Search

Objectives: We systematically reviewed how investigators argued for and justified the validity of their instrumental variables (IV) in clinical studies of dementia and neurodegenerative disease. Methods: We included studies using IV analysis with observational data to investigate causal effects in clinical research studies of dementia and neurodegenerative disease. We reported the subject‐matter argumentation, falsification test, and study design strategies used to satisfy the three assumptions of a valid IV: relevance, exclusion restriction, and exchangeability. Results: Justification for the relevance assumption was performed in all 12 included studies, exclusion restriction in seven studies, and exchangeability in nine studies. Two subject‐matter argumentation strategies emerged from seven studies on the relevance of their IV. All studies except one provided quantitative evidence for the strength of the association between the IV and exposure variable. Four argumentation strategies emerged for exclusion restriction from six studies. Four falsification tests were performed across three studies. Three argumentation strategies emerged for exchangeability across four studies. Nine falsification tests were performed across nine studies. Two notable study design strategies were reported. Conclusion: Our results reinforce IV analysis as a feasible option for clinical researchers in dementia and neurodegenerative disease by clarifying known strategies used to validate an IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Small vessel disease (SVD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) frequently coexist; however, it remains unclear how they collectively affect cognition.Objective: We investigated associations between SVD and AD biomarkers, namely amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) in young onset dementia (YOD) and explored how SVD and ATN interact to affect cognition.Methods: 80 YOD individuals were recruited from a memory clinic. SVD burden (SVD+) was operationalized as a score >1 on the Staals scale and ATN was measured using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).Results: SVD+ was associated with lower CSF Aβ1-42 (B = -0.20, 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.08) and greater neurodegeneration, indexed as hippocampal atrophy (B = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.04). SVD+ was not associated with tau. Cognitive impairment was associated with CSF Aβ1-42 (B = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.18) but not SVD. Rather, SVD was indirectly associated with cognition via reduced CSF Aβ1-42, specifically with global cognition (B = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.09 to -0.01) and memory (B = 0.08, 95% CI: -.01 to .21). SVD was indirectly associated with cognition via increased neurodegeneration in grey matter (Global cognition: B = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.17 to -0.03; Memory: B = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.18) and the hippocampus (Global cognition: B = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.01; Memory: B = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.17).Conclusion: In YOD, SVD burden was associated with AD pathology, namely CSF Aβ1-42. SVD indirectly contributed to cognitive impairment via reducing CSF Aβ1-42 and increasing neurodegeneration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]