1. Signaling dynamics distinguish high- and low-priority neutrophil chemoattractant receptors.
- Author
-
Lundgren SM, Rocha-Gregg BL, Akdoğan E, Mysore MN, Hayes S, and Collins SR
- Subjects
- Humans, Chemotactic Factors pharmacology, Chemotactic Factors metabolism, Interleukin-8 metabolism, Signal Transduction, Neutrophils metabolism, Leukotriene B4 pharmacology, Leukotriene B4 metabolism
- Abstract
Human neutrophils respond to multiple chemoattractants to guide their migration from the vasculature to sites of infection and injury, where they clear pathogens and amplify inflammation. To properly focus their responses during this complex navigation, neutrophils prioritize pathogen- and injury-derived signals over long-range inflammatory signals, such as the leukotriene LTB4, secreted by host cells. Different chemoattractants can also drive qualitatively different modes of migration even though their receptors couple to the same Gα
i family of G proteins. Here, we used live-cell imaging to demonstrate that the responses differed in their signaling dynamics. Low-priority chemoattractants caused transient responses, whereas responses to high-priority chemoattractants were sustained. We observed this difference in both primary neutrophils and differentiated HL-60 cells, for downstream signaling mediated by Ca2+ , a major regulator of secretion, and Cdc42, a primary regulator of polarity and cell steering. The rapid attenuation of Cdc42 activation in response to LTB4 depended on the phosphorylation sites Thr308 and Ser310 in the carboxyl-terminal tail of its receptor LTB4R in a manner independent of endocytosis. Mutation of these residues to alanine impaired chemoattractant prioritization, although it did not affect chemoattractant-dependent differences in migration persistence. Our results indicate that distinct temporal regulation of shared signaling pathways distinguishes between receptors and contributes to chemoattractant prioritization.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF