Search

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), the preferred method to quantify proteinuria, can be calculated from urine dipstick protein or protein-to-creatinine ratio (PCR). The performance of calculated vs. measured ACR in predicting kidney failure and death without kidney failure in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Here, we used population-based data from Alberta, Canada, to identify adults with incident moderate-severe CKD (sustained for more than 90 days) from 2008-04-01 to 2017-03-31, who had same-day measures of ACR and urine dipstick (ACR-dipstick cohort) or PCR (ACR-PCR cohort) in the two years before cohort entry. We followed participants until 2019-03-31 and trained competing risk models of kidney failure and death without kidney failure including age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and either measured or calculated ACR. Model performance was tested in cohorts created using the same algorithm in Manitoba, Canada. The ACR-dipstick and ACR-PCR cohorts included 18,731 and 4,542 people (training cohorts) and 821 and 1,831 people (testing cohorts), respectively. In internal and external testing, there was closer agreement between predictions based on measured vs. PCR-calculated ACR than between those based on measured vs. dipstick-calculated ACR. The dipstick-calculated ACR had higher Brier scores than measured ACR from year three for both outcomes, indicating worsening calibration. Models including measured or calculated ACR had similar discrimination: year one-to-five area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 83-89% for kidney failure and 69-75% for mortality. Thus, if confirmed in different ethnic groups, calculated ACR can be used for risk predictions when the measured ACR is not available. PCR-calculated ACR may have superior performance to dipstick-calculated ACR.

Trials in children with chronic kidney disease do not consistently report outcomes that are critically important to patients and caregivers. This can diminish the relevance and reliability of evidence for decision making, limiting the implementation of results into practice and policy. As part of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology—Children and Adolescents (SONG-Kids) initiative, we convened 2 consensus workshops in San Diego, California (7 patients, 24 caregivers, 43 health professionals) and Melbourne, Australia (7 patients, 23 caregivers, 49 health professionals). This report summarizes the discussions on the identification and implementation of the SONG-Kids core outcomes set. Four themes were identified; survival and life participation are common high priority goals, capturing the whole child and family, ensuring broad relevance across the patient journey, and requiring feasible and valid measures. Stakeholders supported the inclusion of mortality, infection, life participation, and kidney function as the core outcomes domains for children with chronic kidney disease.

Introduction Information on early, guideline discordant referrals in nephrology is limited. Our objective was to investigate trends in referral patterns to nephrology for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods Retrospective cohort study of adults with ≥1 visits to a nephrologist from primary care with ≥1 serum creatinine and/or urine protein measurement 2, persistent albuminuria (ACR ≥ 300 mg/g, PCR ≥ 500 mg/g, or Udip ≥ 2+), or progressive and persistent decline in eGFR until index nephrology visit (≥ 5 mL/min/1.73m2). Results Of 69,372 patients with CKD, 28,518 (41%) were referred in a guideline concordant manner. The overall rate of first outpatient visits to nephrology increased from 2006 to 2019, although guideline discordant referrals showed a greater increase (trend 21.9 per million population/year, 95% confidence interval 4.3, 39.4) versus guideline concordant referrals (trend 12.4 per million population/year, 95% confidence interval 5.7, 19.0). The guideline concordant cohort were more likely to be on renin-angiotensin system blockers or beta blockers (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.12, 1.16), and had a higher risk of CKD progression (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.06, 1.13), kidney failure (hazard ratio 7.65, 95% confidence interval 6.83, 8.56), cardiovascular event (hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.35,1.45) and mortality (hazard ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.52, 1.63). Conclusions A significant proportion nephrology referrals from primary care were not consistent with current guideline-recommended criteria for referral. Further work is needed to identify quality improvement initiatives aimed at enhancing referral patterns of patients with CKD.

Data on dissemination strategies that generate awareness of clinical pathways for kidney care are limited.This study reports the application of Google Analytics to describe the reach and use of the Chronic Kidney Disease Pathway (CKD-P) using a multi-faceted dissemination strategy.The design of this study is a retrospective descriptive study.This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada.Individuals who accessed the CKD-P Web site between November 5, 2014, and May 31, 2019.Dissemination activities included print, electronic, in-person meetings, and a laboratory prompt. We used Google Analytics over a 5-year period to evaluate the following CKD-P Web site user metrics: number of sessions, pageviews, visit duration, user path, and bounce rate (when an individual visits a single page of the Web site and leaves the Web site without interacting with additional pages).We plotted dissemination activities alongside Web site metrics using control charts and described the data using means and percentages. We performed chi-square test for trends to evaluate year-over-year usage.There were 83 294 users, 90 805 sessions, and 231 684 pageviews. The overall bounce rate was 45.7%. Each user had an average of 1.5 sessions and a session duration of 2 minutes and 8 seconds. There was a significant positive trend for total annual users (We were unable to confirm if users were primary care providers and if word-of-mouth dissemination among providers/researchers drove people to use the CKD-P.Google Analytics was a useful and accessible tool for evaluating CKD-P reach and use trends. It was challenging to identify how individual dissemination activities contributed to CKD-P reach; however, repeated dissemination appeared to play a role in increasing CKD-P use.Not applicable-observational study design.Il existe peu de données sur les stratégies de diffusion pour sensibiliser les différents intervenants aux plans d’intervention en santé rénale.Cette étude rend compte de l’utilization de Google Analytics pour décrire la portée et l’utilization d’un plan d’intervention en ligne pour l’insuffisance rénale chronique (CKD-P —Étude descriptive rétrospective.Alberta, Canada.Les individus ayant accédé au site Web CKD-P entre le 5 novembre 2014 et le 31 mai 2019.Les activités de diffusion comprenaient des documents imprimés, des documents électroniques, des réunions en personne et un lien internet vers le site web de CKD-P lors de la transmission d’un résultat anormal de laboratoire. Nous avons utilisé Google Analytics pendant cinq ans pour évaluer les mesures suivantes pour les utilisateurs du site Web CKD-P: nombre de sessions, vues de page, durée des visites, chemin d’accès utilisateur et taux de rebond (lorsqu’une personne visite une seule page du site Web et le quitte sans interagir avec d’autres pages).Les activités de diffusion et les paramètres du site Web sont présentés à l’aide de tableaux de contrôle, et les données à l’aide de moyennes et de pourcentages. Un test de Chi-Deux a servi à déterminer les tendances et évaluer l’utilization d’une année sur l’autre.Nous avons répertorié 83 294 utilisateurs, 90 805 sessions et 231 684 pages consultées. Le taux de rebond global était de 45,7 %. En moyenne, chaque utilisateur comptait 1,5 session dont la durée moyenne était de 2 minutes 8 secondes. On a observé une tendance positive significative pour le nombre total annuel d’utilisateurs (Il n’a pas été possible de confirmer si les utilisateurs étaient des fournisseurs de soins primaires et si la diffusion de bouche-à-oreille entre les fournisseurs/chercheurs avait amené les gens à utiliser CKD-P.Google Analytics s’est avéré un outil utile et accessible pour évaluer les tendances de portée et d’utilization de CKD-P. Il est difficile d’établir comment les activités de diffusion individuelles contribuent à la portée de CKD-P; la diffusion répétée semble néanmoins jouer un rôle dans l’augmentation de l’utilization de CKD-P.Sans objet — étude observationnelle.

International audience; Outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials in peritoneal dialysis (PD) are diverse, are measured inconsistently, and may not be important to patients, families, and clinicians. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis (SONG-PD) initiative aims to establish a core outcome set for trials in PD based on the shared priorities of all stakeholders. We convened an international SONG-PD stakeholder consensus workshop in May 2018 in Vancouver, Canada. Nineteen patients/caregivers and 51 health professionals attended. Participants discussed core outcome domains and implementation in trials in PD. Four themes relating to the formation of core outcome domains were identified: life participation as a main goal of PD, impact of fatigue, empowerment for preparation and planning, and separation of contributing factors from core factors. Considerations for implementation were identified: standardizing patient-reported outcomes, requiring a validated and feasible measure, simplicity of binary outcomes, responsiveness to interventions, and using positive terminology. All stakeholders supported inclusion of PD-related infection, cardiovascular disease, mortality, technique survival, and life participation as the core outcome domains for PD.

The omission of outcomes that are of relevance to patients, clinicians, and regulators across trials in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) limits shared decision making. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Polycystic Kidney Disease (SONG-PKD) Initiative convened an international consensus workshop on October 25, 2018, to discuss the identification and implementation of a potential core outcome set for all ADPKD trials. This article summarizes the discussion from the workshops and the SONG-PKD core outcome set. Key stakeholders including 11 patients/ caregivers and 47 health professionals (nephrologists, policy makers, industry, and researchers) attended the workshop. Four themes emerged: "Relevance of trajectory and impact of kidney function" included concerns about a patient's prognosis and uncertainty of when they may need to commence kidney replacement therapy and the lack of an early prognostic marker to inform long-term decisions; "Discerning and defining pain specific to ADPKD" highlighted the challenges in determining the origin of pain, adapting to the chronicity and repeated episodes of pain, the need to place emphasis on pain management, and to have a validated measure for pain; "Highlighting ADPKD consequences" encompassed cyst-related complications and reflected patient's knowledge because of family history and the hereditary nature of ADPKD; and "Risk for life-threatening but rare consequences" such as cerebral aneurysm meant considering both frequency and severity of the outcome. Kidney function, mortality, cardiovascular disease, and pain were established as the core outcomes for ADPKD.

Cardiovascular disease is more common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and traditional risk factors do not adequately predict those at risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Recent evidence suggests elevated trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), created by gut microflora from dietary L-carnitine and choline, is associated with CV events. We investigated the relationship of TMAO levels in patients with stages 3b and 4 CKD to ischemic CV events using the CanPREDDICT cohort, a Canada-wide observational study with prospective 3-year follow-up of adjudicated CV events. Baseline samples were obtained for 2529 CKD patients. TMAO, choline, and L-carnitine levels were measured using tandem mass spectrometry. Baseline median TMAO level was high for the whole cohort (20.41 μM; interquartile range [IQR]: 12.82–32.70 μM). TMAO was independently associated with CV events (hazard ratio 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.06–1.42 / 1 SD lnTMAO) after adjusting for all potential CV risk factors. Those in the highest TMAO quartile had significantly higher risk of CV events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.59; 95% confidence interval: 1.04–2.43; P = 0.0351) in the analysis of recurring ischemic events. Among those with stage 3b CKD (hazard ratio 1.45; 95% confidence interval: 1.12–1.87 / 1 SD lnTMAO), independent of kidney function, TMAO levels identified those at highest risk for events. Our results suggest that TMAO may represent a new potentially modifiable CV risk factor for CKD patients. Further studies are needed to determine sources of variability and if lowering of TMAO reduces CV risk in CKD.

There are an estimated 14,000 randomized trials published in chronic kidney disease. The most frequently reported outcomes are biochemical endpoints, rather than clinical and patient-reported outcomes including cardiovascular disease, mortality, and quality of life. While many trials have focused on optimizing kidney health, the heterogeneity and uncertain relevance of outcomes reported across trials may limit their policy and practice impact. The international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) Initiative was formed to identify core outcomes that are critically important to patients and health professionals, to be reported consistently across trials. We convened a SONG Implementation Workshop to discuss the implementation of core outcomes. Eighty-two patients/caregivers and health professionals participated in plenary and breakout discussions. In this report, we summarize the findings of the workshop in two main themes: socializing the concept of core outcomes, and demonstrating feasibility and usability. We outline implementation strategies and pathways to be established through partnership with stakeholders, which may bolster acceptance and reporting of core outcomes in trials, and encourage their use by end-users such as guideline producers and policymakers to help improve patient-important outcomes. ispartof: pages:1053-1068 ispartof: Kidney Int vol:94 issue:6 pages:1053-1068 ispartof: location:United States status: published

International audience; Fatigue is one of the most highly prioritized outcomes for patients and clinicians, but remains infrequently and inconsistently reported across trials in hemodialysis. We convened an international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) consensus workshop with stakeholders to discuss the development and implementation of a core outcome measure for fatigue. 15 patients/caregivers and 42 health professionals (clinicians, researchers, policy makers, and industry representatives) from 9 countries participated in breakout discussions. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. 4 themes for a core outcome measure emerged. Drawing attention to a distinct and all-encompassing symptom was explicitly recognizing fatigue as a multifaceted symptom unique to hemodialysis. Emphasizing the pervasive impact of fatigue on life participation justified the focus on how fatigue severely impaired the patient's ability to do usual activities. Ensuring relevance and accuracy in measuring fatigue would facilitate shared decision making about treatment. Minimizing burden of administration meant avoiding the cognitive burden, additional time, and resources required to use the measure. A core outcome measure that is simple, is short, and includes a focus on the severity of the impact of fatigue on life participation may facilitate consistent and meaningful measurement of fatigue in all trials to inform decision making and care of patients receiving hemodialysis.

The purpose of this review is to contribute to the Choosing Wisely Canada campaign and develop a list of 5 items for nephrology health care professionals and patients to re-evaluate based on evidence that they are overused or misused.A working group was formed from the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. This working group sequentially used a multistage Delphi method, a survey of CSN members, a modified Delphi process, and a comprehensive literature review to determine 10 candidate items representing potentially ineffective care in nephrology. An in-person vote by CSN members at their Annual General Meeting was used to rank each item based on their relevance to and potential impact on patients with kidney disease to derive the final 5 items on the list.One hundred thirty-four of 609 (22%) CSN members responded to the survey, from which the CSN working group identified 10 candidate-misused items. Sixty-five CSN members voted on the ranking of these items. The top 5 recommendations selected for the final list were (1) do not initiate erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with hemoglobin levels greater than or equal to 100 g/L without symptoms of anemia; (2) do not prescribe nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for individuals with hypertension or heart failure or CKD of all causes, including diabetes; (3) do not prescribe angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in combination with angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of hypertension, diabetic nephropathy or heart failure; (4) do not initiate chronic dialysis without ensuring a shared decision-making process between patients, their families, and their nephrology health care team; and (5) do not initiate dialysis in outpatients with CKD category G5-ND in the absence of clinical indications.A low survey response rate of both community and academic nephrologists could contribute to sampling bias. However, the purpose of this report is to generate discussion, rather than study practice variation.These 5 evidence-based recommendations aim to improve outcomes and individualize care for patients with kidney disease, while reducing inefficiencies and preventing harm.Contribuer à la campagne nationale Choisir avec soin (Choosing Wisely Canada) et dresser une liste de cinq pratiques à être réévaluées par les professionnels de la santé et par les patients en néphrologie, parce que trop utilisées ou utilisées incorrectement.Un groupe de travail a été constitué au sein du comité de recommandations pour la pratique clinique de la Société canadienne de néphrologie (SCN). Ce groupe de travail a utilisé, de façon séquentielle, la méthode Delphi par paliers, un sondage mené auprès des membres de la SCN, une version modifiée de la méthode Delphi et une revue exhaustive de la littérature pour établir une liste de 10 pratiques candidates identifiant des soins potentiellement inefficaces en néphrologie. Les éléments retenus ont fait l’objet d’un vote auprès des membres de la SCN présents lors de l’assemblée générale annuelle. Ces derniers ont voté sur chacun des éléments pour permettre de les classer en fonction de leur pertinence et de l’impact potentiel qu’ils pouvaient avoir sur les patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale. Cinq éléments ont été retenus au terme de ce processus.Seuls 134 des 609 membres de la SCN (soit 22 %) ont répondu au sondage. Le groupe de travail de la SCN a identifié 10 pratiques candidates pour lesquelles 65 membres de la SCN ont voté en vue de procéder à un classement. Les 5 recommandations retenues dans la liste finale étaient (1) de ne pas entreprendre de traitement avec des agents stimulant l’érythropoïèse (ASE) chez les patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) dont le taux d’hémoglobine est supérieur ou égal à 100 g/L sans symptômes d’anémie ; (2) de ne pas prescrire de médicaments anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens (AINS) chez les individus souffrant d’hypertension, d’insuffisance cardiaque ou d’IRC peu importe la cause, y compris le diabète ; (3) de ne pas prescrire d’inhibiteurs de l’ECA (enzyme de conversion de l’angiotensine) en combinaison avec des antagonistes des récepteurs de l’angiotensine II (ARA II) pour le traitement de l’hypertension, de la néphropathie diabétique ou de l’insuffisance cardiaque ; (4) de ne pas amorcer d’hémodialyse chronique sans assurer un processus décisionnel partagé entre les patients, leurs familles, et leur équipe de soin de santé en néphrologie ; et (5) de ne pas amorcer l’hémodialyse chez les patients externes atteints d’IRC de catégorie G5-ND en l’absence d’indications cliniques.Le faible taux de réponse au sondage de la part des néphrologues de la communauté et du milieu universitaire a pu contribuer à introduire un biais attribuable à l’échantillonnage. Cependant, le but de ce rapport est de susciter la discussion, plutôt que d’étudier les variations dans la pratique.Ces cinq recommandations fondées sur des données probantes visent à améliorer les résultats des patients atteints d’insuffisance rénale et à individualiser les soins qui leur sont prodigués, tout en réduisant les lacunes et en prévenant les torts qui pourraient en découler.

Background Computer-based clinical decision support aims to improve the quality of patient care. The utility of decision support for improving blood pressure control in hemodialysis patients is unknown. Methods This was a nonrandomized controlled trial of adult patients receiving chronic in-center hemodialysis during the period of April 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006, in 1 of the 2 major university-based renal programs in Alberta, Canada. Physicians in the intervention center were provided with twice-monthly audits and printed management suggestions based on guideline-recommended blood pressure targets. The same data were available to physicians in the control group but without audit and feedback decision support. Results Eight hundred and thirty hemodialysis patients were receiving dialysis treatment at the time the study was initiated. Preintervention and postintervention blood pressure data were available for 361 patients. The primary outcome, the proportion of postdialysis systolic blood pressures at target over 12 months, did not differ between the intervention and the control programs (unadjusted odds ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34-1.02, p = 0.06; adjusted odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35-1.11, p = 0.11). There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in other measures of blood pressure such as the mean change in postdialysis systolic blood pressures (unadjusted mean difference 4 mm Hg, 95% CI, -1 to 9, p = 0.36; adjusted mean difference 2 mm Hg, 95% CI, -1 to 5, p = 0.19). Conclusions In this population of chronic hemodialysis patients, a computer-based clinical decision support system was not associated with improved blood pressure control.

Background We hypothesized that the higher mortality for hemodialysis patients who live farther from the closest attending nephrologist compared with patients living closer might be due to lower quality of care. Study Design Population-based longitudinal study. Setting & Participants All adult maintenance hemodialysis patients with measurements of quality-of-care indicators initiating hemodialysis therapy between January 2001 and June 2010 in Northern Alberta, Canada. Predictors Hemodialysis patients were classified into categories based on the distance by road from their residence to the closest nephrologist: ≤50 (referent), 50.1-150, 150.1-300, and >300 km. Outcomes Quality-of-care indicators were based on published guidelines. Measurements Quality-of-care indicators at 90 days following initiation of hemodialysis therapy and, in a secondary analysis, at 1 year. Results Measurements were available for 1,784 patients. At baseline, the proportions of patients residing in each category were 69% for ≤50 km to closest nephrologist; 17%, 50.1-150 km; 7%, 150.1-300 km; and 7%, >300 km. Those who lived farther away from the closest nephrologist were less likely to have seen a nephrologist 90 days prior to the initiation of hemodialysis therapy ( P for trend=0.008) and were less likely to receive Kt/V of 1.2 (adjusted OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.84; P for trend=0.01). Remote location also was associated with suboptimal levels of phosphate control ( P for trend=0.005). There were no differences in the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas or grafts or hemoglobin levels across distance categories. Limitations Registry data with limited data for non–guideline-based quality indicators. Conclusions Although several quality-of-care indicators were less common in remote-dwelling hemodialysis patients, these differences do not appear sufficient to explain the previously noted disparities in clinical outcomes by residence location.