Search

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune condition for which three treatments have been approved since 2019: eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. We conducted a survey of U.S. academic neuroimmunologists to assess adoption of these therapies and barriers to use. Thirty-three neuroimmunologists from 18 states completed the survey. Nearly all (88 %) reported using the novel NMOSD treatments (NNTs). They uncommonly switched clinically stable patients to NNTs (69 % switched none, 22 % switched 1-25 % of their patients). For newly diagnosed patients, NNT initiation rates varied. Following relapse, respondents were dichotomized, either switching 75-100 % of patients (60 %) or 0-25 % (40 %). Insurance and cost-related barriers were common., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Olga Thon has received financial compensation for her participation in advisory boards and speakers’ bureaus from Horizon Therapeutics. None of the other authors have disclosures., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The Italian National Health Service (INHS) has recently reimbursed the monoclonal antibody inebilizumab as a second line monotherapy after rituximab (RTX) use for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) patients ≥ 18 years anti-aquaporin 4 antibody-immunoglobulin G positive, who experienced a relapse in the last year or cannot receive RTX, if incident patients. Other INHS-reimbursed drugs for NMOSD treatment are satralizumab, eculizumab and, off-label, besides RTX, ocrelizumab, tocilizumab, and immunosuppressants., Research Design and Methods: A 3-year (2023-2025) prevalence-based budget impact model following the INHS viewpoint compared the costs and the NMOSD attacks without (1st scenario) and with inebilizumab (2nd scenario). The epidemiology of NMOSD, and the INHS-funded healthcare resources (drugs and their administration; specialist visits; hospitalizations due to drug-related adverse events and NMOSD attacks) were obtained from the literature. One-way, threshold value and scenario sensitivity analyses investigated the robustness of the baseline findings., Results: During 2023-2025 inebilizumab saves the INHS €8,373,125.13 (1st scenario: €176,770,028.63; 2nd scenario: €168,396,903.50) and 12.74 NMOSD attacks (1st scenario: 213.94; 2nd scenario: 201.19). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the baseline results., Conclusion: Inebilizumab reduces the INHS expenditure for NMOSD drugs. Future research should explore the cost-effectiveness of inebilizumab vs other NMOSD-targeting drugs in Italy.

Background: The N-MOmentum trial investigated safety and efficacy of inebilizumab in participants with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)., Objective: Evaluate the attack identification process and adjudication committee (AC) performance in N-MOmentum., Methods: Adults ( n = 230) with NMOSD and Expanded Disability Status Scale score ⩽8 were randomized (3:1) to inebilizumab 300 mg or placebo. The randomized controlled period was 28 weeks or until adjudicated attack. Attacks were adjudicated according to 18 predefined criteria. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomarker (serum glial fibrillary acidic protein [sGFAP]) analyses were performed., Results: A total of 64 participant-reported neurological events occurred; 51 (80%) were investigator-determined to be attacks. The AC confirmed 43 of the investigator-determined attacks (84%). There was high inter- and intra-AC-member agreement. In 25/64 events (39%) and 14/43 AC-adjudicated attacks (33%), MRI was reviewed during adjudication. Retrospective analysis revealed new domain-specific T1 and T2 MRI lesions in 90% of adjudicated attacks. Increased mean sGFAP concentrations (>2-fold change) from baseline were observed in 56% of adjudicated attacks versus 14% of investigator-determined attacks rejected by the AC and 31% of participant-reported events determined not to be attacks., Conclusion: AC adjudication of NMOSD attacks according to predefined criteria appears robust. MRI lesion correlates and sGFAP elevations were found in most adjudicated attacks.

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system mediated by antibodies targeting the aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel expressed on astrocytes. The binding of specific antibodies to AQP4 causes complement-dependent cytotoxicity, leading to inflammation and demyelination. Several recent phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials showed the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting B-cells, interleukin-6 receptor, and complement., Areas Covered: Current biologic treatments for NMOSD and developments therein, and unresolved issues in NMOSD treatment., Expert Opinion: New biologic treatments demonstrate high efficacy and good safety for patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. The optimal therapeutics for seronegative NMOSD, pediatric patients, and female patients who are pregnant or wish to be are unclear, and further research is needed. Also, real-world studies of new biological agents and the data on the durability of their beneficial effects and their long-term safety are required. Effective rescue therapy for an acute attack is critical given permanent disability in NMOSD is attack-related, and biologic agents that treat acute attack are emerging. If such treatments are to become widely applied, studies on the most cost-effective treatment strategies are needed.

Aims: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an autoantibody-mediated, B cell-driven disease. Inebilizumab is a humanized, affinity-optimized, afucosylated IgG1 κ monoclonal antibody that binds to the B-cell specific surface antigen CD19, resulting in rapid, profound and sustained depletion of circulating peripheral B cells in NMOSD subjects (pivotal study). The objective of this study was to conduct population modelling of B-cell response following inebilizumab treatment in adult subjects with NMOSD, and to assess the impact of drug exposure to outcome., Methods: A haematopoietic transit model was developed to describe the joint effects of reducing influx from pro-B cells and accelerating CD20 +  B-cell depletion in the blood by inebilizumab. Furthermore, the relationships between inebilizumab pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and the primary efficacy endpoint and key secondary efficacy endpoints were evaluated., Results: At the 300-mg dose, there was no apparent relationship between efficacy (reduction in disease attack risk, risk of worsening from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale, cumulative total active MRI lesions, and the number of NMOSD-related in-patient hospitalizations) and PK exposure. Subjects with low, medium and high PK exposure had a similar hazard ratio of NMOSD attack vs. placebo group., Conclusion: The pharmacodynamic modelling confirmed effective depletion of B cells is achieved with a 300 mg intravenous dose of inebilizumab administered on Day 1 and Day 15 and every 6 months thereafter. The PK variability between patients had no apparent effect on clinical efficacy., (© 2022 Horizon Therapeutics. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on British Pharmacological Society.)

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are rare neurologic autoimmune diseases that have a poor prognosis if left untreated. For many years, generic oral immunosuppressants and repurposed monoclonal antibodies that target the interleukin-6 pathway or B cells were the mainstays of drug treatment. Recently, these drug treatments have been complemented by new biologics developed and approved specifically for NMOSD. In principle, all of these drugs are effective, but treatment recommendations that take this into account are still pending. Instead, the choice of a drug may depend on other criteria such as drug safety or tolerability. In this review, we summarise current knowledge on the adverse effects of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, tocilizumab, eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab in NMOSD. Infections, cytopenias, and infusion-related reactions are most common, but the data are as heterogeneous as the manifestations are diverse. Nevertheless, knowledge of safety issues may facilitate treatment choices for individual patients.

Aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD) are inflammatory demyelinating disorders distinct from each other and from multiple sclerosis (MS).While anti-CD20 treatments can be used to treat MS and AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD, some MS medications are ineffective or could exacerbate AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD including beta-interferons, natalizumab, and fingolimod. AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD has a relapsing course in most cases, and preventative maintenance treatments should be started after the initial attack. Rituximab, eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab all have class 1 evidence for use in AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD, and the latter three have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). MOGAD is much more likely to be monophasic than AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD, and preventative therapy is usually reserved for those who have had a disease relapse. There is a lack of any class 1 evidence for MOGAD preventative treatment. Observational benefit has been suggested from oral immunosuppressants, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), rituximab, and tocilizumab. Randomized placebo-controlled trials are urgently needed in this area., (© 2022. The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc.)

Background: The N-MOmentum trial, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study of inebilizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), enrolled participants who were aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-seropositive (AQP4+) or -seronegative (AQP4-). This article reports AQP4- participant outcomes., Methods: AQP4-IgG serostatus was determined for all screened participants by a central laboratory, using a validated, fluorescence-observation cell-binding assay. Medical histories and screening data for AQP4- participants were assessed independently by an eligibility committee of three clinical experts during screening. Diagnosis of NMOSD was confirmed by majority decision using the 2006 neuromyelitis optica criteria. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G (MOG-IgG) serology (using a clinically validated, flow cytometry assay) and annualized attack rates (AARs) were evaluated post hoc. Efficacy outcomes were assessed by comparing pre-study and on-study AARs in treated participants., Results: Only 18/50 AQP4- screened participants (36%) were initially considered eligible for randomization; 16 were randomized and received full treatment, 4 to placebo (1 MOG-IgG-seropositive [MOG+]) and 12 to inebilizumab (6 MOG+). The most common reason for failure to pass screening among prospective AQP4- participants was failure to fulfill the 2006 NMO MRI criteria. In inebilizumab-treated AQP4- participants, on-study AARs (95% confidence interval [CI]) calculated from treatment initiation (whether from randomization or when received at the start of the open-label period) to the end of study were lower than pre-study rates: for all AQP4- participants (n = 16), mean (95% CI) AAR was 0.048 (0.02-0.15) versus 1.70 (0.74-2.66), respectively. For the subset of AQP4-/MOG+ participants (n = 7), AAR was 0.043 (0.006-0.302) after treatment versus 1.93 (1.10-3.14) before the study. For the subset of AQP4-/MOG- participants (n = 9), post-treatment AAR was 0.051 (0.013-0.204) versus 1.60 (1.02-2.38). Three attacks occurred during the randomized controlled period in the AQP4- inebilizumab group and were of mild severity; no attacks occurred in the AQP4- placebo group. The low number of participants receiving placebo (n = 4) confounds direct comparison with the inebilizumab group. No attacks were seen in any AQP4- participant after the second infusion of inebilizumab. Inebilizumab was generally well tolerated by AQP4- participants and the adverse event profile observed was similar to that of AQP4+ participants., Conclusion: The high rate of rejection of AQP4- participants from enrollment into the study highlights the challenges of implementing the diagnostic criteria of AQP4- NMOSD. An apparent reduction of AAR in participants with AQP4- NMOSD who received inebilizumab warrants further investigation., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The B-cell-depleting agent rituximab (anti-CD20) was historically used to prevent attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Inebilizumab, which targets and depletes CD19-expressing B cells, plasmablasts, and some plasma cells, received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of NMOSD based on results from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 N-MOmentum trial. Because of their closely related mechanisms of action, consideration as to whether inebilizumab may be a suitable treatment option for patients with prior rituximab experience is important. This post hoc analysis of data from N-MOmentum assessed inebilizumab efficacy and tolerability in participants previously treated with rituximab., Methods: Adjudicated attacks, secondary efficacy outcomes, and treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed by prior rituximab use during a 6-month randomized control period and open-label period., Results: Seventeen participants in N-MOmentum had prior rituximab use, of whom 13 were randomly assigned to the inebilizumab treatment group. Seven of these participants had breakthrough attacks prior to enrollment (annualized attack rate, 0.78 attacks/person-year) despite rituximab use. While they were receiving inebilizumab in the randomized control period, 1 of 13 participants with prior rituximab use had an attack (hazard ratio vs all placebo, 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 1.20; p = 0.07). Two additional participants with prior rituximab use experienced attacks on inebilizumab during the open-label period, with an overall annualized attack rate of 0.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.02 0.34) attacks/person-year. This annualized attack rate was similar to that of participants without prior rituximab use (0.10 [95% confidence interval: 0.07 0.15]). None of the 7 participants who experienced attacks while taking rituximab experienced an attack while receiving inebilizumab. Two (12%) participants with prior rituximab use experienced serious treatment-emergent adverse events related to inebilizumab, with serious or grade ≥3 infections occurring in 3 (18%) participants each. No deaths or opportunistic infections were reported in this cohort., Conclusions: These findings support the efficacy of inebilizumab in participants with NMOSD who had previously been treated with rituximab. Infections occurred in nearly all study participants with prior rituximab exposure, highlighting a need for clinical vigilance in such individuals. Further studies are necessary to determine potential safety concerns of inebilizumab, including risk of infection, in rituximab-experienced patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02200770., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: In the N-MOmentum trial, the risk of an adjudicated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attack was significantly reduced with inebilizumab compared with placebo., Objective: To demonstrate the robustness of this finding, using pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses., Methods: N-MOmentum is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial of inebilizumab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal B-cell-depleting antibody, in patients with NMOSD. Pre-planned and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the primary endpoint across a range of attack definitions and demographic groups, as well as key secondary endpoints., Results: In the N-MOmentum trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02200770), 174 participants received inebilizumab and 56 received placebo. Attack risk for inebilizumab versus placebo was consistently and significantly reduced, regardless of attack definition, type of attack, baseline disability, ethnicity, treatment history, or disease course (all with hazard ratios < 0.4 favoring inebilizumab, p < 0.05). Analyses of secondary endpoints showed similar trends., Conclusion: N-MOmentum demonstrated that inebilizumab provides a robust reduction in the risk of NMOSD attacks regardless of attack evaluation method, attack type, patient demographics, or previous therapy.The N-MOmentum study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT2200770.

Treatment and new evidences in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Illés Zs, MD, PhD Ideggyogy Sz 2021;74(9-10):309-321. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is associated with antibodies against AQP4 in about 80% of the cases. In about one-fourth of seronegative cases, antibodies against the MOG protein are present in the serum (MOG-antibody associated disease, MOGAD). This article discusses off-label azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of NMOSD and reviews the evidence-based clinical aspects of B/plasma cell depletion, antagonization of IL-6 signaling and blocking the complement pathway. The review also summarizes basic aspects of NMOSD pregnancy focusing on treatment, and the different therapeutic approach in MOGAD. In the recent two years, phase 3 clinical trials provided class I evidence for the efficacy and safety of rituximab (anti-CD20), inebilizumab (anti-CD19), tocilizumab (anti-IL6R), satralizumab (anti-IL6R), and eculizumab (anti-C5) in combination with other immunosuppressants or in monotherapy. The treatment approach in MOGAD is complicated by the monophasic course in about half of the cases and by the potential disappearance of MOG antibody. The necessity of maintenance treatment in MOGAD should be decided after tapered oral steroid. Immunosuppression is recommended in NMOSD during pregnancy and lactation, and this should be considered for optimal selection of treatment in fertile female patients. The new monoclonal antibodies broadened treatment options NMOSD, and the treatment strategy of MOGAD has become more straightforward.

Until recently, the use of preventative immunotherapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) was based on observational studies and clinical experiences. Meanwhile, the first drugs, among others the monoclonal antibody inebilizumab, were approved for the treatment of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-positive NMOSD. Inebilizumab binds to the CD19 antigen on B cells and leads to B-cell depletion. The first two dosages of 300 mg inebilizumab are administered intravenously at an interval of 2 weeks followed by further infusions every 6 months. In the placebo-controlled pivotal phase II/III study N-MOmentum, inebilizumab significantly prolonged the time to a first adjudicated relapse in AQP4 antibody-positive patients compared with placebo. The most frequent side effects were infusion reactions, urinary and respiratory tract infections, and arthralgia. This review presents data on clinical and preclinical pharmacology, administration, safety aspects and clinical trials of inebilizumab., (Copyright 2021 Clarivate Analytics.)

Background: Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disease, which manifests mostly as recurrent episodes of optic neuritis or myelitis that cause important disability. Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are crucial in reducing relapses, disability, and mortality. Even though, there are few prospective randomized controlled trials, several drugs have proved to be both effective and safe. Azathioprine and Rituximab represent the standard of care and are used as first-line treatment agents worldwide. However, recent studies have unveiled new therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies. To make treatment recommendations and management guidelines, it is imperative to define an appropriate standard of care., Methods: A systematic literature review was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases using the following terms: "(NMO OR Devic OR Neuromyelitis Optica) AND (Azathioprine OR Prednisone OR Rituximab OR Tocilizumab OR Bortezomib OR Inebilizumab OR Eculizumab OR Satralizumab)" including both, randomized clinical trials and observational studies published between January 2006 and January 2021. The inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 or older, NMOSD diagnosis following the Wingerchuck criteria, two or more therapies been compared, and the evaluation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. All studies comparing treatment only with placebo were excluded. Quality was assessed according with the design of the study, and results were synthesized through comparative tables for each outcome evaluated, differentiating the results of randomized and non-randomized studies., Results: Thirteen studies with 1447 patients were included. Twelve studies evaluated the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) before and after treatment; in five of seven evaluating rituximab, it outperformed its comparators in improving the disability degree. Eleven studies assessed the annual relapse rate (ARR). Again, in six of seven evaluating rituximab, it was superior to other therapies. Time to relapse (TTR) was reported in five studies. The three studies that included Rituximab revealed a longer time to relapse in this arm of treatment. Finding were consistent in randomized and non-randomized studies. The new molecules Satralizumab, Eculizumab and Tocilizumab were evaluated in one study each, proving to be highly effective and safe. The safety profile analysis showed a higher number of adverse events for Azathioprine., Discussion: This systematic review demonstrates a superiority tendency of Rituximab upon the other treatments strengthening the available evidence about NMOSD management. Superiority in EDSS outcomes, annual relapse rate, time to first relapse and relapses during treatment time was evidenced in the Rituximab group compared to other medications, with lower rates of adverse events. New molecules Tocilizumab, Eculizumab and Satralizumab also showed superiority in the evaluated results, especially in the relapses during treatment time outcome, although with subtle differences in EDSS and ARR outcomes., Conclusion: Our results suggest that monoclonal antibodies are highly effective and safe for the treatment of NMOSD; Rituximab showed better performance on multiple outcomes and has more evidence available. New molecules: Eculizumab, Tocilizumab, Satralizumab are good options for treatment. Drugs like Azathioprine and Mycophenolate are effective, but with a worse risk-benefit ratio, therefore, they are useful alternatives in places that do not have access to monoclonal antibodies., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Treatment options for patients suffering from neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) so far have relied on off-label and empiric drugs. The first drug for the therapy of anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-seropositive NMOSD patients has been approved in 2019: the C5 complement inhibitor eculizumab. The interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor satralizumab and anti-CD19 antibody inebilizumab have published positive phase III trial results and await approval in the near future., Areas Covered: We sum up current treatment options and portray in detail the new developments in NMOSD drugs focusing on phase III clinical trials, followed by an overview of emerging drugs in less advanced clinical trial stages., Expert Opinion: Eculizumab's approval by the competent authorities marks a milestone in NMOSD treatment. Satralizumab and inebilizumab will most likely follow in approval given their presented results in efficacy and safety. All three drugs have shown efficacy in reducing relapse rates in NMOSD patients with anti-AQP4 antibodies. Although we will have even more evidence-based therapy options in the future, empirically used medications will keep their importance for now. The potential effect of new medications in AQP4 antibody-seronegative NMOSD and patients with an NMOSD phenotype and antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein remains to be determined.

Introduction: Evidence-based treatment options for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) patients are beginning to enter the market. Where previously, there was only the exclusive use of empiric and off-label immunosuppressants in this rare and devastating central nervous system autoimmune disease., Areas Covered: In accordance to expanding pathogenetic insights, drugs in phase II and III clinical trials are presented in the context of the current treatment situation for acute attacks and immunopreventative strategies in NMOSD. Some such drugs are the 2019-approved complement inhibitor eculizumab, other compounds in late development include its modified successor ravulizumab, IL-6 receptor antibody satralizumab, CD19 targeting antibody inebilizumab and the TACI-Fc fusion protein telitacicept., Expert Opinion: Moving from broad immunosuppression to tailored treatment strategies, the prospects for efficient NMOSD therapy are positive. For the first time in this disease, class I treatment evidence is available, but long-term data will be necessary to confirm the overall promising study results of the compounds close to approval. While drug development still centers around AQP4 antibody seropositive patients, current and future research requires consideration of possible diverging treatment demands for the smaller group of seronegative patients and patients with presence of MOG antibodies.

Inebilizumab is one of the monoclonal antibodies approved as maintenance therapy for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). It is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19). Common adverse reactions include urinary tract infections, nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, infusion reactions, headaches and a decrease in immunoglobulin levels. Here, we present a case of an NMOSD patient who experienced transient hyperCKaemia after the use of inebilizumab. The adverse reactions of this very rare monoclonal antibody drug improved after discontinuation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) coexisting with both Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and pancytopenia are exceptionally rare. There is no study on the treatment of such patients. We presented a case of AQP4-IgG seropositive refractory NMOSD patient combined with SS and pancytopenia with significant response to inebilizumab. In 2017 the 49-year-old female patient was diagnosed with SS and pancytopenia without any treatment. In August 2022, she had a sudden onset of lower limbs weakness, manifested as inability to walk, accompanied by urinary incontinence. After receiving methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, she regained the ability to walk. In February 2023, she suffered from weakness of both lower limbs again and paralyzed in bed, accompanied by retention of urine and stool, and loss of vision in both eyes. After receiving methylprednisolone and three plasmapheresis, the condition did not further worsen, but there was no remission. In March 2023, the patient was admitted to our hospital and was formally diagnosed with AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD combined with SS and pancytopenia. After receiving two 300 mg injections of inebilizumab, not only the symptoms of NMOSD improved significantly, but also the symptoms of concurrent SS and pancytopenia. In the cases of AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD who have recurrent episodes and are comorbid with other autoimmune disorders, inebilizumab may be a good choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions. Methods: Efficacy of ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs). Results: For patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions. Conclusion: In the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action. Plain Language Summary: Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, also called AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD, is a rare autoimmune disease that causes repeated episodes of symptoms such as blindness, arm/leg weakness, painful spasms, vomiting, and hiccups, among other symptoms. Each episode can cause nervous system damage to worsen, making it more difficult to recover back to regular abilities. Repeated episodes are likely to cause permanent damage, such as blindness and paralysis. Medical treatments that reduce episodes also reduce the damage and the chances symptoms will become permanent. One treatment, ravulizumab, is being studied to treat adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD. This analysis looked at information from published clinical studies to compare ravulizumab with three other treatments (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab) to determine how well each treatment reduced NMOSD episodes. There are no studies that have tested all four treatments in one study. Here, the treatments were compared by a method used to estimate the likelihood of a treatment being better than the others. While all four treatments successfully reduced episodes in their own studies, this analysis predicts that ravulizumab would likely be best in preventing episodes compared with inebilizumab or satralizumab when used alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive treatments. These findings, in consideration along with other relevant factors such as cost, safety, dosing delivery method, and frequency of treatment, may help doctors and patients decide what is the best treatment option for each individual patient to prevent attacks in adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe N-MOmentum trial investigated safety and efficacy of inebilizumab in participants with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).ObjectiveEvaluate the attack identification process and adjudication committee (AC) performance in N-MOmentum.MethodsAdults (n = 230) with NMOSD and Expanded Disability Status Scale score ⩽8 were randomized (3:1) to inebilizumab 300 mg or placebo. The randomized controlled period was 28 weeks or until adjudicated attack. Attacks were adjudicated according to 18 predefined criteria. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomarker (serum glial fibrillary acidic protein [sGFAP]) analyses were performed.ResultsA total of 64 participant-reported neurological events occurred; 51 (80%) were investigator-determined to be attacks. The AC confirmed 43 of the investigator-determined attacks (84%). There was high inter- and intra-AC-member agreement. In 25/64 events (39%) and 14/43 AC-adjudicated attacks (33%), MRI was reviewed during adjudication. Retrospective analysis revealed new domain-specific T1 and T2 MRI lesions in 90% of adjudicated attacks. Increased mean sGFAP concentrations (>2-fold change) from baseline were observed in 56% of adjudicated attacks versus 14% of investigator-determined attacks rejected by the AC and 31% of participant-reported events determined not to be attacks.ConclusionAC adjudication of NMOSD attacks according to predefined criteria appears robust. MRI lesion correlates and sGFAP elevations were found in most adjudicated attacks.

Abstract Introduction Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions. Methods Efficacy of ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs). Results For patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions. Conclusion In the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system characterized by recurrent, disabling attacks that affect the optic nerve, spinal cord, and brain/brainstem. While rituximab, targeting CD20-positive B-cells, is used as an off-label therapy for NMOSD, some patients continue to exhibit breakthrough attacks and/or adverse reactions. Inebilizumab, a humanized and glycoengineered monoclonal antibody targeting CD19-positive B-cells, has been FDA approved for the treatment of NMOSD in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive. Given the limited real-world data on the efficacy and safety of inebilizumab, especially in those transitioning from rituximab, a retrospective chart review was conducted on 14 NMOSD patients from seven centers. Of these, 71.4% (n = 10) experienced a combined 17 attacks during rituximab treatment, attributed to either breakthrough disease (n = 10) or treatment delay (n = 7). The mean duration of rituximab treatment was 38.4 months (3.2 years). Notably, no subsequent attacks were observed during inebilizumab treatment [mean duration of inebilizumab treatment was 19.3 months (1.6 years)], underscoring its potential as an effective treatment for NMOSD. Our data suggest that inebilizumab provides clinical benefit with effective disease control and a favorable safety profile for patients transitioning from rituximab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare demyelinating disease of the central nervous system primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. Viral infection may trigger NMOSD. Here, we report the case of a 34-year-old female presenting with a range of symptoms including nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, choking, and fatigue with unsteady gait, diplopia, hearing loss, left-sided facial paralysis, breathing difficulties, and hoarseness of voice. Her HBV DNA concentration, as determined by quantitative PCR analysis, exceeded 5x107 IU/ml in serum and 4.48x10² IU/ml in CSF. Next-generation sequencing of CSF revealed 1,528 HBV sequences in DNA analysis and 6 sequences in RNA analysis. Serum aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab) titer was 1:10, and the CSF titer was 1:3.2. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed high signal intensities in the brain stem, medulla oblongata, and left middle cerebellar peduncle with mild restricted-diffusion. The patient received antiviral and hepatoprotective medications before the high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy. However, the patient did not respond well to the first-line treatment. Subsequently, the patient received ofatumumab and inebilizumab. Throughout the follow-up period, there was a gradual improvement in her neurological symptoms, with no reactivation of hepatitis B or deterioration of liver function observed. Thereby, to the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of successful treatment with ofatumumab and inebilizumab in a patient with NMOSD concurrent with HBV infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+ NMOSD) is an autoantibody-mediated, relapsing disease affecting the central nervous system. Relapse-preventive treatment is crucial because each single attack can result in severe disability. First medications for maintenance therapy of AQP4+ NMOSD have only recently been approved. These include the monoclonal anti-CD19 antibody inebilizumab. Objective: To provide a review of the mechanism of action, effectiveness, safety and implementation of inebilizumab in AQP4+ NMOSD. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature. Results: Inebilizumab induces profound B-cell depletion. In contrast to anti-CD20-mediated B-cell depletion, for example, by rituximab, inebilizumab depletes B cells not only in mature but also in early stages, as well as plasmablasts. This may lead to a more profound reduction in antibody titres, but whether this is clinically meaningful remains to be determined. Infections are the most relevant adverse effects of inebilizumab. Class I evidence from a randomized controlled trial supports the reduction of risk of attack in AQP4+ NMOSD by inebilizumab. Conclusion: Inebilizumab is an effective, first-line, on-label option for attack-preventive treatment of patients with AQP4+ NMOSD. It has not been established whether the efficacy of inebilizumab (anti-CD19) and rituximab (anti-CD20, off-label) for attack prevention in AQP4+ NMOSD differs. Due to missing head-to-head studies, the differential indication of inebilizumab versus three other approved maintenance treatment options for AQP4+ NMOSD is a matter of ongoing debate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibody therapies mark the new era of targeted treatment for relapse prevention in aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD). For over a decade, rituximab, an anti-CD20 B-cell-depleting agent, had been the most effectiveness treatment for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor, was also observed to be effective. In 2019, several randomized, placebo-controlled trials were completed that demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of eculizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor), inebilizumab (anti-CD19 B-cell-depleting agent), and satralizumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor), leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of specific treatments for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD for the first time. Most recently, ravulizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor) was also shown to be highly efficacious in an open-label, external-controlled trial. Although only some patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) warrant immunotherapy, there is currently no FDA-approved treatment for relapse prevention in MOGAD. Observational studies showed that tocilizumab was associated with a decrease in relapses, whereas rituximab seemed to have less robust effectiveness in MOGAD compared to AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Herein, we review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of each monoclonal antibody therapy used in AQP4-IgG+NMOSD and MOGAD, including special considerations in children and women of childbearing potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a devastating inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that is often severely disabling from the outset. The lack of pathognomonic aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibodies in seronegative NMOSD not only hinders early diagnosis, but also limits therapeutic options, in contrast to AQP4 antibody-positive NMOSD, where the therapeutic landscape has recently evolved massively. Case presentation: We report a 56-year-old woman with bilateral optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive myelitis as the index events of a seronegative NMOSD, who was successfully treated with inebilizumab. Conclusion: Treatment with inebilizumab may be considered in aggressive seronegative NMOSD. Whether broader CD19-directed B cell depletion is more effective than treatment with rituximab remains elusive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effect modifiers are study design or patient characteristics that influence the efficacy of the treatment, resulting in different relative treatment effect estimates, e.g., different hazard ratios (HRs) for relapse. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, Randomized controlled trial, Matching-adjusted indirect comparison, Eculizumab, Inebilizumab, Satralizumab, Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-positive, Bayesian network meta-analysis Keywords: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-positive; Randomized controlled trial; Bayesian network meta-analysis; Matching-adjusted indirect comparison; Eculizumab; Inebilizumab; Satralizumab EN Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-positive Randomized controlled trial Bayesian network meta-analysis Matching-adjusted indirect comparison Eculizumab Inebilizumab Satralizumab 1445 1449 5 08/02/22 20220901 NES 220901 Dear Editor, We read with interest the comments from Cree et al. [[1]] on our recently published study describing a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the efficacies of eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) [[2]]. [Extracted from the article]

Sample Size Notably, inebilizumab and satralizumab were studied as monotherapy options for NMOSD in 161 AQP4+ participants in the treatment arm of the N-MOmentum and 41 in the SAkuraStar trials. Keywords: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; Aquaporin-4; Eculizumab; Satralizumab; Inebilizumab; Network meta-analysis; Matching-adjusted indirect comparison; Randomized controlled trials EN Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Aquaporin-4 Eculizumab Satralizumab Inebilizumab Network meta-analysis Matching-adjusted indirect comparison Randomized controlled trials 1439 1443 5 08/02/22 20220901 NES 220901 Dear Editor, We read with interest the recent article by Wingerchuk et al. [[1]] reporting the results of a fixed-effects proportional hazards Bayesian meta-analysis of treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune neuroinflammatory central nervous system disease predominantly affecting the optic nerves and the spinal cord, that often results in accumulated permanent disability caused by successive attacks [[2]]. Moreover, 27% of patients in the treatment arm of the PREVENT trial had a history of rituximab use compared to just 13% in the SAkuraSky trial and 7% in the N-MOmentum trial. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease defined by attacks on the central nervous system that cause irreversible damage. Recent approval of NMOSD therapies warrants investigations of comparative efficacy to inform treatment decisions. Methods: A network meta-analysis (NMA) of all U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab) for adults with aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-positive (AQP4+) NMOSD was conducted via a systematic literature review (SLR) using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were executed for the SLR. A fixed-effects proportional hazards Bayesian NMA was used to estimate relative treatment effects based on data extracted from RCTs identified during the SLR (search end date: 11 September 2020). Four unique RCTs (N-MOmentum, PREVENT, SAkuraSky, and SAkuraStar) were identified, and data from 29 publications were extracted for analysis. Network scenarios describing the most comparable patient population groups (such as by treatment settings) were evaluated in our analyses. Relative treatment effects were evaluated based on time-to-first relapse and were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: In patients treated with a monoclonal antibody only, eculizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse compared with satralizumab (HR 0.10, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.65) and inebilizumab (HR 0.11, 95% CrI 0.02, 0.68). In patients treated with monoclonal antibody with or without background immunosuppressive therapy (IST), patients treated with eculizumab ± IST were also less likely to relapse than patients treated with satralizumab ± IST (HR 0.24, 95% CrI 0.06, 0.98). Conclusion: The NMA results suggest that complement component 5 (C5) inhibition prevents NMOSD relapses more effectively than broader mechanisms of action. Plain Language Summary: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation that damages the brain and spinal cord. Many patients with NMOSD produce antibodies against a protein called aquaporin-4 (AQP4+). In the past two years, three drugs (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with AQP4+ NMOSD. Comparing the efficacy of these three drugs would help physicians make treatment decisions for their patients. In the absence of clinical trials directly comparing these three drugs, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis in order to allow for simultaneous comparisons of these three drugs and estimate relative treatment effects between any pair of interventions in a connected network. With a Bayesian methodology, it is also possible to estimate the probability of being the best treatment out of all other interventions in a connected network. While all three drugs are safe and shown to prevent relapses in placebo-controlled trials, the results of our analysis suggests that eculizumab was the most efficacious in preventing relapses when compared with inebilizumab or satralizumab. These findings may help to inform physicians and their patients when determining the best treatment option for preventing the occurrence of relapses in adults with AQP4+ NMOSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the N-MOmentum trial, the risk of an adjudicated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attack was significantly reduced with inebilizumab compared with placebo. Objective: To demonstrate the robustness of this finding, using pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Methods: N-MOmentum is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial of inebilizumab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal B-cell-depleting antibody, in patients with NMOSD. Pre-planned and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the primary endpoint across a range of attack definitions and demographic groups, as well as key secondary endpoints. Results: In the N-MOmentum trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02200770), 174 participants received inebilizumab and 56 received placebo. Attack risk for inebilizumab versus placebo was consistently and significantly reduced, regardless of attack definition, type of attack, baseline disability, ethnicity, treatment history, or disease course (all with hazard ratios < 0.4 favoring inebilizumab, p < 0.05). Analyses of secondary endpoints showed similar trends. Conclusion: N-MOmentum demonstrated that inebilizumab provides a robust reduction in the risk of NMOSD attacks regardless of attack evaluation method, attack type, patient demographics, or previous therapy. The N-MOmentum study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT2200770. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Clinical Neuroscience / Ideggyógyászati Szemle is the property of LifeTime Media Kft. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: To update the efficacy and safety data of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and explore the differences in the effect of treatment between patients seropositive and seronegative for AQP4-IgG. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library published up to July 2020 were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of monoclonal antibodies treatment (mAb) in patients with NMOSD. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio (HR) for relapse. The secondary outcomes included Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) changes from baseline, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). A random-effects model was applied for the effect of heterogeneity among trials. Results: We included 603 patients (monoclonal antibody group, n=382, and control group, n=221) from seven RCTs. There were fewer relapses in the mAb group (HR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.23-0.46, p

Background: To update the efficacy and safety data of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and explore the differences in the effect of treatment between patients seropositive and seronegative for AQP4-IgG. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library published up to July 2020 were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of monoclonal antibodies treatment (mAb) in patients with NMOSD. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio (HR) for relapse. The secondary outcomes included Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) changes from baseline, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). A random-effects model was applied for the effect of heterogeneity among trials. Results: We included 603 patients (monoclonal antibody group, n =382, and control group, n =221) from seven RCTs. There were fewer relapses in the mAb group (HR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.23-0.46, p <0.001), as well as in the AQP4-IgG-seropositive patients (HR=0.18, 95% CI: 0.10–0.32, p <0.001), but not in AQP4-IgG-seronegative NMOSD. Similar results were observed when considering satralizumab only. The mAb had no impact on the changes in EDSS scores from baseline (WMD=−0.21, 95% CI: −0.50-0.09, p =0.176). The mAb did not lead to a higher frequency of AEs (OR=1.18, 95% CI: 0.70–1.98, p =0.529) or SAEs (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.63–1.56, p =0.975) compared with the control group. Conclusions: Compared to the control arm, monoclonal antibody therapy showed a significantly better outcome in restraining the HR for relapse among patients with NMOSD but insignificant effects in NMOSD patients with seronegative APQ4-IgG. The safety profile in each arm had no significant difference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first description of neuromyelitis optica by Eugène Devic and Fernand Gault dates back to the 19th century, but only the discovery of aquaporin-4 autoantibodies in a major subset of affected patients in 2004 led to a fundamentally revised disease concept: Neuromyelits optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are now considered autoantibody-mediated autoimmune diseases, bringing the pivotal pathogenetic role of B cells and plasma cells into focus. Not long ago, there was no approved medication for this deleterious disease and off-label therapies were the only treatment options for affected patients. Within the last years, there has been a tremendous development of novel therapies with diverse treatment strategies: immunosuppression, B cell depletion, complement factor antagonism and interleukin-6 receptor blockage were shown to be effective and promising therapeutic interventions. This has led to the long-expected official approval of eculizumab in 2019 and inebilizumab in 2020. In this article, we review current pathogenetic concepts in NMOSD with a focus on the role of B cells and autoantibodies as major contributors to the propagation of these diseases. Lastly, by highlighting promising experimental and future treatment options, we aim to round up the current state of knowledge on the therapeutic arsenal in NMOSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]