Search

Nitrification inhibitors show promise in decreasing nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from agricultural systems worldwide, but they may be much less effective than previously thought when both direct and indirect emissions are taken into account. Whilst nitrification inhibitors are effective at decreasing direct N2O emission and nitrate ( NO3-) leaching, limited studies suggest that they may increase ammonia ( NH3) volatilization and, subsequently, indirect N2O emission. These dual effects are typically not considered when evaluating the inhibitors as a climate change mitigation tool. Here, we collate results from the literature that simultaneously examined the effects of nitrification inhibitors on N2O and NH3 emissions. We found that nitrification inhibitors decreased direct N2O emission by 0.2-4.5 kg N2O-N ha−1 (8-57%), but generally increased NH3 emission by 0.2-18.7 kg NH3-N ha−1 (3-65%). Taking into account the estimated indirect N2O emission from deposited NH3, the overall impact of nitrification inhibitors ranged from −4.5 (reduction) to +0.5 (increase) kg N2O-N ha−1. Our results suggest that the beneficial effect of nitrification inhibitors in decreasing direct N2O emission can be undermined or even outweighed by an increase in NH3 volatilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Urease and nitrification inhibitors are designed to mitigate ammonia (NH 3) volatilization and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emission, but uncertainties on the agronomic and economic benefits of these inhibitors prevent their widespread adoption in pasture systems, particularly in subtropical regions where no such information is available. Here we report a field experiment that was conducted in a subtropical pasture in Queensland, Australia to examine whether the use of the urease inhibitor N -(n -butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT, applied as Green UreaNV®) and the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP, applied as Urea with ENTEC®) is environmentally, agronomically and economically viable. We found that Green UreaNV® and Urea with ENTEC® decreased NH 3 volatilization and N 2 O emission by 44 and 15%, respectively, compared to granular urea. Pasture biomass and nitrogen (N) uptake were increased by 22–36% and 23–32%, respectively, with application of the inhibitors compared to granular urea. A simple economic assessment indicates that the fertilizer cost for pasture production was 5.4, 4.4 and 6.0 Australian cents per kg dry matter for urea, Green UreaNV® and Urea with ENTEC®, respectively, during the experimental period. The mitigation of N loss using the inhibitors can reduce the environmental cost associated with pasture production. These results suggest that the use of these inhibitors can provide environmental, agronomic and economic benefits to a subtropical pasture. Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image Highlights • Effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on N dynamics of a subtropical pasture were examined. • NBPT and DMPP decreased NH 3 volatilization by 44% and N 2 O emission by 15%, respectively. • The use of these inhibitors increased pasture biomass and N uptake by ~20–30%. • These inhibitors can provide environmental, agronomic and economic benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nitrification inhibitors are effective in decreasing direct nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emission from agricultural soils but may stimulate ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization. Part of the NH 3 deposited to land is converted to N 2 O and emitted to the atmosphere, termed indirect N 2 O emission. While vegetable production systems entail a considerable risk of NH 3 and N 2 O loss from high nitrogen (N) input to the soil, the simultaneous effects of nitrification inhibitors on these N loss pathways have rarely been examined. We conducted paddock-scale (ca. four hectares) measurements using micrometeorological techniques to simultaneously quantify the effects of a nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) on NH 3 and N 2 O emissions from two intensive vegetable farms. We found that DMPP decreased direct N 2 O emission by 37–38% (2.2–7.3 kg N ha −1 ) across the farms during the most intensive period of N input (18 days), but could increase NH 3 volatilization by 3–39% (1.6–4.8 kg N ha −1 ). The results highlight the importance of considering multiple N loss pathways when developing a strategy for mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]