Search

Recognizing the rising incidence, prevalence, and mortality of cancer in low- and middle-resource settings, as well as the increasingly international profile of its membership, ASCO has committed to expanding its engagement at a global level. In 2017, the ASCO Academic Global Oncology Task Force sought to define the potential role for ASCO in supporting global oncology as an academic field. A set of recommendations to advance the status of global oncology as an academic discipline were created through a consensus-based process involving participation by a diverse group of global oncology and global health practitioners; these recommendations were then published. The recommendations included developing a set of global oncology competencies for trainees and faculty interested in a career in academic global oncology. Here, we describe the global oncology competencies developed by this task force. These competencies consist of knowledge and skills needed in general global health as well as cancer-specific care and research, including understanding global cancer health disparities, defining unique resources and needs in low- and middle-resource settings, and promoting international collaboration. Although the competencies were originally developed for US training programs, they are intended to be widely applicable globally. By formalizing the training of oncologists and supporting career pathways in the field of global oncology, we can make progress in achieving global equity in cancer care and control.

Competing Interests: Declaration of interests VV reports leadership or fiduciary roles in other board, society, committee or advocacy groups, paid or unpaid from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology, African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer, The Lancet, eCancer, and JCO Global Oncology, and is co-editor of the Translational Oncology journal outside of the submitted work. NB-P reports receiving grants or contracts from Zuellig Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer Malaysia, AIA Sdn Bhd insurance company, and Pharmaceutical Association of Malaysia, outside of the submitted work. NB-P also reports receiving payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; receives support for attending meetings or travel from Roche and the Pharmaceutical Association of Malaysia; reports participating on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Pfizer Asia Pacific, Malaysia; reports leadership or a fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups, paid or unpaid with Together Against Cancer; and reports receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Roche Diagnostics, all outside of the submitted work. NF reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Neogenomics, Mirati, and Regeneron; and reports receiving payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novartis outside of the submitted work. SH reports leadership or a fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups, paid or unpaid as President of GENDRO, a non-for-profit association that promotes the mainstreaming of gender in academic research and reporting practices. DM reports receiving grants or contracts from Astellas and Pfizer and reports receiving payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, Amgen, and Merck Sharp & Dohme outside of the submitted work. DM also reports support for attending meetings or travel from Ipsen, and reports participating on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Bayer, Janssen, and Ipsen, all outside of the submitted work. JB reports other financial or non-financial interests with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (salaried as full-time postdoctoral research associate, supported internally by the Geoffrey Beene Foundation) outside of the submitted work. PSH reports other financial or non-financial interests with the National Institutes of Health, Center for Global Health (partial salary support through an Intergovernmental Personnel Act Mobility Program) outside of the submitted work. SM reports consulting fees for P-95 (based in Leuven, Belgium) outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Since 2007, the Oncofertility Consortium Annual Conference has brought together a diverse network of individuals from a wide range of backgrounds and professional levels to disseminate emerging basic and clinical research findings in fertility preservation. This network also developed enduring educational materials to accelerate the pace and quality of field-wide scientific communication. Between 2007 and 2019, the Oncofertility Consortium Annual Conference was held as an in-person event in Chicago, IL. The conference attracted approximately 250 attendees each year representing 20 countries around the world. In 2020, however, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted this paradigm and precluded an in-person meeting. Nevertheless, there remained an undeniable demand for the oncofertility community to convene. To maintain the momentum of the field, the Oncofertility Consortium hosted a day-long virtual meeting on March 5, 2021, with the theme of "Oncofertility Around the Globe" to highlight the diversity of clinical care and translational research that is ongoing around the world in this discipline. This virtual meeting was hosted using the vFairs ® conference platform and allowed over 700 people to participate, many of whom were first-time conference attendees. The agenda featured concurrent sessions from presenters in six continents which provided attendees a complete overview of the field and furthered our mission to create a global community of oncofertility practice. This paper provides a synopsis of talks delivered at this event and highlights the new advances and frontiers in the fields of oncofertility and fertility preservation around the globe from clinical practice and patient-centered efforts to translational research., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Infertility is a major problem affecting children, adolescents, and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, either due to the disease itself or because of oncologic treatment. Oncofertility (OF) focuses on counseling cancer patients about fertility risks and preservation options. However, OF and fertility preservation (FP) conversations on Twitter and their impact are unknown. We aim to characterize the users and type of content of these conversations., Materials and Methods: This observational study analyzed tweets with the hashtags "#Oncofertility" and "#FertilityPreservation" over eight months. We classified Twitter accounts by user type and country. Tweets were categorized by content type, and retweets and likes were quantified. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis., Results: A total of 399 tweets from 223 different accounts were evaluated. Twitter accounts comprised 22 countries and stemmed from high, upper-middle, and lower-middle-income countries in 86.5%, 5.4%, and 6.3%, respectively; no accounts from low-income countries were found. Accounts were mostly from physicians (37%) and healthcare centers (20%); we did not find any patient accounts. The most common content category was informative tweets directed to patients (30.8%), followed by discussion/sharing of medical papers (25.6%). Only 14.5% of tweets contained information about children and adolescents. Still, only 4.5% were aimed at children. Retweets were absent in 16.5% of the tweets, and 80.7% did not have comments., Conclusion: OF and FP discussions on Twitter were limited to interactions among medical professionals. Also, advocacy groups showed limited activity on social media. Even though a significant proportion of tweets directed to patients were found, no active involvement of patients was observed. Finally, limited number of tweets (4.5%) were directed to children and adolescents. There is a need to raise awareness about the effects of cancer on fertility in this group. Currently, Twitter is not a resource of information for children and AYAs with cancer who need OF counseling and fertility preservation. Our results open a debate on how to promote the use of social media in the future to improve the quality of OF information available, awareness, and care since there is an unmet need for fertility preservation access in young cancer patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Martinez-Ibarra, Remolina-Bonilla, Buerba-Vieregge, Barragan-Carrillo, Castro-Alonso, Mateos-Corella and Bourlon.)

Guidelines recommend discussing fertility preservation with patients with cancer. In Mexico, internists frequently are the primary care provider (PCP) for adults in reproductive age. The knowledge of oncofertility among PCPs in low and middle income countries is poorly known. Internal medicine residents in a tertiary care hospital in Mexico City participated in a survey regarding fertility concepts in cancer patients. Sixty-three residents participated; their median age was 27. Thirty percent reported 0% self-perceived confidence for providing counseling about fertility issues, and 26% reported more than 50% self-perceived confidence. Twenty-eight percent reported not asking patients in reproductive age about satisfied parity/paternity. Eighty-one percent correctly identified patients that should receive fertility counseling, and 68% identified alkylating chemotherapy as having the highest risk of infertility. Fifty-four percent were able to name at least one fertility preservation (FP) strategy for males, whereas 49% were able to name at least one strategy in females. Residents who reported at least 50% self-perceived confidence for providing fertility counseling were more likely to name at least one FP strategy for men (64.7%) versus those who reported less than 50% self-perceived confidence (52.1%), but this result was not statistically significant (p = 0.378). This was similar for FP strategies in women, with 64.7% of more confident residents naming at least one, compared with 43.4% of less confident residents (p = 0.134). Knowledge of FP in patients with cancer is insufficient among internal medicine residents in our institution. Inclusion of oncofertility concepts in the internal medicine program is needed., (© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.)

Background: Myelophthisis (MPT) has been associated with a dreadful prognosis. Patients' access to palliative care (PC) and factors influencing its clinical outcomes are poorly described. Our aim was to analyze the impact of patient- and disease-specific characteristics on survival of patients with MPT and describe their use of PC in a resource-limited setting., Methods: Retrospective study including patients with solid tumor MPT, diagnosed between 1996 and 2018., Results: Seventy patients ( median 58 years) were included. 58% were synchronously diagnosed with MPT at time of primary tumor diagnosis. Most common oncologic diagnoses were prostate (25.7%), gastrointestinal (20%), and breast (18.6%) neoplasms. Median overall survival (OS) was 1.9 months. Primaries other than prostate, breast, and lung (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15 - 1.8; p = 0.02) and transfusion requirements (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.01 - 7.9; p = 0.04) were independently associated with decreased OS. Administration of multiple systemic therapeutic interventions (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06 - 0.39; p = 0.01) was the sole factor improving OS. Assessment by PC was pursued in 51.4% of patients. The median number of consults per patient was two, with no difference in assessment rate or consult number across different primaries ( P = 0.96). Four cases of palliative sedation were reported, all performed by the primary care team., Conclusion: MPT is highly heterogeneous and risk stratification to optimize the use of therapeutic interventions in unison with palliative interventions is needed to maximize efforts toward improving patient quality of life. There is an alarming need of PC services in the multidisciplinary management of patients within developing regions.

Background: The early integration of supportive care in oncology improves patient-centered outcomes. However, data are lacking regarding how to achieve this in resource-limited settings. We studied whether patient navigation increased access to multidisciplinary supportive care among Mexican patients with advanced cancer., Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between August 2017 and April 2018 at a public hospital in Mexico City. Patients aged ≥18 years with metastatic tumors ≤6 weeks from diagnosis were randomized (1:1) to a patient navigation intervention or usual care. Patients randomized to patient navigation received personalized supportive care from a navigator and a multidisciplinary team. Patients randomized to usual care obtained supportive care referrals from treating oncologists. The primary outcome was the implementation of supportive care interventions at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included advance directive completion, supportive care needs, and quality of life., Results: One hundred thirty-four patients were randomized: 67 to patient navigation and 67 to usual care. Supportive care interventions were provided to 74% of patients in the patient navigation arm versus 24% in usual care (difference 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.62; p < .0001). In the patient navigation arm, 48% of eligible patients completed advance directives, compared with 0% in usual care (p < .0001). At 12 weeks, patients randomized to patient navigation had less moderate/severe pain (10% vs. 33%; difference 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.38; p = .006), without differences in quality of life between arms., Conclusion: Patient navigation improves access to early supportive care, advance care planning, and pain for patients with advanced cancer in resource-limited settings., Implications for Practice: The early implementation of supportive care in oncology is recommended by international guidelines, but this might be difficult to achieve in resource-limited settings. This randomized clinical trial including 134 Mexican patients with advanced cancer demonstrates that a multidisciplinary patient navigation intervention can improve the early access to supportive and palliative care interventions, increase advance care planning, and reduce symptoms compared with usual oncologist-guided care alone. These results demonstrate that patient navigation represents a potentially useful solution to achieve the adequate implementation of supportive and palliative care in resource-limited settings globally., (© 2020 AlphaMed Press.)

Purpose: Today, male and female adult and pediatric cancer patients, individuals transitioning between gender identities, and other individuals facing health extending but fertility limiting treatments can look forward to a fertile future. This is, in part, due to the work of members associated with the Oncofertility Consortium., Methods: The Oncofertility Consortium is an international, interdisciplinary initiative originally designed to explore the urgent unmet need associated with the reproductive future of cancer survivors. As the strategies for fertility management were invented, developed or applied, the individuals for who the program offered hope, similarly expanded. As a community of practice, Consortium participants share information in an open and rapid manner to addresses the complex health care and quality-of-life issues of cancer, transgender and other patients. To ensure that the organization remains contemporary to the needs of the community, the field designed a fully inclusive mechanism for strategic planning and here present the findings of this process., Results: This interprofessional network of medical specialists, scientists, and scholars in the law, medical ethics, religious studies and other disciplines associated with human interventions, explore the relationships between health, disease, survivorship, treatment, gender and reproductive longevity., Conclusion: The goals are to continually integrate the best science in the service of the needs of patients and build a community of care that is ready for the challenges of the field in the future.

Young women with cancer comprise a special population of patients who experience cancer and oncologic care in a unique way. Recent progress in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches has transformed the landscape of clinical oncology practice. This perspective addresses novel therapies, and some of the main challenges that oncologists face when providing care for young patients in the era of next-generation sequencing and tissue-agnostic approaches through the use of targeted therapies for diverse malignancies., (Copyright: © 2021 Permanyer.)

In recognition of the rising incidence and mortality of cancer in low- and middle-resource settings, as well as the increasingly international profile of its membership, ASCO has prioritized efforts to enhance its engagement at a global level. Among the recommendations included in the 2016 Global Oncology Leadership Task Force report to the ASCO Board of Directors was that ASCO should promote the recognition of global oncology as an academic field. The report suggested that ASCO could serve a role in transitioning global oncology from an informal field of largely voluntary activities to a more formal discipline with strong research and well-defined training components. As a result of this recommendation, in 2017, ASCO formed the Academic Global Oncology Task Force (AGOTF) to guide ASCO's contributions toward formalizing the field of global oncology. The AGOTF was asked to collect and analyze key issues and barriers toward the recognition of global oncology as an academic discipline, with an emphasis on training, research, and career pathways, and produce a set of recommendations for ASCO action. The outcome of the AGOTF was the development of recommendations designed to advance the status of global oncology as an academic discipline.

Purpose: The state of limited resource settings that Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has created globally should be taken seriously into account especially in healthcare sector. In oncofertility, patients should receive their fertility preservation treatments urgently even in limited resource settings before initiation of anticancer therapy. Therefore, it is very crucial to learn more about oncofertility practice in limited resource settings such as in developing countries that suffer often from shortage of healthcare services provided to young patients with cancer., Methods: As an extrapolation during the global crisis of COVID-19 pandemic, we surveyed oncofertility centers from 14 developing countries (Egypt, Tunisia, Brazil, Peru, Panama, Mexico, Colombia, Guatemala, Argentina, Chile, Nigeria, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and India). Survey questionnaire included questions on the availability and degree of utilization of fertility preservation options in case of childhood cancer, breast cancer, and blood cancer., Results: All surveyed centers responded to all questions. Responses and their calculated oncofertility scores showed different domestic standards for oncofertility practice in case of childhood cancer, breast cancer, and blood cancer in the developing countries under limited resource settings., Conclusions: Medical practice in limited resource settings has become a critical topic especially after the global crisis of COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the resources necessary to provide oncofertility treatments is important until the current COVID-19 pandemic resolves. Lessons learned will be valuable to future potential worldwide disruptions due to infectious diseases or other global crises.

Purpose: Oncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale., Methods: Survey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health-funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services., Results: Sixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding., Conclusion: This survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements., Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc. Alexandra S. RashediEmployment: Cigna (I) Stock or Other Ownership: Cigna (I)Antoinette AnazodoResearch Funding: Merck SeronoCassio SartorioEmployment: Vida Centro de Fertilidade Leadership: Vida Centro de Fertilidade Stock or Other Ownership: Vida Centro de FertilidadeCatharina C.M. BeerendonkTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: GoodlifeEllen M. GreenblattConsulting or Advisory Role: Ferring Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: EMD SeronoFernando M. ReisHonoraria: Politec Saúde (I) Consulting or Advisory Role: Politec Saúde (I) Speakers’ Bureau: UCB (I) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbott Laboratories (I)Johan SmitzSpeakers’ Bureau: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ferring PharmaceuticalsMaria T. BourlonLeadership: Medivation, Astellas Pharma Honoraria: Medivation, Astellas Pharma Speakers’ Bureau: Asofarma Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen PharmaceuticalsMichel De VosHonoraria: Cook Medical Research Funding: Cook MedicalRichard A. AndersonConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, HRA Pharma, NeRe Pharmaceuticals Speakers’ Bureau: Roche, Beckman Coulter, IBSA Institut Biochimque Research Funding: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: IBSA Institut BiochimqueRoberto de A. AntunesConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Serono Speakers’ Bureau: Merck Serono Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Serono, MSDTeresa Almeida-SantosConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, MSD Research Funding: MerckTeresa K. WoodruffResearch Funding: Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Inst) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Purpose: In the accompanying article, "Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe," we showed that specific fertility preservation services may not be offered at various sites around the world because of cultural and legal barriers. We assessed global and regional experiences as well as the legal status of third-party reproduction and adoption to serve as a comprehensive international data set and resource for groups that wish to begin oncofertility interventions., Methods: We provide data on the legalities of third-party assisted reproductive technologies and other family-building options in the 28 oncofertility-practicing countries surveyed., Results: We found regional and country differences that will be important in the development of tailored resources for physicians and for patient brochures that are sensitive to these local restrictions and cultural norms., Conclusion: Because many patients first consult Web-based materials, the formal assessment of the availability of these options provides members of the global oncofertility community with data to which they might otherwise not have ready access to better serve their patients., Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc. Alexandra S. RashediEmployment: Cigna (I) Stock or Other Ownership: Cigna (I)Antoinette AnazodoResearch Funding: Merck SeronoCassio SartorioEmployment: Vida Centro de Fertilidade Leadership: Vida Centro de Fertilidade Stock or Other Ownership: Vida Centro de FertilidadeCatharina C.M. BeerendonkTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: GoodlifeEllen M. GreenblattConsulting or Advisory Role: Ferring Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: EMD SeronoFernando M. ReisHonoraria: Politec Saúde (I) Consulting or Advisory Role: Politec Saúde (I) Speakers’ Bureau: UCB (I) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbott Laboratories (I)Flor SánchezPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: patent pendingJohan SmitzSpeakers’ Bureau: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ferring PharmaceuticalsMaria T. BourlonLeadership: Medivation, Astellas Pharma Honoraria: Medivation, Astellas PharmaRichard A. AndersonConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, HRA Pharma, NeRe Pharmaceuticals Speakers’ Bureau: Roche, Beckman Coulter, IBSA Institut Biochimque Research Funding: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: IBSA Institut BiochimqueRoberto de A. AntunesConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Serono Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Serono, MSDSergio RomeroPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: patent pendingTeresa Almeida-SantosConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, MSD Research Funding: Merck SeronoTeresa K. WoodruffResearch Funding: Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Inst) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)