Search

INTRODUCTION: Although continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) is an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations, data from Asian cohorts is limited. The therapy is often discontinued due to the complexity of its delivery.METHODS: Fifty-one PD patients undergoing CSAI as an add-on therapy were enrolled in the Thai Apomorphine Registry, an electronic database that recorded clinical characteristics and parameters during the 14-consecutive-day titration and long-term follow-up. Factors at the time of titration were documented in order to identify predictors of long-term discontinuation.RESULTS: Following initiation, PD patients were administered a mean CSAI dose of 5.89 mg/h (SD 1.36) over a mean time of 12.28 h (SD 1.90) each day. The mean follow-up period was 626.2 days (SD 619.17). Significant reductions in UPDRS-I, II, III, and IV scores, total NMSQ score, PDQ-8 score, daily off and dyskinesia hours, Timed Up and Go test, walking step test, levodopa-equivalent daily dose, number of times a day the levodopa was taken versus pre-CSAI values were observed (p < 0.05, each). Thirty-five (68.6%) patients discontinued during the follow-up period. Relative risks of variables recorded at the time of titration that determined discontinuation of CSAI therapy were an absence of full-time caregivers, achieving a daily off hours reduction CONCLUSION: Identifying factors that predict discontinuation of CSAI at the time of its initiation may help physicians to better understand the patient's drug response and how to manage them long-term.

“Every child exhibiting dystonia merits an l-dopa trial, lest the potentially treatable condition of dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) is missed” has been a commonly cited and highly conserved adage in movement disorders literature stemming from the 1980s. We here provide a historical perspective on this statement, discuss the current diagnostic and therapeutic applications of l-dopa in everyday neurologic practice, contrast these with its approved indications, and finish with our view on both a diagnostic and therapeutic trial in children and adults with dystonia. In light of the relatively low prevalence of DRDs, the large interindividual variation in the required l-dopa dose, the uncertainty about an adequate trial duration, the substantial advances in knowledge on etiology and pathophysiology of these disorders, and the availability of various state-of-the-art diagnostic tests, we think that a diagnostic l-dopa trial as a first step in the approach of early-onset dystonia (≤25 years) is outdated. Rather, in high-resource countries, we suggest to use l-dopa after biochemical corroboration of a defect in dopamine biosynthesis, in genetically confirmed DRD, or if nigrostriatal degeneration has been demonstrated by nuclear imaging in adult patients presenting with lower limb dystonia. Furthermore, our literature study on the effect of a therapeutic trial to gain symptomatic relief revealed that l-dopa has occasionally proven beneficial in several established “non-DRDs” and may therefore be considered in selected cases of dystonia due to other causes. In summary, we argue against the application of l-dopa in every patient with early-onset dystonia and support a more rational therapeutic use.

Introduction This registry evaluated the 24-month safety and efficacy of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients under routine clinical care. Methods Motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and safety were evaluated. Observations were fully prospective for treatment-naïve patients (60% of patients) and partially retrospective for patients with ≤12 months of pre-treatment with LCIG (40% of patients). Hours of “On” and “Off” time were assessed with a modified version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part IV items 32 and 39. Results Overall, 375 patients were enrolled by 75 movement disorder centers in 18 countries and 258 patients completed the registry. At 24 months LCIG treatment led to significant reductions from baseline in “Off” time (hours/day) (mean ± SD = −4.1 ± 3.5, P < 0.001), “On” time with dyskinesia (hours/day) (−1.1 ± 4.8, P = 0.006), Non-Motor Symptom Scale total (−16.7 ± 43.2, P < 0.001) and individual domains scores, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 item total score (−7.1 ± 21.0, P < 0.001). Adverse events deemed to have a possible/probable causal relationship to treatment drug/device were reported in 194 (54%) patients; the most frequently reported were decreased weight (6.7%), device related infections (5.9%), device dislocations (4.8%), device issues (4.8%), and polyneuropathy (4.5%). Conclusions LCIG treatment led to sustained improvements in motor fluctuations, non-motor symptoms particularly sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition and gastrointestinal domains, as well as quality of life in advanced PD patients over 24 months. Safety events were consistent with the established safety profile of LCIG., 0, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Many clinicians regard levodopa as a last resort in the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. Here we critically review the arguments that are typically used to postpone the start of levodopa for as long as possible. We will point out that most concerns are invalid. Levodopa remains the most effective and best tolerated Parkinson's drug to date, and should have an important role in all therapeutic strategies, both as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease and as part of combination therapy in advanced disease. Regardless of disease stage, the choice of a particular drug should not be driven by fear of long term complications but by the clinical condition of the patient at the time, with an emphasis on functioning in everyday life and any comorbidity. A 'phobia' for levodopa—or, indeed, for any other antiparkinsonian medication—is unacceptable according to current evidence.

Background: In a previous study on a consecutive series of 62 patients with PD, the authors showed that bilateral subthalamic or pallidal continuous high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) affects neither memory nor executive functions 3 to 6 months after surgery. Objective: To investigate the specific effects of DBS by comparing the performance of patients with the stimulator turned “on” and “off.” Methods: The performance of 56 patients on clinical tests of executive function was compared after 3 and 12 months of DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN; n = 48) or the internal globus pallidus (GPi; n = 8) with the stimulator “on” or “off.” Global intellectual efficiency, verbal learning, and mood were also evaluated with the stimulator “on.” The performance of another group of 20 patients was compared after 6 months of DBS of the STN (n = 15) or the GPi (n = 5) with the stimulator “on” or “off” on more experimental tests recently shown to be more sensitive to l-dopa therapy. Results: When the stimulator was “on,” STN patients showed a mild but significant improvement in psychomotor speed and working memory. In comparison with the presurgical state, STN patients had no cognitive deficit at 12 months, except for lexical fluency. There was no differential effect of STN or GPi stimulation. Conclusions: 1) The specific effect of DBS seems to mimic the action of l-dopa treatment in the cognitive as in the motor domain; 2) the surgery associated with DBS does not appear to affect the cognitive performance of patients with PD 12 months later, except for a mild deficit in lexical fluency.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole proprionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptors to the pathogenesis of parkinsonian signs and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. BACKGROUND: Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias reflect, in part, altered function of glutamate receptors of the NMDA subtype. The possible role of AMPA receptors, however, has not yet been examined. METHODS: The authors compared the ability of an AMPA agonist (CX516) and a noncompetitive AMPA antagonist (LY300164) to alter parkinsonian symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in MPTP-lesioned monkeys. Eight levodopa-treated parkinsonian monkeys received rising doses of each drug, first in monotherapy and then in combination with low-, medium-, and high-dose levodopa. RESULTS: CX516 alone, as well as when combined with low-dose levodopa, did not affect motor activity but induced dyskinesia. Moreover, following injection of the higher doses of levodopa, it increased levodopa-induced dyskinesia by up to 52% (p < 0.05). LY300164 potentiated the motor activating effects of low-dose levodopa, increasing motor activity by as much as 86% (p < 0.05), and that of medium-dose levodopa as much as 54% (p < 0.05). At the same time, LY300164 decreased levodopa-induced dyskinesia by up to 40% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AMPA receptor upregulation may contribute to the expression of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Conceivably, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonists could be useful, alone or in combination with NMDA antagonists, in the treatment of PD, by enhancing the antiparkinsonian effects of levodopa without increasing and possibly even decreasing levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Neurology

Background Long-duration response (LDR) to levodopa is supposed to decrease with Parkinson disease (PD) progression, but direct observation of this response in advanced PD has never been performed. Objective To study the LDR to levodopa in patients with advanced PD treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS). Design and Setting We studied 30 consecutive patients with PD who underwent subthalamic DBS. One group had no antiparkinsonian treatment since surgery (no-levodopa group), whereas medical treatment had to be reinitiated in the other group (levodopa group). Main Outcome Measure Motor subscale score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Results Compared with preoperative assessment, evaluation 6 months postoperatively with DBS turned off for 3 hours found a worsening of the motor subscale score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in the no-levodopa group. This worsening being absent in the levodopa group, it probably reflected the loss of the LDR to levodopa in the no-levodopa group. When DBS was turned on, postoperative motor subscale scores of the Unifid Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in both groups were similar to preoperative scores while receiving medication, suggesting that subthalamic DBS compensated for the short-duration response and LDR to levodopa. Conclusions Our results suggest that the LDR to levodopa remains significant even in advanced PD, and that subthalamic DBS compensates for the short-duration response and LDR to levodopa.

(+)-4-Propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine (+PHNO) is a potent dopamine agonist that has been administered transdermally to four patients with Parkinson's disease and "on-off" fluctuations. Skin patches of increasing size were used to treat these patients, who also received infrequent doses of oral levodopa if required. The effect of +PHNO was measured as an increased duration of action of individual levodopa doses. The clinical effect measured in this way was directly proportional to the plasma concentrations of +PHNO achieved. The plasma concentrations of +PHNO began to rise 4-6 h after patch application and reached a steady state by 24 h. The final plasma concentration of +PHNO was proportional to the area of skin covered.