Search

Background: Cancer is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. Whether cancer is also associated with atrial cardiopathy, another atrial pathology associated with heightened ischemic stroke risk, is uncertain., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study among consecutive patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke at a quaternary care center in New York, United States from 2011 through 2016. The study exposure was active cancer. The study outcome was atrial cardiopathy, defined as a left atrial volume index ≥35 mL/m 2 on echocardiography. We used multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics, to evaluate the relationship between cancer (active or historical) and atrial cardiopathy. We performed a subgroup analysis among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS)., Results: The final cohort included 1104 patients with acute ischemic stroke, of whom 10 % had active cancer and 47 % had atrial cardiopathy. Patients with atrial cardiopathy, compared to those without, were older (median age, 77 versus 68 years), and more frequently had hypertension, coronary disease, and atrial fibrillation. Active cancer was present in 9.6 % of patients with atrial cardiopathy (n = 50/520) and 10.4 % of patients without (n = 61/584). There was no association between active cancer and atrial cardiopathy among the overall ischemic stroke cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.37) nor in patients with ESUS (aOR, 0.64; 95 % CI, 0.30-1.36). When the cancer exposure was broadened to include any history of cancer (n = 236, 21.4 %), there still was no significant association with atrial cardiopathy (aOR, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.68-1.25)., Conclusions: When defining atrial cardiopathy by left atrial volume, we did not find an association between cancer and atrial cardiopathy in patients with ischemic stroke, including among those with ESUS. Future studies, evaluating other atrial cardiopathy biomarkers and settings, are needed to further investigate any potential link between cancer and atrial cardiopathy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Beyeler has received research support from the University of Bern, Switzerland. Dr. Navi has received personal fees for serving on an adjudication committee for MindRhythm Inc. Dr. Kamel reports serving as a PI for the ARCADIA trial (NIH/NINDSU01NS095869), which received in-kind study drug from the BMS-Pfizer Alliance for Eliquis® and ancillary study support from Roche Diagnostics; other funding from NIH (R01HL144541, R01NS123576, U01NS106513); serving as Deputy Editor for JAMA Neurology; serving on clinical trial steering/executive committees for Medtronic, Janssen, and Javelin Medical; serving on endpoint adjudication committees for AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and household ownership interests in TETMedical, Spectrum Plastics Group, and Burke Porter Group. The other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence, timing, and type of new cancer diagnosis among patients with cryptogenic stroke., Methods: We used data from the ARCADIA trial, which enrolled patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. Participants were prospectively followed, and serious adverse events were assessed every 3 months or sooner if investigators were alerted between visits to an event. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of a cancer diagnosis within the first year after randomization., Results: Among 878 participants without baseline history of cancer, 13 (1.5%) were diagnosed with incident cancer in the year after randomization, comprising 12 solid cancers (3 prostate, 2 breast, 2 gastrointestinal, and 5 other primary sites) and 1 hematologic cancer (non-Hodgkin lymphoma). The cumulative incidences of a cancer diagnosis were 0% at 3 months, 0.6% (95% CI 0.2%-1.5%) at 6 months, and 2.0% (95 CI 1.1%-3.4%) at 1 year. The median time from index stroke to cancer diagnosis was 261 days (interquartile range 183-358)., Discussion: In a multicenter cryptogenic stroke cohort with prospective follow-up, the 1-year cumulative incidence of a cancer diagnosis was 2%. This rate may be an underestimation because of the clinical trial population and exclusion of cancers diagnosed immediately after stroke., Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192215. Registered June 20, 2017. First patient enrolled February 1, 2018.

Background and Objectives: Cancer is associated with an increased risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and venous thromboembolism. The role of a cardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) as a surrogate parameter for paradoxical embolism in cancer-related strokes is uncertain. We sought to investigate the relationship between the presence of an RLS and cancer in AIS patients., Methods: We included consecutive AIS patients hospitalized at our tertiary stroke center between January 2015 and December 2020 with available RLS status as detected on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Active cancers were retrospectively identified and the association with RLS was assessed with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting to minimize the ascertainment bias of having a TEE obtained., Results: Of the 2236 AIS patients included, 103 (4.6%) had active cancer, of whom 24 (23%) were diagnosed with RLS. An RLS was present in 774 out of the 2133 AIS patients without active cancer (36%). After adjustment and weighting, the absence of RLS was associated with active cancer (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-4.58). When analysis was restricted to patients younger than 60 years of age or those with a high-risk RLS (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism Score ⩾ 6), there was no association between RLS and cancer (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 0.79-11.88 and aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.10-3.10, respectively)., Conclusion: RLS was diagnosed less frequently in AIS patients with cancer than in cancer-free patients, suggesting that arterial sources may play a larger role in cancer-related strokes than paradoxical venous embolization. Future studies are needed to validate these findings and evaluate potential therapeutic implications, such as the general indication, or lack thereof, for patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in this patient population., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Mo.B. reports research support from the Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and the University of Bern, Switzerland.None of the other authors report any conflicts of interest in relation with this study.

Background: Early diagnosis of previously unknown cancer (i.e., occult cancer) after an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) could result in faster initiation of cancer therapy and potentially improve clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare mortality rates between AIS patients with occult cancer diagnosed during the index stroke hospitalization versus those diagnosed after hospital discharge., Methods: Among consecutive AIS patients treated at our stroke center from 2015 through 2020, we identified new cancer diagnoses made within the year after the AIS. We used multivariable Cox regression analyses to evaluate the association between the timing of occult cancer diagnosis (during the AIS hospitalization versus after discharge) and long-term survival., Results: Of 3894 AIS patients with available long-term follow-up data, 59 (1.5 %) were diagnosed with a new cancer within one year after index stroke. Of these, 27 (46 %) were diagnosed during the index hospitalization and 32 (54 %) were diagnosed after discharge. During a median follow-up of 406 days (interquartile range, 89-1073), 70 % (n = 19) of patients whose cancer was diagnosed during hospitalization had died, compared to 63 % (n = 20) of patients whose cancer was diagnosed after discharge (p= 0.58). In our main multivariable model, there was no difference in long-term mortality between patient groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16; 95 % confidence interval, 0.53-2.52; p= 0.71)., Conclusions: In this analysis, timing of a new cancer diagnosis after AIS did not seem to influence patients' long-term survival. Given the fairly small number of included patients with previously occult cancer, larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm our results., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Morin Beyeler reports research support from the “Kurt und Senta Hermann-Stiftung”, the Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and the University of Bern, Switzerland. None of the other authors report any conflicts of interest in relation with this study., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Approximately 10% to 15% of ischemic strokes are associated with cancer; cancer-associated stroke, particularly when cryptogenic, is associated with high rates of recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic strategies in patients with cancer and cryptogenic stroke., Objective: To compare apixaban vs aspirin for the prevention of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with history of cancer and cryptogenic stroke., Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc analysis of data from 1015 patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke and biomarker evidence of atrial cardiopathy in the Atrial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs in Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke (ARCADIA) trial, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted from 2018 to 2023 at 185 stroke centers in North America. Data analysis was performed from October 15, 2023, to May 23, 2024., Exposures: Oral apixaban, 5 mg (or 2.5 mg if criteria met), twice daily vs oral aspirin, 81 mg, once daily. Subgroups of patients with and without cancer at baseline were examined., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome for this post hoc analysis was a composite of major ischemic or major hemorrhagic events. Major ischemic events were recurrent ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Major hemorrhagic events included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and any major extracranial hemorrhage., Results: Among 1015 participants (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-76] years; 551 [54.3%] female), 137 (13.5%) had a history of cancer. The median (IQR) follow-up was 1.5 (0.6-2.5) years for patients with history of cancer and 1.5 (0.6-3.0) years for those without history of cancer. Participants with history of cancer, compared with those without history of cancer, had a higher risk of major ischemic or major hemorrhagic events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.10-2.71). Among those with history of cancer, 8 of 61 participants (13.1%) randomized to apixaban and 16 of 76 participants (21.1%) randomized to aspirin had a major ischemic or major hemorrhagic event; however, the risk was not significantly different between groups (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.26-1.43). Comparing participants randomized to apixaban vs aspirin among those with cancer, events included recurrent stroke (5 [8.2%] vs 9 [11.8%]), major ischemic events (7 [11.5%] vs 14 [18.4%]), and major hemorrhagic events (1 [1.6%] vs 2 [2.6%])., Conclusions and Relevance: Among participants in the ARCADIA trial with history of cancer, the risk of major ischemic and hemorrhagic events did not differ significantly with apixaban compared with aspirin., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192215.

Ischemic stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. The underlying mechanisms linking cancer and stroke are not completely understood. Long-standing and more recent evidence suggests that cancer-associated prothrombotic states, along with treatment-related vascular toxicity, such as with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, contribute to an increased risk of ischemic stroke in cancer patients. Novel biomarkers, including coagulation, platelet and endothelial markers, cell-free DNA, and extracellular vesicles are being investigated for their potential to improve risk stratification and patient selection for clinical trials and to help guide personalized antithrombotic strategies. Treatment of cancer-related stroke poses unique challenges, including the need to balance the risk of recurrent stroke and other thromboembolic events with that of bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. In addition, how and when to restart cancer treatment after stroke remains unclear. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the mechanisms underlying ischemic stroke in cancer, propose an etiological classification system unique to cancer-related stroke to help guide patient characterization, provide an overview of promising biomarkers and their clinical utility, and discuss the current state of evidence-based management strategies for cancer-related stroke. Ultimately, a personalized approach to stroke prevention and treatment is required in cancer patients, considering both the underlying cancer biology and the individual patient's risk profile., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Malignancy associated acute ischemic stroke (AIS) requires specific diagnostic work-up, treatment and prevention to improve outcome. This study aimed to develop a biomarker-based score for prediction of occult malignancy in AIS patients., Methods: Single-center cross-sectional study including consecutive AIS patients treated between July 2017 and November 2018. Patients with active malignancy at presentation, or diagnosed within 1 year thereafter and patients free of malignancy, were included and malignancy associated biomarkers were assessed. LASSO analyses of logistic regression were performed to determine biomarkers predictive of active malignancy. Predictors were derived from a predictive model for active malignancy. A comparison between known and unknown (=occult) malignancies when the index stroke occurred was used to eliminate variables not associated with occult malignancy. A predictive score (OCCULT-5 score) for occult malignancy was developed based on the remaining variables., Results: From 1001 AIS patients, 61 (6%) presented an active malignancy. Thirty-nine (64%) were known and 22 (36%) occult. Five variables were included in the final OCCULT-5 score: age ≥ 77 years, embolic stroke of undetermined source, multi-territorial infarcts, D-dimer levels ≥ 820 µ/gL, and female sex. A score of ≥ 3 predicted an underlying occult malignancy with a sensitivity of 64%, specificity of 73%, positive likelihood ratio of 2.35 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.50., Conclusions: The OCCULT-5 score might be useful to identify patients with occult malignancy. It may thus contribute to a more effective and timely treatment and thus lead to a positive impact on overall outcome., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest None of the other authors report any., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)