Search

The patient granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) response is represented by the leukocyte peak in the blood induced by a single dose of G-CSF after chemotherapy, and is correlated with subsequent neutropenic infection risk. General patterns for a meaningful risk group stratification, have not yet been determined. Two independent data sets including a total of 306 cases with myeloma or lymphoma and autologous blood stem cell transplant were available. An infection susceptibility curve plotted according to ranked G-CSF responses from a multicenter study reproduced and validated a curve from the previous single center. Two trend changes were seen within these curves at around 11,000 and 22,000 leukocytes/μL, which separated three groups with a high, medium and low risk of infection. While G-CSF response is related to the consecutive duration of neutropenia, it retains additional independent predictive information for infection risk (p<0.0001) and, more important, is a tool available before the onset of the critical period.

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality during the neutropenic phase after intensive cytotoxic therapies for malignancies. Improved management of sepsis during neutropenia may reduce the mortality of cancer therapies. Clinical guidelines on sepsis treatment have been published by others. However, optimal management may differ between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. Our aim is to give evidence-based recommendations for haematologist, oncologists and intensive care physicians on how to manage adult patients with neutropenia and sepsis.

Catheter-related infections cause considerable morbidity in hospitalised patients. The incidence does not seem to be higher in neutropenic patients than in non- neutropenic patients. Gram-positive bacteria (coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus) are the most frequently cultured pathogens, followed by Candida species. In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria play only a minor role in catheter-related infections. Positive blood cultures are the cornerstone in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections, while local signs of infection are only rarely present. However, a definite diagnosis generally requires the removal of the catheter and its microbiological examination. The role plate method with semiquantitative cultures (Maki) has been established as standard in most laboratories. Other standard procedures use quantitative techniques (Sherertz, Brun-Buisson) and are more sensitive. For therapy of catheter-related infections, antibiotics are administered according to the susceptibility of the cultured organism. Routine administration of gylcopepticed antibiotics is not indicated. Removal of the catheter has to be considered in any case of suspected catheter-related infection and is obligatory in Staphylococcus aureus and Candida infections. Tunnel or pocket infection of long-term catheters is always an indication for removal. In the future, the rate of catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients may be reduced by the use of catheters coated with antimicrobial agents.

Morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies, especially leukemia and lymphoma, are increased by invasive fungal infections. Since diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is often delayed, antifungal prophylaxis is an attractive approach for patients expecting prolonged neutropenia. Antifungal prophylaxis has obviously attracted much interest resulting in dozens of clinical trials since the late 1970s. The non-absorbable polyenes are probably ineffective in preventing invasive fungal infections, but may reduce superficial mycoses. Intravenous amphotericin B and the newer azoles were used in clinical trials, but their role in antifungal prophylaxis is still not well defined. Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients are at particularly high risk for invasive fungal infections. Other well described risk factors are neutropenia >10 days, corticosteroid therapy, sustained immunosuppression, graft versus host disease, and concomitant viral infections. The enormous study efforts are contrasted by a scarcity of risk stratified evidence based recommendations for clinical decision making. The objective of this review accumulating information on about 10.000 patients is to assess evidence based criteria primarily regarding the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]