Search

Taking into account higher risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 or death among patients with cancer, as well as impaired immunogenicity after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, in addition to waning immunity, booster dosing appears mandatory in this patient population. This review sought to provide reasonable evidence so as to assist oncologists in their daily practice, helping them decide when an anti-SARS-Cov2 antibody (Ab) dosage should be scheduled after a full two-dose vaccination and, if necessary, propose an early third dose (D3). Such D3 could apply to non-responder patients with anti-Spike (S) Abs titres <40 binding Ab unit (BAU)/mL. For lowresponder patients with anti-S Ab titres between 40 BAU/mL and 100/260 BAU/mL (suggested area of uncertainty), an early D3 may similarly be proposed. Nevertheless, this D3 could be administered in a less urgent manner, taking into account associated comorbidities and regional epidemic incidence rates. This latter strategy may comprise a monthly dosage of anti-S titres so as to better assess the kinetics of waning immunity. For responder patients with anti-S titres above 260 BAU/mL, we suggest to follow the recommendations outlined for the general population. Given this context, patients with anti-S titres above 1000 BAU/mL should be given the possibility to undergo anti-S titre control after three months, designed to assess rapid humoral waning immunity. We strongly recommend that patients with cancer be included into observational serological monitoring studies or clinical trials that are dedicated to severe immunocompromised patients without any humoral seroconversion after D3., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement J. Barrière reports fees from BMS and Mylan Medical, all outside the submitted work. C. Audigier-Valette reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer–Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Roche AbbVie; grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer–Ingelheim, BMS, Novartis, Roche MSD GSK; reimbursement for international meetings assistance from AstraZeneca, Boehringer–Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; all outside the submitted work. M. Carles, D. Re, A. Zoubir and B. Seitz-Polski have nothing to disclose. V. Gounant reports personal fees from MSD, Chugai, Novartis and Boehringer; personal fees and non-financial support from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Takeda and Pfizer; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Roche, all outside the submitted work; D. Descamps received honoraria and travel grants from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, MSD and Janssen-Cilag, all outside the submitted work. G. Zalcman received research grants from Roche-France, BMS, and Takeda perceived fees from BMS, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer and Borhinger-Ingelheim; reimbursement for international meetings assistance from AbbVie, MSD, Astra-Zeneca, BMS and Roche-France, all outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact at all stages of cancer treatment. Risk of death from COVID-19 in patients treated for a cancer is high. COVID-19 vaccines represent a major issue to decrease the rate of severe forms of the COVID-19 cases and to maintain a normal cancer care. It is difficult to define the target population for vaccination due to the limited data available and the lack of vaccine doses available. It appears theoretically important to vaccinate patients with active cancer treatment or treated since less than three years, as well as their family circle. In France, patients actually defined at "high risk" for priority access to vaccination are those with a cancer treated by chemotherapy. A panel of experts recently defined another "very high-priority" population, which includes patients with curative or palliative first or second-line chemotherapy, as well as patients requiring surgery or radiotherapy involving a large lung volume, lymph nodes and/or of hematopoietic tissue. Ideally, it is best to vaccinate before cancer treatment. Despite the lack of published data, COVID-19 vaccines can also be performed during chemotherapy by avoiding periods of bone marrow aplasia and if possible, to do it in cancer care centers. It is necessary to implement cohorts with immunological and clinical monitoring of vaccinated cancer patients. To conclude, considering the current state of knowledge, the benefit-risk ratio strongly favours COVID-19 vaccination of all cancer patients., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The impacts of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic on cancer care are multiple, entailing a high risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with cancer treated by chemotherapy. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines represent an opportunity to decrease the rate of severe COVID-19 cases in patients with cancer and also to restore normal cancer care. Patients with cancer to be targeted for vaccination are difficult to define owing to the limited contribution of these patients in the phase III trials testing the different vaccines. It seems appropriate to vaccinate not only patients with cancer with ongoing treatment or with a treatment having been completed less than 3 years ago but also household and close contacts. High-risk patients with cancer who are candidates for priority access to vaccination are those treated by chemotherapy. The very high-priority population includes patients with curative treatment and palliative first- or second-line chemotherapy, as well as patients requiring surgery or radiotherapy involving a large volume of lung, lymph node and/or haematopoietic tissue. When possible, vaccination should be carried out before cancer treatment begins. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can be performed during chemotherapy while avoiding periods of neutropenia and lymphopenia. For organisational reasons, vaccination should be performed in cancer care centres with messenger RNA vaccines (or non-replicating adenoviral vaccines in non-immunocompromised patients). Considering the current state of knowledge, the benefit-risk ratio strongly favours SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of all patients with cancer. To obtain more data concerning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, it is necessary to implement cohorts of vaccinated patients with cancer., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement None declared., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

PLA2R1 is a large transmembrane receptor of 180-kDa that belongs to the superfamily of C-type lectins. It was discovered because of its high affinity for secreted phospholipases A2 (sPLA2), enzymes that play a key role in lipid mediator synthesis. Early PLA2R1 physiological roles include the clearance of sPLA2 from the extracellular medium and/or promotion of their actions. Over the last four years, two independent studies suggested that PLA2R1 plays a role in cancer as a tumor gene suppressor and is the major target antigen of auto-immune antibodies involved in idiopathic membranous nephropathy, a severe human kidney disease. These novel findings shed light on PLA2R1 and pave the way for its use as a reliable biomarker and an attractive therapeutic target in these diseases., (© 2014 médecine/sciences – Inserm.)