Search

Background: The number of marginal living kidney donors has increased. Medically complex donors who have hypertension, older age, or low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been more likely to be used., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors at a single center. We analyzed 309 living donors and divided them into three groups: group with older donors (aged ≥70 years) (n = 41), middle-aged (aged 46-69 years) (n = 239), and young donors (aged <46 years) (N = 29). Donor factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b or worse within 5 years post-donation were investigated., Results: Of the 309 live donors, 86 (27.8%) developed CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation. The incidence of CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation was significantly higher in older donor (p < 0.01). Cox regression models revealed that older donor ages and lower eGFR were significantly related to the development of CKD stage3b or worse, independent of comorbidities such as obesity and hypertension [hazard ratio (95% CI); 4.59 (1.02-20.6), p = 047, 0.95 (0.94-0.96), p ≤ 0.01, respectively]. However, recovery of eGFR 4-5 years after donation was noted in the middle-aged and older donor groups, whereas the level of eGFR remained unchanged in the young group., Conclusions: Older donors tend to develop CKD stage3b within 5 years post-donation but with the potential of recovery. Healthy older people (aged ≥70 years) could be candidates for living donors under careful monitoring of kidney function after donation., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become the standard treatment for small renal tumors, including highly complex cases. However, applying RAPN to renal tumors in the horseshoe kidney (HSK) is clinically challenging due to malformations and complex blood supply. Herein, we present two cases of RAPN in patients with HSK treated using selective artery clamping methods., Case Reports: A 61-year-old male with a 15 mm renal tumor located on the upper pole of the right HSK was referred to our Department. The patient underwent RAPN via the transperitoneal approach, following a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) assessment. Additionally, before surgery, we confirmed which renal arteries would be clamped in surgery by examining the kidney regions supplied by each renal artery. The second patient referred to our Department, a 45-year-old male, had a 46 mm renal tumor located on the isthmus of the HSK. His tumor received blood supply from two renal arteries, with the bilateral collecting systems converging and forming a ureter on 3D-CT. The patient underwent RAPN through an intraperitoneal approach in the semi-lateral position, with port placement lower than in standard RAPN. Pathological examinations revealed clear-cell renal cell carcinoma with negative surgical margins in both cases. Both patients had no recurrences or metastases at 53 and 13 months post-surgery, respectively., Conclusion: We present cases successfully treated with RAPN with selective artery clamping methods for HSK using 3D-CT without encountering complications, even in isthmus tumors., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Nephron-sparing surgery is required for patients with kidney transplant with organ-confined renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the allograft kidney to preserve renal function. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is expected to be the optimal surgical approach for these patients, as in the general population. However, RAPN for RCC arising in the allograft kidney is rarely reported. Here, we report 2 cases of patients who underwent RAPN for allograft RCC., Case Presentation: Two patients were diagnosed with RCC in the renal allograft based on enhanced computed tomography findings. Case 1 was a 69-year-old man with a 32-mm mass in the middle portion of the right iliac fossa renal allograft, and case 2 was a 55-year-old man with a 24-mm mass in the lower pole of the right iliac fossa renal allograft. In each patient, RAPN was performed for the renal mass through a transperitoneal approach, with clamping of the renal artery. No major perioperative complications occurred in either patient, negative surgical margins were achieved, and no significant changes in kidney function were observed during either surgery. Pathologic findings showed clear cell RCC in case 1 and papillary RCC in case 2., Conclusion: RAPN can be a feasible and effective treatment option for allograft RCC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Sarcopenia is associated with oncological outcomes in various types of cancer. However, the impact of sarcopenia in renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus remains unclear. We herein evaluated the prognostic significance of sarcopenia for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus following nephrectomy and thrombectomy., Methods: Patients who underwent nephrectomy and thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus at our department between 2004 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Their sarcopenic status, determined by sex, body mass index and skeletal muscle index, was calculated using pre-surgical radiographic imaging. We compared the post-operative cancer-specific survival and overall survival, surgical data and duration of post-operative hospitalization of sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients., Results: Out of 83 patients, 54 (65%) were sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients had significantly shorter cancer-specific survival (median: 33.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0323) and overall survival (32.0 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0173) than non-sarcopenic patients. Furthermore, multivariate analyses showed that sarcopenia was an independent factor for cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio: 2.76, P = 0.0212) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.93, P = 0.014). The incidence rate of surgical complications (any grade: 35.2% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.482; grades ≥ 3: 7.4% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.648) or duration of post-operative hospitalization (median: 11 vs. 10 days, P = 0.148) was not significantly different between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients., Conclusions: In conclusion, this study showed that sarcopenia was an independent prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus after nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy. Thus, sarcopenia evaluation can be utilized as an effective prognosticator of post-operative survival., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Limited data are available regarding the effect of systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era on survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN)., Methods: Overall, 161 patients with synchronously mRCC were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups based on the time of diagnosis: (i) early molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) (2008-2011), (ii) late mTT (2012-8/2016) and (iii) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) eras (9/2016-2018). Overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis was compared among the eras., Results: Of the 161 patients, 52 (32%), 75 (46%), and 34 patients (21%) were classified into the early mTT, late mTT and ICI eras, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0065 and P = 0.0010, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.389). In 112 patients undergoing CN and systemic therapy, OS was significantly longer in the ICI and late mTT eras than that in the early mTT era (P = 0.0432 and P = 0.0498, respectively) but did not significantly differ between the ICI and late mTT eras (P = 0.320). Multivariate analysis of OS in the 161 synchronous mRCC patients revealed that the era was an independent factor (P < 0.0001), together with the histopathological type (P = 0.0130), CN status (P = 0.0010), International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk (P = 0.0002) and liver metastasis status (P = 0.0124)., Conclusion: This retrospective analysis showed that systemic therapy change in the post-cytokine era improved OS of mRCC patients undergoing CN., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes between the transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for lateral tumors., Methods: This study included patients who underwent RAPN for lateral renal tumors between 2013 and 2019. Lateral tumors were defined as X of A factors in the RENAL nephrometry score. In total, 290 and 48 patients with TP and RP, respectively, were included in the analysis. To minimize the effects of selection bias, the following variables were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching: age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, tumor size, and RENAL nephrometry score., Results: After matching, 48 patients were allocated to each group. The mean age was 55 years, and the mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 68-69 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The mean tumor size was 30-31 mm. The RP group had a shorter operative time (124 vs. 151 min, p = 0.0002), shorter console time (74 vs. 110 min, p < 0.0001), shorter warm ischemic time (14 vs. 17 min, p = 0.0343), lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (33 vs. 52 ml, p = 0.0002), and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (3.3 vs. 4.0 days, p < 0.0001) than the TP group. The change in eGFR, incidence rate of perioperative complication, and positive surgical margin rate did not significantly differ between the two groups., Conclusion: RP had better surgical outcomes, including shorter operative time, lower EBL, and shorter PLOS for lateral renal tumors, which may suggest that RP is the optimal approach for selected lateral renal tumors.

To investigate the detection of peritumoral pseudocapsule (PC) using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for tumors resected by robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Study participants included 206 patients with clinical T1 RCC who underwent RAPN between October 2017 and February 2018. Two radiologists who were blinded to the pathological findings evaluated the computed tomography (CT) images. Radiological diagnosis of a PC was defined by a combination of observations, including a low-attenuation rim between the tumor and renal cortex in the cortico-medullary phase and a high-attenuation rim at the edge of the tumor in the nephrogenic or excretory phase. A PC was detected on CT in 156/206 tumors (76%) and identified by pathology in 182/206 (88%) tumors including 153/166 (92%) clear cell RCC, 13/14 (93%) papillary RCC, and 7/16 (44%) chromophobe RCC. In the whole cohort, CT findings showed a sensitivity of 81.3% (148/182), specificity of 66.7% (16/24), and positive predictive value of 94.9% (148/156). When the data were stratified according to pathological subtypes, MDCT was observed to have a sensitivity of 86.9% (133/153) and specificity of 61.5% (8/13) in clear cell RCC, sensitivity of 38.5% (5/13) and specificity of 100% (1/1) in papillary RCC, and sensitivity of 44.4% (4/7) and specificity of 66.7% (6/9) in chromophobe RCC. A low or high-attenuation rim around the tumor in the cortico-medullary or nephrographic-to-excretory phase indicates a PC of RCC, though the accuracy is not satisfactory even with 64- or 320-detector MDCT.

Background: When local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurs after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) on the ipsilateral side, some surgeons hesitate to perform reoperative surgery because of possible difficulties. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy (RePN) compared with those of initial partial nephrectomy (iPN) for RCC of a solitary kidney., Methods: Until September 2017, 1671 patients with renal tumors underwent NSS. Of these, 79 patients who underwent NSS for sporadic RCC of a solitary kidney were included. Parameters were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, Pearson Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests., Results: Eleven patients underwent RePN and 68 underwent iPN. The RePN group had a relatively smaller tumor size (p = 0.0432), longer operative time (p = 0.0432), and higher estimated blood loss (p = 0.0002) than the iPN group. No significant differences in the other clinical factors were found between the groups. The rates of perioperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade II were 18.2% and 17.6% in the RePN group and iPN group, respectively. The mean decreasing rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate was not different between the groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant differences were found in hemodialysis-free survival (p = 0.7392) and intrarenal recurrence-free survival (p = 0.4924) between the groups., Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of RePN were not significantly different compared with those of iPN for patients with sporadic RCC of a solitary kidney. RePN is technically feasible with acceptable complication and local recurrence rates with better postoperative kidney function.

Background: The aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio (ie, the De Ritis ratio) is associated with prognosis in some types of cancers including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Meanwhile, an effective prognosticator for end-stage renal disease (ESRD)-associated RCC remains unknown. Thus, we investigated the prognostic impact of the AST/ALT ratio in patients with ESRD-associated RCC., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 243 patients receiving radical nephrectomy for nonmetastatic ESRD-associated RCC. The patients were divided according to the cutoff value of preoperative AST/ALT ratio. Prognostic factors associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) after radical nephrectomy were analyzed., Results: The maximum Youden index showed that the cutoff value of the AST/ALT ratio was 1.42. The high AST/ALT ratio group (≥ 1.42; n = 88) had a significantly shorter 10-year CSS than the low AST/ALT ratio group (64.3% vs. 87.2%; P = .0027). Multivariate analysis revealed that the AST/ALT ratio was an independent prognostic factor of CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03; P = .0020), together with serum C-reactive protein level (HR, 4.84; P < .0001), pathologic stage (HR, 2.79; P = .0030), and tumor grade (HR, 7.08; P = .0087). Based on these independent factors, the patients were further classified into 3 groups: low (0-1 factor), intermediate (2 factors), and high risk (3-4 factors). The 10-year CSS in the high-risk group was significantly shorter than that of the other groups (68.9% vs. 70.9% vs. 94.4%; P < .0001)., Conclusion: The AST/ALT ratio can aid in the risk classification of patients with ESRD-associated RCC., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although minimally invasive procedures have been established as the standard for a donor nephrectomy, there are many different surgical techniques described in the literature. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of kidney transplant procedures using the pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (PRDN) and hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARDN) techniques., Methods: A retrospective study involving 1508 transplant procedures was conducted; 874 were PRDN procedures; and 634 were HARDN. We reviewed the outcomes of the PRDN and HARDN groups, which were performed at two different centers over an identical time period., Results: Donors in the PRDN group had a longer operation time (P < 0.0001), reduced estimated blood loss (P < 0.0001), less open conversion (P = 0.0002), lower postoperative serum C-reactive protein levels (P < 0.0001), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.0001) than the HARDN group. Recipients in the PRDN group had lower serum creatinine levels at postoperative day 1-6 and the decreased incidence of slow graft function (P = 0.0017) than the HARDN group. The HARDN procedure was an independent risk factor for the incidence of acute rejection (P = 0.0211) and graft loss (P = 0.0193)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that the PRDN procedure is less invasive for donors as it results in reduced blood loss, lower postoperative serum CRP levels, and a shorter postoperative stay than the HARDN procedure. Additionally, PRDN provides a better outcome for recipients as it lowers the incidence of acute rejection and improves graft survival compared to HARDN.

Objective: To evaluate the change in the operated parenchymal volume during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy limited to the enucleation technique, and to analyze the predictors of decrease in operated parenchymal volume, including the tumor contact surface area., Methods: The study included 135 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumors using the enucleation technique. Measurements of the parenchymal volume, tumor volume and contact surface area were obtained in the venous phase on enhanced computed tomography. All measurements, including volumetric and renal function analysis, were carried out <2 months before and 6 months after surgery., Results: The mean age of included participants was 56 years, and the mean tumor size was 33 mm. The mean tumor volume was 26 cc, and the mean contact surface area was 22 cm 2 . In the complete cohort, the mean preoperative and postoperative normal parenchymal volumes of the operated kidney were 158 and 141 cc, respectively. The mean change in parenchymal volume of the operated kidney was -10%. In contrast, the mean change in global estimated glomerular filtration was just -4.0%. Univariate analysis showed that the RENAL nephrometry score, contact surface area, tumor volume and warm ischemia time were associated with the change in the operated kidney parenchymal volume. However, in the multivariate analysis, a large contact surface area was the only independent predictor of decreased operated parenchymal volume <10 cm 3 ., Conclusion: Contact surface area is a strong predictor of the decrease in the parenchymal volume in the operated kidney during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy carried out using the enucleation technique for T1 renal tumors., (© 2019 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objective: To investigate peritumoral pseudocapsule status in patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and to examine predictive factors associated with the absence of peritumoral pseudocapsule., Methods: A total of 367 patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were divided into two groups according to peritumoral pseudocapsule status. The groups were compared in terms of patient and tumor characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify predictive factors for the absence of peritumoral pseudocapsule., Results: Of the 367 tumors, 323 (88%) were surrounded by a peritumoral pseudocapsule. The mean tumor size was 30 mm, and 70% of the patients were male. Tumors with a peritumoral pseudocapsule had a larger diameter than those without (31 vs 26 mm; P = 0.0008). A peritumoral pseudocapsule was observed in 92% of the clear cell, in 89% of the papillary and in 86% of the clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma cases compared with just 50% in the chromophobe renal cell carcinoma cases (P < 0.0001). Sex, age, Fuhrman grade and tumor complexity did not differ among patients. A multivariate analysis showed that smaller tumor size (≥34 vs <34 mm, odds ratio 3.31; P = 0.0023) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (vs other subtypes, odds ratio 12.5; P < 0.0001) predicted an absence of peritumoral pseudocapsule., Conclusions: Small tumor size and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were significant predictors of a lack of peritumoral pseudocapsule, suggesting that a positive surgical margin must be avoided for these tumors when an enucleation technique is used for robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy., (© 2019 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Purpose: Renorrhaphy in partial nephrectomy may damage intraparenchymal vessels and compress the renal parenchyma, which may lead to the formation of renal artery pseudoaneurysms or vascularized parenchymal volume reduction. Using propensity score matching, we compared surgical outcomes following non-renorrhaphy and renorrhaphy techniques for open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for T1a renal tumors., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 159 patients with normal contralateral kidneys who underwent OPN for T1a renal tumors and pre- and postoperative enhanced computed tomography between 2012 and 2015. Patient variables were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching between the two Groups: renorrhaphy (inner and outer layer sutures) and non-renorrhaphy (inner layer sutures only). Postoperative complications and renal function were compared between the two groups., Results: We matched 43 patients per Group. Operative time, estimated blood loss, cold ischemic time, and postoperative hospital stay were not significantly different between the two Groups. Urine leakage (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred in 0 renorrhaphy cases and 2 non-renorrhaphy cases (0% versus 4.6%, P=0.49). Renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) occurred in 6 renorrhaphy cases and in 0 non-renorrhaphy cases (13% versus 0%, P=0.02)., Conclusions: The non-renorrhaphy technique may result in a lower risk of RAP but a greater risk of urine leakage. This technique needs further refinement to become a standard procedure for OPN., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.)

Objectives: To compare surgical outcomes, including renal function and the preserved renal parenchymal volume, between robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using propensity score-matched analyses., Methods: In total, 253 patients, with a normal contralateral kidney, who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (n = 131) or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (n = 122) with renal arterial clamping between 2010 and 2015, were included. Patients' background and tumor factors were adjusted by propensity score matching. Surgical outcomes, including postoperative renal function, complications, warm ischemia time and preserved renal parenchymal volume, evaluated by volumetric analysis, were compared between the surgical procedures., Results: After matching, 64 patients were assigned to each group. The mean age was 56-57 years, and the mean tumor size was 22 mm. Approximately 50% of patients had low complexity tumors (RENAL nephrometry score 4-7). The incidence rate of acute kidney failure was significantly lower in the robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (11%) than laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (23%) group (P = 0.049), and warm ischemia time shorter in the robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (17 min) than laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (25 min) group (P < 0.0001). The preservation rate of renal function, measured by the estimated glomerular filtration rate, at 6 months post-surgery was 96% for robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and 90% for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (P < 0.0001). The preserved renal parenchymal volume was higher for robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (89%) than laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (77%; P < 0.0001). The rate of perioperative complications, surgical margin status and length of hospital stay were equivalent for both techniques., Conclusions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy allows to achieve better preservation of renal function and parenchymal volume than laparoscopic partial nephrectomy., (© 2018 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Objective: To compare early postoperative renal function in transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for anterior and posterior renal tumors., Patients and Methods: This study included 227 patients who underwent transperitoneal RAPN for anterior or posterior renal tumors. Tumor position was defined by RENAL nephrometry score. To minimize selection bias between anterior and posterior tumors, patient variables were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching., Results: Of the 227 patients, 125 were classified as having anterior tumors and 102 as having posterior tumors. After matching, 82 patients were included in each group. The mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 66 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The mean tumor size was 28 to 29 mm. The decrease in early postoperative nadir eGFR (-10% vs -4.0%, p = 0.0103) was significantly higher for posterior tumors than for anterior tumors. However, the difference improved 6 to 12 months after surgery (-6.0% vs -6.2%, p = 0.9564). The other surgical outcomes, including operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), complications, surgical margin status, and length of hospital stay, were not significantly different between the two groups. In multivariate analysis of the entire cohort, posterior tumors (vs anterior tumor, odds ratio [OR]: 2.30, p = 0.0051), longer WIT (OR: 3.10, p = 0.0019), and high tumor complexity (vs low complexity, OR: 3.46, p = 0.0264) were independent predictors for development of a 10% decrease in early postoperative eGFR., Conclusions: Posterior tumors had a greater decrease in early postoperative nadir eGFR than anterior tumors, with equivalent surgical outcomes, including similar renal function, 6 to 12 months after surgery in the setting of transperitoneal RAPN.

Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes between resection and enucleation in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) based on the Surface-Intermediate-Base margin score (SIB score)., Patients and Methods: This study included 282 patients who underwent RAPN between 2014 and 2016. SIB score was macroscopically evaluated immediately after the surgery. We divided the patients into the following two groups: enucleation (SIB score, 1-2) and resection (SIB score, 3-5). To minimize selection bias between the two surgical methods, patient variables were adjusted by 1:1 propensity score matching., Results: Of the 282 patients, 48 were assigned to the enucleation group and 234 to the resection group. After matching, 45 patients were included in each group. The mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 70 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . The mean tumor size was 32-33 mm. The decrease in eGFR (5.6 vs 12%, p = 0.0365) and total perioperative complication (16% vs 38%, p = 0.0171) were significantly lower in the enucleation group than in the resection group. Estimated blood loss was higher in the enucleation group than in the resection group (129 cc vs 117 cc, p = 0.0088), despite a similar transfusion rate. The postoperative length of hospital stay was shorter in the enucleation group than in the resection group (4.1 vs 5.0 days, p = 0.0288). Operation time and surgical margin status were not significantly different between groups., Conclusions: In carefully selected patients, enucleation was associated with more favorable surgical outcomes in the cohort than resection, including improved renal function and a lower complication rate.

Background: Outcomes of retroperitoneoscopic procurement of living kidneys with multiple renal arteries (MRA) in the recipients are largely unknown. Our aim is to access the effect of kidney allografts with MRA on donor and recipient outcomes after pure retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN)., Methods: From July 2001 to August 2010, 533 patients underwent live donor kidney transplants with allografts procured by RPLDN at our center. Of these 533 transplants, 406, 105, and 22 patients had one, two, and three renal arteries, respectively. We compared the retrospectively collected clinical data of each donor with MRA and the recipient using those with single renal artery as controls., Results: Significant differences were found among the one-renal artery and three-renal artery groups regarding operative time, estimated blood loss, warm and cold ischemic time, and incidence of slow graft function (SGF). However, there was no significant difference regarding patient and graft survival among the three groups. Major complications, such as open conversion, bleeding, and blood transfusion, were not found in patients with MRA. Five ureteral complications occurred. Of these, there was one patient with MRA. In univariate analysis, MRA patients had a risk factor of developing SGF (P=0.005) but not ureteral complications following RPLDN., Conclusion: Kidneys with MRA after RPLDN increase the risk of SGF in recipients. However, they provide similar outcomes as to long-term graft survival and complications compared with those of single renal artery. Renal artery multiplicity should not be a contraindication for live kidney donation and may not increase the risk of ureteral complications.

Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is a standard method of donor nephrectomy. Most cases of LLDN are transperitoneal. Retroperitoneal access, however, implies a direct approach to the retroperitoneal organs without interfering with any of them. Since 2001, we have been trying to establish the technique of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN). To assess the safety, feasibility, and usefulness of RPLDN, we reviewed the experience with this technique at our institution., Patients and Methods: From July 2001 to March 2009, 425 patients underwent live donor renal transplantation at our institution with allografts procured by RPLDN. Study variables included operative time, time to retrieval of the kidney, blood loss, warm ischemia time, length of hospital stay, number and length of renal vessels, graft function, and complications., Results: Mean follow-up was 53 months. Donor nephrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The complication rate was 4.9%. In one case, the procedure was changed to open donor nephrectomy because of severe adhesion in the renal hilum from previous surgery. Ureteral complications occurred in four patients, who were successfully treated with retrograde ureteral stent placement. None of the donors needed readmission. Mean warm ischemia time was 4.8 minutes. Creatinine levels returned to normal in all patients, and long-term allograft function was good. Serum creatinine levels at postoperative days 1, 7, and 14 were 3.7 mg/dL, 1.4 mg/dL, and 1.4 mg/dL on average, respectively. Slow graft function was noted in four (1.1%) cases but returned to the normal level within 2 weeks after surgery. One-year donor survival was 99%, and 1-year graft survival was 98.2%., Conclusions: Excellent donor safety and allograft function were obtained with RPLDN. These results suggest that RPLDN could be an option for LLDN.

We tried to establish the technique of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN). Between July 2001 and March 2004, 135 renal transplant donors underwent RPLDN. Low (average: 7 mmHg) CO2 gas pressure was employed during the procedure. All procedures were performed through a three-port retroperitoneal approach without opening the peritoneal cavity. The hand-assisted technique was not used. One hundred and twenty-seven cases were of left and eight cases were of right nephrectomy. Donor nephrectomy was carried out successfully in all patients. In one donor, the procedure was changed to open donor nephrectomy because of severe adhesion around the renal vein due to previous surgery. No serious complications, such as massive bleeding or bowel injury were encountered. Return of bowel function took 0.7 days on average. Post-operative hospital stay was 4.9 days on average, and return to work was 12 days on average. Ureteral complications occurred in 2 patients and were treated with temporally retrograde ureteral stenting. Average serum creatinine levels were 1.5 mg/dL, 1.3 mg/dL and 1.3 mg/dL at 3, 7 and 14 days after transplantation, respectively. No patients required hemodialysis after transplantation due to acute tubular necrosis. RPLDN could be an option for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Objectives: To examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who have undergone repeat open partial nephrectomy (reOPN) or robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (reRAPN). Methods: Until May 2022, 3310 patients with renal tumors underwent nephron‐sparing surgery (NSS) at affiliated institutions. Of these, 22 and 17 patients who underwent reOPN and reRAPN, respectively, were included in this study. Results: No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of sex, age, comorbidities, recurrent tumor size at repeat NSS, interval from recurrence to initial NSS, and nephrometry score. ReRAPN had a shorter operative time (median: 138.0 vs. 214.0 min; p = 0.0023) and less estimated blood loss (median: 50.0 vs. 255.0 mL; p = 0.0261) than reOPN. The incidence of complications with Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 2 was higher in the reOPN group than in the reRAPN group (31.8 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.0467). The mean decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups. The trifecta achievement rates in the reRAPN (64.7%) and reOPN (27.3%) groups were significantly different (p = 0.0194). On multivariate analysis, age and surgical method were significant predictors of trifecta achievement after partial nephrectomy. Conclusions: There were no differences in postoperative renal functional outcomes between reOPN and reRAPN. ReRAPN is superior to reOPN in terms of surgical burden. Therefore, ReRAPN is an important minimally invasive surgery for recurrent renal cell carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We compared survival and perioperative outcomes of robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for older patients (age 70 years or older) with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: This retrospective, single‐center study included 260 patients who underwent RAPN and 44 patients who underwent LRN. The overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. Results: Compared with the LRN group, a trend of more complications was observed in the RAPN group, including a higher body mass index (24 vs. 22 kg/m2; P = 0.0002) and higher rates of hypertension (77% vs. 55%; P = 0.0029) and chronic kidney disease (62% vs. 36%; P = 0.0027). After adjustment by the IPTW analysis, the RAPN group had a shorter operative time (143 vs. 282 min; P = 0.033), shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (4.1 vs. 7.9 days; P = 0.004), and less change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate during surgery (−8.4% vs. −32%; P < 0.0001) than the LRN group; however, the perioperative complication rates were similar. Patients who underwent RAPN had better 5‐year OS than those who underwent LRN (95% vs. 90%; log‐rank, P = 0.017). Conclusion: RAPN resulted in better OS and surgical outcomes, with shorter operative time, shorter PLOS, and better renal function preservation, than LRN for older patients with stage 1 RCC. Therefore, RAPN may be the primary option for patients indicated for surgical intervention. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 269–274. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare surgical and functional outcomes between robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma with stage 4 chronic kidney disease. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 60 patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15–30 ml/min/1.73 m2) who underwent partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma between April 2004 and April 2020. We compared perioperative outcomes according to the surgical approach. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for end‐stage renal disease. Results: Robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy were performed in 31 and 29 patients, respectively. The median age was 68 years and 17% of all patients were women. Patient and tumor characteristics did not differ between groups. The operative time (155.2 vs. 221.0 min, p < 0.0001) and the postoperative length of hospital stay (5.2 vs. 10.6 days, p = 0.0083) were significantly shorter, and the estimated blood loss was lower (53.4 vs. 363.2 ml, p = 0.0003) in the robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group than in the open partial nephrectomy group. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only significant predictor of end‐stage renal disease after partial nephrectomy on multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Both procedures preserved renal function in this patient cohort, delaying the requirement for postoperative dialysis. Furthermore, robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with shorter operative time and postoperative length of hospital stay, as well as lesser estimated blood loss than open partial nephrectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cancer development in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) has elicited recent interest. We investigated the surgical and functional outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in AYAs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1023 patients with clinical stage I RCC who underwent RAPN before January 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: AYAs (aged 18–39 years) and non-AYAs (aged 40–89 years). The trifecta criteria, defined as a negative surgical margin, no perioperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade > 2), and preserved postoperative renal function (1-year postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate > 90% of baseline), were used to compare outcomes. We performed 1:1 propensity-score matching on the patient cohort. Results: There were initially 125 and 898 patients in the AYAs and non-AYAs groups, respectively, and 108 patients were included in each group after propensity score matching. There were no significant differences in surgical factors (operation time, clamping ischemia time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, surgical complication rate) or renal function in the early postoperative period. The mean postoperative renal function was better (p = 0.0200) and the decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower (p = 0.0026) in AYAs than in non-AYAs 12 months postoperatively. The trifecta achievement rates in the AYAs and non-AYAs groups were significantly different (67.6% and 53.7%, respectively, p = 0.0220). Conclusion: Although there was no difference in surgical burden between the groups, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was better preserved in AYAs than in non-AYAs at 6 and 12 months post-RAPN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the quality of recovery in patients who underwent robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy and to compare the outcomes of the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. Methods: This study included 121 patients who underwent robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy under general anesthesia from April 2019 to September 2019 at Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. Quality of recovery was defined according to the QoR‐40 Japanese version. The participants responded to the QoR‐40 Japanese version on three designated days. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the surgical approach: transperitoneal or retroperitoneal. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independent factors associated with better quality of recovery. Results: Out of the 121 patients, 56 (46%) and 65 (54%) patients were included in the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal group, respectively. Although the QoR‐40 Japanese version scores were not different between the two groups at admission, a better quality of recovery was observed in the retroperitoneal group than in the transperitoneal group at discharge based on the total score: physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence and pain. A multivariate analysis showed that the retroperitoneal approach and male sex were associated with a better QoR‐40 Japanese version score at discharge. Conclusions: A retroperitoneal approach offers better quality of recovery than a transperitoneal approach, and therefore it might represent the optimal approach in selected patients undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared the clinical features, pathological features, and prognoses of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in the native kidney after kidney transplantation (RCC-transplant) or on hemodialysis (RCC-HD), and analyzed predictive factors for survival at a Japanese single institution. This cohort included 42 patients in the RCC-transplant group and 467 patients in the RCC-HD group. RCC-transplant patients were younger (53 years vs. 56 years, P = 0.0358) and had less frequent symptoms (12% vs. 27%, P = 0.0344) than RCC-HD patients. Although tumor size, tumor stage, and histological subtype were not significantly different, the RCC-transplant group had less frequent multifocal occurrences and ACDK. Overall 5-year survival (RCC-transplant, 80%; RCC-hemodialysis, 76%; P = 0.3217) and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; RCC-transplant, 84%; RCC-hemodialysis, 89%; P = 0.8916) were not significantly different between the two groups. Tumor stage and grade were significant predictors for CSS. Although kidney transplantation and hemodialysis were not associated with CSS, tumor stage was an independent predictor of CSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]