Search

Background: This study aimed to define the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib combined with two different infusion schedules of ifosfamide., Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumours, good performance score, good organ function, and no standard therapy available were eligible. Continuous once daily sunitinib, in escalating doses per cohort, was combined with ifosfamide, 9 g m(-2) for 3 days or 6 g m(-2) for 5 days, administered every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments were performed., Results: With growth-factor support, the MTD of sunitinib combined with either ifosfamide schedule was 12.5 mg in 32 patients enrolled. Neutropenia-related adverse events were dose-limiting toxicities. Sunitinib did not affect ifosfamide PK. Ifosfamide significantly decreased exposure to sunitinib and increased exposure to its metabolite, SU12662. No consistent changes in PD parameters were observed., Conclusion: With growth-factor support, the MTD of sunitinib with both ifosfamide schedules was 12.5 mg. Ifosfamide produced decreased sunitinib blood levels because of CYP3A induction. As PK interactions cannot explain the relatively low sunitinib doses that can be combined with ifosfamide, synergy in toxicity is likely. Whether this also holds true for anti-tumour activity needs to be further explored.

Background: The purpose of this study was to look at the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel, cisplatin-derived platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), when used in combination, to exclude potential clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions., Methods: Fifteen patients with recurrent or metastatic solid tumors were randomized to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 in the first treatment course on day 1 and the same combination plus 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 in the second course, or the two treatment courses in reversed order. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first two cycles., Results: Full pharmacokinetic data was available for 12 of the 15 patients. Treatment was tolerated well, with frequency of toxicity consistent with the safety profile known for docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU. Mean clearance values for docetaxel and cisplatin showed no statistically significant difference across the "triple" and the "double" combination treatments, and the mean pharmacokinetic parameters of all agents were within the ranges for previously reported single agent treatment., Conclusion: No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU used in combination were noticed in this study.

Background: The aim of the study was to determine the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and potential drug interactions of the angiogenesis inhibitor ABT-510 combined with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle in combination with ABT-510. ABT-510 was administered subcutaneously twice daily at doses of 50 mg or 100 mg. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetics were obtained on days 1 (gemcitabine, cisplatin as single agents), 15 (ABT-510 as single agent) and 22 (gemcitabine, cisplatin and ABT-510 as combination)., Results: Thirteen patients received ABT-510 as either 50 mg b.i.d. (seven patients) or 100 mg b.i.d. (six patients) in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin. The most common reported adverse events reflected the known toxicity profile induced by gemcitabine-cisplatin without ABT-510. One episode of hemoptysis occurred in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 13 days of treatment. No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between ABT-510, gemcitabine and platinum were observed. Three partial responses were observed in 12 evaluable patients (one head and neck cancer, one melanoma and one NSCLC)., Conclusions: Combining ABT-510 at doses of 50 mg and 100 mg with gemcitabine-cisplatin is feasible. Pharmacokinetic interactions were not observed and adding ABT-510 does not appear to increase toxicity.

XR11576 is an oral topoisomerase I and II inhibitor. The objectives of this phase I study were to assess the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to describe the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of XR11576 when administered orally on days 1-5 every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumours. Patients were treated with escalating doses of XR11576 at doses ranging from 30 to 180 mg day(-1). For PK analysis, plasma sampling was performed during the first and second courses of treatment and XR11576 concentrations were assayed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass spectrometric detection. In all, 21 patients received a total of 47 courses. The MTD was reached at 180 mg day(-1), with diarrhoea and fatigue as DLT. Nausea and vomiting, although not qualifying for DLT, was ubiquitous. Only in combination with an extensive prophylactic antiemetic regimen consisting of a combination of both dexamethasone and a 5HT3 antagonist was treatment with XR11576 at 120 mg day(-1) tolerable. The systemic exposure of XR11576 increased more than proportionally with increasing dose, with a large interpatient variability. No objective responses were seen; four patients experienced stable disease for periods of 12-30 weeks. In this study, the DLTs of XR11576 were diarrhoea and fatigue. The recommended dose for phase II studies of XR11576 is 120 mg administered orally, on days 1-5 every 21 days. Alternative regimens are currently being explored.

The purpose of this weekly schedule phase I study of liposome encapsulated paclitaxel (LEP) was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the pharmacokinetic profiles, and to evaluate preliminarily antitumour effects in patients with refractory solid malignancies. LEP was administered as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 45 min once every week for 6 out of 8 weeks. Fourteen patients were treated at doses ranging from 90 to 150 mg/m(2)/week. In one patient, DLT was observed at the dose level of 150 mg/m(2)/week, who received less than 70% of the intended cumulative dose. No cumulative toxicities were observed. Stabilisation of disease for 8 weeks was documented in two patients. The whole blood clearance of total paclitaxel was similar for LEP (15.3+/-8.98 l/h/m(2)) and Taxol (17.5+/-3.43 l/h/m(2)), and the extraliposomal to total drug ratio increased rapidly to unity at later sampling time points. The trial was discontinued upon completion of enrolment of the 150 mg/m(2)/week cohort because an assessment of the pharmacokinetics and clinical data suggested that LEP was unlikely to have any advantages over Taxol. It is concluded that this formulation of LEP is unlikely to provide improvements over the taxanes currently in clinical use.

The study described here was designed to investigate the influence of the hydration schedule of cisplatin on the pharmacokinetics of topotecan. To test this hypothesis, 13 adult cancer patients were treated with intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin followed by i.v. topotecan for 5 days every 3 weeks using a short hydration schedule (SHS) for cisplatin in the first course and a hyper-hydration schedule (HHS) in the second course or vice versa. Topotecan pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in plasma, whole blood and red blood cells in both courses on days 1, 2 and 5. 11 patients received both courses and were pharmacokinetically evaluable. No significant differences between the two studied schedules were noted in the clearances of topotecan on day 1 in the different matrices. However, in both hydration schedules, on average, slightly lower topotecan clearances were observed on both days 2 and 5 compared with day 1 in all of the matrices, while no differences were noted between days 2 and 5. This alteration was independent of the schedule used and was less pronounced than that which has been initially reported for SHS and, overall, will not have clinical consequences.

This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility and possible enhanced antitumour activity of the sequential administration of methotrexate (MTX) and docetaxel (D) in patients with solid tumours. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction of the two agents. A total of 22 patients were enrolled, a total of six dose levels were investigated. MTX (days 1+15) 30, 40 and 50 mg/m(2)+D (day 2 or day 1) 75 and 85 mg/m(2) with supportive care measures. Both haematological and non-haematological toxicities were significant, preventing dose escalation above MTX 40 mg/m(2)+D 75 mg/m(2). Four partial responses were documented, three in patients with breast cancer, one in a patient with urothelial cell cancer. Pharmacokinetic data did not give an explanation for the significant toxicity as they revealed no interaction of D and MTX kinetics. Methotrexate and 7-OH MTX kinetics seemed to be independent of the administration of D and the moment of D administration appeared not to influence MTX kinetics. The sequential administration of MTX and D results in significant toxicity without any evidence of a clinical benefit.

Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in a broad phase II program of lurtotecan (GI147211), a novel camptothecin derived topoisomerase I inhibitor, to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population, to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters and to investigate relationships with clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was applied during course one, which involved two sampling time-points. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) and volume of distribution. In total, samples were collected of 109 (63%) of 173 patients. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic evaluation could be carried out successfully in 85 (78%) of the sampled patients. CL of lurtotecan showed substantial variability (mean 87 +/- 28 L/h) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I studies where full pharmacokinetic curves were used. Residual variability in the population estimate of CL was 9.9%. No significant relationships were observed between exposure parameters and toxicity nor likelihood of tumor response, however the latter relationship may well have been obscured by the heterogeneity of the studied population. Prospective implementation of large scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and important to establish whether interpatient variability in drug exposure is a major determinant of toxicity or activity.

Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in the clinical phase II programme of EO9 to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population of patients, to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters, and to investigate relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was developed, which involved three sampling times, and was implemented during course 1. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) of EO9 and area under the curve (AUC). In total, samples were collected of 85 (65%) of the patients. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was successful in 61 (72%) of the sampled patients. CL of EO9 showed substantial variability (median 5.08 l/min; range 2.67-6.42) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I study where full pharmacokinetic profiles were used. No significant relationships were noticed between exposure parameters and safety, but overall limited toxicity was observed. No tumor responses were documented. Prospective implementation of large-scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and may generate important findings, in particular when tumor responses and relevant toxicity are observed.

The topoisomerase I inhibitors reviewed in this paper are all semisynthetic analogs of camptothecin (CPT). Modulation of this intranuclear enzyme translates clinically in to antitumor activity against a broad spectrum of tumors and is therefore the subject of numerous investigations. We present preclinical and clinical data on CPT analogs that are already being used in clinical practice [i.e. topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11)] or are currently in clinical development (e.g. 9-aminocamptothecin, 9-nitrocamptotecin, lurtotecan, DX 8951f and BN 80915), as well as drugs that are still only developed in a preclinical setting (silatecans, polymer-bound derivates). A variety of different strategies is being used to modulate the systemic delivery of this class of agents, frequently in order to increase antitumor activity and/or reduce experienced side effects. Three principal approaches are discussed, including: (i) pharmaceutical modulation of formulation vehicles, structural alterations and the search for more water-soluble prodrugs, (ii) modulation of routes of administration and considerations on infusion duration, and (iii) both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic biomodulation.

Anticancer drugs still are dosed based on the body-surface area (BSA) of the individual patient, although the BSA is not the main predictor of the clearance for the majority of drugs. The relevance of BSA-based dosing has not been evaluated for topotecan yet. A retrospective pharmacological analysis was performed of kinetic data from four clinical Phase I studies in which topotecan was administered p.o. as a single agent combined with data from a combination study of topotecan and cisplatin. A strong correlation (r = 0.91) was found between the area under the plasma concentration time curve of the lactone and carboxylate forms of topotecan by plotting 326 data sets obtained from 112 patients receiving oral topotecan at dose levels ranging from 0.15-2.70 mg/m2. The intrapatient variability, studied in 47 patients sampled for 3 or more days, for the apparent lactone clearance, ranged from 7.4-69% (mean, 24 +/- 13%; median, 20%). The interpatient variabilities in the lactone clearance, calculated with the data of all studied patients, expressed in liter/h/m2 and in liter/h were 38% and 42%, respectively. In view of the relatively high inter- and intrapatient variabilities in topotecan clearance, in contrast to a variability of only 12% in the BSA of the studied patients, no advantage of BSA-based dosing was found over fixed dose regimens.

Cremophor EL (CrEL) is a castor oil surfactant used as a vehicle for formulation of a variety of poorly water-soluble agents, including paclitaxel. Recently, we found that CrEL can influence the in vitro blood distribution of paclitaxel by reducing the free drug fraction, thereby altering drug accumulation in erythrocytes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics of CrEL, and to examine inter-relationships of paclitaxel disposition, infusion duration and CrEL kinetics. The CrEL plasma clearance, studied in 17 patients for a total of 28 courses, was time dependent and increased significantly with prolongation of the infusion duration from 1 to 3 to 24 h (p<0.03). An indirect response model, applied based on use of a Hill function for CrEL concentration-dependent alteration of in vivo blood distribution of paclitaxel, was used to fit experimental data of the 3 h infusion (r2=0.733; p=0.00001). Simulations for 1 and 24 h infusions using predicted parameters and CrEL kinetic data revealed that both short and prolonged administration schedules induce a low relative net change in paclitaxel blood distribution. Our pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model demonstrates that CrEL causes disproportional accumulation of paclitaxel in plasma in a 3 h schedule, but is unlikely to affect drug pharmacokinetics in this manner with alternative infusion durations.

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of pleural and ascitic fluid on the pharmacokinetics of the antitumor camptothecin derivative topotecan. Four patients with histological proof of malignant solid tumor received topotecan (0.45 or 1.5 mg/m2) p.o. on several occasions in both the presence and absence of third space volumes. Serial plasma and pleural or ascitic fluid samples were collected during each dosing and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for both the intact lactone form of topotecan and its ring-opened carboxylate form. The apparent topotecan clearance demonstrated substantial interpatient variability but remained unchanged within the same patient in the presence [110 +/- 55.6 liters/ h/m2 (mean +/- SD of eight courses)] or absence of pleural and ascitic fluid [118 +/- 31.1 liters/h/m2 (mean +/- SD of seven courses)]. Similarly, terminal half-lives and area under the concentration-time curve ratios of lactone:total drug in plasma were similar between courses within each patient. Topotecan penetration into pleural and ascitic fluid demonstrated a mean lag time of 1.61 h (range, 1.37-1.86 h), and ratios with plasma concentration increased with time after dosing in all patients. The mean ratio of third space topotecan total drug area under the concentration-time curve to that in plasma was 0.55 (range, 0.26-0.87). These data indicate that topotecan can be safely administered to patients with pleural effusions or ascites and that there is substantial penetration of topotecan into these third spaces, which may prove beneficial for local antitumor effects.

A new HPLC method has been developed for the quantitative determination of methotrexate (MTX) and its 7-hydroxyl metabolite in human plasma. Samples were purified by protein precipitation with acetone and methanol, and a sample clean-up with a mixture of n-butanol and diethyl ether. The analytes were separated on an RP Inertsil ODS-80A column and eluted in a solvent system containing 5% (v/v) tetrahydrofuran in water (pH 2.0). UV absorption measurement was performed at 313 nm, and the detector response was linear in a concentration range of 10-10,000 ng/ml. The lower limit of quantitation of MTX was 10 ng/ml using 1 ml sample aliquots. Values for accuracy and (within-run and between-run) precision were between 95.5-111% and 3.69-11.0%, respectively, at four concentrations analyzed in quintuplicate on four separate occasions. The assay was applied to study the effects of docetaxel co-administration on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of MTX in cancer patients.

Purpose: 9-Amino-20(S)-camptothecin (9-AC) is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase-I. Recently, a bioavailability of approximately 48% for the oral PEG-1000 formulation was reported. We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral PEG-1000 formulation of 9-AC to define the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity profiles, pharmacokinetic-dynamic relationships, and preliminary antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with oral (PEG-1000) 9-AC given once a day for 7 or 14 days at doses ranging from 0.25 to 1.1 mg/m(2)/d; cycles were repeated every 21 days. For pharmacokinetic analysis, plasma sampling was performed on days 1 and 6 or 8 of the first course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay., Results: Thirty patients were entered onto the study; three patients were not assessable for toxicity and response. Twenty-seven patients received a total of 89 courses. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were myelosuppression and diarrhea at a dose of 1.1 mg/m(2)/d for 14 days. Pharmacokinetics showed a substantial interpatient variation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 9-AC. The intrapatient variability was extremely small. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in WBC count and the AUC of 9-AC lactone (r(2) = 0.86). One partial response was noted in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer., Conclusion: DLTs in this phase I study of oral 9-AC daily for 14 days every 21 days were myelosuppression and diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 0.84 mg/m(2)/d. In view of the substantial interpatient variability in AUC and the availability of a limited sampling model, a pharmacokinetic guided phase II study should be considered.

Objective: To study the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor and antitumor agent 9-amino-20(S)-camptothecin in patients with solid tumors after repeated oral administration., Methods: Thirty-two patients with cancer received oral 9-aminocamptothecin formulated in capsules with polyethylene glycol-1000 as excipient at doses that ranged from 0.25 to 1.5 mg/m2/day. Serial plasma and saliva samples were obtained on days 1 and 6 or days 1 and 8 of the first cycle and analyzed for the lactone and carboxylate forms of 9-aminocamptothecin by HPLC., Results: 9-Aminocamptothecin showed linear and dose-independent pharmacokinetics, with extremely small intrapatient kinetic variability (coefficient of variation: <10%). However, interpatient variability in plasma pharmacokinetics was large (coefficient of variation: 99%). The relative extent of lactone to carboxylate interconversion was large (>90%) and predictable from individual pretreatment serum albumin values (P = .0099). The 9-aminocamptothecin concentration ratio in plasma and saliva was strongly patient dependent, and highly variable around a mean value of <0.8, suggesting that saliva is an unreliable matrix for kinetic monitoring. The area under the curve of the lactone form of 9-aminocamptothecin was significantly correlated with the dose-limiting hematologic toxicity (P < .001)., Conclusion: Our data indicate that the large interindividual pharmacodynamic variability in response to 9-aminocamptothecin is caused mainly by a variability in kinetic characteristics, suggesting that a kinetic-dynamic guided study design is warranted in future clinical investigations.

The clinical pharmacokinetics of the antineoplastic agent irinotecan (CPT-11) are associated with substantial interpatient variability. The degree to which this variability in CPT-11 exposure impacts upon the response and toxicity of the drug has not yet been properly determined. In general, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) is an appropriate indicator of exposure, but requires collection of up to 17 timed blood samples. This presents difficulties if large-scale population samplings are required. The present study involved the development and validation of a strategy to estimate the AUCs of the lactone and total (i.e. lactone plus carboxylate) forms of CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 from a limited number of blood samples in patients co-treated with cisplatin. Using data from 24 patients, univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to generate the models. The best predictive models for simultaneous estimation of CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs were obtained with three time points at 0.5, 1.67 and 5.50 h after start of the 90 min i.v. infusion of CPT-11. The models were tested separately in another group of 24 patients receiving the same combination treatment. This validation set demonstrated that CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs after standard dose administration could be predicted sufficiently unbiased and precisely with three timed samples to warrant clinical application.

Prolonged exposure to topotecan in in vitro and in vivo experiments has yielded the highest antitumor efficacy. An oral formulation of topotecan with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans enables convenient prolonged administration. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships from four Phase I studies with different schedules of administration of oral topotecan in 99 adult patients with malignant solid tumors refractory to standard forms of chemotherapy were compared. Topotecan was administered as follows: (a) once daily (o.d.) for 5 days every 21 days (29 patients); (b) o.d. for 10 days every 21 days (19 patients); (c) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 10 days every 21 days (20 patients); and (d) b.i.d. for 21 days every 28 days (31 patients). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 55 patients using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Totals of 109, 48, 64, and 59 courses were given, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of granulocytopenia for the o.d. x 5-day dosage, a combination of myelosuppression and diarrhea in both of the 10-day schedules, and only diarrhea in the 21-day schedule. Pharmacokinetics revealed a substantial variation of the area under curve (AUC) of topotecan lactone in all of the dose schedules with a mean intrapatient variation of 25.4 +/- 31.0% (o.d. x 5), 34.5 +/- 25.0% (o.d. x 10), 96.5 +/- 70.1% (b.i.d. x 10), and 59.5 +/- 51.0% (b.i.d. x 21). Significant correlations were observed between myelotoxicity parameters and AUC(t) day 1 and AUC(t) per course of topotecan lactone. In all of the studies, similar sigmoidal relationships could be established between AUC(t) per course and the percentage decrease of WBCs. At maximum-tolerated dose level, no significant difference in AUC(t) per course was found [AUC(t) per course was 107.4 +/- 33.7 ng x h/ml (o.d. x 5), 145.3 +/- 23.8 ng x h/ml (o.d. x 10), 100.0 +/- 41.5 ng x h/ml (b.i.d. x 10), and 164.9 +/- 92.2 ng x h/ml (b.i.d. x 21), respectively.] For oral topotecan, the schedule rather than the AUC(t)-per-course seemed to be related to the type of toxicity. Prolonged oral administration resulted in intestinal side effects as a dose-limiting toxicity, and short-term administration resulted in granulocytopenia. On the basis of this pharmacokinetic study, no schedule preference could be expressed, but based on patient convenience, administration once daily for 5 days could be favored.

Preclinical studies indicate enhanced antitumor activity of 9-amino-20(S)-camptothecin (9-AC) when it is administered in a manner that provides prolonged systemic exposure. In view of this observation, the pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of 9-AC polyethylene glycol 1000 capsules were evaluated in 12 patients with solid tumors. Patients were randomized to receive either 1.5 mg/m2 9-AC p.o. on day 1 and 1.0 mg/m2 9-AC i.v. on day 8 or vice versa. Serial plasma samples were collected up to 55 h after dosing and analyzed for 9-AC by liquid chromatography. Plasma concentrations of the lactone and carboxylate forms of 9-AC rapidly reached an equilibrium, with the active lactone accounting for < 10% of total drug at the terminal disposition phase. The drug demonstrated peak levels at 1.2 h and an overall bioavailability of 48.6+/-17.6% (range, 24.5-80.4%), indicating significant systemic exposure to the drug, which may enable chronic oral treatment.

Topotecan is a specific inhibitor to topoisomerase I. An oral formulation of topotecan is available with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans. A phase I and pharmacological study of the oral formulation of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 21 days was performed in adult patients with solid tumours to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adult patients with a WHO performance status < or = 2 adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions, with malignant solid tumours refractory to standard forms were entered into the study. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 4 of the first course using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic assay. 29 patients entered the study, all patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The doses studied in the 29 patients were 1.2, 1.8, 2.3, 2.7 mg/m2/day and a fixed dose of 4 mg/day without surface area adjustment. A total of 109 courses were given. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at a dose of 2.7 mg/m2/day and consisted of CTC (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria) grade IV granulocytopenia. The regimen was well tolerated. Non-haematological toxicities were mild, including fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in white blood cells versus the area under the curve (AUC(t)) of topotecan lactone (R = 0.76 P < 0.01) which was modelled by a sigmoidal Emax function. The correlation coefficient between the absolute topotecan dose administered and the AUC(t) was R = 0.52 (P = 0.04). Pharmacokinetics of the fixed dose of 4 mg/day were comparable to the 2.3 mg/m2/day dose. DLT in this phase I study of five daily doses of oral topotecan every 21 days was granulocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 2.3 mg/m2/day or alternatively, a fixed dose of 4 mg/day.

Prolonged exposure to topotecan (TPT) in in vitro experiments and in vivo studies in animals yielded the highest antitumor efficacy. An oral bioavailability of TPT of 32-44% enables convenient prolonged administration. Because of unpredictable diarrhea in the third week of the twice daily (b.i.d.) 21-day schedule of p.o. administered TPT and the finding of optimal down-regulation of topoisomerase I level after 10-14 days in mononuclear peripheral blood cells, a shorter period of administration (10 days) was chosen for Phase I and pharmacological studies of oral administration of TPT. Adult patients with malignant solid tumors that were refractory to standard forms of chemotherapy were entered. Two dose schedules were studied: once daily (o.d.) and b.i.d. administration for 10 days every 3 weeks. TPT o.d. for 10 days was studied at dose levels 1.0, 1.4, and 1.6 mg/m2/day, and dose levels were 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 mg/m2 with the 10-day b.i.d. schedule. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 8 of the first course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Nineteen patients were entered in the 10-day o.d. schedule, with a total of 48 courses given. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at 1.6 mg/m2/day and consisted of common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade IV thrombocytopenia and CTC grade III diarrhea. The maximum tolerated dose was 1.4 mg/m2/day. In the 10-day b.i.d. administration of TPT, a total of 64 courses were studied in 20 patients. DLT was reached at a dose of 0.8 mg/m2 b.i.d. and consisted of CTC grade IV myelosuppression and CTC grade IV diarrhea. The maximum tolerated dose was 0.7 mg/m2 b.i.d. Nonhematological toxicities with both schedules included mild nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and anorexia. Pharmacokinetics revealed a substantial variation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of TPT lactone in both schedules. Significant correlations were observed between the myelotoxicity parameters and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at day 1 of TPT lactone o.d. and b.i.d. The DLT of 10 daily administrations of oral topotecan every 3 weeks consisted of a combination of myelosuppression and diarrhea for both schedules studied. The recommended doses for Phase II studies are 1.4 mg/m2/day for 10 days for the o.d. administration and 0.7 mg/m2 for the b.i.d. schedule.

Purpose: Topotecan is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Recently bioavailability of an oral formulation of approximately 30% with limited variability was reported. We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral formulation of topotecan to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory malignancies., Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with oral topotecan given twice daily for 21 days, with cycles repeated every 28 days. In subsequent cohorts, the dose was escalated from 0.15 to 0.6 mg/m2 twice daily. Pharmacokinetics were performed on day 1 and 8 of the first course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods., Results: Thirty-one patients entered the study; one patient was not assessable for toxicity and response as therapy was prematurely interrupted on request of the patient who had not experienced toxicity. Thirty patients received a total of 59 courses. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at a dose of 0.6 mg/m2 twice daily and consisted of diarrhea, which started subacutely at a median onset on day 15 (range, 12 to 20) and resolved after a median of 8 days (range, 7 to 16). Other toxicities were mild, including leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting. The MTD was 0.5 mg/m2 twice daily. No responses were observed. Pharmacokinetics showed a substantial variation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at time point "t" [AUC(t)] of topotecan and ring-opened product hydroxyacid. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage of decrease in WBC count versus the AUC(t) of topotecan (r = .75), which was modeled by a sigmoidal maximal effect concentration (Emax) function., Conclusion: The DLT in this phase I study for chronic oral topotecan for 21 days was diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 0.5 mg/m2 twice daily.