Search

Background: Oral and subcutaneous morphine is widely used for the treatment of cancer-related pain; however, solid pharmacokinetic data on this practice are lacking. Furthermore, it is largely unknown which factors contribute to the variability in clearances of morphine and its metabolites and whether morphine clearance is related to treatment outcome., Methods: Blood samples from 49 cancer patients treated with oral and/or subcutaneous morphine were prospectively collected and were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). The influence of age, gender, renal function and several polymorphisms possibly related to the pharmacokinetics of the three compounds was investigated. In addition, the relation between treatment failure and morphine and metabolite clearances was explored., Results: A one-compartment model including an extensive first-pass effect adequately described the data of morphine and its metabolites. Estimated mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios following oral versus subcutaneous administration were: M3G/morphine 29.7:1 vs. 11.1:1; M6G/morphine 5.26:1 vs. 1.95:1; and M3G/M6G 5.65:1 vs. 5.70:1. Renal function was significantly correlated with clearance of the metabolites, which increased 0.602 L/h per every 10 mL/min/1.73 m 2 increase of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), reaching a plateau for eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The clearance of morphine or its metabolites was not found to be correlated with treatment failure., Conclusion: The influence of age-, gender- and pharmacokinetic-related polymorphisms was not identified on the pharmacokinetics of morphine. Clearance of morphine or its metabolites was not found to explain treatment outcome; however, large variations in plasma concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G support further studies on the relation between plasma concentrations and treatment outcome. Dutch Trial Register ID: NTR4369.

Purpose: Our aim was to compare pharmacological aspects of two switching strategies from morphine/oxycodone to methadone; the stop and go (SAG) strategy in which methadone is started directly after the initial opioid has been stopped, and the 3-days switch (3DS), in which morphine/oxycodone is gradually changed to methadone by cross-tapering over 3 days., Methods: Forty-two cancer patients with pain and/or opioid side effects were assessed in this randomised trial. Trough serum concentrations of methadone, morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), and oxycodone were measured on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14. Primary outcome was number of patients with methadone concentrations in apparent C(SS) on day 4. Secondary outcomes were exposure to opioids during the first 3 days, interindividual variation of opioid concentrations, and correlation between methadone concentrations and pain intensity (PI) day 3., Results: Thirty-five patients received methadone (16 in the SAG group, 19 in the 3DS group). The median preswitch morphine equivalent doses were 620 (range 350-2000) mg/day in the SAG group and 800 (range 90-3600) mg/day in the 3DS group (p = 0.43);42% reached C(SS) for methadone in the SAG group on day 4 compared with 22% in the 3DS group (p = 0.42). The SAG group was significantly less exposed to morphine/M6G/oxycodone and significantly more exposed to methadone in the first 3 days. Methadone showed a low correlation with PI. More patients dropped out after intervention in the SAG group than in the 3DS group (38% vs. 5%; p = 0.032). One SAG patient suffered from respiratory depression on day 5., Conclusion: The SAG group was initially more exposed to methadone and less to the replaced opioids but without observed clinical benefit and with a higher dropout rate. Patients switched to methadone should be followed closely for the first 5 days, regardless of switching strategy.

Objective: This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between the plasma concentration of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide and pain in cancer patients receiving oral morphine., Methods: The trough value of plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites were measured by high performance liquid chromatography using an ultraviolet detector. Using this assay system, the plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in 26 cancer pain patients were measured and compared with pain intensity. The pain intensity was assessed at the time of blood sampling using the visual analog scale., Results: The trough value of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide did not show a significant correlation with pain intensity by visual analog scale assessment, but morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine showed a significantly positive correlation (r = 0.528, P = 0.006 and r = 0.671, P < 0.001, respectively). By dividing the group according to low (≤ median value) or high (> median value) VAS scores a significant difference was found between the two groups in morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine (P = 0.045 and P = 0.007, respectively)., Conclusion: These results indicated that the level of morphine-3-glucuronide is related to the patient's perception of morphine effect, and the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine indicated potency to assess clinical effect.

The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G) in children with cancer. Serum concentrations of morphine and M6G in children who received single oral or short term continuous intravenous morphine were determined by HPLC and ELISA assays, respectively. The serum C(max) of morphine and M6G after i.v. morphine administration was 560.5 and 309.0 nM and the T(max) was 61 and 65 min, respectively. The elimination half-life was 140.0 and 328.7 min, respectively. After oral administration of morphine, the serum C(max) of morphine and M6G was 408.34 and 256.3 nM and the T(max) was 40.0 and 60 min, respectively. The half-life was 131.0 and 325.8 min, respectively. The side effects were: drowsiness (100%), nausea and/or vomiting (57%), pruritus (28%) and urinary retention (14%). There were no reports of respiratory complications. This study showed that pharmacokinetics factors of morphine and M6G in children were significantly different from adults. Therefore the required dose for children should be different from that of adults and should be based on studies performed on children rather than on studies on adults. Some adverse effects, particularly nausea and pruritus, may be commoner than is usually thought, while others, particularly respiratory problems did not occur.

Objective: We prospectively investigated the efficacy of opioid rotation from oral morphine to oral oxycodone in cancer patients who had difficulty in continuing oral morphine treatment because of inadequate analgesia and/or intolerable side effects., Methods: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled and 25 were evaluated. The rate of patients who achieved adequate pain control, which provided an indication of treatment success, was evaluated as primary endpoint. The acceptability and pharmacokinetics of oxycodone were evaluated in addition to the assessment of analgesic efficacy and safety during the study period., Results: In spite of intense pain, the morphine daily dose could not be increased in most patients before the study because of intolerable side effects. However, switching to oral oxycodone allowed approximately 1.7-fold increase as morphine equivalent dose. Consequently, 84.0% (21/25) of patients achieved adequate pain control. By the end of the study, all patients except one had tolerated the morphine-induced intolerable side effects (i.e. nausea, vomiting, constipation, drowsiness). Common side effects (>10%) that occurred during the study were typically known for strong opioid analgesics, and most were mild to moderate in severity. A significant negative correlation between creatinine clearance (CCr) value and the trough concentrations of the morphine metabolites was observed. On the other hand, no significant correlation was found between CCr value and the pharmacokinetic parameters of oxycodone or its metabolites., Conclusions: For patients who had difficulty in continuing oral morphine treatment, regardless of renal function, opioid rotation to oral oxycodone may be an effective approach to alleviate intolerable side effects and pain.

A simultaneous determination of morphine (M) and its two metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), by HPLC in the serum of oncological patients is described. The compounds are extracted from the serum by means of Chromabond C18--EC solid-phase-extraction cartridges, separated on a Symmetry C18 analytical column (150 x 4.9 mm, 5 microm) and detected by a UV detector at 210 nm. The mobile phase consisted of 8% acetonitrile in water, 30 mmol/l phosphate buffer (pH 3) and 1 mmol/l octane sulfonic acid as the ion pairing agent; its flow-rate was 0.8 ml/min. Under these conditions, the detection limits were 10 ng/ml, 60 ng/ml and 90 ng/ml for M, M3G, and M6G, respectively. This paper concerns blood serum concentration levels of M, M3G and M6G in oncological patients, their ratios and their role in pain resistance.

Background: Dispositions for genes encoding opioid receptors may explain some variability in morphine efficacy. Experimental studies show that morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide are less effective in individuals carrying variant alleles caused by the 118 A > G polymorphism in the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1). The purpose of the study was to investigate whether this and other genetic polymorphisms in OPRM1 influence the efficacy of morphine in cancer pain patients., Methods: We screened 207 cancer pain patients on oral morphine treatment for four frequent OPRM1 gene polymorphisms. The polymorphisms were the -172 G > T polymorphism in the 5'untranslated region of exon 1, the 118 A > G polymorphism in exon 1, and the IVS2 + 31 G > A and IVS2 + 691 G > C polymorphisms, both in intron 2. Ninety-nine patients with adequately controlled pain were included in an analysis comparing morphine doses and serum concentrations of morphine and morphine metabolites in the different genotypes for the OPRM1 polymorphisms., Results: No differences related to the -172 G > T, the IVS2 + 31 G > A and the IVS2 + 691 G > C polymorphisms were observed. Patients homozygous for the variant G allele of the 118 A > G polymorphism (n = 4) needed more morphine to achieve pain control, compared to heterozygous (n = 17) and homozygous wild-type (n = 78) individuals. This difference was not explained by other factors such as duration of morphine treatment, performance status, time since diagnosis, time until death, or adverse symptoms., Conclusion: Patients homozygous for the 118 G allele of the mu-opioid receptor need higher morphine doses to achieve pain control. Thus, genetic variation at the gene encoding the mu-opioid receptor contributes to variability in patients' responses to morphine.

Background: The feasibility of drug monitoring of serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) during chronic morphine therapy is not established. One important factor relevant to drug monitoring is to what extent morphine, M6G and M3G serum concentrations fluctuate during stable morphine treatment., Methods: We included twenty-nine patients admitted to a palliative care unit receiving oral morphine (n = 19) or continuous subcutaneous (sc) morphine infusions (n = 10). Serum concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G were obtained at the same time on four consecutive days. If readmitted, the patients were followed for another trial period. Day-to-day variations in serum concentrations and ratios were determined by estimating the percent coefficient of variation (CV = (mean/SD) x100)., Results: The patients' median morphine doses were 90 (range; 20-1460) mg/24 h and 135 (range; 30-440) mg/24 h during oral and sc administration, respectively. Intraindividual fluctuations of serum concentrations estimated by median coefficients of day-to-day variation were in the oral group for morphine 46%, for M6G 25% and for M3G 18%. The median coefficients of variation were lower in patients receiving continuous sc morphine infusions (morphine 10%, M6G 13%, M3G 9%)., Conclusion: These findings indicate that serum concentrations of morphine and morphine metabolites fluctuate. The fluctuations found in our study are not explained by changes in morphine doses, administration of other drugs or by time for collection of blood samples. As expected the day-to-day variation was lower in patients receiving continuous sc morphine infusions compared with patients receiving oral morphine.

Background: In patients with pain of malignant origin morphine may be administered in high and often increasing doses during extended periods of time. In patients with chronic pain of non-malignant origin morphine may be an important remedy, and in these cases the goal is to keep the morphine dose stable. The pharmacokinetic as well as the pharmacodynamic consequences of long-term morphine treatment with special reference to the two most important metabolites of morphine morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) remain to be settled., Methods: Assessments for pain, sedation and other morphine induced side effects were made several times for 19 cancer patients treated with changing doses of oral sustained release (SR) morphine and twice for 17 non-cancer patients treated with stable doses of SR morphine. Blood samples were obtained simultaneously and analysed for contents of morphine, M-3-G and M-6-G by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)., Results: Significant correlations were found between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma morphine (r = 0.469, p < 0.01), plasma M-6-G (r = 0.677, p < 0.01), and plasma M-3-G ((r = 0.827, p < 0.01), in the cancer patient group, but only between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma M-3-G (0.662, p < 0.01) and plasma M-6-G (0.571, p < 0.01) in the non-cancer patient group. Normalised M-3-G/M and M-6-G/M ratios for the cancer patient group were independent of duration of treatment and daily dose of SR morphine. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group duration of treatment did not influence the metabolite ratios. Correlations between pain score and plasma morphine, M-6-G and M-6-G/M were weak in the cancer patient as well as in the non-cancer patient group making it impossible to draw any conclusion regarding the potential contributory analgesic effect of M-6-G. Dryness of the mouth was the most frequent adverse effect reported in the non-cancer as well as the cancer patient group. In the latter group patients complaining of dryness of the mouth had significantly higher plasma morphine and M-6-G concentrations than patients who did not suffer from this side effect. This difference persisted (or was close to significance) when excluding patients receiving antidepressants., Conclusion: In the cancer patient group neither dose nor treatment period seems to influence morphine glucuronidation. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group receiving stable doses of morphine duration of treatment does not seem to influence morphine glucuronidation. Dryness of the mouth was positively correlated to high plasma concentrations of morphine and M-6-G.

To provide additional pharmacokinetic evidence for the oral-to-parenteral relative potency ratio of 1:2 to 1:3 for chronic morphine use in a palliative care setting, we determined the plasma concentrations of morphine and its major metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), in hospitalized advanced cancer patients maintained on long-term oral or intravenous morphine. There were significant linear correlations between daily doses of morphine and plasma concentrations (molar base) of morphine, M3G and M6G for both routes of administration. The oral-to-intravenous relative ratios of the regression coefficients were 2.9 for morphine and 1.8 for morphine + M6G. The morphine kinetic variables were not significantly influenced by any hepato-renal biochemical markers. These results support the commonly used oral-to-intravenous relative potency ratio of 1:2 to 1:3 in patients with cancer pain receiving chronic morphine treatment.

Background: In order to make treatment decisions physicians should have knowledge about the relations between patient characteristics and drug disposition. Dose, route of administration, gender, age and renal function are reported to influence the serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucurnide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) during chronic treatment of cancer pain. These factors, however, are not evaluated in studies with a sample size sufficient to explore predictive factors., Methods: Three hundred consecutive morphine users admitted because of a malignant disease were recruited. The relations of serum concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G to patient characteristics (gender, age, weight, renal function, liver function, dose, route of administration) were explored, and regression analysis performed to investigate whether these characteristics predicted serum concentrations obtained during routine clinical drug monitoring., Results: Morphine dose was associated with serum concentrations of morphine (r = 0.69), M6G (r = 0.76) and M3G (r = 0.76). Oral morphine resulted in higher dose-adjusted M6G and M3G serum concentrations compared with s.c. morphine. Creatinine serum concentrations correlated with serum concentrations of M6G and M3G. Dose and route of administration predicted morphine serum concentrations, while dose and renal function predicted M6G and M3G serum concentrations. Age was an additional factor predicting M3G concentrations. Dose was the only factor that explained a clinically significant part of the observed variability., Conclusion: Patient characteristics predict only minor parts of the variability of morphine, M3G and M6G serum concentrations observed during routine clinical drug-monitoring in cancer patients.

Morphine, the recommended drug for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain, is metabolized predominantly to the glucuronides morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G). The quantitative clinical importance of these metabolites following the administration of oral morphine is unclear. This study investigates the relationship between plasma concentrations of morphine (M), M6G, M3G and clinical effects in patients receiving sustained release oral morphine for cancer-related pain. Peak and trough plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). At corresponding time points, pain [Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), Verbal Rating Scales (VRS), Pain Relief Scores (PRS)] and toxicity (VAS and VRS) were assessed. Renal and liver function tests were performed. Forty-six patients were included in the study. There was a significant correlation between dose and both peak and trough plasma M, M6G and M3G (r > 0.60, P < 0.001 for each). Differences between peak and trough M, M6G, M3G, M+M6G, M6G:M, M3G:M and M3G:M6G were all significant (P < 0.001 for each). Pain was generally well controlled in the group, with a median VAS of 15 mm at the peak blood sampling time point. The differences between peak and trough values for VAS pain, VAS nausea and VAS drowsiness were not statistically significant (P = 0.078, 0.45 and 0.099, respectively). There were no differences in peak or trough morphine and metabolite concentrations or ratios between patients with low (< median) or high pain scores. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between high and low plasma concentrations and clinical effect. This study did not identify a simple relationship between plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine metabolites or metabolite ratios and clinical effects in patients with cancer and pain who were receiving chronic oral morphine therapy. Although overall pain control was good, there was marked interpatient variability in the dose of morphine and the plasma concentrations necessary to achieve this degree of analgesia.

Objective: UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7 is the major UGT isoform responsible for the 3- and 6-glucuronidation of morphine in humans. Studies in rats have indicated that UGT1A1 may also contribute to the formation of morphine 3-glucuronide (M3G). Our objective was to investigate whether the UGT2B7 H268Y and UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms contribute to the variability in morphine glucuronide-to-morphine plasma ratios among cancer patients undergoing analgesic therapy with morphine., Methods: Seventy patients with normal hepatic and renal function using slow-release morphine to relieve cancer pain were included. UGT2B7 genotyping was performed using restriction enzyme analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified DNA fragments. Wild-type and variant alleles of the UGT1A1 gene were identified using sizing of PCR-amplified fragments. Morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G)/morphine, M3G/morphine, and M3G/M6G plasma ratios were compared between genotypes., Results: The M3G/morphine, M6G/morphine, and M3G/M6G plasma ratios varied 16-, 42-, and sevenfold, respectively, among individuals. No statistically significant differences in plasma ratios were found between individuals possessing UGT2B7 H/H ( n=20), H/Y ( n=30), or Y/Y ( n=20) genotypes. Five patients were homozygous for the UGT1A1 TA(7) allele, which is associated with reduced UGT1A1 gene expression. However, the mean M3G/M6G and M3G/morphine plasma ratios in TA(7) homozygous subjects did not differ significantly from those of heterozygous or homozygous wild-type (TA(6)) individuals., Conclusion: The UGT2B7 H268Y polymorphism cannot account for the considerable variation in glucuronide-to-morphine ratios in cancer patients. Moreover, the contribution of UGT1A1 to the formation of M3G appears to be of minor biological significance, at least in a UGT2B7 background.

Delirium often causes severe distress for terminally ill cancer patients, and treatment of underlying pathologies is important to achieve symptom alleviation. Although accumulation of morphine metabolites may play an important role in development of delirium, empirical findings are conflicting due to a large inter-individual variation in morphine-related concentrations. To explore intra-individual changes of morphine metabolite concentrations before and after occurrence of terminal delirium, a prospective observational study was performed on terminally ill cancer patients. Among 131 consecutive hospice inpatients, 16 samples from 8 patients who received two blood samplings before and after development of delirium were analyzed. Delirium developed a median of 5 days before death, and clinical causes were attributed to multi-organ failure. Plasma concentrations of morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) significantly increased after development of delirium within the same patient. Mean normalized concentrations of M-6-G and M-3-G elevated from 1.24 +/- 1.06 to 2.94 +/- 3.52 ng/mL/mg (P = 0.016), and from 7.46 +/- 4.75 to 15.4 +/- 13.2 ng/mL/mg (P = 0.016), respectively. Normalized morphine concentration increased with a marginal statistical significance from 0.54 +/- 0.27 to 0.83 +/- 0.22 ng/mL/mg (P = 0.055). In conclusion, plasma concentrations of M-6-G and M-3-G were significantly higher after development of terminal delirium than before. It is suggested that accumulations of morphine metabolites can contribute to development of delirium in cancer patients whose death is impending.

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a newly developed controlled-release suppository (MSR) with MS Contin tablets (MSC) in cancer patients with pain., Methods: In a double-blind, randomised, two-way cross-over trial, 25 patients with cancer pain were selected with a morphine (M) demand of 30 mg every 12 h. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 received active MSC (30 mg) and placebo MSR, followed by placebo MSC and active MSR (30 mg) each for a period of 5 days. Group 2 started with active MSR and placebo MSC, followed by active MSC and placebo MSR, each for a period of 5 days. Blood for determination of plasma concentration of morphine (M) and its 3- and 6-glucuronides (M3G, M6G) was collected, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)0-12 h, peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax), and CO and C12 of M, M6G and M3G were determined on day 5 and day 10. Intensity of pain experienced by each patient was assessed every 2 h on a 0-10 scale, while side effects and rescue medication were recorded., Results: Twenty patients (ten patients in each group) completed the study. A pronounced inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations of M, M3G and M6G was observed after administration of both forms. Apart from the C0 and C12, no significant differences in AUC0-12 h, tmax and Cmax of morphine between the rectal and oral route of administration were found. In the case of the metabolites, it was found that AUC0-12 h and Cmax of M6G, and AUC0-12 h, Cmax, C0 and C12 of M3G after rectal administration were significantly lower than after oral administration. However, apart from the tmax of M6G, none of the pharmacokinetic parameters of M, M6G or M3G met the criteria for bioequivalence. There were no significant (P = 0.44) differences in pain intensity score between the oral and rectal forms within the two groups, regardless of the treatment sequence. No treatment differences in nausea, sedation or the demand on escape medication (acetaminophen tablets) between the rectal and oral forms were observed., Conclusion: The newly developed controlled-release M suppository is safe and effective and may be a useful alternative for oral morphine administration in patients with cancer pain.

Oxycodone is an opioid analgesic that closely resembles morphine. Oxymorphone, the active metabolite of oxycodone, is formed in a reaction catalyzed by CYP2D6, which is under polymorphic genetic control. The role of oxymorphone in the analgesic effect of oxycodone is not yet clear. In this study, controlled-release (CR) oxycodone and morphine were examined in cancer pain. CR oxycodone and morphine were administered to 45 adult patients with stable pain for 3-6 days after open-label titration in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Twenty patients were evaluable. Both opioids provided adequate analgesia. The variation in plasma morphine concentrations was higher than that of oxycodone, consistent with the lower bioavailability of morphine. Liver dysfunction affected selectively either oxycodone or morphine metabolism. Three patients with markedly aberrant plasma opioid concentrations are presented. Significant individual variation in morphine and oxycodone metabolism may account for abnormal responses during treatment of chronic cancer pain.

Objectives: (1) To determine the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) in children with cancer receiving morphine as immediate-release morphine liquid or sustained-release tablets. (2) To determine differences with age within the group and from adults. (3) To explore relationships between plasma concentration and pain measurements., Study Design: Blood samples were collected and plasma analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical and fluorescence detection. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were derived with the program P-PHARM., Results: Forty children with a median age of 11.4 years (range 1.7 to 18.7 years) received a median dose of 1.4 mg/kg/d (range 0.4 to 24.6 mg/kg/d). A median of 4 blood samples per child was collected. Plasma clearance of morphine was 23.1 mL/min per kg body weight. The volume of distribution was 5.2 L/kg. Molar ratios of M3G/morphine, M6G/morphine, and M3G/M6G were 21.1, 4.7, and 4.2, respectively. Children <11 years had significantly higher clearance and larger volume of distribution for morphine and its glucuronides than older children and adults. Regression analysis indicated average plasma morphine concentration equal to dose (mg/kg/d) x 8.6 (95% confidence interval 7.4 to 9.9). Significant pain was present in 30% of the children. Higher pain scores were recorded in children with average morphine concentrations <12 ng/mL (P <.01 MW)., Conclusion: Age differences in morphine pharmacokinetics exist within children and compared with adults. The study supports a starting dose of 1.5 to 2. 0 mg/kg/d to provide plasma morphine concentrations >12 ng/mL in children with cancer pain unrelieved by mild to moderate strength analgesia.

Unlabelled: Twenty-three patients treated with intracerebroventricular (ICV) morphine in this study not only obtained excellent pain relief without rapid increases in dose, but also experienced a reduction in morphine-related side effects. By 24 h after initiation of ICV morphine, the mean trough cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) morphine concentration (approximately 20 microM) was 50-fold higher than the baseline concentration (approximately 0.4 microM), and the CSF concentration of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) was undetectable (<0.01 microM). The mean CSF concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) decreased 90%, from a baseline concentration of 1 microM to 0.1 microM by Day 7 postventriculostomy. Thereafter, the mean trough CSF M3G concentration remained relatively constant while ICV morphine was continued, although the concomitant M3G plasma concentrations were undetectable (<0.01 microM). The large increase in the CSF morphine concentration in patients receiving ICV morphine strongly suggests that increased CSF morphine levels are unlikely to be the primary cause of analgesic tolerance or undesirable excitatory side effects (hyperalgesia, myoclonus, seizures) experienced by some patients receiving chronic large-dose systemic morphine., Implications: After initiation of intracerebroventricular morphine, cancer patients experienced excellent pain relief. Although the mean morphine concentration in cerebrospinal fluid increased 50-fold relative to preventriculostomy levels, rapid dose increases did not occur, which suggests that increased cerebrospinal fluid morphine levels are unlikely to be the main cause of analgesic tolerance.

The relationships between plasma morphine and metabolite (M3G and M6G) concentrations and analgesic efficacy were investigated in an open study of 39 cancer pain patients receiving chronic oral morphine therapy with either morphine sulfate solution or controlled-release morphine tablets. There were no differences in morphine, metabolite kinetics, or analgesic efficacy between equivalent doses of conventional or controlled-release formulations. The increase in morphine plasma concentration after a dose (1 hr for normal release, 2 hr for controlled release) was correlated significantly with the dose of morphine (r = 0.914, P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in pain intensity (P < 0.05) and increase in pain relief (P < 0.001) after the dose of morphine administration, when compared with the predose score. One-half of the patients had mild and tolerable adverse effects. Patients were classified by mean pain relief between doses as having optimal, moderate, or poor pain control. No simple relationship was found between morphine plasma concentration and pain control. Morphine plus M6G concentrations in the "optimal control" group (751.2 +/- 194 nmol/L), however, were more than twice those found in the "moderate control" group (276.9 +/- 41.9 nmol/L) (P < 0.05), and no patient in the moderate control group had a morphine plus M6G concentration greater than 405 nmol/L. These results support the importance of M6G in morphine analgesia. For these hospitalized patients, there appeared to be a therapeutic range of morphine plus M6G plasma concentrations for optimal pain control with a lower limit of 400 nmol/L predose.

The active morphine metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G), may contribute to both the analgesia and the adverse effects observed during morphine (MOR) therapy. To evaluate the relationship between M-6-G and adverse effects, we measured steady-state plasma concentrations of MOR and M-6-G and concurrently noted the presence or absence of moderate to severe cognitive impairment or myoclonus in 109 cancer patients who were receiving either oral (n = 71) or parenteral (n = 38) morphine. MOR and M-6-G plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC with electrochemical detection. The presence of cognitive impairment or myoclonus was analyzed in relation to molar M-6-G/MOR ratio, age, morphine dose, the use of other centrally acting drugs, renal function (blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine), hepatic function (serum bilirubin, serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (SGOT), and alkaline phosphotase) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The patient population consisted of 60 women and 49 men. The mean age was 51.5 years (range: 10-85 years). The mean morphine dose (total dose-prior 48 h) was 486 mg (range: 40-4800 mg) for the oral group and 931 mg (range: (10-9062 mg) for the parenteral group. The mean molar M-6-G/MOR ratios were 6.1 (SD: 18.2; range: 0.01-153.3) for the oral treatment group and 2.7 (SD: 4.16; range: 0.05-23.8) for the parenteral treatment group. Overall, the M-6-G/MOR ratio demonstrated a moderate but significant correlation with BUN (r = 0.4; P < 0.001) and creatinine (r = 0.45; P < 0.001) levels, but not with the other clinical variables examined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The plasma concentrations and renal clearance values of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were determined in 11 adult cancer patients maintained on a long term oral morphine dosage (10 to 100mg every 4h). Concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by a specific high performance liquid chromatography assay. In this group of patients, whose creatinine clearance values ranged from 52 to 180 ml/min (3.12 to 10.8 L/h), average steady-state plasma concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G were related (p < 0.01) to the morphine dose per kilogram of bodyweight. The mean total urinary recovery as morphine, M3G and M6G was 74.6 +/- 26.5% of the dose. Renal clearance values for M3G and M6G were closely related (r2 = 0.80; p < 0.0005). It was not possible to detect a relationship between the renal clearance of morphine, M3G and M6G, and that of creatinine. The renal tubular handling of all 3 compounds showed wide interindividual variation, and there was evidence of either net renal tubular secretion or reabsorption. There was no apparent relationship between plasma morphine and M6G concentrations and pain relief.

Plasma morphine concentrations were measured in five cancer patients receiving long-term epidural morphine administration. Peak concentrations were observed within 1 h of dosage and concentrations then declined biexponentially. Plasma morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) concentrations were measured in two patients and plasma M3G concentrations were observed to be much higher than plasma M6G and morphine concentrations. Peak plasma M6G concentrations occurred within 1.0 h of dosing and plasma M6G concentrations then remained higher than plasma morphine concentrations.

Sustained-release morphine (MST) given by the rectal route was compared with oral MST in an open randomised cross-over trial in ten patients with cancer who received stable doses of MST. No significant difference was found in the areas under the curve of the concentration-time profiles (AUC) following oral or rectal administration for parent morphine. The AUCs determined for morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) after oral administration were approximately twice those obtained following rectal administration. The maximal concentration achieved was lower and the time to maximal concentration was longer following rectal administration for morphine, M6G and M3G. The relative mean arrival times following rectal administration were significantly longer for morphine and M3G but not for M6G. These findings suggest slower absorption but less first-pass metabolism of MST after rectal administration. No significant difference was noted between the oral and the rectal route in measurements on visual-analogue scales for pain or side effects. We recommend the rectal route as being suitable for MST administration when the oral route is no longer available. In changing from oral to rectal administration, the same dose and dose interval may be used, but dose adjustment may be needed.

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) is an active metabolite of morphine that may contribute to drug effects. To understand better the relationship between morphine and M-6-G in cancer patients receiving chronic therapy, we employed high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection to measure: (1) morphine and M-6-G plasma concentrations following discontinuation of dosing in 2 patients, one receiving oral therapy and the other an intravenous infusion; (2) morphine and M-6-G concentrations in random blood samples taken at apparent steady state from 8 patients, 7 with normal renal function and 1 with mild renal insufficiency, who were receiving continuous morphine infusions; and (3) morphine and M-6-G concentrations in random blood samples taken over a period of weeks from 4 patients, 2 with stable and 2 with declining renal function. Results demonstrated a slightly slower decline in plasma M-6-G than morphine concentrations following drug discontinuation, as would be expected for metabolite and parent relationship; roughly similar M-6-G: morphine ratios (mean molar ratio = 1.22) across a broad range of morphine doses in patients with normal renal function; and an increase in this ratio over time in patients with progressive renal dysfunction. These data illustrate the kinetics of M-6-G in cancer patients receiving chronic morphine therapy and confirm the importance of renal function in determining the concentration of the metabolite.

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) is an active metabolite that may contribute to the clinical effects produced by systemic administration of morphine. To help clarify the extent to which M-6-G may cross the blood-brain barrier and exert effects, we employed high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection to measure the concentrations of M-6-G and morphine in the plasma and either ventricular (three patients) or lumbar (eight patients) CSF of cancer patients receiving chronic morphine therapy. The mean ratio of morphine in ventricular CSF:morphine in plasma was 0.71; the same ratio for M-6-G was only 0.077. The average molar ratio of M-6-G: morphine in ventricular CSF was 0.207, and the average molar ratio in plasma was 1.89. Although sampling problems render the lumbar CSF results less reliable, they were very similar. Thus, plasma contained approximately twice as much M-6-G as morphine, whereas CSF contained only one-fifth to one-third as much. These data confirm that M-6-G in plasma is distributed into CSF, but to a far lesser extent than morphine. They help explain animal data demonstrating much higher potency of M-6-G on administration into CSF than systemic administration and indicate that the degree to which M-6-G contributes to morphine effects in humans remains an unresolved question.

The single-dose and steady state kinetics of morphine given as controlled-release tablets (30 mg every 12 h) and as a solution (15 mg every 6 h) have been compared in 11 cancer patients with chronic pain. The concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were analyzed by HPLC. There were no significant differences between the tablets and solution in the mean steady state concentrations of morphine, M3G or M6G. The tmax was 3.3 h for the tablets compared to 1.1 h for the solution. After giving the controlled-release tablets every 12 h there was a significantly higher fluctuation index of the morphine concentrations than after the solution. Urinary recovery at steady state was comparable between the two preparations, with averages of 57% and 47%, respectively. Thus, no major differences were found in the pharmacokinetics of morphine and its glucuronidated metabolites after 30 mg morphine as controlled-release tablets every 12 h or 15 mg of morphine solution every 6 h, except for a significantly longer tmax and greater fluctuation in morphine concentrations after the controlled-release tablets.

Clinical studies on the effectiveness of morphine administered through different routes are contradictory. In order to further elucidate this point, the plasma concentrations of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronated metabolites were measured after short-term oral, sublabial, rectal and subcutaneous administration of the opiate. The bioavailability of free morphine and the 6-glucuronated active metabolite was comparable through the different routes. It was concluded that the choice of the route of morphine administration should be mainly guided by the needs of each individual patient.

One hundred fifty-one patients with chronic cancer pain were studied during chronic treatment with oral morphine. Plasma concentrations of morphine and metabolites (M3G and M6G) were measured. The ratio of plasma morphine to metabolites was not affected by dose. Generalized linear interactive modeling analysis using morphine dose, age, sex, renal and hepatic dysfunction, and concomitant medication as explanatory variables accounted for 70% of the variance in plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). Increasing morphine dose was a significant factor for increased plasma concentrations of morphine, M3G, and M6G. Other significant factors were: age greater than 70 years (increased M3G and M6G plasma concentrations), plasma creatinine greater than 150 mumol/L (increased M3G and M6G plasma concentrations), male sex (decreased morphine and M6G plasma concentrations), raised creatinine plus coadministration of tricyclic antidepressants (increased M3G plasma concentrations), ranitidine (increased morphine plasma concentrations), and raised creatinine plus coadministration of ranitidine (increased M6G plasma concentrations).

A convenient and sensitive analytical method for determination of plasma morphine and its metabolites in cancer patients was established using HPLC with a column-switching technique. Sample plasma which has been deproteinized with trichloroacetic acid is injected onto a precolumn, then the compounds of interest are preferentially introduced into the analytical column for separation and detection after washing out the unnecessary plasma components from the precolumn. Detection was simultaneously performed with coulometry for unchanged morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide and with UV analysis for morphine-3-glucuronide. Analytical recoveries were greater than 99% for these compounds, and the averaged coefficients of within-day or between-day variation did not exceed 5.5%. Detection limits were 0.2 ng/mL for morphine, 0.5 ng/mL for morphine-6-glucuronide, and 10 ng/mL for morphine-3-glucuronide. Correlation between the previously reported solid extraction method and this method was satisfactory in plasma samples after administration of morphine.

There is growing evidence that renally-impaired patients receiving morphine therapy are at greater risk of developing opiate toxicity, due to the accumulation of an active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), which is usually excreted by the kidneys. This study examined the relationships between morphine dosage, renal function, and trough plasma concentrations of morphine and its glucuronide metabolites in 21 patients (aged mean: 68.5 years: 11 males) receiving either oral or subcutaneous morphine for terminal cancer pain. The median daily morphine dosages (mg.kg-1) were: orally 1.87 (range 0.37-6.82) and subcutaneously 1.64 (range 0.22-3.60). The median plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and M6G (ng.ml-1) were: 36.0, 1035.2, and 142.3, respectively. The plasma concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G were each significantly related to the daily morphine dosage (n = 21, Spearman r = 0.79, 0.91, and 0.88 respectively). Accumulation of the morphine glucuronides was dependent on renal function. The plasma concentrations of M3G and M6G, when divided by the morphine concentration, were significantly related to the calculated creatinine clearance of the patient. Patients receiving oral morphine had higher plasma concentration ratios of glucuronide/morphine than those receiving subcutaneous therapy, presumably due to first-pass glucuronidation. The results of this study confirm that accumulation of the pharmacologically active M6G is related to renal function, which probably explains the observation that morphine dosage requirements are generally reduced in patients with renal impairment.

The bioavailability of oral controlled release morphine tablets (MST, Napp Laboratories) and oral morphine sulphate in aqueous solution (MSS) was compared in 10 patients with advanced cancer. Serum samples were analysed for morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) using a specific HPLC assay. The relative bioavailability of morphine with MST was significantly less than that with MSS (mean 80%, range 50-110%) although there was no difference between the formulations in the relative availability of M3G and M6G. There was no significant difference between the formulations in the serum concentration of morphine at 12 h. The mean ratios morphine: M6G:M3G (comparing areas under the serum concentration-time curves) were 1:9:56. There was a highly significant linear relationship between the dose administered and AUC for morphine, M3G and M6G after MSS; and for morphine after MST. Median tmax for morphine was 0.5 h with MSS and 2.5 h with MST; for M3G 1.5 h with MSS and 3.0 h with MST; and for M6G 1.5 h with MSS and 3.25 h with MST. A secondary peak of unconjugated morphine, which may represent enterohepatic circulation, was seen in several patients 2-4 h after administration of elixir and 4-6 h after administration of MST.