Search

Purpose: Tethered spinal cord syndrome (TCS) is characterized by cutaneous attachments on the filum terminale that stretch the spinal cord, leading to musculoskeletal and urogenital sequelae. While the neurocutaneous associations with TCS remain undefined, a recent study reports a high incidence of TCS among a pediatric neurofibromatosis (NF) cohort. This present study utilizes a population-level database to estimate TCS incidence among pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2 (NF1, NF2)., Methods: The TriNetX Research Network was queried to identify patients diagnosed with NF and/or TCS before the age of 21. Symptomatic TCS requiring surgical intervention was identified using corresponding procedural codes within 12 months following TCS diagnosis. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to measure the associations of NF1/NF2 with TCS., Results: 19,426 pediatric NF patients were evaluated (NF1: 18,383, NF2: 1042). The average ages of TCS diagnosis among NF1, NF2, and non-NF patients were 12, 16, and 9 years, respectively. The incidence of TCS was 1.2% in NF1 patients and 7.3% in NF2 patients, compared to 0.074% in the general population. The associations of NF incidence with TCS were significantly increased in both NF1 (OR 16.42; 14.38-18.76) and NF2 (OR 105.58; 83.56-133.40) patients compared to the general population. Symptomatic TCS requiring surgical intervention was not significantly associated with NF1/NF2 patients compared to the general TCS population., Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates a high incidence of TCS but delayed intervention in pediatric NF patients. Considering TCS counseling, spinal MRI, and earlier intervention may be warranted for NF patients experiencing musculoskeletal symptomatology., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: People with pre-existing conditions may be more susceptible to severe COVID-19 when infected by SARS-CoV-2. The relative risk and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in people with rare diseases such as neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), or schwannomatosis (SWN) is unknown., Methods: We investigated the proportions of people with NF1, NF2, or SWN in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) electronic health record data set who had a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19., Results: The cohort sizes in N3C were 2501 (NF1), 665 (NF2), and 762 (SWN). We compared these with N3C cohorts of patients with other rare diseases (98-9844 individuals) and the general non-NF population of 5.6 million. The site- and age-adjusted proportion of people with NF1, NF2, or SWN who had a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 (collectively termed positive cases) was not significantly higher than in individuals without NF or other selected rare diseases. There were no severe outcomes reported in the NF2 or SWN cohorts. The proportion of patients experiencing severe outcomes was no greater for people with NF1 than in cohorts with other rare diseases or the general population., Conclusion: Having NF1, NF2, or SWN does not appear to increase the risk of being SARS-CoV-2 positive or of being a patient with COVID-19 or of developing severe complications from SARS-CoV-2., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest J.T.J. is a recipient of royalties from Elsevier and consulting fees from Navio Theragnostics, Inc; CereXis; and Recursion. S.P. is a cofounder of NFlection Therapeutics and NF2 Therapeutics, Inc; consults for Akouos; and serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of and holds stock in SonALAsense. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Neurofibromatoses (type 1: NF1; type 2: NF2) are autosomal dominant tumor predisposition syndromes mostly caused by loss-of-function mutations in the tumor suppressor genes NF1 and NF2, respectively. Genotyping is important for correct diagnosis of these diseases. The authors aimed to characterize NF1 and NF2 variants in patients from Southern Brazil., Methods: Ninety-three unrelated probands with NF1 and 7 unrelated probands with NF2 features were recruited from an Oncogenetics center in Southern Brazil. Two next generation sequencing panels were customized to identify point mutations: NF1 (NF1, RNF135, and SUZ12 genes) and NF2 (NF2 and SMARCB1 genes). Large rearrangements were assessed by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification., Results: Sixty-eight heterozygous NF1 variants were identified in 75/93 probands (80%) and 3 heterozygous NF2 variants were identified in 3/7 probands (43%). In NF1, 59 (87%) variants were pathogenic (4 large rearrangements - 6%), 6 (9%) were likely pathogenic, 3 (4%) were variants of uncertain significance and 28 (41%) were novel. In NF2, all variants were pathogenic. No novel genotype-phenotype correlations were observed; however, previously described correlations were confirmed in our cohort., Conclusion: The clinical and molecular characterization of neurofibromatoses in different populations is very important to provide further insights into the pathogenesis of these diseases.

A comprehensive discussion of neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is presented, including clinical characteristics, symptoms, diagnosis, tumor types, prevalence and incidence, genetic testing, imaging, treatment options, and follow-up management of NF2., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The two types of neurofibromatosis are NF-1 and NF-2. Both cause abnormal cell growth in the central and peripheral nervous system. Each disease is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait, thus each child of an affected parent has a 50% chance of inheriting the disorder. Because there is no cure for either type of NF and treatment consists of amelioration of clinical symptoms, genetic counseling is the only preventive approach to this disease.

Neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2 are clinically distinct autosomal dominant disorders that affect an estimated 1.5 million individuals throughout the world. The genetic defect in each disorder has been mapped to different chromosomes, NF1 to chromosome 17 and NF2 to chromosome 22. Progress towards the cloning of the NF1 gene has proceeded rapidly. The NF1 locus was bracketed using genetic linkage analysis on NF1 affected pedigrees. Physical mapping methods were then used to precisely map the translocation breakpoints in each of two NF1 affected individuals who harbored constitutional chromosomal translocations in the putative NF1 region of chromosome 17. The region of DNA located between the two translocations has been cloned in cosmids and yeast artificial chromosomes and a number of RNA coding sequences have been identified. The identification of the NF1 gene will depend on finding mutations in the DNA of affected individuals. In the case of NF2, progress seems to have been less rapid, in part due to the lower availability of NF2 affected pedigrees. The genetic defect has been mapped to the long arm of chromosome 22 by studies of chromosomal loss in the tumours associated with this disease. Subsequent genetic mapping has confirmed this location. Flanking DNA markers for the NF2 locus have been identified. The region of DNA between these markers is in the order of 5-10 Mb. The identification of chromosomal aberrations in patients with NF2 that involve chromosome 22 will play an important role in the identification of the NF2 gene in much the same way as they have in NF1.