Search

Background: An open-label, non-comparative study assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with first recurrence glioblastoma., Methods: Patients with first recurrence of histologically confirmed World Health Organization Grade IV glioma, after treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy, received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria) or toxicity. Primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival rate assessed by Bayesian approach. The prespecified efficacy criterion was that the Bayesian posterior probability threshold for exceeding the 1-year overall survival of bevacizumab (34.5%) from the Japanese phase 2 study (JO22506) would be 93%., Results: Of the 50 enrolled patients, 44 (88.0%) had recurrent malignant glioma (glioblastoma, gliosarcoma), and of these, 26 (59.1%) had at least one measurable lesion at baseline. The Bayesian posterior mean 1-year overall survival (90% Bayesian credible intervals) with nivolumab was 54.4% (42.27-66.21), and the Bayesian posterior probability of exceeding the threshold of the 1-year overall survival rate of bevacizumab (34.5%) was 99.7%. Median (90% confidence interval) overall and progression-free survival was 13.1 (10.4-17.7) and 1.5 (1.4-1.5) months, respectively. One partial response was observed (objective response rate 1/26 evaluable patients [3.8%]). Treatment-related adverse event rates were 14.0% for Grade 3-4 and 2.0% for Grade 5; most adverse events resolved and were manageable., Conclusions: The 1-year overall survival with nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with glioblastoma met the prespecified efficacy criterion. The safety profile of nivolumab was consistent with that observed in other tumor types., Clinical Trial Registration: JapicCTI-152967., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination is currently one of the preferred regimens for advanced melanoma in recently updated clinical practice guidelines. However, the evidence on the efficacy of the combination for acral or mucosal subtypes remains less robust. This is the final analysis of a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled phase II study that investigated the long-term efficacy and safety in treatment-naive Japanese patients with advanced melanoma, including acral or mucosal subtypes, and subsequent therapy after discontinuation of the investigational agents. Patients received four doses of nivolumab (1 mg/kg i.v.) in combination with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg i.v.) at 3-week intervals, followed by doses of nivolumab (3 mg/kg i.v.) at 2-week intervals. The median follow-up period was 20.8 months (range, 5.2-35.0). The centrally and locally assessed objective response rates were both 43.3% (13/30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5-62.6). Median progression-free survival was not reached (95% CI, 3.02-not reached), and median overall survival was also not reached (95% CI, 19.52-not reached). The 30-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 50.3% and 54.2%, respectively. No new safety concerns were detected. After discontinuation of the investigational agents, 83.3% of patients received some form of subsequent therapy including 43.3% of patients who received nivolumab monotherapy and 26.7% of patients who received radiotherapy. Of the four patients who discontinued the investigational agents because of immune-related adverse events, two received subsequent therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively) and the other two showed long-term treatment-free survival (659 and 590 days, respectively). Long-term survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in Japanese patients with melanoma including acral and mucosal subtypes, which is consistent with the CheckMate 067 study. Many patients continued to receive some form of treatment safely after stopping treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab., (© 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Nivolumab is a human monoclonal antibody against the immune checkpoint receptor programmed death-1, inhibiting binding to programmed death-ligand 1 or 2 (PD-L1 or PD-L2). This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced/recurrent uterine cervical cancer, uterine corpus cancer, or soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients received nivolumab 240 mg at 2-week intervals. Primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety. PD-L1 expression and microsatellite-instability (MSI) status were analyzed as potential efficacy biomarkers. Objective response rate was 25%, 23%, and 0% in patients with cervical cancer (n = 20), corpus cancer (n = 22), and STS (n = 21), respectively. The lower 80% confidence intervals of objective response rates in patients with cervical or corpus cancer exceeded the threshold rate (5%); the primary endpoint was met in cervical and corpus cancer, but not in STS. Median progression-free survival was 5.6, 3.4, and 1.4 months, and 6-month overall survival was 84%, 73%, and 86% in cervical cancer, corpus cancer, and STS, respectively. The objective response rate was higher in patients with cervical cancer with PD-L1-positive (n = 5/15; 33%) versus PD-L1-negative (n = 0/5; 0%) tumors. The two patients with corpus cancer classified as MSI-high responded; the six patients classified as microsatellite stable did not respond. Overall, nivolumab showed acceptable toxicity in all cohorts, with evidence of clinical activity in uterine cervical or corpus cancer, but not in STS. PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer and MSI-high in corpus cancer may predict clinical activity of nivolumab in these cancers., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

The immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab inhibits the programmed death 1 receptor and suppresses the immune resistance of cancer cells. This is a long-term follow up of a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study of nivolumab in untreated Japanese patients with stage III/IV or recurrent melanoma. In addition, a post-hoc subgroup analysis stratified by melanoma types was performed. Nivolumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response, the disease control rate and change in tumor diameter. Safety was assessed by recording treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), including select immune-related adverse events. Of the 24 patients initially included in the primary phase II study, 10 survived for over 3 years (41.7%). The ORR was 34.8% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 20.8, 51.9) for all patients. When analyzing by melanoma type, the ORR was 66.7% (90% CI: 34.7, 88.3) for superficial spreading, 33.3% (90% CI: 11.7, 65.3) for mucosal, and 28.6% (90% CI: 10.0, 59.1) for acral lentiginous tumors. The median OS was 32.9 months, the 3-year OS rate was 43.5%, and the 3-year PFS rate was 17.2%. A long-term response was observed in all the tumor types. The most common TRAE included skin toxicity (45.8%) and endocrine disorders (29.2%). This study demonstrated the long-term efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab in patients with advanced or recurrent melanoma, irrespective of melanoma type., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: In Japan, preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the risk of recurrence after surgical resection remains high. Although a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-programmed death 1 antibody, as postoperative adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery established its superior efficacy as adjuvant therapy, the efficacy for patients who received preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has not been demonstrated. This study aims to elucidate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil followed by surgical resection. Methods: This study is a multi-institutional, single-arm, Phase II trial. We plan to recruit 130 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, who have undergone preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil followed by surgical resection. If the patient did not have a pathological complete response, nivolumab is started as a postoperative adjuvant therapy within 4–16 weeks after surgery. The nivolumab dose is 480 mg/day every four weeks. Nivolumab is administered for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival; the secondary endpoints are overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and incidence of adverse events. Discussion: To our knowledge this study is the first trial establishing the efficacy of nivolumab as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil followed by surgical resection. In Japan, preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is a well-established standard treatment for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, developing an effective postoperative adjuvant therapy has been essential for improving oncological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In addition to blood test data, inflammation-based prognostic markers have been used to predict the prognosis of various types of cancer. However, several of these previous studies may be outdated, as they were conducted prior to the widespread adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors, leading to limited reports on their efficacy. The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of different inflammation-based prognostic markers in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer undergoing nivolumab monotherapy as salvage-line chemotherapy. In a retrospective cohort study across Japan, a total of 159 patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who were treated with nivolumab between September 2017 and March 2020 were selected. Blood test data were collected within 14 days of the start of chemotherapy and 17 inflammation-based prognostic markers were evaluated. Cox regression analysis was performed using all patient background factors. Subsequently, model selection was performed using backward elimination based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to obtain effective background factors which could be assessed for their impact on patient survival. For each marker, the magnitude of the impact on the survival rate, after adjusting for the background factors, was assessed using concordance and AIC analyses. A total of 159 patients (female, 30.2%; median age, 70 years) were included in the present study. Most patients received platinum, fluoropyrimidine and taxane treatment, with a median of three prior lines of systemic therapy. With a median follow-up of 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.5-3.8), median overall survival and time to treatment failure were 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.3-4.5) and 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.3), respectively. Amongst the 17 markers analyzed, the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) was classed as the most useful factor that affected the survival rate of patients. Real-world data showed that mGPS, an inflammation-based prognostic marker, had the strongest correlation with prognosis in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer receiving nivolumab monotherapy. The present study was registered as a clinical trial with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm) under the trial registration number UMIN000050590 on 15th March 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the 5‐year follow‐up results from a single‐arm, open‐label, multicenter phase II study (ONO‐4538‐08) conducted in Japan. Twenty‐four patients with treatment‐naïve, recurrent, or unresectable stage III/IV malignant melanoma received 3 mg/kg nivolumab every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 26.1%. Five years after the start of nivolumab treatment, there were six survivors. The 5‐year OS rate was 66.7% for patients with a superficial spreading type, 14.3% for acral lentiginous type, and 16.7% for mucosal type. The 5‐year progression‐free survival rate was 17.2%. No new cases of partial response or complete response were observed after 3 years, and overall response and disease control rates were similar to those reported at 3 years. The treatment‐related adverse events reported between the 3‐ and 5‐year follow‐up periods were anemia (grade 2), white blood cell count decrease (grade 2), and psoriasiform dermatitis (grade 2) in one patient each. No new grade 3 or higher treatment‐related adverse events occurred in this period. In conclusion, first‐line treatment with nivolumab in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma resulted in confirmed long‐term survival. No new safety signals were reported in the studied population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treating advanced or recurrent melanoma remains a challenge. Cancer cells can evade the immune system by blocking T-cell activation through overexpression of the inhibitory receptor programmed death 1 ( PD-1) ligands. The PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab blocks the inhibitory signal in T cells, thus overcoming the immune resistance of cancer cells. Nivolumab has shown promising anticancer activity in various cancers. We carried out a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously untreated Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. Twenty-four patients with stage III/ IV or recurrent melanoma were enrolled and received i.v. nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate evaluated by an independent radiology review committee. The independent radiology review committee-assessed overall response rate was 34.8% (90% confidence interval, 20.8-51.9), and the overall survival rate at 18 months was 56.5% (90% confidence interval, 38.0-71.4). Treatment-related adverse events ( AEs) of grade 3 or 4 only occurred in three patients (12.5%). Two patients discontinued nivolumab because of AEs, but all AEs were considered manageable by early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Subgroup analyses showed that nivolumab was clinically beneficial and tolerable regardless of BRAF genotype, and that patients with treatment-related select AEs and with vitiligo showed tendency for better survival. In conclusion, nivolumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profiles in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent melanoma, with or without BRAF mutations. (Trial registration no. Japic CTI-142533.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although nivolumab is administered every two or four weeks, high programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) binding of nivolumab on T cells lasting for several months has been reported. A relationship between the PD-1 occupancy rate on T-cells and the efficacy of nivolumab is not yet fully understood. The present study used flow cytometric analyses to determine the time-dependence of PD-1 occupancy in five patients who discontinued nivolumab. The relationship between PD-1 occupancy at relapse and the efficacy of re-challenge was also studied. Occupancies after discontinuation were measured at a total of 32 points. The data indicated that it took 32.4 and 48.9 weeks to decrease occupancy by 50 and 70%, respectively. Subsequently, two patients had recurrence and were re-challenged with nivolumab. At that time, one patient had 70.8% occupancy while the other had 6.6%. Treatment was effective only for the patient with lower occupancy. Overall, the present study suggests that re-challenge with nivolumab may be efficacious in patients with low occupancy at recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preclinical models revealed potential synergistic effects of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies. Therefore, we investigated the use of nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel triple therapy for metastatic breast cancer. This phase 2, multicentre, single-arm study (NEWBEAT) investigated the safety and efficacy of first-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, regardless of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression. The primary end-point was objective response rate. Key secondary end-points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicities. A biomarker study evaluated tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and serum VEGF-A levels. Between February 2018 and October 2018, 57 patients were enrolled. An objective response rate was seen in 39/56 patients (70%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.9–81.2%), meeting the primary end-point. The objective response rate was 74% in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer versus 59% in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.0 (95% CI 11.0–16.3) and 32.5 (95% CI 26.0–not evaluable) months, respectively (median follow-up: 29.5 months). Grade 3/4 adverse drug reactions occurred in 33 of 57 patients (58%). There were no grade 5 adverse events. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 43 of 57 patients (75%), with grade 3/4 events in eight patients (14%). Biomarker analysis showed that tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression was not correlated with the efficacy of triple therapy. Efficacy outcomes were similar between the serum VEGF-high and VEGF-low groups. First-line nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. • First clinical trial to report efficacy of nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel. • Objective response rates were promising (74% in HR+HER2− and 59% in patients with triple-negative breast cancer). • The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.0 months and 32.5 months, respectively. • Tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression was not correlated with the efficacy of triple therapy. • Efficacy and prognosis were similar between serum vascular endothelial growth factor-high and vascular endothelial growth factor-low groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aim The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. Methods In this multicentre, single-arm study, treatment-naïve Japanese patients with unresectable stage III/IV or recurrent melanoma received nivolumab (1 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by biweekly doses of nivolumab (3 mg/kg). The primary end-point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate and safety. Results The subtypes of the thirty patients enrolled were: 12, mucosal; eight, non-acral cutaneous; seven, acral; two, uveal and one, unknown primary melanoma. The ORR was 43.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.5, 62.6) with central and local assessment. The centrally and locally assessed disease control rate (95% CI) were 73.3% (54.1, 87.7) and 86.7% (69.3, 96.2), respectively. At the median follow-up period of 14.1 months (range 5.2–27.7), median OS and centrally assessed PFS were not reached. OS (95% CI) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 93.3% (75.9, 98.3), 83.3% (64.5, 92.7), 72.9% (50.0, 86.5) and 65.6% (40.4, 82.2), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients. Grade III–IV and serious AEs occurred, mostly during the combination phase, in 23 (76.7%) and 20 (66.7%) patients, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions This study confirmed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with advanced melanoma including rare subtypes. Incidence rates for grade III–IV AEs were high but manageable with appropriate medical attention and treatment. Trial registration JapicCTI-152869. Highlights • This study tested the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. • Participants were treatment-naïve Japanese patients with advanced melanoma including rare subtypes. • Survival outcomes were consistent with previous studies in Western populations. • The safety profile was similar to previous reports. • Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a viable option for Japanese melanoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Non-cutaneous melanoma, including mucosal and uveal melanoma, is a rare neoplasm that accounts for only approximately 1% of all melanomas in the USA and 3.8% in Japan. Several studies have suggested that immune check point inhibitors (ICPis) have lower efficacy against non-cutaneous melanoma than cutaneous melanoma. To evaluate real-world outcomes, we conducted a retrospective analysis of nivolumab for non-cutaneous melanoma. Methods We reviewed 21 patients with unresectable or metastatic non-cutaneous melanoma treated with nivolumab in the first-line setting between Nov 2014 and Dec 2018. Response was assessed every 2-3 months by CT or MRI based on RECIST ver 1.1. Time-to-event analyses were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Adverse events were evaluated with CTCAE ver 4.0. Results Among the 21 patients, 13 were men and median age was 67 years (range, 47-85). Primary site was the nasal cavity or paranasal sinus/uvea/esophagus/rectum/genital/conjunctiva (n = 11/4/2/2/1/1). BRAF mutation was absent in all tumors. Overall response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval, 35-77%). With median follow-up for survivors of 13.1 months, 1-year overall survival was 59% (median, 8.2 months) and 1-year progression-free survival was 6.6% (median, 2.1 months). Six patients (29%) experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including thyroid dysfunction (n = 4, all grade 2), liver enzyme elevation (n = 3, all grade 2), pigmentary change (n = 2, all grade 1), diabetes mellitus (n = 1, grade 3), and interstitial lung disease (n = 1, grade 2). All these irAEs were manageable. Regarding subsequent treatment, 6 patients received ipilimumab and 1 received pembrolizumab. However, no patient responded to subsequent ICPi. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, nivolumab showed only modest efficacy against non-cutaneous melanoma and a manageable safety profile. Treatment for the unmet medical needs of non-cutaneous melanoma warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]