Search

Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the effect of thermal ablation combined with activated functional killer (AFK) cells immunotherapy for patients with malignant tumors., Materials and Methods: A cohort of 10 patients with malignancies received thermal ablation combined with AFK cells immunotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, laboratory test, and postoperative complications were assessed., Results: The success rate of the combination therapy was 100% and no severe complications occurred. Five patients maintained in PFS (50%) during the follow-up. The median PFS was 11 months (range 3.5-16.75 months). The hemoglobin (P = 0.023), hematocrit (P = 0.034), and lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.023); neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.038), neutrophil ratio (P = 0.016), albumin (P = 0.006), and alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.029); CA-125 (P = 0.033); and D-dimer (P = 0.011) changed significant after ablation. Whereas the white blood cell count (P = 0.003), neutrophil count (P = 0.024), lymphocyte count (P =0.003), monocyte ratio (P = 0.008), and eosinophil ratio (P = 0.005) changed significantly after combination therapy. The lymphocytes (P = 0.001) in the surviving patients increased more significantly after treatment. After the combination therapy, the percentage of CD3 + cells (P = 0.016) and CD3 + CD8 + cells (P = 0.002) increased, while CD3 - CD16 + CD56 + (P = 0.002) and CD4 + /CD8 + (P = 0.016) decreased., Conclusion: Combination of thermal ablation and AFK cells immunotherapy is a safe and effective method for patients with malignancy. And adoptive immunotherapy with AFK cells may be helpful to prevent recurrence after thermal ablation in patients with advanced cancer., Competing Interests: None

Oncolytic virus (OV) immunotherapy has demonstrated to be a promising approach in cancer treatment due to tumor-specific oncolysis. However, their clinical use so far has been largely limited due to the lack of suitable delivery strategies with high efficacy. Direct 'intratumoral' injection is the way to cross the hurdles of systemic toxicity, while providing local effects. Progress in this field has enabled the development of alternative way using 'systemic' oncolytic virotherapy for producing better results. One major potential roadblock to systemic OV delivery is the low virus persistence in the face of hostile immune system. The delivery challenge is even greater when attempting to target the oncolytic viruses into the entire tumor mass, where not all tumor cells are equally exposed to exactly the same microenvironment. The microenvironment of many tumors is known to be massively infiltrated with various types of leucocytes in both primary and metastatic sites. Interestingly, this intratumoral immune cell heterogeneity exhibits a degree of organized distribution inside the tumor bed as evidenced, for example, by the hypoxic tumor microenviroment where predominantly recruits tumor-associated macrophages. Although in vivo OV delivery seems complicated and challenging, recent results are encouraging for decreasing the limitations of systemically administered oncolytic viruses and an improved efficiency of oncolytic viral therapy in targeting cancerous tissues in vitro. Here, we review the latest developments of carrier cell-based oncolytic virus delivery using tumor-infiltrating immune cells with a focus on the main features of each cellular vehicle., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The Aim of This Study: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the DC cells combined with CIK cells (DC/CIK) and DC activated cytotoxic T cells (DC-ACT) treatment can promote antitumor response and change the immune indicators by targeting the heterogeneous tumor cell populations at a system level., Methods: In this study, 112 patients with cancer were assigned to the DC/CIK treatment and 116 patients received the DC-ACT therapy. We detected the lymphocyte subsets and other immune indicators pre- and post-treatment to evaluate the changes of patient's immunity and compare the differences in immune status between two adoptive cellular immunotherapies., Results: DC/CIK therapy elevated the percentage of CD3+ HLA-DR+ T cells, NK cells and several serological cytokines such as IL-2, IL-6 after cell infusion ( p < .05). DC-ACT therapy could increase the total CD3 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, CD3+ HLA-DR+ cells and IL-12 cytokines after cell infusion ( p < .05). The levels of IL-4/IFN-γ, IL-4/IL-12 and IL-6/IL-12 were reduced significantly in the DC-ACT group compared with DC/CIK group. These observations suggested that DC-ACT therapy has more dominance to induce Th1 cytokine response instead of skewing toward the Th2 cytokine profile based on the immunomodulatory properties., Conclusions: These results indicated that DC, CIK, and DC-ACT cells exert anti-tumor activity through the different pathways. Thus, this work may provide valuable insights into the clinical curative effect evaluation of immunocyte therapy and the design of combined immunotherapeutic strategies for malignant tumors.

In cell transfer therapy (CTT), immune cells such as innate immune-derived natural killer cells and dendritic cells as well as acquired immune-related T lymphocytes such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and cytokine-activated or genetically modified peripheral blood T cells are used in the management of cancer. These therapies are increasingly becoming the most used treatment modality in cancer after tumor resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In adoptive cell transfer, the lymphocytes isolated from either a donor or the patient are modified ex vivo and reinfused to target malignant cells. Transferring in vitro-manipulated immune cells produces a continuous antitumor immune response. In this review, we evaluate the recent advances in CTT for the management of various malignancies., (© 2019 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.)

For many years, cancer therapy has appeared to be a challenging issue for researchers and physicians. By the introduction of novel methods in immunotherapy, the prospect of cancer therapy even more explained than before. Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell-based immunotherapy demonstrated to have potentiality in improving clinical outcomes and relieving major side effects of standard treatment options. In addition, given the distinctive features such as high safety, low toxicity effects on healthy cells, numerous clinical trials conducted on CIK cells. Due to the shortcomings that observed in CIK cell immunotherapy alone, arising a tendency to make modifications (combined modality therapy or combination therapy) including the addition of various types of cytokines, genetic engineering, combination with immune checkpoints, and so on. In this review, we have tried to bring forth the latest immunotherapy methods and their overview. We have discussed the combination therapies with CIK cells and the conducted clinical trials. This helps the future studies to use integrated therapies with CIK cells as a promising treatment of many types of cancers., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Cancer is a severe lethal disease. Currently, immunotherapy has become an effective alternative therapeutic approach for cancers. Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells have a higher proliferation rate, increased efficacy with few side-effects, and non-MHC-restricted killing after co-culturing with dendritic cells (DCs). Therefore, it has been widely studied and applied in the treatment of cancers. In our study, we explored the antitumor effects of CIK cells co-culturing with DCs pulsed with non-cell derived targeting peptides, which could specifically bind to certain tumor cells. Our results indicated that targeting peptide-loaded DCs could enhance the differentiation and cytotoxicity of CIK cells. Moreover, CIK cells, which were treated with specific targeting peptide-loaded DCs, could effectively and specifically kill tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, as long as tumor cells were pre-coated with the specific binding peptides. In conclusion, targeting peptides could guide DC-CIK to effectively and specifically kill tumor cells which were pre-coated with these targeting peptides and non-cell derived targeting peptide-loaded-DC-CIK may work as a novel means for cancer therapy.

Background: Cytokine-induced killer cells (CIKs) are an advanced therapeutic medicinal product (ATMP) that has shown therapeutic activity in clinical trials but needs optimization. We developed a novel strategy using CIKs from banked cryopreserved cord blood units (CBUs) combined with bispecific antibody (BsAb) blinatumomab to treat CD19 + malignancies., Methods: CB-CIKs were expanded in vitro and fully characterized in comparison with peripheral blood (PB)-derived CIKs., Results: CB-CIKs, like PB-CIKs, were mostly CD3 + T cells with mean 45% CD3 + CD56 + and expressing mostly TCR(T cell receptor)αβ with a TH1 phenotype. CB-CIK cultures had, however, a larger proportion of CD4 + cells, mostly CD56 - , as well as a greater proportion of naïve CCR7 + CD45RA + and a lower percentage of effector memory cells, compared with PB-CIKs. CB-CIKs were very similar to PB-CIKs in their expression of a large panel of co-stimulatory and inhibitory/exhaustion markers, except for higher CD28 expression among CD8 + cells. Like PB-CIKs, CB-CIKs were highly cytotoxic in vitro against natural killer (NK) cell targets and efficiently lysed CD19 + tumor cells in the presence of blinatumomab, with 30-60% lysis of target cells at very low effector:target ratios. Finally, both CB-CIKs and PB-CIKs, combined with blinatumomab, showed significant therapeutic activity in an aggressive PDX Ph + CD19 + acute lymphoblastic leukemia model in NOD-SCID mice, without sign of toxicity or graft-versus-host disease. The improved expansion protocol was finally validated in good manufacturing practice conditions, showing reproducible expansion of CIKs from cryopreserved cord blood units with a median of 28.8 × 10 6 CIK/kg., Discussion: We conclude that CB-CIKs, combined with bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies, offer a novel, effective treatment strategy for leukemia., (Copyright © 2018 International Society for Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Relapse of cancer remains one of the primary causes of treatment failure and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A multitude of approaches have been used in the management of posttransplant relapse. This review focuses on recent data with cellular therapies designed to treat or prevent posttransplant relapse of hematologic malignancies, although many of these therapeutic approaches also have applications to solid tumors and in the nontransplant setting. Currently available cell therapies include second transplant, natural killer cells, monocyte-derived dendritic cell vaccines, and lymphocytes via donor lymphocyte infusion, antigen-primed cytotoxic T lymphocytes, cytokine-induced killer cells, marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells. These treatment options offer the prospect for improved relapse-free survival after HSCT., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.S.W. has received research funding from MedImmune, Kite Pharma, and Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and has served on an advisory committee for Servier. He also is the co-inventor of investigational products with patents assigned to the National Institutes of Health. A.C.D. declares no competing financial interests., (© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology. All rights reserved.)

Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells form under certain stimulation conditions in cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). They are a heterogeneous immune cell population and contain a high percentage of cells with a mixed T-NK phenotype (CD3+CD56+). The ready availability of a lymphocyte source, together with the high proliferative rate and potent anti-tumor activity of CIK cells, has allowed their use as immunotherapy in a wide variety of neoplasms. Cytotoxicity mediated by CD3+CD56+ T cells depends on the major histocompatibility antigen (MHC)-independent recognition of tumor cells and the activation of signaling pathways through the natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) cell-surface receptor. Clinical trials have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of CIK cell immunotherapy even in advanced stage cancer patients or those that have not responded to first-line treatment. This review summarizes biological and technical aspects of CIK cells, as well as past and current clinical trials and future trends in this form of immunotherapy.

Objective: Professional antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) and cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells, components of anti-cancer therapy, have shown clinical benefits and potential to overcome chemotherapeutic resistance. To evaluate whether DC-CIK cell-based therapy improves the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy, we reviewed the literature on DC-CIK cells and meta-analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Methods: We searched several databases and selected studies using predefined criteria. RCTs that applied chemotherapy with and without DC-CIK cells separately in two groups were included. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were reported to measure the pooled effect., Results: Twelve reported RCTs (826 patients), which were all performed on Chinese patients, were included. Combination therapy exhibited better data than chemotherapy: 1-year overall survival (OS) (OR=0.22, P<0.01), 2-year OS (OR=0.28, P<0.01), 3-year OS (OR=0.41, P<0.01), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) (OR=0.16, P<0.05), 3-year DFS (OR=0.32, P<0.01), objective response rate (ORR) (OR=0.54, P<0.01), and disease control rate (DCR) (OR=0.46, P<0.01). Moreover, the levels of CD3(+) T-lymphocytes (MD=-11.65, P<0.05) and CD4(+) T-lymphocytes (MD=-8.18, P<0.01) of the combination group were higher., Conclusions: Immunotherapy of DC-CIK cells may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy on solid cancer and induces no specific side effect. Further RCTs with no publishing bias should be designed to confirm the immunotherapeutic effects of DC-CIK cells.

Background Aims: Adoptive immunotherapy with the use of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells represents an effective therapeutic option for treating malignancies. The characteristics and function of cord blood-derived CIK (CB-CIK) cells have been evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of administering CB-CIK cells to patients with cancer., Methods: In this retrospective clinical trial, 15 patients with cancer received CB-CIK therapy with different cycles from April 2012 to August 2014. CB-CIK cells demonstrated a high percentage of main functional fraction CD3(+)CD56(+) and efficient anti-tumor activity in vitro., Results: After the infusion of CB-CIK cells, the subsets of CD3(+)CD4(+) T lymphocytes and CD3(-)CD56(+) T cells in the peripheral blood were significantly increased compared with those before the therapy. Of 15 patients, one patient with hepatocellular cancer and one patient with esophageal cancer achieved complete responses, two patients with ovarian cancer obtained partial remissions, 10 patients had stable disease and one patient with hepatocellular cancer had progressive disease. Acute toxicities including fever, slight fever, dizziness and other neurologic toxicities were few and occurred in patients after infusion of CB-CIK cells., Conclusions: These results demonstrated the feasibility and safety of treating malignancies with CB-CIK cells. The study provides a potential therapeutic approach for the patients with poor health or older patients who cannot tolerate repeated collection of blood., (Copyright © 2015 International Society for Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells represent a heterogeneous cell population, including a large majority of CD3+CD56+ cells, a relatively minor fractions of typical T cells (CD3+CD56-), and natural killer (NK) cells (CD3-CD56+). In order to elucidate the tumor killing mechanism of these three subpopulations of CIK cells, this review summarized the concordances and differences among CD3+CD56+ CIK cells, CD3-CD56+ NK cells and CD3+CD56- T cells to the following aspects: the effects of cell surface molecules, mechanisms of tumor killing, and clinical applications of these cells in immunotherapy. NK cells can be classified into CD56brightCD16- NK cells, which produce cytokines in response to monokine co-stimulation, and the CD56dimCD16+ NK cells, which contribute to lysing susceptible target. Also, the immunity of NK cells is mainly regulated by several immune-receptors, such as ACR, ICR, NCR and KIRs. T cells require TCR and co-stimulatory molecules for initiation of T cell activation. The CD3+CD56+ CIK cells co-express with T-cell marker CD3 and NK cell marker CD56 to appear the most potent cytotoxicity and high impact on adoptive cellular immunotherapy. These CIK subpopulations share some similar tumor killing mechanisms. LFA-1 not only mediates the binding of NK cells to target cells through its ligand ICAM-1 to localize actin accumulation but also acts as a co-stimulatory receptor on NK cells. LFA-1 also functions as co-stimulatory receptor for T cells to transmit intracellular signals from the TCR to LFA-1. Furthermore, cytotoxic effect of CD3+CD56+ CIK cells is blocked by antibodies directly against LFA-1 and its counter receptor, ICAM-1. Clinically, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is shown in both NK cells and T cells for tumor killing while dendritic cells are another main regulator for the activation of three subpopulations. In summary, CD3+CD56+ CIK cells have dual-functional capability as T-cell subsets which acquire NK cells function and reserve TCR-mediated specific cytotoxicity. Meanwhile, CIK cells play important roles in tumor immunology. It paves the way to more effective immunotherapies for various tumors., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Adoptive immune cell transfer such as cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells has become an important adjuvant approach in patients with tumours., Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the adverse events (AEs) that occur during the transfusion of autologous CIK cells and to identify the risk factors associated with these AEs., Methods: Cell infusion-associated AEs were evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria. Analysis was performed from a single-centre data on 893 malignant tumour patients who received a total of 4088 transfusions from March 2008 to October 2013., Results: A total of 215/4088 (5.26%) transfusion cases from 893 patients presented with AEs (Grade 1 - 4); 204/215 (94.88%) were Grade 1 - 2, and 156/215 (72.56%) occurred within 24 h. The most common AEs were fever (0.88%), chills (0.56%) and fatigue (0.49%). The rare but severe AEs included anaphylactoid purpura, tumour lysis syndrome, anaphylactic shock, arthralgia. No transfusion-associated death was noticed. The mainly relative risk factors for AEs included transfer cycles and clinical stages., Conclusion: This study is a large-sample AEs research, to our knowledge, relative to immune cell transfusion from a single centre data analysis, revealing that autologous CIK cell therapy represents a fairly safe and well-tolerated treatment modality for malignant tumour patients, even rare severe, but not lethal AEs were observed in few patients.

Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells are ex vivo expanded T lymphocytes endowed with potent MHC-independent antitumor activity. CIK cells are emerging as promising therapeutic approach in the field of cancer adoptive immunotherapy, with biologic features favoring their transferability into clinical applications. Aim of this review is to present the biologic characteristic of CIK cells, discussing the main preclinical findings and initial clinical applications in the field of solid tumors.

Background: There are few choices for treatment of advanced cancer patients who do not respond to or tolerate conventional anti-cancer treatments. Therefore this study aimed to deploy the benefits and clinical efficacy of continuous dendritic cell-cytokine induced killer cell infusions in such patients., Materials and Methods: A total of 381 infusions (from 67 advanced cases recruited) were included in this study. All patients underwent peripheral blood mononuclear cell apheresis for the following cellular therapy and dendritic cells-cytokine induced killer cells were expanded in vitro. Peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets were quantified through flow cytometry to address the cellular immunity status. Clinical efficacy and physical activities were evaluated by RECIST criteria and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores respectively. Logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between cellular infusions and clinical benefits., Results: An average of 5.7±2.94x10(9) induced cells were infused each time and patients were exposed to 6 infusions. Cellular immunity was improved in that cytotoxic CD8+CD28+T lymphocytes were increased by 74% and suppressive CD8+CD28-T lymphocytes were elevated by 16% (p<0.05). Continuous infusion of dendritic cells-cytokine induced killer cells was associated with improvement of both patient status and cellular immunity. A median of six infusions were capable of reducing risk of progression by 70% (95%CI 0.10-0.91). Every elevation of one ECOG score corresponded to a 3.90-fold higher progression risk (p<0.05) and 1% increase of CD8+CD28- T cell proportion reflecting a 5% higher risk of progression (p<0.05)., Conclusions: In advanced cancer patients, continuous dendritic cell-cytokine induced killer cell infusions are capable of recovering cellular immunity, improving patient status and quality of life in those who are unresponsive to conventional cancer treatment.

Introduction: Conventional chemotherapies seemed to have reached a therapeutic plateau in the treatment of solid tumors and many metastatic diseases are still incurable. Events of chemo-resistance and relapses appear to be sustained by a subset of putative cancer stem cells (CSCs). New anticancer strategies need to face this new challenge exploring their efficacy against CSCs. Immunotherapy has raised enthusiasms in cancer therapy and its potential against CSCs is an intriguing field of research., Areas Covered: In this work we reviewed the immunotherapy approaches directed against CSCs in solid tumors. We schematically divided adaptive immunotherapy strategies, mainly based on dendritic cell-vaccination, and strategies exploiting MHC-unrestricted effectors like natural killer cells, γδ T lymphocytes and cytokine-induced killer cells. Findings, strength and limitations of these models are discussed and compared highlighting their potential clinical relevance., Expert Opinion: The important biologic role and clinical relevance of CSCs introduced a 'noble target' for immunotherapy and cancer treatments in general. Initial evidences suggest that CSCs may be susceptible to various types of immunotherapy attacks, overcoming their chemo-resistance. Investigation of important safety issues, based on shared features with 'normal' stem cells, along with intriguing synergisms with modulatory agents are open challenges for the next future and effective clinical translation.

CIK cells therapy has been evaluated as an adoptive cell immunotherapy for cancer patients, but there still have not been any standardized systems for evaluating the antitumor efficacy yet. The WHO and RECIST criteria have already been established for a few years but not sufficient to fully characterize the activity of immunotherapy. Based on these two criteria, the irRC was proposed for evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy. A variety of bioassays for immune monitoring including the specific and non-specific methods, have been established. We recommend detect levels of various immunocytes, immune molecules and soluble molecules to find the correlations among them and clinicopathological characteristics to establish criteria for immunological classification. We also recommend a paradigm shift for the oncologists in the evaluation of immune therapies to ensure assessment of activity based on clinically relevant criteria and time points.

Introduction: Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells are mainly CD3(+)CD56(+) NKT cells exhibiting non-MHC-restricted cytotoxicity against a broad range of tumors. Much research is going on to improve CIK cell effectivity and to evaluate the clinical benefit of different combinations with conventional therapies., Areas Covered: This review provides an update on in vitro/in vivo studies and clinical trials applying CIK cells for the treatment of solid tumors. This comprises attempts using additional cytokines, genetic engineering and combinations with different conventional and modern therapies., Expert Opinion: Since our last review, much effort has been made to improve CIK cell cytotoxicity and clinical effectivity. Targeted CIK cell therapy and combinations of CIK cells with antiangiogenic drugs or oncolytic viruses are examples of recent outstanding achievements in the field of adoptive CIK cell therapy. The clinical application of CIK cells in combination with conventional therapies, especially, obtained promising results. However, the best combination and the optimal therapy schedule have yet to be defined.

Adoptive immunotherapy is considered a promising strategy for the treatment of metastatic tumors and current research efforts are directed to define the optimal approach and facilitate the transferability from preclinical to clinical settings. Among several approaches it is possible to schematically distinguish strategies based on either MHC-restricted or MHC-unrestricted immune effectors. The first are mainly based on the infusion of tumor-specific T lymphocytes capable of recognizing determined MHC-restricted tumor associated antigens (TAA) through their T cell receptor. MHC-unrestricted approaches do not target specific tumor associated antigens and are mainly mediated by effectors of the innate immune system, like natural killer (NK) cells or NKT cells, first barrier against pathogens and tumorigenesis processes, or by ex vivo activated lymphocytes like cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells. MHC-unrestricted effectors are usually more abundant than TAA-specific precursors and easier to expand. Furthermore their activity is not restricted to precise HLA-haplotypes, not limited to a single tumor histotype and could overcome downregulation of MHC molecules operated by tumor cells as immune escape mechanism. In this review we will discuss the main cancer immunotherapy strategies based on MHC-unrestricted immune effectors. The topic will be approached from the angle of ex vivo expansion protocols in clinical prospective, as well as potential approaches to favorably modulate their functions.

Introduction: Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells are heterogeneous ex vivo-expanded T lymphocytes with mixed T-NK phenotype and endowed with a wide MHC-unrestricted antitumor activity. CIK cells can be expanded from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cultured with the timed addition of IFN-γ, Ab anti-CD3 and IL2. A consistent subset of mature CIK cells presents a CD3(+)CD56(+) phenotype. The CD3(+)CD56(+) cellular subset is the main responsible for the tumor-killing activity, mostly mediated by the interaction of NKG2D receptor with MHC-unrestricted ligands (MIC A/B; ULBPs) on tumor cells., Areas Covered: In the present work, we described the biologic characteristics of CIK cells, focusing on those aspects that may favor their clinical translation. We reviewed preclinical data and analyzed reports from clinical trials. A specific paragraph is dedicated to future research perspectives in the field., Expert Opinion: CIK cells represent a realistic new option in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Crucial issues, favoring their clinical translation, are the easy availability of large amounts of expanded CIK cells and their MHC-unrestricted tumor killing, potentially effective against many tumor types. Intriguing future perspectives and open challenges are the investigation of synergisms with other immunotherapy approaches, targeted therapies or even conventional chemotherapy.

China is the country where the most clinical trials on CIK cells have been performed. We aimed to provide definite evidence for using CIK cell treatment and extrapolate a common applicative standard for malignancies. We chose the VIP database of Chinese scientific and technological journals to search the literature. We entered the keywords "CIK" or "xi bao yin zi you dao de sha shang xi bao" (the equivalent Chinese phrase for CIK cells, by Chinese characters) and searched for in vivo human trials. In 24 collected trials, 936 patients were treated with CIK cells, 525 men and 246 women. The cultivation time of CIK cells ranged from 7 to 28 days. In five studies, CIK cells were co-cultured with dendritic cells. The total number of CIK cells used ranged from 6×10(6) to 1.5×10(10). The total number of DC-CIK cells used ranged from 1×10(9) to 1.3×10(10). In all studies, those immune parameters and tumour markers examined increased, but not all increased significantly. Of the reported 563 patients, 40 had a complete response, 126 had a partial response, 125 had a minimal response, 135 had stable disease and 58 had progressive disease. The remaining 76 patients did not reach an objective response. The total response rate was 51.7% (291/563). The toxicities were slight. CIK cell treatment is a promising and safe modality for treating malignancies. We proposed a standard for cultivating CIK cells.

The immune system can be harnessed to fight cancer by active (stimulating the patient's intrinsic immune response to cancer) and by passive (transfer of active humoral or cellular immunity) immunotherapy. While for each strategy proof-of-principle was provided, clinical benefit was limited likely due to malfunction of lymphocytes. Increasing knowledge of both the mechanism of vaccination through dendritic cells (DCs) and the potency of a subset of natural killer T lymphocytes termed cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells led to new strategies through combining adoptive and passive immunotherapy. This review summarizes most recent clinical trials indicating that CIK cells can substantially enhance the effect of tumor vaccines and discusses the potential therapeutic benefit in the long-term control of tumor progression., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Expanded activated autologous lymphocyte (EAAL) therapy with CD3(+)CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte and CD3(-)56(+) natural killer cell as the major effector cells is a type of adoptive cell therapy. In this study, 19 patients with metastatic tumors received EAAL therapy. Two to four weeks after the administration of EAAL cells, the subsets of CD3(+)CD8(+) T lymphocytes and CD3(-)CD56(+) natural killer cells in the peripheral blood were increased significantly in comparison with those before the therapy. The number of IFN-γ secreting cells also significantly increased after the EAAL infusion (p=0.002) and the p values for the counts of CD3(+)IFN-γ(+) lymphocytes and CD3(-)IFN-γ(+) lymphocytes were 0.006 and 0.015, respectively. Moreover, the percentage of IFN-γ producing cells of the CD3(+), CD8(+) and CD3(-) subsets after infusion were all increased significantly, which indicated that EAAL therapy was able to enrich the potentially anti-tumor cytotoxic peripheral blood lymphocytes., (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The feasibility and safety of immunotherapy mediated by intentionally mismatched rIL-2 activated killer lymphocytes (IMAK) with no prior stem cell engraftment was investigated in patients with advanced chemotherapy-resistant hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors. Our goals were to maximize anti-cancer activity by using intentionally mismatched donor lymphocytes; amplify killing of target cancer cells by rIL-2 activation of killer cells in vitro and in vivo, and avoid the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by anticipated rejection of alloreactive donor lymphocytes. Conditioning consisted of 5 days of fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) or a single dose of cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), 2 subcutaneous injections of alpha interferon (IFN) 3 x 10(6) and COX2 inhibitors, followed by administration of IMAK (65 +/- 5 CD3(+)CD56(-); 17 +/- 5 CD3(-)CD56(+)) in conjunction with low dose subcutaneous rIL-2 (6 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day) for 5 days for continuous activation of alloreactive donor lymphocytes prior to their anticipated rejection. Here, we present our phase 1 clinical study data in a cohort of 40 high-risk patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Treatment was accompanied by some malaise and occasional self-limited fever but otherwise well tolerated on an outpatient basis. Transient engraftment of donor cells was documented in two patients and only one developed self-limited grade 1 GVHD. Among patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease, long-term progression-free survival was recorded in 5 of 21 evaluable patients with metastatic solid tumors and in four of five patients with hematological malignancies. We conclude that the proposed procedure is feasible, safe, and potentially effective, with some otherwise resistant cancer patients long-term disease-free, thus justifying larger Phase II studies in patients with hematological malignancies and metastatic solid tumors, preferably at a stage of minimal residual disease with the goal in mind to eradicate all malignant cells at an early stage of the disease.