1. Mutual influences between numerical and non-numerical quantities in comparison tasks
- Author
-
Mathieu Guillaume, Amandine Van Rinsveld, Anthony Beuel, and Charlotte Hendryckx
- Subjects
Adult ,Theoretical computer science ,Physiology ,Computer science ,Number Sense ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,Psychologie du développement cognitif ,050105 experimental psychology ,bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology ,Judgment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physiology (medical) ,Humans ,Approximate number system ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology|Cognitive Neuroscience ,Imagerie cérébrale fonctionnelle ,General Psychology ,05 social sciences ,Neurosciences cognitives ,Psychologie expérimentale ,General Medicine ,Number sense ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology ,PsyArXiv|Neuroscience|Cognitive Neuroscience ,PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology ,PsyArXiv|Neuroscience ,Psycholinguistique ,Approximate Number System (ANS) ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology ,Cues ,Psychologie cognitive ,Sciences cognitives ,Intuition ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Humans possess a numerical intuition that allows them to manipulate large non-symbolic quantities. This ability has been broadly assessed with the help of number comparison tasks involving simultaneously displayed arrays. Many authors pointed out that the manipulation (or the lack thereof) of non-numerical features deeply impacts performance in these tasks, but the specific nature of this influence is not clear. The current study investigates the interaction between numerical and non-numerical quantity judgment tasks. Adult participants performed five distinct comparison tasks, each based on a target dimension: numerosity, total area, dot size, convex hull, and mean occupancy. We manipulated the relation between the target and the other dimensions to measure their respective influence on task performance. Results showed that total area and convex hull substantially affected numerosity comparisons. The number of dots conversely acted as an informative dimension when participants had to make a decision based on the total area or the convex hull. Our results illustrate that adults flexibly use non-target dimensions as visual cues to perform comparison judgments. Overall, this suggests that the influence found in numerical comparison tasks is explicit and deliberate rather than due to implicit visual integration processes., info:eu-repo/semantics/published
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF