Search

The role of putative preneoplastic enterochromaffin-like cell lesions, either hyperplastic or dysplastic, in the genesis of type 1 enterochromaffin-like cell neuroendocrine tumors associated with type A chronic atrophic gastritis, their actual neoplastic risk, and their precise histogenetic mechanism deserve further clarification by specific histopathologic studies coupled with patient follow-up. A total of 100 patients with severe type A chronic atrophic gastritis, enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia, and antral G-cell hyperplasia were endoscopically and histologically followed up for a median of 90.1 months (total of 9118 person-months). Preneoplastic enterochromaffin-like cell lesions and newly developed neuroendocrine tumors were investigated histologically and histochemically, in parallel with enterochromaffin-like cell lesions found in nontumor mucosa of another 32 well-characterized and previously reported type 1 neuroendocrine tumors. Both neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine mucosa changes were analyzed and statistically evaluated. During follow-up, 7 of 100 patients developed neuroendocrine tumors: 5 were in a group of 20 cases with previous enterochromaffin-like cell dysplasia and 2 were among 80 cases showing only enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia throughout the study (hazard ratio, 20.7; P < .001). The severity of enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia at first biopsy, with special reference to linear hyperplasia with 6 chains or more per linear millimeter, also increased the risk of neuroendocrine tumor development during follow-up (hazard ratio, 13.0; P < .001). Enterochromaffin-like cell microinvasive dysplastic lesions arising at the epithelial renewal zone level, in connection with immature proliferating mucous-neck cells, were found to be linked to early intramucosal neuroendocrine tumor histogenesis. Both enterochromaffin-like cell dysplasia and severe hyperplasia indicate increased risk of neuroendocrine tumor development in type A chronic atrophic gastritis with hypergastrinemia/G-cell hyperplasia. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuroendocrine carcinomas show overlapping morphological and immunohistochemical features independently of their site of origin, which makes identification of the primary location problematic when they are diagnosed as metastases of unknown origin. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are easily morphologically differentiated from neuroendocrine tumors in surgical material, although this distinction can be difficult when using small biopsy specimens. The diagnostic usefulness of different transcription factors as site-specific markers or as discriminating markers between neuroendocrine carcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors has been previously studied with sometimes contradictory results. In this respect, the role of achaete-scute homolog 1 has been poorly investigated, although some recent findings demonstrate its expression in neuroendocrine carcinomas. Using immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, we investigated the expression of achaete-scute homolog 1 in 335 neuroendocrine neoplasms (194 neuroendocrine carcinomas and 141 neuroendocrine tumors) of different sites, to check its possible utility as diagnostic marker. High concordance between immunohistochemical and molecular findings was found. Achaete-scute homolog 1 expression was identified in 82% of lung neuroendocrine carcinomas and 70% of extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Achaete-scute homolog 1 was not detected in any gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and was found in only a minority of lung carcinoids. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of achaete-scute homolog 1 expression were 82.4% and 89.7% in distinguishing neuroendocrine carcinomas from neuroendocrine tumors of the lung, 40.6% and 100% to differentiate extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas from neuroendocrine tumors, and 82.4% and 59.4% in distinguishing lung from extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Our data suggest that achaete-scute homolog 1 is not a site-specific marker. However, achaete-scute homolog 1 may be proposed as a diagnostic marker of poor differentiation and may help to differentiate neuroendocrine carcinomas from neuroendocrine tumors in difficult cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Ki67-based grading is a major prognostic parameter for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gene expression profiles of these tumors have been explored, yet their relationship with Ki67-based tumor grade has only been superficially investigated. To fill this gap, we analyzed differentially expressed genes across 29 cases of different grades. Our data provided the first proof that the switch from lower to higher grades is associated with a profound change in the transcriptome. The comparison of multiple samples from the same patients, including primaries and metastasis, showed that the major determinant of difference was tumor grade, irrespective of the anatomic location or patient of origin. These data call for further investigation of this association and of the role of Ki67 in affecting chromosomal stability in neuroendocrine tumors of different grades, which may clarify the basis of tumor progression and provide clues on how to interfere with it. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) display variable aggressive behavior. A major predictor of survival is tumor grade based on the Ki67 proliferation index. As information on transcriptomic profiles of PanNETs with different tumor grades is limited, we investigated 29 PanNETs (17 G1, 7 G2, 5 G3) for their expression profiles, mutations in 16 PanNET relevant genes and LINE-1 DNA methylation profiles. A total of 3050 genes were differentially expressed between tumors with different grades (p < 0.05): 1279 in G3 vs. G2; 2757 in G3 vs. G1; and 203 in G2 vs. G1. Mutational analysis showed 57 alterations in 11 genes, the most frequent being MEN1 (18/29), DAXX (7/29), ATRX (6/29) and MUTYH (5/29). The presence and type of mutations did not correlate with the specific expression profiles associated with different grades. LINE-1 showed significantly lower methylation in G2/G3 versus G1 tumors (p = 0.007). The expression profiles of matched primaries and metastasis (nodal, hepatic and colorectal wall) of three cases confirmed the role of Ki67 in defining specific expression profiles, which clustered according to tumor grades, independently from anatomic location or patient of origin. Such data call for future exploration of the role of Ki67 in tumor progression, given its involvement in chromosomal stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]