Search

Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases such as inherited peripheral neuropathies sometimes accurately recreate the pathophysiology of the human disease, and sometimes accurately recreate the genetic perturbations found in patients. Ideally, models achieve both, but this is not always possible; nonetheless, such models are informative. Here we describe two animal models of inherited peripheral neuropathy: mice with a mutation in tyrosyl tRNA‐synthetase, YarsE196K, modeling dominant intermediate Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease type C (diCMTC), and mice with a mutation in serine palmitoyltransferase long chain 1, Sptlc1C133W, modeling hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1 (HSAN1). YarsE196K mice develop disease‐relevant phenotypes including reduced motor performance and reduced nerve conduction velocities by 4 months of age. Peripheral motor axons are reduced in size, but there is no reduction in axon number and plasma neurofilament light chain levels are not increased. Unlike the dominant human mutations, the YarsE196K mice only show these phenotypes as homozygotes, or as compound heterozygotes with a null allele, and no phenotype is observed in E196K or null heterozygotes. The Sptlc1C133W mice carry a knockin allele and show the anticipated increase in 1‐deoxysphingolipids in circulation and in a variety of tissues. They also have mild behavioral defects consistent with HSAN1, but do not show neurophysiological defects or axon loss in peripheral nerves or in the epidermis of the hind paw or tail. Thus, despite the biochemical phenotype, the Sptlc1C133W mice do not show a strong neuropathy phenotype. Surprisingly, these mice were lethal as homozygotes, but the heterozygous genotype studied corresponds to the dominant genetics seen in humans. Thus, YarsE196K homozygous mice have a relevant phenotype, but imprecisely reproduce the human genetics, whereas the Sptlc1C133W mice precisely reproduce the human genetics, but do not recreate the disease phenotype. Despite these shortcomings, both models are informative and will be useful for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Mutations in glycyl-, tyrosyl-, and alanyl-tRNA synthetases (GARS, YARS and AARS respectively) cause autosomal dominant Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, and mutations in Gars cause a similar peripheral neuropathy in mice. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) charge amino acids onto their cognate tRNAs during translation; however, the pathological mechanism(s) of ARS mutations remains unclear. To address this, we tested possible mechanisms using mouse models. First, amino acid mischarging was discounted by examining the recessive “sticky” mutation in alanyl-tRNA synthetase (Aars sti ), which causes cerebellar neurodegeneration through a failure to efficiently correct mischarging of tRNAAla. Aars sti/sti mice do not have peripheral neuropathy, and they share no phenotypic features with the Gars mutant mice. Next, we determined that the Wallerian Degeneration Slow (Wlds) mutation did not alter the Gars phenotype. Therefore, no evidence for misfolding of GARS itself or other proteins was found. Similarly, there were no indications of general insufficiencies in protein synthesis caused by Gars mutations based on yeast complementation assays. Mutant GARS localized differently than wild type GARS in transfected cells, but a similar distribution was not observed in motor neurons derived from wild type mouse ES cells, and there was no evidence for abnormal GARS distribution in mouse tissue. Both GARS and YARS proteins were present in sciatic axons and Schwann cells from Gars mutant and control mice, consistent with a direct role for tRNA synthetases in peripheral nerves. Unless defects in translation are in some way restricted to peripheral axons, as suggested by the axonal localization of GARS and YARS, we conclude that mutations in tRNA synthetases are not causing peripheral neuropathy through amino acid mischarging or through a defect in their known function in translation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]