Search

Background: Evidence on renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) effect in reducing urinary protein levels in patients with nephrotic syndrome is insufficient. We determined whether RASis can induce complete remission (CR) in patients on immunosuppressive therapy., Methods: This cohort study included 84 adults (median age, 65 years; males, 57%) with primary nephrotic syndrome (excluding minimal change disease) not receiving RASis during enrollment in the Japanese Nephrotic Syndrome Cohort Study from January 2009 to December 2010, and were followed up for 5 years. Exposure and outcome were RASi initiation and first CR, respectively. Marginal structural models and Poisson regression were used to account for time-varying covariates and estimate causal effects of RASis on CR., Results: Overall, 51 (61%), 73 (87%), and 55 (66%) patients had membranous nephropathy, were prescribed immunosuppressive agents at baseline (1-month post-renal biopsy and/or at start of immunosuppressive therapy), and were prescribed RASis during the study period, respectively. Sixty-five patients experienced first CR (incidence rate, 5.05/100 person-months). RASi use was associated with a higher (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.84), and lower (aIRR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.68) first CR in patients with membranous nephropathy and other pathologies, respectively., Conclusion: RASis are beneficial as adjuvant therapy for inducing remission in patients with membranous nephropathy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Nephrology.)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are prescribed as conservative or adjunctive therapies for adult idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. However, studies on real-world practice patterns are scarce. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and incidence of ACEI/ARB prescription and their associated factors. This nationwide cohort study included adult Japanese patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome including minimal change disease (MCD), membranous nephropathy (MN), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and others. The outcomes were the prevalence of ACEI/ARB prescription at baseline (date of renal biopsy or date of immunosuppressant initiation) and at 2 months after baseline. Of the 326 eligible patients, 122 (37.4%) had already been prescribed ACEIs/ARBs. Of the remaining 204 patients, 67 (32.7%) were newly prescribed within the 2-month period. MN/FSGS (vs. MCD, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 4.96 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.53-9.72] and 3.95 [95% CI 1.61-9.66], respectively), higher age (per 1-yr increase, AOR: 1.02 [95% CI 1.00-1.04]), other hypertensive agents (AOR: 2.18 [95% CI 1.21-3.92]), antidiabetic drug (AOR: 6.57 [95% CI 1.77-24.4]) were associated with a higher prevalence of ACEI/ARB prescription. MN (vs. MCD, AOR: 6.00 [95% CI 2.57-14.0]) and higher baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) (per 10-mmHg increase, AOR: 1.36 [95% CI 1.09-1.70]) were associated with a higher incidence of ACEI/ARB prescription. On average, incidence of ACEI/ARB prescription increased from 19.2% to 40.8% as baseline SBP increased from 100 to 140 mmHg. Thus, Japanese nephrologists are likely to prescribe ACEIs/ARBs for nephrotic patients with MN or high baseline SBP, even below the hypertensive range., (© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Few good-quality clinical trials on adults with nephrotic syndrome exist. Thus, there are discrepancies between real-world practice and clinical practice guidelines. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey to investigate potential discrepancies and the factors associated with variations in clinical practice., Methods: A questionnaire was administered electronically to all board-certified nephrologists in Japan. To examine clinical practice variations in relation to physician characteristics, we estimated the ratio of the mean duration of steroid therapy using a generalized linear model, and the odds ratio of higher level ordinal variables using an ordered logistic regression model., Results: Responses of the 116 participants showed some variation for the majority of questions. Most participants (94.8%) indicated that screening for malignant tumors was "Conducted for almost all patients". The duration of steroid therapy was found to be longer among physicians seeing ≥ 30 patients with nephrotic syndrome per month, both for minimal-change disease (ratio of mean 1.69; 95% CI 1.07-2.66) and membranous nephropathy (ratio of mean 1.71; 95% CI 1.09-2.69)., Conclusions: We identified practice patterns for nephrotic syndrome and discrepancies between clinical practice guidelines and actual practice. Defining the standard therapy for nephrotic syndrome may be necessary to generate high-quality evidence and develop clinical guidelines.