3 results on '"Vieveen JM"'
Search Results
2. Anaesthetic management during open and percutaneous irreversible electroporation.
- Author
-
Nielsen K, Scheffer HJ, Vieveen JM, van Tilborg AA, Meijer S, van Kuijk C, van den Tol MP, Meijerink MR, and Bouwman RA
- Subjects
- Ablation Techniques adverse effects, Aged, Arrhythmias, Cardiac etiology, Contraindications, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Hypertension etiology, Kidney Neoplasms surgery, Liver Neoplasms secondary, Liver Neoplasms surgery, Male, Middle Aged, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods, Monitoring, Intraoperative methods, Muscle Contraction, Pain Measurement methods, Pain, Postoperative etiology, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery, Pelvic Neoplasms surgery, Perioperative Care methods, Prospective Studies, Ablation Techniques methods, Anesthesia, General methods, Electroporation methods, Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Background: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel tumour ablation technique involving repetitive application of electrical energy around a tumour. The use of pulsed electrical gradients carries a risk of cardiac arrhythmias, severe muscle contractions, and seizures. We aimed to identify IRE-related risks and the appropriate precautions for anaesthetic management., Methods: All patients who were treated with IRE were prospectively included. Exclusion criteria were arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, active coronary artery disease, and epilepsy. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with complete muscle relaxation during ECG-synchronized pulsing. Adverse events, cardiovascular effects, blood samples, cerebral activity, and post-procedural pain were analysed., Results: Twenty-eight patients underwent 30 IRE sessions for tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis. No major adverse events occurred during IRE. Median systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased by 44 mm Hg (range -7 to 108 mm Hg) and 19 mm Hg (range 1-50 mm Hg), respectively. Two transient minor cardiac arrhythmias without haemodynamic consequences were observed. Muscle contractions were mild and IRE caused no reactive brain activity on a simplified EEG. Pain in the first 24 h after percutaneous IRE was generally mild, but higher pain scores were reported after pancreatic treatment (mean VAS score 3; range 0-9)., Conclusions: Side-effects during IRE on tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis seem mild and manageable when current recommendations for anaesthesia management, including deep muscle relaxation and ECG synchronized pulsing, are followed. Electrical pulses do not seem to cause reactive cerebral activity and evidence for pre-existing atrial fibrillation as an absolute contra-indication for IRE is questionable., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Irreversible electroporation for nonthermal tumor ablation in the clinical setting: a systematic review of safety and efficacy.
- Author
-
Scheffer HJ, Nielsen K, de Jong MC, van Tilborg AA, Vieveen JM, Bouwman AR, Meijer S, van Kuijk C, van den Tol PM, and Meijerink MR
- Subjects
- Ablation Techniques adverse effects, Ablation Techniques mortality, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Humans, Multimodal Imaging, Neoplasms mortality, Neoplasms pathology, Positron-Emission Tomography, Postoperative Complications mortality, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, Ablation Techniques methods, Electrochemotherapy adverse effects, Electrochemotherapy mortality, Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Purpose: To provide an overview of current clinical results of irreversible electroporation (IRE), a novel, nonthermal tumor ablation technique that uses electric pulses to induce cell death, while preserving structural integrity of bile ducts and vessels., Methods: All in-human literature on IRE reporting safety or efficacy or both was included. All adverse events were recorded. Tumor response on follow-up imaging from 3 months onward was evaluated., Results: In 16 studies, 221 patients had 325 tumors treated in liver (n = 129), pancreas (n = 69), kidney (n = 14), lung (n = 6), lesser pelvis (n = 1), and lymph node (n = 2). No major adverse events during IRE were reported. IRE caused only minor complications in the liver; however, three major complications were reported in the pancreas (bile leak [n = 2], portal vein thrombosis [n = 1]). Complete response at 3 months was 67%-100% for hepatic tumors (93%-100% for tumors o 3 cm). Pancreatic IRE combined with surgery led to prolonged survival compared with control patients (20 mo vs 13 mo) and significant pain reduction., Conclusions: In cases where other techniques are unsuitable, IRE is a promising modality for the ablation of tumors near bile ducts and blood vessels. This articles gives an extensive overview of the available evidence, which is limited in terms of quality and quantity. With the limitations of the evidence in mind, IRE of central liver tumors seems relatively safe without major complications, whereas complications after pancreatic IRE appear more severe. The available limited results for tumor control are generally good. Overall, the future of IRE for difficult-to-reach tumors appears promising., (Copyright © 2014 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.