicians did not change prescribing attitude after the WHI oestrogen plus progestin trial. HRT is a well proven effective treatment in breast cancer survivors with severe climacteric complaints, but a majority of physicians is not convinced of its safety in breast cancer survivors. Therefore, a majority of physicians do not find the need to prescribe HRT in breast cancer survivors.